RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The influence of pack-year history and smoking cessation timing on postoperative morbidity and mortality in a highly comorbid cohort is uncertain. We examined whether the association between smoking and adverse postoperative events is modified by pack-year history and smoking cessation timing. METHODS: We collected single-institution, retrospective data from consecutive patients undergoing open operations for carotid, aortic, and infrainguinal arterial disease. Active smoking was defined as smoking on the day of the index surgical intervention. Duration of smoking cessation was calculated as the time between smoking cessation and index surgery. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality and morbidity. Logistic and time-to-event Cox regressions estimated associations with interactions between cessation duration and pack-year history for nonactive smokers. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2019, 1087 patients underwent 1640 high-risk vascular interventions. Median pack-year history was 40.0 pack-years (interquartile range [IQR]: 20.0-60.0) among nonactive smokers and 46.0 pack-years (IQR: 31.0-61.0) among active smokers (P < 0.001). The median smoking cessation time was 15.5 y (IQR: 4.4-30.9). Smoking status did not independently predict an increased risk of postoperative mortality or morbidity (odds ratio [OR] = 0.99, P = 0.96). Among nonactive smokers, neither smoking cessation duration (OR = 0.99, P = 0.16) nor pack-year history (OR = 1.00, P = 0.88) were significantly associated with adverse events (interaction P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: After high-risk vascular interventions in a single institution, active smoking, cessation period, and pack-year history are not associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity or mortality-highlighting the benefit of cessation as independent of frequency or intensity.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To examine the reported adverse events associated with inferior vena cava (IVC) catheterization and investigate the reasons for discrepancies between reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cochrane Library trials register, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for studies that included any terms of IVC and phrases related to catheters or central access. Of the 5,075 searched studies, 137 were included in the full-text evaluation. Of these, 37 studies were included in the systematic review, and the adverse events reported in 16 of these 37 identified studies were analyzed. An inverse-variance random-effects model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Outcomes were summarized by the incidence rate (IR) and 95% CI. RESULTS: Compared with that of catheters <10 F in size (IR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.12), the incidence of catheter-related infections per 100 catheter days was 0.2 more for catheters ≥10 F in size (IR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.25-0.31). In addition, dual-lumen catheters showed 0.13 more malfunction per 100 catheter days (IR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.37) than that shown by single-lumen catheters (IR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.09-0.19). Both differences were statistically significant. Other adverse events were malposition (IR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.04-0.05), fracture (IR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.02), kinking (IR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.01), replaced catheter (IR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.31), removal (IR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.1-0.16), IVC thrombosis (IR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.03), and retroperitoneal hematoma (IR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.01), all per 100 catheter days. CONCLUSIONS: Translumbar IVC access is an option for patients with exhausted central veins. Small-caliber catheters cause fewer catheter-related infections, and single-lumen catheters function longer.