Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 276
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(5): 3072-3084, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35165817

RESUMO

Carcinoid crisis is a potentially fatal condition characterized by various symptoms, including hemodynamic instability, flushing, and diarrhea. The incidence of carcinoid crisis is unknown, in part due to inconsistency in definitions across studies. Triggers of carcinoid crisis include general anesthesia and surgical procedures, but drug-induced and spontaneous cases have also been reported. Patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and carcinoid syndrome are at risk for carcinoid crisis. The pathophysiology of carcinoid crisis has been attributed to secretion of bioactive substances, such as serotonin, histamine, bradykinin, and kallikrein by NETs. The somatostatin analog octreotide has been considered the standard of care for carcinoid crisis due to its inhibitory effect on hormone release and relatively fast resolution of carcinoid crisis symptoms in several case studies. However, octreotide's efficacy in the treatment of carcinoid crisis has been questioned. This is due to a lack of a common definition for carcinoid crisis, the heterogeneity in clinical presentation, the paucity of prospective studies assessing octreotide efficacy in carcinoid crisis, and the lack of understanding of the pathophysiology of carcinoid crisis. These issues challenge the classical physiologic model of carcinoid crisis and its common etiology with carcinoid syndrome and raise questions regarding the utility of somatostatin analogs in its treatment. As surgical procedures and invasive liver-directed therapies remain important treatment modalities in patients with NETs, the pathophysiology of carcinoid crisis, potential benefits of octreotide, and efficacy of alternative treatment modalities must be studied prospectively to develop an effective evidence-based treatment strategy for carcinoid crisis.


Assuntos
Tumor Carcinoide , Síndrome do Carcinoide Maligno , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Tumor Carcinoide/terapia , Humanos , Síndrome do Carcinoide Maligno/etiologia , Síndrome do Carcinoide Maligno/terapia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/tratamento farmacológico , Octreotida/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Somatostatina/uso terapêutico
2.
J Surg Res ; 264: 481-489, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33857792

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hepatic angiosarcoma (AS) and hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) are rare primary hepatic vascular malignancies (PHVM) that remain poorly understood. To guide management, we sought to identify factors and trends predicting survival after surgical intervention using a national database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database patients with a diagnosis of PHVM were identified. Clinicopathologic factors were extracted and compared. Overall survival (OS) was estimated and predictors of survival were identified. RESULTS: Three hundred ninty patients with AS and 216 with HEHE were identified. Only 16% of AS and 36% of HEHE patients underwent surgery. The median OS for patients who underwent surgical intervention was 97 months, with 5-year OS of 30% for AS versus 69% for HEHE patients (P< 0.001). Tumor biology strongly impacted OS, with AS histology (Hazard Ratio [HR] of 3.61 [1.55-8.42]), moderate/poor tumor differentiation (HR = 3.86 [1.03-14.46]) and tumor size (HR = 1.01 [1.00-1.01]) conferring worse prognosis. The presence of metastatic disease in the surgically managed cohort (HR = 5.22 [2.01-13.57]) and involved surgical margins (HR = 3.87 [1.59-9.42]), were independently associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this national cohort of PHVM, tumor biology, in the form of angiosarcoma histology, tumor differentiation and tumor size, was strongly associated with worse survival after surgery. Additionally, residual tumor burden after resection, in the form of positive surgical margins or the presence of metastasis, was also negatively associated with survival. Long-term clinical outcomes remain poor for patients with the above high-risk features, emphasizing the need to develop effective forms of adjuvant systemic therapies for this group of malignancies.


Assuntos
Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/terapia , Hemangiopericitoma/terapia , Hemangiossarcoma/terapia , Hepatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/mortalidade , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/patologia , Hemangiopericitoma/mortalidade , Hemangiopericitoma/patologia , Hemangiossarcoma/mortalidade , Hemangiossarcoma/patologia , Humanos , Fígado/irrigação sanguínea , Fígado/patologia , Fígado/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasia Residual , Radioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Tumoral , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
J Surg Res ; 233: 144-148, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29397145

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Parental leave is linked to health benefits for both child and parent. It is unclear whether surgeons at academic centers have access to paid parental leave. The aim of this study was to determine parental leave policies at the top academic medical centers in the United States to identify trends among institutions. METHODS: The top academic medical centers were identified (US News & World Report 2016). Institutional websites were reviewed, or human resource departments were contacted to determine parental leave policies. "Paid leave" was defined as leave without the mandated use of personal time off. Institutions were categorized based on geographical region, funding, and ranking to determine trends regarding availability and duration of paid parental leave. RESULTS: Among the top 91 ranked medical schools, 48 (53%) offer paid parental leave. Availability of a paid leave policy differed based on private versus public institutions (70% versus 38%, P < 0.01) and on medical center ranking (top third = 77%; middle third = 53%; and bottom third = 29%; P < 0.01) but not based on region (P = 0.06). Private institutions were more likely to offer longer paid leaves (>6 wk) than public institutions (67% versus 33%; P = 0.02). No difference in paid leave duration was noted based on region (P = 0.60) or rank (P = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately, 50% of top academic medical centers offer paid parental leave. Private institutions are more likely to offer paid leave and leave of longer duration. There is considerable variability in access to paid parenteral leave for academic surgeons.


Assuntos
Licença Parental/estatística & dados numéricos , Faculdades de Medicina/organização & administração , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Setor Privado/estatística & dados numéricos , Setor Público/estatística & dados numéricos , Faculdades de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
4.
J Surg Res ; 233: 360-367, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30502272

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Predictive models for nonhome discharge (NHD) have been proposed in major surgical specialties. The rates and risk factors associated with NHD and prolonged length of stay (PLOS) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) have not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for NHD and PLOS after CRS/HIPEC in a national cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CRS/HIPEC cases were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2011-2012 data set. Patients with an NHD or PLOS (>30 d) were compared with a group of patients discharged to home within 30 d. Univariate analysis was used to compare patient characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative complications among both groups. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of NHD and PLOS. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-six patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC were identified, of which 44 (7.9%) were not discharged to home within 30 d. The rate of NHD and PLOS in this cohort was 4.1% and 3.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified age ≥65 y, pre-op albumin <3.0 g/dL, and having a multivisceral resection as independent predictors of NHD/PLOS. If all three predictors are met preoperatively, the probability of NHD/PLOS was calculated to be 30.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors for NHD/PLOS after CRS/HIPEC were advanced age, hypoalbuminemia, and multivisceral resection. Adequate identification of these risk factors may facilitate preoperative discussion with patients, and improve discharge planning and resource utilization.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/efeitos adversos , Hipertermia Induzida/efeitos adversos , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Terapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritônio/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Transicional/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Cancer ; 124(6): 1122-1131, 2018 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29211302

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The adoption of novel and effective gastric cancer therapies into general clinical practice has crucial implications for patient outcomes. The current study explored trends in treatment use and overall survival in patients with gastric cancer in the United States. METHODS: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia and noncardia were identified in the National Cancer Data Base between 2006 and 2014. Tumor stages were divided into early (IA), locally advanced (IB-IIIC), and metastatic (IV) stage. Treatment use was examined according to tumor stage and location. Time trend analyses of treatment use and overall survival were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 89,098 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were identified. In those with early-stage cancer, endoscopic treatment increased over time in patients with cardia and noncardia disease. In patients with locally advanced cardia disease, preoperative therapy use increased over time (2013-2014 [vs 2006-2008]: odds ratio [OR], 3.09; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.80-3.41). In patients with locally advanced noncardia disease, the use of preoperative therapy also increased (2013-2014: OR, 3.32; 95% CI, 2.88-3.82) as did the use of perioperative therapy (2013-2014: OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 3.52-5.03) in lieu of postoperative treatment (2013-2014: OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.60-0.71). In patients with metastatic disease, approximately 34% of patients with cardia and 40% of patients with noncardia cancer did not receive treatment. Stage-specific and location-specific overall survival was found to improve over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Practice patterns for the treatment of gastric cancer in the United States reflect the increased adoption of evidence-based therapies, including endoscopic resection of early-stage cancer and preoperative therapy for patients with locally advanced disease. Treatment for metastatic disease remains markedly underused. Cancer 2018;124:1122-31. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/tendências , Oncologia/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Cárdia/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Feminino , Gastrectomia/métodos , Gastrectomia/tendências , Gastroscopia/métodos , Gastroscopia/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Oncologia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/tendências , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Ann Surg ; 268(1): 151-157, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28486387

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) in comparison with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in a national cohort of patients. BACKGROUND: Limited well-controlled studies exist comparing perioperative outcomes between MIPD and OPD. METHODS: Patients who underwent MIPD and OPD were abstracted from the 2014 to 2015 pancreas-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. OPD and MIPD patients were matched 3:1 using propensity score, and perioperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 4484 patients were identified with 334 (7.4%) undergoing MIPD. MIPD patients were younger, more likely to be White, and had a lower rate of weight loss. They were more likely to undergo classic Whipple and to have a drain placed. After 3:1 matching, 1002 OPD patients were compared with 334 MIPD patients. MIPD was associated with longer mean operative time (426.6 vs 359.6 minutes; P < 0.01), higher readmission rate (19.2% vs 14.3%; P = 0.04) and lower rate of prolonged length of stay >14 days (16.5% vs 21.6%; P = 0.047). The 2 groups had a similar rate of 30-day mortality (MIPD 1.8% vs OPD 1.3%; P = 0.51), overall complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and delayed gastric emptying. A secondary analysis comparing MIPD without conversion or open assist with OPD showed that MIPD patients had lower rates of overall surgical site infection (13.4% vs 19.6%; P = 0.04) and transfusion (7.9% vs 14.4%; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: MIPD had an equivalent morbidity and mortality rate to OPD, with the benefit of a decreased rate of prolonged length of stay, though this is partially offset by an increased readmission rate.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Seleção de Pacientes , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(5): 1193-1201, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29488187

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are limited well-controlled studies that conclusively demonstrate a benefit of adjuvant therapy in resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Most studies include all biliary tract tumors as one entity despite the heterogeneity of these diseases. METHODS: We identified patients with resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma from the National Cancer Database between 2006 and 2013. Patients who received adjuvant therapy (AT) were compared to an observation (OB) cohort by propensity score matching. RESULTS: We identified 1846 patients: 1053 patients (57%) in the OB group, and 793 (43%) in the AT group. Patients who received adjuvant therapy were more likely to be younger, have a higher rate of private insurance, have higher T and N stage tumors, and were more likely to have positive resection margins. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 577 OB group patients were compared with 577 AT group patients. The AT cohort was associated with better overall survival compared with the OB cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.83). The median survival was 29.5 and 23.3 months for the AT and OB groups, respectively (P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a survival advantage for adjuvant therapy in disease with positive resection margins (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.42-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival in resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, especially in disease with positive resection margins. This study supports the use of adjuvant therapy in high-risk patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/terapia , Tumor de Klatskin/terapia , Conduta Expectante , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/radioterapia , Ductos Biliares Extra-Hepáticos , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Tumor de Klatskin/tratamento farmacológico , Tumor de Klatskin/radioterapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 16(12): 1468-1475, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30545994

RESUMO

Background: Preoperative therapy is being increasingly used in the treatment of resectable pancreatic cancer. Because there are only limited data on the optimal preoperative regimen, we compared overall survival (OS) between preoperative chemotherapy (CT) and preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: Patients receiving preoperative therapy and resection for clinical T1-3N0-1M0 adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were identified in the National Cancer Database for 2006 through 2012. We constructed inverse probability of treatment weights to balance baseline group differences, and compared OS between CT and CRT, as well as pathologic and postoperative findings. Results: We identified 1,326 patients (CT: 616; CRT: 710). Differences in OS were not significant between CRT and CT (median survival, 25 vs 26 months; P=.10; weight-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77-1.02). Compared with patients in the CT group, those in the CRT group had lower pathologic T stage (ypT0/T1/T2: 36% vs 21%; P<.01), less lymph node involvement (ypN1: 35% vs 59%; P<.01), and fewer positive resection margins (14% vs 21%; P=.01), but had more postoperative unplanned readmissions (9% vs 6%; P=.01) and increased 90-day mortality (7% vs 4%; P=.03). Those in the CRT group were also less likely to receive postoperative therapy (26% vs 51%; P<.01). Conclusions: Preoperative CT and CRT have similar OS, but CRT is associated with more favorable pathologic features at the cost of higher postoperative morbidity and mortality. Additional trials investigating preoperative therapy are needed for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Pâncreas/patologia , Pâncreas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
9.
J Surg Oncol ; 118(1): 21-30, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29878370

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A paucity of data exists regarding the natural history and outcome measures of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP), a histology distinct from pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study is to characterize the clinicopathological features of ASCP in a large cohort of patients comparing outcome measures of surgically resected patients to PDAC. METHODS: We identified patients diagnosed with ASCP or PDAC from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2012. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment regimens, and overall survival were analyzed between the groups. RESULTS: We identified 207 073 patients: 205 328 (99%) in the PDAC group and 1745 (1%) in the ASCP group. ASCP tumors were larger, located more frequently in a body/tail location (36% vs 24%, P < 0.001), undifferentiated/anaplastic histology (41% vs 17%, P < 0.001), and early stage presentation, (39% vs 32%, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in OS when comparing all patients with PDAC and ASCP (6.2 months and 5.7 months, P = 0.601). In surgical patients ASCP histology was associated with worse OS (14.8 months vs 20.5 months, P < 0.001) but had lower nodal involvement (55% vs 61%, P < 0.001). ASCP histology was independently associated with worse OS, after adjusting for tumor characteristics, treatment, and patient demographics. In patients with only resected ASCP histology, negative lymph node status, R0 surgical resection, and receipt of chemotherapy was independently associated with improved overall survival following surgical resection. CONCLUSION: Although patients with ASCP and PDAC tumors have similar survival when non-surgical and surgical patients are combined, ASCP is associated with worse survival in stage I/II resected patients.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patologia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Idoso , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Surg Endosc ; 32(6): 2907-2913, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29280014

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is being performed with increasing frequency for pancreatic cancer, but the most oncologically efficacious surgical platform, whether robotic or laparoscopic, is yet to be determined. Currently, there are no national studies comparing the oncological outcomes between robotic (RPD) and laparoscopic (LPD) pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2013. We compared the perioperative, pathological, and mid-term oncological outcomes between RPD and LPD. RESULTS: There were 1623 MIPD cases, of which 90% were LPD and 10% were RPD. Most LPD (63%) and RPD (51%) cases were performed at institutions with a volume of ≤ 5 MIPDs per year. There were no differences in patient- and tumor-related factors between the groups. The majority of treated tumors were adenocarcinoma (90.1% for RPD and 89.1% for LPD). RPDs were more likely to be performed at academic centers (89.1%) compared to LPDs (68.1%, P < 0.001) and at higher-volume centers (median MIPD/year of 4.7 for RPD vs 3.6 for LPD, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the median number of examined lymph nodes, margin status, median length of stay, 90-day mortality, or 30-day readmission between groups. There was no difference in median overall survival for pancreatic adenocarcinoma between LPD (20.7 months) and RPD (22.7 months; log-rank P = 0.445). The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 74 and 31% for LPD and 71 and 33% for RPD. CONCLUSION: In this national cohort of patients, LPD and RPD were associated with equivalent perioperative, pathological, and mid-term oncological outcomes.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
Adv Perit Dial ; 34(2018): 47-49, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30480537

RESUMO

Peritonitis is a major complication in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, often requiring a switch to hemodialysis (HD). Common sources of bacterial peritonitis are touch contamination and PD catheter-related infection. Intra-abdominal pathology is a less common cause of peritonitis in PD patients, and rarely is Neisseria mucosa the causative organism.We present an uncommon case of N. mucosa peritonitis in a 30-year-old African American female patient treated with nocturnal intermittent PD. The infection occurred in the setting of a translocated intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) in the infrahepatic region because of transmural migration. Our patient underwent laparoscopic removal of the IUCD and received empiric intraperitoneal (IP) vancomycin and intravenous ceftriaxone. After the isolate was identified as N. mucosa, her regimen was changed to IP ceftriaxone for a total of 21 days. Cell count after completion of antibiotics showed resolution of the peritonitis. The PD catheter was salvaged and transition to HD was avoided.


Assuntos
Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Infecções por Neisseriaceae , Diálise Peritoneal , Peritonite , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Neisseria mucosa , Vancomicina
12.
HPB (Oxford) ; 20(3): 237-243, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29103839

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Determining the biologic behavior of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is important when managing patients with this disease. We sought to define the intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) characteristics of NELM and correlate with tumor biology and prognosis. METHODS: Prospective data on patients who underwent IOUS and surgical intervention for NELM were collected, with images digitally recorded, blindly reviewed, and scored for echogenicity. Association between sonographic appearance, clinicopathologic factors and long-term outcomes was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 216 lesions from 65 patients were analyzed, with IOUS identifying at least one additional metastasis than preoperative imaging in 41 patients (63.1%) with subsequent change of surgical strategy in 14 patients (21.5%). Most NELM appeared hypoechoic (49.1%) on IOUS, while 38.9% demonstrated hyperechogenicity and 12% isoechogenicity. Hypoechoic lesions were associated with poorly-differentiated tumor (p = 0.005) and smaller tumor size (p = 0.004). Patients with hypoechoic metastases demonstrated significantly shorter median disease-free survival compared with isoechoic or hyperechoic lesions (9 vs 20 vs 18 months, p = 0.049). DISCUSSION: In addition to improved tumor detection of NELM, IOUS was found to be associated with features of tumor biology, specifically tumor grade and risk-of-recurrence. Echogenicity should be considered a potential prognostic factor in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.


Assuntos
Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia , Idoso , Diferenciação Celular , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Masculino , Metastasectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/mortalidade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Carga Tumoral
13.
Ann Surg ; 266(4): 641-649, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28657938

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential clinical advantage of anatomical resection versus nonanatomical resection for colorectal liver metastases, according to KRAS mutational status. BACKGROUND: KRAS-mutated colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are known to be more aggressive than KRAS wild-type tumors. Although nonanatomical liver resections have been demonstrated as a viable approach for CRLM patients with similar oncologic outcomes to anatomical resections, this may not be the case for the subset of KRAS-mutated CRLM. METHODS: 389 patients who underwent hepatic resection of CRLM with known KRAS mutational status were identified. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: In this study, 165 patients (42.4%) underwent nonanatomical resections and 140 (36.0%) presented with KRAS-mutated CRLM. Median disease-free survival (DFS) in the entire cohort was 21.3 months, whereas 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS was 67.3%, 34.9%, and 31.5% respectively. Although there was no difference in DFS between anatomical and nonanatomical resections in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors (P = 0.142), a significant difference in favor of anatomical resection was observed in patients with a KRAS mutation (10.5 vs. 33.8 months; P < 0.001). Five-year DFS was only 14.4% in the nonanatomically resected group, versus 46.4% in the anatomically resected group. This observation persisted in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.74; P = 0.002), when corrected for number of tumors, bilobar disease, and intraoperative ablations. CONCLUSIONS: Nonanatomical tissue-sparing hepatectomies are associated with worse DFS in patients with KRAS-mutated tumors. Because of the aggressive nature of KRAS-mutated CRLM, more extensive anatomical hepatectomies may be warranted.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Hepatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Mutação , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Ann Surg ; 266(4): 582-594, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28742711

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the current state of the General Surgery (GS) residency training model by investigating resident operative performance and autonomy. BACKGROUND: The American Board of Surgery has designated 132 procedures as being "Core" to the practice of GS. GS residents are expected to be able to safely and independently perform those procedures by the time they graduate. There is growing concern that not all residents achieve that standard. Lack of operative autonomy may play a role. METHODS: Attendings in 14 General Surgery programs were trained to use a) the 5-level System for Improving and Measuring Procedural Learning (SIMPL) Performance scale to assess resident readiness for independent practice and b) the 4-level Zwisch scale to assess the level of guidance (ie, autonomy) they provided to residents during specific procedures. Ratings were collected immediately after cases that involved a categorical GS resident. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and supplemented with Bayesian ordinal model-based estimation. RESULTS: A total of 444 attending surgeons rated 536 categorical residents after 10,130 procedures. Performance: from the first to the last year of training, the proportion of Performance ratings for Core procedures (n = 6931) at "Practice Ready" or above increased from 12.3% to 77.1%. The predicted probability that a typical trainee would be rated as Competent after performing an average Core procedure on an average complexity patient during the last week of residency training is 90.5% (95% CI: 85.7%-94%). This falls to 84.6% for more complex patients and to less than 80% for more difficult Core procedures. Autonomy: for all procedures, the proportion of Zwisch ratings indicating meaningful autonomy ("Passive Help" or "Supervision Only") increased from 15.1% to 65.7% from the first to the last year of training. For the Core procedures performed by residents in their final 6 months of training (cholecystectomy, inguinal/femoral hernia repair, appendectomy, ventral hernia repair, and partial colectomy), the proportion of Zwisch ratings (n = 357) indicating near-independence ("Supervision Only") was 33.3%. CONCLUSIONS: US General Surgery residents are not universally ready to independently perform Core procedures by the time they complete residency training. Progressive resident autonomy is also limited. It is unknown if the amount of autonomy residents do achieve is sufficient to ensure readiness for the entire spectrum of independent practice.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência/normas , Autonomia Profissional , Educação Baseada em Competências , Avaliação Educacional/normas , Feedback Formativo , Cirurgia Geral/normas , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos
16.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(12): 3725-3731, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28849407

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data on the risk factors for conversion during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) and its effect on postoperative outcomes are limited. METHODS: This retrospective study used the pancreas-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to compare MIDP requiring unplanned conversion with completed MIDP and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). RESULTS: Of the 2926 cases identified in this study, 48.8% had ODP, 42.8% had MIDP, and 7.9% had conversion to MIDP. The conversion rate was 15.3% overall, 17.3% for laparoscopic surgery, and 8.5% for robotic surgery (p < 0.001). The risk factors associated with conversion were higher body mass index (BMI), low preoperative albumin level, a current smoking habit, and malignant T3/T4 disease or chronic pancreatitis compared with benign tumor smaller than 5 cm. A robotic approach was associated with a lower adjusted conversion rate than laparoscopy (odds ratio [OR] 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.52). After adjustment, conversion was associated with a higher overall complication rate than MIDP (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.35-2.66) or ODP (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.00-1.98). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pancreatitis, large malignant tumors, higher BMI, lower serum albumin, and a current smoking habit were shown to be independent risk factors for conversion during MIDP. A robotic approach was associated with a lower conversion rate than laparoscopic MIDP. Conversion of MIDP was associated with a higher overall complication rate than completed MIDP or ODP. Adequate patient selection for MIDP may prevent conversion and associated increased morbidity.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/mortalidade , Pancreatectomia/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(7): 1787-1794, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28194592

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is a heterogeneous disease with variable presentation between racial and ethnic groups. Staging laparoscopy (SL) detects occult metastases not visible on cross-sectional imaging and therefore improves staging. It remains unclear how differences in race and ethnicity affect disease presentation and the yield of SL. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database to identify patients with gastric cancer treated with curative intent at our institutions from 2008 to 2015. RESULTS: Hispanic patients presented at an earlier mean age (55.5 ± 11.9 years) compared with Asian (59.8 ± 13.9 years), African American (61.0 ± 10.0 years), and white patients (61.7 ± 12.5 years; p = 0.046) and with more locally advanced disease (clinical stage T3/T4 or node positive; Hispanic 87%; African American 79%; white 68%, Asian 55%; p = 0.03). SL identified 42 patients (34%) with occult metastatic disease. Hispanics were more likely to have a positive SL (44%) than white patients (21%; p = 0.04). On univariate analysis, Hispanic ethnicity, clinical T3/T4, positive nodal disease, signet ring cells, and poor differentiation were predictors of a positive SL. On multivariable analysis, clinical T3/T4, signet ring cells, and poor differentiation independently predicted radiographically occult disease. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic patients presented with more locally advanced disease and were more likely to have occult disease found on SL compared with white patients. Laparoscopy should be used routinely as part of the pretreatment staging evaluation for patients with locally advanced disease as it alters the management in a significant proportion of patients.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/etnologia , Carcinoma de Células em Anel de Sinete/etnologia , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais , Neoplasias Gástricas/etnologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células em Anel de Sinete/patologia , Carcinoma de Células em Anel de Sinete/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gastrectomia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
18.
J Surg Res ; 214: 209-215, 2017 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28624046

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) can significantly improve the survival in selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. This study aims to identify perioperative patient characteristics predictive of failure to rescue (FTR), mortality following postoperative complications from CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: Patients suffering a complication following CRS/HIPEC between 2005 and 2013 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set. FTR was defined as 30-d mortality in the setting of a complication. Patients who suffered FTR were compared against those who survived a complication (non-FTR). Predictors of FTR were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 915 eligible CRS/HIPEC cases were identified. In all, 382 patients (42%) developed ≥1 postoperative complication, and 88 patients (10%) suffered ≥1 major complication. Seventeen patients died following a complication, amounting to an FTR rate of 4%. FTR patients were more likely than non-FTR patients to have dependent functional status (18% versus 2%, P = 0.01), have American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 4 status (29% versus 8%, P = 0.01), develop ≥3 complications (65% versus 24%, P < 0.01), and suffer a major complication (94% versus 20%, P < 0.01). The following were independently associated with FTR: ASA class 4 (odds ratio [OR]: 13.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-146.8) and major complications (OR: 66.0, 95% CI, 8.4-516.6). CONCLUSIONS: ASA class 4, major morbidity, and likely dependent functional status are independent predictors of FTR following CRS/HIPEC to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis. Therefore, ASA class 4 and dependent functional status should be considered as contraindications for CRS/HIPEC and only offered in highly selective cases.


Assuntos
Quimioterapia do Câncer por Perfusão Regional , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Falha da Terapia de Resgate/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertermia Induzida , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias Peritoneais/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
19.
HPB (Oxford) ; 19(12): 1037-1045, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28867297

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the development of pathways to enhance recovery and discharge to home, a significant proportion of patients are discharged to inpatient facilities after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this study was to determine the rate of non-home discharge (NHD) following PD in a national cohort of patients and to develop predictive nomograms for NHD. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to construct and validate pre- and postoperative nomograms for NHD following PD. RESULTS: A total of 6856 patients who underwent PD were identified, of which 927 (13.5%) had an NHD. The independent preoperative predictors of NHD were being female, older age, higher BMI, low serum albumin, >10% weight loss, ASA class III/IV, and being diagnosed with a bile duct/ampullary neoplasm or neuroendocrine tumor. A preoperative nomogram was constructed with a concordance index of 0.77. When postoperative variables were added to the model, the concordance index increased to 0.82. The postoperative predictors of NHD were return to the operating room, length of stay of ≥14 days, and any inpatient complications. CONCLUSIONS: These nomograms could be useful risk assessment tools to predict NHD after PD and therefore facilitate patient counseling and improve resource utilization and discharge planning.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Nomogramas , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/efeitos adversos , Alta do Paciente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
20.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(2): 375-81, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26561404

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Liver resection is a key therapeutic strategy to improve survival in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. Underutilization may negatively affect outcomes. Using a Web-based survey and standardized imaging scenarios, this study assessed medical oncologists' (MOs) perceptions of resectability, preferences for chemotherapy sequencing, and referral for surgical consultation in a static patient profile of good performance status and no extrahepatic spread but varying bulk and distribution of disease. METHODS: A total of 190 US-based MOs were surveyed. A single patient profile was created and combined with 10 different sets of liver computed tomographic images displaying a broad spectrum of metastases. Assessments of resectability and ranking were compared with the results obtained from an expert panel of 3 hepatic surgeons. RESULTS: The expert hepatic surgeons designated 8 scans resectable, 1 borderline resectable/convertible, and 1 unresectable. In the 8 resectable cases, 34.4 % of MOS perceived the case to be initially resectable, 41.7 % potentially resectable after chemotherapy response, and 23.9 % unresectable. Increasing number of lesions, larger tumor diameter, and bilateral disease were associated with lower resectability perception (P < 0.01). Among those cases considered resectable by MOs, they preferred initial resection (54.2 %) over neoadjuvant chemotherapy (38.4 %). Initial referral for surgical consultation was generally favored only for cases considered initially resectable by MOs. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms both potential discrepancies between MOs' and hepatic surgeons' perception of resectability and underutilization of early surgical consultation for patients with potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases and underscores the importance of an evaluation that includes an experienced hepatic surgeon.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Cirurgia Geral/normas , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Oncologia/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Hepatectomia , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa