Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 125(12): 1851-1855, 2020 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32307087

RESUMO

The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a valuable tool used in the evaluation of syncope, arrhythmia, and cryptogenic stroke. In the inpatient setting, ILRs are routinely implanted in the electrophysiology (EP) lab despite the low complication rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and cost of implanting ILRs at the patient's bedside by both electrophysiologists and advanced practice providers (APPs). This was a single center, retrospective study of consecutive ILR implantations performed from February 2018 to May 2019. We examined 3 groups: implantations in the EP lab by electrophysiologists (EP Lab/MD), implantations at the bedside by electrophysiologists (Floor/MD), and implantations at the bedside by APPs (Floor/APP). Over 15 months, 152 patients underwent ILR implantation: 48 in the EP Lab/MD group, 57 in the Floor/MD group, and 47 in the Floor/APP group. The procedure duration was longer in the Floor/APP group (14.2 ± 5.9 minutes) compared with the EP Lab/MD and Floor/MD groups (6.8 ± 4.3 minutes, 9.1 ± 4.9 minutes, p <0.001). The overall complication rate was low (2.6%) with no differences between the groups (p = 0.83). The calculated costs per implant for the EP Lab/MD group, Floor/MD group, and Floor/APP group were $482.05, $162.82, and $73.08, respectively.


Assuntos
Eletrodos Implantados , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/instrumentação , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Telemetria/instrumentação , Idoso , Eletrofisiologia Cardíaca , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med ; 21(12): 94, 2019 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31848747

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a high-risk marker for accelerated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. In addition to common, modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors that contribute to PAD, which include hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smoking, an elevation in concentrations of serum atherogenic lipoproteins (lipids) is an increasingly recognized contributor to premature atherosclerosis. RECENT FINDINGS: The recognition and inclusion of PAD as a marker of higher-cardiovascular risk demonstrates the need to aggressively reduce elevations in atherogenic lipoproteins, particularly low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol. In addition to diet, lifestyle, and statin therapy, there is evidence that novel, pharmacologic lipid-lowering treatments improve specific outcomes in patients with PAD as primary and adjunctive therapy. In this review, we discuss the efficacy and evolving roles of statin and novel nonstatin therapies on outcomes in patients with PAD.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa