The comparative efficacy and safety of factor Xa inhibitors and warfarin for primary thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma patients undergoing immunomodulatory therapy.

There are limited data on the optimal choice of anticoagulation in multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study using the TriNetX database to compare the efficacy and safety of factor Xa inhibitors and warfarin in this patient population. Compared to warfarin, factor Xa inhibitors had a similar risk of deep vein thrombosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.11 [95% CI: 0.50-2.46]) or pulmonary embolism (HR: 1.08 [95% CI: 0.59-2.00]). There were no differences in the risk of gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding. Factor Xa inhibitor-treated patients had lower all-cause mortality (HR: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.36-0.86]) compared with warfarin. These data suggest that factor Xa inhibitors had similar safety and efficacy compared with warfarin for MM patients on IMiDs.

Indigenizing and co-producing the ACGME anesthesiology milestone in Taiwan: a Delphi study and subgroup analysis.

BACKGROUND: To implement the ACGME Anesthesiology Milestone Project in a non-North American context, a process of indigenization is essential. In this study, we aim to explore the differences in perspective toward the anesthesiology competencies among residents and junior and senior visiting staff members and co-produce a preliminary framework for the following nation-wide survey in Taiwan. METHODS: The expert committee translation and Delphi technique were adopted to co-construct an indigenized draft of milestones. Descriptive analysis, chi-square testing, Pearson correlation testing, and repeated-measures analysis of variance in the general linear model were employed to calculate the F values and mean differences (MDs). RESULTS: The translation committee included three experts and the consensus panel recruited 37 participants from four hospitals in Taiwan: 9 residents, 13 junior visiting staff members (JVSs), and 15 senior visiting staff members (SVSs). The consensus on the content of the 285 milestones was achieved after 271 minor and 6 major modifications in 3 rounds of the Delphi survey. Moreover, JVSs were more concerned regarding patient care than were both residents (MD = - 0.095, P < 0.001) and SVSs (MD = 0.075, P < 0.001). Residents were more concerned regarding practice-based learning improvement than were JVSs (MD = 0.081; P < 0.01); they also acknowledged professionalism more than JVSs (MD = 0.072; P < 0.05) and SVSs (MD = 0.12; P < 0.01). Finally, SVSs graded interpersonal and communication skills lower than both residents (MD = 0.068; P < 0.05) and JVSs (MD = 0.065; P < 0.05) did. CONCLUSIONS: Most ACGME anesthesiology milestones are applicable and feasible in Taiwan. Incorporating residents' perspectives may bring insight and facilitate shared understanding to a new educational implementation. This study helped Taiwan generate a well-informed and indigenized draft of a competency-based framework for the following nation-wide Delphi survey.

Ring-Embedded Finger Over Proximal Interphalangeal Joint with Preserved Neurovascularization: A Case Report and Literature Review.

CASE: We present a unique case of a 45-year-old man with his right middle finger embedded with rings. Limited finger flexion was noted because of flexor tendon injury caused by the dorsal migration of the embedded ring through joint. The rings were removed under anesthesia, resulting in the resolution of swelling and recover of osseous structure. Follow-up examinations revealed no residual edema or numbness, indicating preserved neurovascularization, despite the dorsal migration of the ring. CONCLUSION: Our unique case reveals continuous finger ring migration without compromising neurovascular bundles, with review of 30 cases emphasizing the importance of psychiatric consultation. Timely intervention yielded nearly half of patients achieving full recovery.

Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma: Updated meta-analysis of real-world clinical outcome after RESCUE-ASDH trial.

INTRODUCTION: The Randomized Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for Patients Undergoing Evacuation of Acute Subdural Hematoma trial found that disability and quality-of-life outcomes were similar between craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH), contrasting previous literature. This meta-analysis aimed to validate the applicability of RESCUE-ASDH results using real-world data in ASDH patients. METHODS: We searched Chocrane, Embase, and MEDLINE for relevant articles reporting clinical outcomes of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy. Meta-analysis used R software (Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman at the University of Auckland, New Zealand) with the restricted maximum likelihood method for random-effects meta-analyses, presenting odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment for heterogeneity. RESULTS: Besides RESCUE-ASDH, five retrospective studies were included, spanning 2006 to 2016. A total of 961 patients with traumatic ASDH were included in this study (craniotomy, 467; decompressive craniotomy, 494). The pooled analysis of retrospective studies showed no significant difference in poor clinical outcomes between the two groups (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.32-1.10). These findings align with the RESCUE-ASDH trial (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.58-1.23). Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients undergoing craniectomy in pooled result of retrospective studies (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.32-1.10). In RESCUE-ASDH trial, reoperation rate was higher in the craniotomy group, but the pooled result of retrospective did not show significant difference between the craniotomy and craniectomy group. CONCLUSION: This real-world evidence confirms the RESCUE-ASDH trial results. Both craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy yielded similar disability and quality-of-life outcomes for traumatic ASDH patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis; Level III.

Rate of Sodium Correction and Osmotic Demyelination Syndrome in Severe Hyponatremia: A Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend limiting the rate of correction in patients with severe hyponatremia to avoid severe neurologic complications such as osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS). However, published data have been conflicting. We aimed to evaluate the association between rapid sodium correction and ODS in patients with severe hyponatremia. Materials and methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to November 2023. The primary outcome was ODS and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay. Results: We identified 7 cohort studies involving 6,032 adult patients with severe hyponatremia. Twenty-nine patients developed ODS, resulting in an incidence rate of 0.48%. Seventeen patients (61%) had a rapid correction of serum sodium in the first or any 24-hour period of admission. Compared with a limited rate of sodium correction, a rapid rate of sodium correction was associated with an increased risk of ODS (RR, 3.91 [95% CI, 1.17 to 13.04]; I2 = 44.47%; p = 0.03). However, a rapid rate of sodium correction reduced the risk of in-hospital mortality by approximately 50% (RR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.66]; I2 = 0.11%; p < 0.001) and the length of stay by 1.3 days (Mean difference, -1.32 [95% CI, -2.54 to -0.10]; I2 = 71.47%; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Rapid correction of serum sodium may increase the risk of ODS among patients hospitalized with severe hyponatremia. However, ODS may occur in patients regardless of the rate of serum sodium correction.