Do Natural Portosystemic Shunts Need to Be Compulsorily Ligated in Living Donor Liver Transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Natural portosystemic shunt ligation practices in liver transplant vary widely across transplant centres and are frequently undertaken to prevent the serious consequence of portal steal phenomenon. No concrete indications have so far been convincingly identified for their management in living donor liver transplant. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the outcome of 89 cirrhotic patients who either did (n = 63) or did not (n = 25) undergo shunt ligation during living donor liver transplantation between 2017 and 2020. RESULTS: The incidence of early allograft dysfunction/nonfunction (P = 1.0) and portal venous complications (P = 0.555) were similar between the two groups. Although overall complications, biliary complications, and the composite of Grade III and IV complications were significantly higher in the nonligated group (P = 0.015, 0.052 and 0.035), 1- year graft and patient survival were comparable between them (P = 0.524). CONCLUSION: We conclude that shunt ligation in living donor liver transplantation may not always be necessary if adequate portal flow, good vascular reconstruction, and good graft quality have been ensured.

Living Donor Liver Transplant in Patients Aged 60 Years or Older: Experience from a Large Volume Centre in India.

BACKGROUND: With ageing population and higher prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in older patients, more and more living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) are being considered in this group of patients as eligibility for deceased donor liver transplant is restricted to those aged 65 years and younger. However, the short- and long-term outcomes of this group have not been reported from India, which does not have a robust national health scheme. The aim of this study was to provide guidelines for transplant in this group. METHODS: All patients aged 60 years and older (group 1) who underwent LDLT in our centre between January 2006 and December 2017 were studied. A propensity score-matched group in 1:2 ratio was created with comparable sex and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (group 2). The 2 groups were compared for duration of hospital stay, surgical complications, hospital mortality and 1-, 3- and 5-year survival. RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 207 patients, and group 2 had 414 patients. The number of patients in group 1 gradually increased with time from 4 in 2006 to 33 in 2017 accounting for 15% of total cases. Group 1 had more patients with viral hepatitis, NASH and HCC, and they had a higher 30-day mortality due to cardiorespiratory complications. Although 1- and 3-year survival was similar, the 5-year survival was significantly lower in group 1. CONCLUSION: Five-year survival was lower in the elderly group due to cardiorespiratory complications and recurrence of HCC. Outcomes in the elderly group can be improved with better patient selection and preventing HCC recurrence.

Living Donor Liver Transplant for Budd-Chiari Syndrome Without Caval Replacement: A Single-Center Study.

OBJECTIVES: Adequate venous outflow is one of the most important factors responsible for optimal graft function in liver transplantation. Thrombosis of the inferior vena cava in cases of Budd-Chiari syndrome poses a major challenge to a transplant surgeon in establishing proper graft outflow. In deceased donor liver transplant, this problem can be dealt with relative ease as the liver graft includes donor inferior vena cava. However, this is not the case in living donor liver transplant. We present our findings of living donor liver transplant for Budd-Chiari syndrome and discuss techniques that have helped overcome this unique problem without the need for complete inferior vena cava replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included living donor liver transplant recipients from November 2006 to March 2020 at our center and selected patients who underwent this transplant for Budd-Chiari syndrome. We studied the extent and severity of inferior vena cava involvement in these cases. We developed a classification that not only helped to stratify patterns of venacaval disease but also helped to plan the surgical technique. The role of interventional radiology combined with surgery in management of extensive inferior vena cava stenosis was studied. RESULTS: Among 2952 cases of liver transplant in our unit from November 2006 to March 2020, 36 patients had Budd-Chiari syndrome; 21 had significant level of inferior vena cava thrombosis, which was managed with inferior vena cava thrombectomy with either patchplasty (n = 20) or segmental replacement (n = 1). None of our patients showed recurrence of primary disease during the median follow-up of 36 months (range, 8-158 mo). CONCLUSIONS: Establishment of adequate venous ouflow in thrombosed inferior vena cava is possible with proper planning of surgical technique and timely involvement of interventional radiology-guided interventions in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.