Phase III trial of induction gemcitabine or paclitaxel plus carboplatin followed by paclitaxel consolidation in ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GC) or paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) induction regimens with or without paclitaxel consolidation therapy were assessed in ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: Patients with stage IC-IV OC were randomized to either GC (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8, plus carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 5, day 1) or TC (paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) plus carboplatin AUC 6, day 1) every 21 days for up to six cycles. Patients with complete response (CR) were allowed optional consolidation with paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) every 28 days for ≤ 12 months. Patients without CR received single-agent crossover therapy at induction doses/schedules until CR, disease progression (PD), or unacceptable toxicity. PD or death in 636 patients was required to compare induction arms with 80% statistical power for progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Randomized induction therapy was received by 820 of 919 patients enrolled; 352 patients with CR received paclitaxel consolidation whereas 155 patients without CR received single-agent crossover therapy. PFS was similar for GC and TC (median, 20.0 and 22.2 months, respectively; P=.199). Despite high censoring rates (>52%), overall survival was longer for TC (median, 57.3 versus 43.8 months for GC; P=.013). Controlling for patient characteristics including performance status, residual tumor size, and tumor stage, there was no statistical difference in a multivariate analysis (HR=1.22; 95% CI=0.99-1.52; P=.067). CONCLUSIONS: GC does not improve PFS over TC as first-line induction chemotherapy in OC. Although favoring TC, overall survival analyses were limited by the study design and high censoring rates.

Fatal cardiac tamponade following cytoreductive surgery for serous carcinoma of the ovary.

•Pericardial effusion may be present early in the disease process in patients with ovarian cancer.•Even a small pericardial effusion may become clinically apparent in the setting of concomitant pleural effusion(s).•Cardiac tamponade should be considered in the differential diagnosis of postoperative hemodynamic instability to facilitate timely intervention.

A prospective randomized trial of thalidomide with topotecan compared with topotecan alone in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide is an antiangiogenic agent with immune modulating potential. The objective of this study was to determine response rates among women who were treated for recurrent ovarian cancer using topotecan with or without thalidomide. METHODS: Women were enrolled in this multicenter, prospective, randomized phase 2 trial between April 2001 and July 2005. Eligible patients had recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma with measurable disease or elevated CA 125 values. Patients had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Treatment arms received topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m(2) on Days 1 through 5 of a 21-day cycle with or without thalidomide starting at a dose of 200 mg per day and then increasing the dose as tolerated. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. The chi-square test was used to assess differences in response and toxicity, and the log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: The analysis included 69 women (39 women in the control arm and 30 women in the thalidomide arm). Known prognostic factors, including platinum sensitivity, were represented equally in each arm. The median thalidomide dose was 200 mg per day. The overall response rate in the control arm was 21% (complete response [CR] rate, 18%; partial response [PR] rate, 3%) compared with 47% in the thalidomide arm (CR rate, 30%; PR rate, 17%) (P= .03). The median progression-free survival for the control arm was 4 months compared with 6 months in the thalidomide arm (P= .02). The median overall survival was 15 months in the control arm and 19 months in the thalidomide arm (P= .67). Toxicities were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of thalidomide to topotecan for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer appears to improve response rates, and the authors believe that it warrants study through larger phase 3 trials.

A phase I trial of gemcitabine and topotecan in previously treated ovarian or peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent or persistent cancer after treatment with a platinum and paclitaxel-containing regimen were eligible for this study. Initial treatment was gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) on days 2-5, with cycles repeated every 28 days. Dose escalations were planned first for topotecan (Cohort I, Dose Levels 1-5) then for gemcitabine (Cohort II, Dose Levels 6-9) until the MTD was reached. RESULTS: Ten patients received a total of 29 cycles. When none of the first four patients could complete therapy as prescribed due to toxicity, doses for each drug were reduced by 1 day. The next six patients were treated at the modified schedule of gemcitabine days 1 and 8 and topotecan days 2-4 (Dose Level -1). Despite this modification, dose-limiting toxicities including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and stomatitis occurred at Dose Level -1, and the study was closed early. CONCLUSIONS: At both the initial dose schedule and an attenuated schedule, the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan produced dose-limiting toxicities in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer.

Phase II trial of pulse dactinomycin as salvage therapy for failed low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to determine the activity and toxicity of pulse dactinomycin as salvage treatment of patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) who failed methotrexate therapy. METHODS: Eligible patients had persistent/recurrent low-risk GTN defined by changes in serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels (<10% fall over 3 consecutive weekly titers, >20% rise over the previous value, or a rise after attaining institutional normal [>5 mu/mL]); World Health Organization (WHO) score 2-6; Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) performance status 0-1; and previous treatment restricted to methotrexate. Dactinomycin administration was 1.25 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) every 2 weeks until documented complete response (CR) or treatment failure. CR was defined as an institutional normal serum hCG level sustained for >or=4 consecutive weeks; treatment failure was a <10% fall (3 assays over 4 weeks) or >20% rise (over previous value) in hCG serum level. Levels were monitored biweekly x 8 weeks beyond the first normal value, then monthly x 10. RESULTS: Five of 44 enrolled patients were ineligible due to choriocarcinoma and normal pretreatment serum hCG level (2 each), no history of methotrexate (1), and 1 patient with documented phantom hCG syndrome was unevaluable. In all, 28 of 38 (74%) evaluable patients attained CR. The median number of cycles was 4 (range, 2-10). Severe toxicity was minimal, causing no patient to discontinue therapy. All treatment failures achieved a CR after receiving subsequent chemotherapy; 3 patients also underwent hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Pulse dactinomycin is an active regimen for patients with low-risk GTN who fail previous methotrexate therapy.