Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Invest ; 37(1): 39-45, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30676118

RESUMO

Genetic test use in oncology is growing, yet providers' experiences with evolving testing norms and their implications for patient care remain under-explored. In interviews with oncologists and cancer genetics professionals, 22 key informants described the increasing importance of germline results for therapeutic decision-making, preference for ordering tests directly rather than referring, and rapid adoption of cancer gene panels for testing. Implications for informed consent, result interpretation, and patient management were identified. These results suggest concerns raised by the transition of genetic test delivery from cancer genetics professionals to oncologists that must be addressed in practice guidelines and provider training.


Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/métodos , Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa , Neoplasias/genética , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Aconselhamento Genético , Humanos , Masculino , Oncologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pesquisa Qualitativa
2.
Health Serv Res ; 51 Suppl 3: 2537-2549, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27790708

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The response to adverse events can lack patient-centeredness, perhaps because the involved institutions and other stakeholders misunderstand what patients and families go through after care breakdowns. STUDY SETTING: Washington and Texas. STUDY DESIGN: The HealthPact Patient and Family Advisory Council (PFAC) created and led a five-stage simulation exercise to help stakeholders understand what patients experience following an adverse event. The half-day exercise was presented twice. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Lessons learned related to the development and conduct of the exercise were synthesized from planning notes, attendee evaluations, and exercise discussion notes. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: One hundred ninety-four individuals attended (86 Washington and 108 Texas). Take-homes from these exercises included the fact that the response to adverse events can be complex, siloed, and uncoordinated. Participating in this simulation exercise led stakeholders and patient advocates to express interest in continued collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: A PFAC-designed simulation can help stakeholders understand patient and family experiences following adverse events and potentially improve their response to these events.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Imperícia , Erros Médicos/psicologia , Simulação de Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Responsabilidade Legal , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Participação do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Relações Médico-Paciente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa