Cochlear Implantation in Young Mandarin-Speaking Children: One Year After First Fitting.

INTRODUCTION: Bilateral cochlear implantation has been shown to be beneficial in terms of sound localization and speech recognition in children with congenital deafness. However, little is known about the benefits of bilateral cochlear implantationin children who communicate in a tonal language such as Mandarin. This study aims to investigate the auditory perception and speech intelligibility of Mandarin-speaking children 1 year after first fitting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine children aged between 11.5 and 17.9 months with severe-to-profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were recruited; 10 were unilaterally implanted and 19 were bilaterally implanted. A test battery was used to monitor improvements during the first year of cochlear implant use. RESULTS: Bilaterally implanted children scored better in the spatial domain of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of hearing scale for Parents (SSQ-P) in comparison to unilaterally implanted children. Significant improvements were observed in auditory performance and speech intelligibility at 6 and 12 months after first fitting for both groups of children. DISCUSSION: Young children that speak a tonal language, such as Mandarin, can obtain significant improvements in hearing and speech abilities within the first year of cochlear implant use. Furthermore, bilateral implantation provides users with better spatial hearing in comparison to unilateral implantation.

Management of alert messages in the remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and pacemakers: an Italian single-region study.

AIMS: The remote monitoring of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) promotes accurate supervision of the patient and device. Alert settings appear to be a crucial parameter of its efficacy. The purpose of our study was to evaluate various settings for alerts and alert message management in patients with pacemakers and ICDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively evaluated 282 patients (181 males, 101 females, mean age 72 ± 11 years) who were referred to nine electrophysiological centres in the Veneto region of Italy for a pacemaker (76 patients) or ICD (206 patients) implant in which remote monitoring was activated (Biotronik Home Monitoring®, Biotronik, Berlin, Germany). During a mean follow-up of 382 ± 261 days, we received 106,039 transmissions. In the pacemaker group, the alerts that were most frequently activated were those concerning battery exhaustion, surveying impedances, sensing and threshold measurements, as well as missing transmissions. In the ICD/ICD-cardiac resynchronization therapy group, the alerts nearly always activated were those concerning a detection setoff, battery exhaustion, critical values of impedance, or ineffective maximum energy shock. In both groups, the alarms for heart rate monitoring and supraventricular arrhythmia were activated in fewer cases at higher variability among centres. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that more attention is paid to critical technical data than to patients' clinical profiles, probably to limit an excessive flow of data into the centre. Accurate alert settings, personalized to the patients' features, are essential for easier and more effective management of patients who are followed remotely.

Predicting the difficulty of a lead extraction procedure: the LED index.

BACKGROUND: According to recent surveys, many sites performing permanent lead extractions do not meet the minimum prerequisites concerning personnel training, procedures' volume, or facility requirements. The current Heart Rhythm Society consensus on lead extractions suggests that patients should be referred to more experienced sites when a better outcome could be achieved. The purpose of this study was to develop a score aimed at predicting the difficulty of a lead extraction procedure through the analysis of a high-volume center database. This score could help to discriminate patients who should be sent to a referral site. METHODS: A total of 889 permanent leads were extracted from 469 patients. All procedures were performed from January 2009 to May 2012 by two expert electrophysiologists, at the University Hospital of Brescia. Factors influencing the difficulty of a procedure were assessed using a univariate and a multivariate logistic regression model. The fluoroscopy time of the procedure was taken as an index of difficulty. A Lead Extraction Difficulty (LED) score was defined, considering the strongest predictors. RESULTS: Overall, 873 of 889 (98.2%) leads were completely removed. Major complications were reported in one patient (0.2%) who manifested cardiac tamponade. Minor complications occurred in six (1.3%) patients. No deaths occurred. Median fluoroscopic time was 8.7 min (3.3-17.3). A procedure was classified as difficult when fluoroscopy time was more than 31.2 min [90th percentile (PCTL)].At a univariate analysis, the number of extracted leads and years from implant were significantly associated with an increased risk of fluoroscopy time above 90th PCTL [odds ratio (OR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-2.11, P = 0.01; and OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.25, P < 0.001, respectively). After adjusting for patient age and sex, and combining with other covariates potentially influencing the extraction procedure, a multivariate analysis confirmed a 71% increased risk of fluoroscopy time above 90th PCTL for each additional lead extracted (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.06-2.77, P = 0.028) and a 23% increased risk for each year of lead age (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15-1.31, P < 0.001). Further nonindependent factors increasing the risk were the presence of active fixation leads and dual-coil implantable cardiac defibrillator leads. Conversely, vegetations significantly favored lead extraction.The LED score was defined as: number of extracted leads within a procedure + lead age (years from implant) + 1 if dual-coil - 1 if vegetation. The LED score independently predicted complex procedure (with fluoroscopic time >90th PCTL) both at univariate and multivariate analysis. A receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.81. A LED score greater than 10 could predict fluoroscopy time above 90th PCTL with a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 76.7%. CONCLUSION: The LED score is easy to compute and potentially predicts fluoroscopy time above 90th PCTL with a relatively high accuracy.