RESUMO
Mature T cell lymphomas (MTCLs) have worse prognosis, and in contrast to B cell lymphomas, there is no universal marker like CD20 with exception of ALK and CD30, which are present in proportion of MTCL only. Up to now, ALK is traditionally associated with good prognosis in ALCLs, and there are some evidences that CD30-positive T cell or B cell lymphomas have better prognosis. In our retrospective, population-based analysis, we analyzed the real clinical value of ALK and CD30 in the most frequent MTCL subtypes. Between 2000 and 2017, we identified 732 patients with newly diagnosed ALCL, AITL, or PTCL-NOS. Among them, 207 ALCL patients were with known ALK, whereas 61 AITL and 238 PTCL-NOS with known CD30 expression. There were 69/207 (33.3%) ALK + ALCLs, who displayed better 5-year PFS (65.6% vs. 36.2%) (p .001) and 5-year OS (71.5% vs. 45.9%) (p .002) compared to ALK - ; ALK + patients were significantly younger (median 48 vs. 60 years; p < 0.001). For patients ≥ 60 years, 5-year PFS (38.5% vs. 31.2%) and 5-year OS (38.5% vs. 39.6%) were similar between ALK + vs. ALK - patients. For AITL and PTCL-NOS, there were 44/61 (72.1%) and 120/238 (50.4%) CD30 + samples, and difference in CD30 expression was significant (p .02). AITL patients had 5-year OS of 43.8% vs. 55.7% (p 0.848) and 5-year PFS of 36.7% vs. 29.4% (p .624) for CD30 + vs. CD30 - patients, whereas PTCL-NOS had 5-year OS of 35.7% vs. 34.3% (p .318) and 5-year PFS of 29.3% vs. 22.5% (p.114) for CD30 + vs. CD30 - cases. We conclude that ALK in ALCLs (≥ 60 years) and CD30 expression in PCTL-NOS and AITL have only limited prognostic value.
Assuntos
Antígeno Ki-1 , Linfoma de Células T Periférico , República Tcheca , Humanos , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/patologia , Prognóstico , Receptores Proteína Tirosina Quinases , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Pemetrexed is an intravenously administered antifolate cytostatic agent targeting several folate-dependent enzymatic pathways, widely used in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It has been previously demonstrated that the superiority of pemetrexed is limited to patients with non-squamous histology. Aside from the non-squamous histology, there is still no available molecular biomarker predicting treatment efficacy of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the association of baseline serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) with outcomes in a large cohort of patients with non-squamous NSCLC treated with pemetrexed. Clinical data of 325 patients were analysed. Serum samples were collected within one week before the initiation of treatment. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with high CRP was 2.1 and 9.5 compared to 4.2 and 20.5 months for those with normal CRP (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model revealed that serum CRP (HR=1.46, p=0.002) was significantly associated with PFS and also with OS (HR=1.95, p<0.001). In conclusion, the study results suggest that pretreatment serum CRP is associated with poor outcome of non-squamous NSCLC patients treated with pemetrexed.
Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Pemetrexede/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/sangue , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangue , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality, even in developed countries. Prediction of sPTB is therefore a valuable tool to reduce the associated risks. The current standard for the prediction of sPTB consists, in addition to anamnestic data, of previous sPTB and previous second trimester miscarriage, measurement of cervical length by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU CL) together with assessment of fetal fibronectin levels in cervicovaginal fluid. Other evaluation parameters, such as the level of endocannabinoids in the pregnant woman's blood, could increase the sensitivity of this management. Endocannabinoids (eCBs) are a part of the endocannabinoid system (ECS); out of them anandamide (arachidonoyl-ethanolamide, AEA), in particular, plays an important role in the regulation of pregnancy and childbirth. We present the protocol for an open, non-randomized study to evaluate concentrations of AEA and other endocannabinoids: 2 linoleoylglycerol (2-AG), 2 linoleoylglycerol (2-LG), 2 oleoylglycerol (2-OG), and 2 arachidonoyldopamine (2-ADOPA or also NADA) in the blood of pregnant women as potential predictors of sPTB. In a total of 230 women with a history of sPTB or miscarriage, eCBs levels between 22 and 28 weeks of gestation will be assessed from maternal blood, in addition to the standard procedure. The aim of the study is to determine the relationship between blood concentrations of the endocannabinoids tested and the risk of sPTB. The results of this study will describe the prognostic significance of maternal blood eCBs levels for sPTB, and could subsequently enable improved screening programs for early identification of sPTB.
Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo , Nascimento Prematuro , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Nascimento Prematuro/diagnóstico , Endocanabinoides , Segundo Trimestre da GravidezRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are rare malignant mesenchymal tumours with an incidence of 1 in 100,000. They represent only 5% of gastrointestinal tumours. The GISTs are mainly located in the stomach (60-70%) and in the rectum in < 5% of cases. In the case of localized, resectable tumours, the treatment is surgical resection. Depending on the size and localization of the tumour in the rectum, either a local excision, rectal resection with anastomosis, or abdominoperitoneal amputation with permanent stoma can be performed. In contrast to carcinomas, the metastasis of GISTs into lymph nodes is rare; therefore, from an oncological point of view, lymphadenectomy in the form of mesorectal excision is not required. Neoadjuvant treatment using tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) is recommended for tumours larger than 5 cm and in case of tumours infiltrating surrounding organs or sphincters in order to achieve complete resectability, less mutilating and continent procedure. In GISTs with a positive resection line, re-resection can be attempted. Adjuvant TKI therapy can be considered in cases of CD117 positivity and after resections of GISTs with medium and high-risk malignant behaviour. The TKI treatment is also indicated in cases of unresectable and metastatic GISTs. METHODS: Data obtained from the GIST registry by the 1st January 2017, when 10 centres in the Czech Republic were contributing to the registry, were analysed. RESULTS: We analysed 1,095 patients out of which 45 (4.1%) had GIST localized in the rectum. The average age of the patients was 60 years. There were significantly more males (68.9%; p = 0.0007) and symptomatic patients (62.2%; p = 0.034). In total, 82% of the patients underwent surgery. Local excision was performed in 37.8%, resection of the rectum with anastomosis in 29.7%, and Miles operation in 29.7%. In the cohort, most tumours were 2-5 cm in size and almost half of the tumours presented a high risk of malignant behaviour. Systemic treatment was reported in 73% of patients. A complete remission was achieved in 80% of patients with GIST of the rectum. The median survival rate was 11.3 years and the 5-year survival rate is 90.6%. CONCLUSION: Despite the success of TKI treatment, the only potentially curative method of rectal GISTs is a surgical R0 resection. Given the relatively rare frequency of these tumours, proper diagnosis and treatment is demanding. Therefore, these patients should be preferably treated in specialised centres. This work was supported by grant MH CZ - RVO (FNBr, 65269705). The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers. Submitted: 19. 12. 2018 Accepted: 2. 2. 2019.