RESUMO
Eleven compounds including caffeic acid (CA), 4 kinds of caffeoylquinic acid (CQA) and 6 kinds of dicaffeoylquinic acid (DCQA), were selected to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effectiveness using mouse primary peritoneal macrophages in the absence or presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The optimal non-cytotoxic doses of each individual compound were determined using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Pro-inflammatory (TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines secreted by treated macrophages were analyzed using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cytokine secretion profiles of each individual test sample at optimal non-cytotoxic doses were further analyzed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The results showed that CA and all selected CQAs exhibited lower cytotoxicity (IC50: >50 µmol/l). Both CA and 5-CQA were found to have the most significant contributions for inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines, but increasing anti-inflammatory cytokine secretions, evidencing that CA at 10 µmol/l and 5-CQA at 25 µmol/l can be qualified as potent anti-inflammatory agents for treating inflammation-related diseases.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios , Ácidos Cafeicos , Citocinas , Análise de Componente Principal , Animais , Ácidos Cafeicos/farmacologia , Ácidos Cafeicos/química , Camundongos , Citocinas/metabolismo , Citocinas/imunologia , Anti-Inflamatórios/farmacologia , Anti-Inflamatórios/química , Macrófagos Peritoneais/efeitos dos fármacos , Macrófagos Peritoneais/metabolismo , Macrófagos Peritoneais/imunologia , Células Cultivadas , Macrófagos/efeitos dos fármacos , Macrófagos/imunologia , Macrófagos/metabolismoRESUMO
Malnutrition is a common problem in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving targeted therapy plus chemotherapy, resulting in severe toxicity and decreased survival rates. This retrospective study employing propensity score matching (PSM) examined the efficacy and safety of a supplemental home parenteral nutrition (HPN) program for patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy. This retrospective nationwide registry study included data from 14 medical centers/hospitals across Taiwan, and the data period ranged from November 2016 to December 2020. Patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy as their first-line therapy were included and divided into HPN and non-HPN program groups. HPN was initiated based on patient-specific factors, such as baseline nutritional status, treatment-related toxicities, and comorbidities. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using response to therapy, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). This study recruited 758 patients, of whom 110 and 648 were included in the HPN and non-HPN program groups, respectively. After 1:3 PSM, the data of 109 and 327 patients from the HPN and non-HPN program groups were analyzed, respectively. The HPN program group had a higher metastasectomy rate (33.9% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.005), and longer duration of treatment and DoR than the non-HPN program group (13.6 vs. 10.3 and 13.6 vs. 9.9 months, p = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). The HPN program group tended to have a longer median PFS (18.2 vs. 13.9 months, p = 0.102). Moreover, we noted a significant improvement in the median OS in the same group (53.4 vs. 34.6 months, p = 0.002). Supplemental HPN programs may be recommended for select patients with mCRC receiving targeted therapy plus chemotherapy to improve oncological outcomes.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Cetuximab/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Pontuação de Propensão , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Nutrição Parenteral , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
This multicenter study aimed to explore the survival benefit of metastasectomy by first-line cetuximab-based chemotherapy in real-world patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and metastasectomy rate. The exploratory endpoint was the optimal treatment cycle for better OS and PFS. Receiver operating characteristic curve with the area under curve (AUC) was used to identify the optimal cut-off cycle for survival outcomes. A total of 758 mCRC patients were enrolled in this study, with a median OS of 35.1 months, median PFS of 14.6 months, and metastasectomy rate of 21.4%. Left-sided mCRC had a significantly higher DCR (88.9% vs. 73.1%, P<0.001) and better OS (36.4 vs. 19.6 months, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in PFS and metastasectomy rate between left-sided and right-sided mCRC. However, mCRC patients who underwent metastasectomy over the course of treatment had better OS (54.9 vs. 28.6 months, P<0.001) and PFS (21.0 vs. 13.1 months, P<0.001) than those who did not. Notably, right-sided mCRC who benefited from first-line cetuximab-based chemotherapy to underwent metastasectomy also had favorable outcomes, on a par with left-sided mCRC. The optimal treatment cycle was 14 cycles (AUC: 0.779, P<0.001). Patients who received ≥14 cycles had higher metastasectomy rates (27.5% vs. 13.5%, P<0.001), favorable OS (42.6 vs. 23.4 months, P<0.001) and PFS (18.1 vs. 8.6 months, P<0.001), and, importantly, had comparable adverse events compared with patients who received <14 cycles of treatment. Patients who underwent metastasectomy after or during first-line cetuximab therapy have an improved OS in both left-sided and right-sided mCRC. Furthermore, patients receive ≥14 cycles of treatment whenever possible to achieve a higher likelihood of metastasectomy was associated with favorable survival outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: Metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) has been previously found to be up-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) specimens and cells, favoring epithelial-mesenchymal transition. However, the contribution of MMP-7 genotypes to HCC has not been revealed to date. The study aimed to evaluate the contribution of MMP-7 promoter A-181G (rs11568818) and C-153T (rs11568819) genotypes on the risk of HCC in Taiwan, where HCC incidence is extremely high compared to worldwide data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case-control study, MMP-7 genotypes and their association with cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking habits were determined in 298 HCC patients and 889 healthy subjects by a typical polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) methodology. RESULTS: Ever smokers and alcohol drinkers were represented with higher percentages in the case group compared to the control group. MMP-7 rs11568818 genotypes were not found differentially distributed in case and control groups (p for trend=0.5246). People of the analyzed cohort of the present study were all of CC genotypes at their rs11568819 polymorphic sites, without any CT or TT genotypes. As for gene-lifestyle interactions, people with variant genotypes at MMP-7 rs11568818 had the same odds for HCC development compared to the wild-type AA genotype, no matter whether the subjects belonged to the smoker, non-smoker alcohol drinker, or non-drinker groups. CONCLUSION: MMP-7 variant genotypes did not present any significance towards being a marker for HCC risk in Taiwanese.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/genética , Metaloproteinase 7 da Matriz/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Fatores de Risco , GenótipoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: En bloc right hemicolectomy plus pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is administered for locally advanced colon carcinoma that invades the duodenum and/or pancreatic head. This procedure may also be called colo-pancreaticoduodenectomy (cPD). Patients with such carcinomas may present with acute abdomen. Emergency PD often leads to high postoperative morbidity and mortality. Here, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of emergency cPD for patients with advanced colon carcinoma manifesting as acute abdomen. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 4898 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative colectomy during the period from 1994 to 2018. Among them, 30 had locally advanced right colon cancer and had received cPD. Among them, surgery was performed in 11 patients in emergency conditions (bowel obstruction: 6, perforation: 3, tumor bleeding: 2). Selection criteria for emergency cPD were the following: (1) age ≤ 60 years, (2) body mass index < 35 kg/m2, (3) no poorly controlled comorbidities, and (4) perforation time ≤ 6 h. Three patients did not meet the above criteria and received non-emergency cPD after a life-saving diverting ileostomy, followed by cPD performed 3 months later. We analyzed these patients in terms of their clinicopathological characteristics, the early and long-term postoperative outcomes, and compared findings between emergency cPD group (e-group, n = 11) and non-emergency cPD group (non-e-group, n = 19). After cPD, staged pancreaticojejunostomy was performed in all e-group patients, and on 15 of 19 patients in the non-e-group. RESULTS: The non-e-group was older and had a higher incidence of associated comorbidities, while other clinicopathological characteristics were similar between the two groups. None of the patients in the two groups succumbed from cPD. The postoperative complication rate was 63.6% in the e-group and 42.1% in the non-e-group (p = 0.449). The 5-year overall survival rate were 15.9% in the e-group and 52.6% in the non-e-group (p = 0.192). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency cPD is feasible in highly selected patients if performed by experienced surgeons. The early and long-term positive outcomes of emergency cPD are similar to those after non-emergency cPD in patients with acute abdominal conditions.
Assuntos
Abdome Agudo/cirurgia , Colectomia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Abdome Agudo/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologiaRESUMO
Malnutrition and systemic inflammatory response (SIR) frequently occur in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and are associated with poor prognosis. Anti-inflammatory nutritional intervention is not only a way to restore the malnourished status but also modulate SIR. Nine experts, including colorectal surgeons, physicians and dieticians from 5 hospitals geographically distributed in Taiwan, attended the consensus meeting in Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectum Surgeons for a 3-round discussion and achieved the consensus based on a systematic literature review of clinical studies and published guidelines. The consensus recommends that assessment of nutritional risk and SIR should be performed before and after CRC treatment and appropriate nutritional and/or anti-inflammatory intervention should be adapted and provided accordingly.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: For minimally invasive colorectal surgery, preoperative localization is a typical procedure. We here aimed to analyze compared 2 different localization methods in terms of short-term outcomes, like the operative outcome and postoperative complication rates based on real-world data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis study conducted at a medical center. We enrolled patients who were presented with colonic tumor between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, and they had undergone laparoscopic anterior resection in a single institution. Data included patient characteristics, operative outcome, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The preoperative localization group had a better resection margin (4 vs. 3 cm; P<0.001) and fewer procedures of intraoperative colonoscopy (4.67% vs. 18.22%; P=0.002). Lymph node harvest occurred more in patients with endoscopic tattooing procedures than with metallic clip procedures (25 vs. 20; P=0.031). No significant difference was found regarding postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative localization in a laparoscopic anterior resection led to better surgical planning and resection margin. The metallic clip placement was helpful in the preoperative localization and setting. The endoscopic tattooing method had a larger lymph node harvest and with fewer intraoperative colonoscopy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Laparoscopia , Tatuagem , Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Therapeutic options for metastatic CRC (mCRC) have changed significantly in recent years, greatly increasing the complexity of therapeutic decision-making. Although oncology guidelines have helped improve the care process, guidelines may also limit the flexibility to individualize in-clinic decision-making. This consensus paper addresses specific gaps in the current international guidelines to assist Taiwanese colon and rectal experts make specific therapeutic choices. Over 3 years and three meetings with selected experts on "real-world" Taiwanese practice patterns for mCRC, consensus was achieved. The experts also discussed specific questions during in-depth one-on-one consultation. Outcomes of the discussion were then correlated with published evidence by an independent medical writer. The final consensus includes clinically implementable recommendations to provide guidance in treating Taiwanese mCRC patients. The consensus includes criteria for defining fit and unfit intensive treatment patients, treatment goals, treatment considerations of molecular profiles, treatment consideration, and optimal treatment choices between different patient archetypes, including optimal treatment options based on RAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. This consensus paper is the second in the Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (TSCRS) Consensus series to address unmet gaps in guideline recommendations in lieu of Taiwanese mCRC management. Meticulous discussions with experts, the multidisciplinary nature of the working group, and the final drafting of the consensus by independent medical professionals have contributed to the strong scientific value of this consensus.
RESUMO
AIM: To investigate the association between adiponectin (ADIPOQ) genotypes and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk among Taiwanese. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism was adopted to identify ADIPOQ rs266729, rs2241766 and rs1501299 genotypes among 362 CRC patients and 362 healthy controls. RESULTS: ADIPOQ rs266729 GG genotype (p=0.0075) and G allele (p=0.0061) are associated with a significantly increased CRC risk. There is no differential distribution of rs2241766 and rs1501299 genotypes. As for the gene-lifestyle interaction, there are obvious joint effects of rs266729 genotype on the CRC risk among non-smoker, non-alcohol drinker, while not on smoker or non-drinker subgroups. No significant correlation was observed between rs266729 genotypic distributions and age, gender, tumor size, location or metastasis status. Interestingly, a correlation of rs266729 genotype and larger BMI on CRC risk was found. CONCLUSION: G allele at ADIPOQ rs266729 may serve as a determiner for CRC risk, especially for those with BMI ≥24.
Assuntos
Adiponectina/metabolismo , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , TaiwanRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Regorafenib has been demonstrated as effective in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Combination use with chemotherapy has not been reported. We examined the efficacy and safety of adding chemotherapy to Regorafenib for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) patients. METHODS: We recruited mCRC patients at our institute who received either regorafenib monotherapy or regorafenib in combination with other chemotherapies. All patients had received chemo and target therapies and presented with disease progression before regorafenib treatment. The primary end point was overall survival. FINDINGS: Between September1, 2015 and May 31, 2017, 100 mCRC patients at our institute received regorafenib treatment. 39 patients were excluded due to poor performance, lack of timely treatment, or inadequate clinical data. A total of 34 patients received regorafenib combined with other chemotherapies, and 27 patients received regorafenib alone. Median follow up time was 10.4 and 6.1 months, respectively. The primary end point of median OS was higher in the combination group than in the single use group (20.9m vs 10.3m, p = 0.015). The most frequent adverse events were hand-foot skin reactions(16[47.1%]vs 12[44.4%]), fatigue(6[17.6%] vs 7[25.9%]), gastrointestinal discomfort (7[20.6%] vs 6[22.2%]), neutropenia (4[11.8%] vs 1[3.7%]), diarrhea(4[11.8%] vs 1[3.7%]), and mucositis(5[14.7%] vs 1[3.7%]). CONCLUSION: The present study showed the efficacy and side effects of regorafenib combination treatment. Superiority in median OS and median PFS was noted in the combination group. The sampling difference between the study and observation groups effects justifies the comparison. Further clinical evidence of combination therapy efficacy is pending future studies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Metástase Neoplásica/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We describe herein the results of 2 laparoscopic operations to treat patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). METHODS: Two female FAP patients, aged 32 and 29 years old, were treated with restorative proctocolectomy and total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery), respectively. RESULTS: The operative time was 360 minutes for the restorative proctocolectomy and 150 minutes for the total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. The blood loss was 500 cc for the restorative proctocolectomy and minimal for the total colectomy patient. The return of bowel movements took 3 days for each patient, and no complication occurred. Patients were discharged on the 15th and 7th postoperative days. CONCLUSION: A laparoscopic approach for restorative proctocolectomy or total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is safe and technically feasible, and provides good cosmesis.