Distal tibial osteotomy compared to proximal osteotomy for limb lengthening in children.

AIMS: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess and investigate the safety and efficacy of using a distal tibial osteotomy compared to proximal osteotomy for limb lengthening in children. METHODS: In this study, there were 59 consecutive tibial lengthening and deformity corrections in 57 children using a circular frame. All were performed or supervised by the senior author between January 2013 and June 2019. A total of 25 who underwent a distal tibial osteotomy were analyzed and compared to a group of 34 who had a standard proximal tibial osteotomy. For each patient, the primary diagnosis, time in frame, complications, and lengthening achieved were recorded. From these data, the frame index was calculated (days/cm) and analyzed. RESULTS: All patients ended their treatment with successful lengthening and deformity correction. The frame index for proximal versus distal osteotomies showed no significant difference, with a mean 48.5 days/cm (30 to 85) and 48.9 days/cm (28 to 81), respectively (p = 0.896). In the proximal osteotomy group, two patients suffered complications (one refracture after frame removal and one failure of regenerate maturation with subsequent valgus deformity) compared to zero in the distal osteotomy group. Two patients in each group sustained obstacles that required intervention (one necessitated guided growth, one fibula lengthening, and two required change of wires). There was a similar number of problems (pin-site infections) in each group. CONCLUSION: Our data show that distal tibial osteotomies can be safely employed in limb lengthening for children using a circular frame, which has implications in planning a surgical strategy; for example, when treating a tibia with shortening and distal deformity, a second osteotomy for proximal lengthening is not required.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1273-1278.

Wrist fusion using an induced membrane technique for forearm salvage in a patient with an infected open injury with segmental bone loss: A case report.

This case report describes the management of a 27-year-old male who, after a quadbike accident, presented with an open, infected, segmental both bone forearm injury with significant bone and soft tissue loss including the radio-carpal joint. Limb salvage was accomplished in the form of a single bone forearm fusion utilising Masquelet's two-stage induced membrane technique to reconstruct the segmental bone defect. The patient proceeded to uneventful bony union by 6 months and returned to driving and riding a quadbike. Despite significant deep infection, successful salvage was achieved using the induced membrane technique. Critical to success was aggressive, repeated debridement alongside restoration of vascular supply and reconstruction of soft tissue defects. We highlight the multidisciplinary approach to management including relevant specialists with a particular interest in limb reconstruction.