The SDS22:PP1:I3 complex: SDS22 binding to PP1 loosens the active site metal to prime metal exchange.

SDS22 and Inhibitor-3 (I3) are two ancient regulators of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) that regulate multiple essential biological processes. Both SDS22 and I3 form stable dimeric complexes with PP1; however, and atypically for PP1 regulators, they also form a triple complex, where both proteins bind to PP1 simultaneously (SPI complex). Here we report the crystal structure of the SPI complex. While both regulators bind PP1 in conformations identical to those observed in their individual PP1 complexes, PP1 adopts the SDS22-bound conformation, which lacks its M1 metal. Unexpectedly, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) revealed that the affinity of I3 for the SDS22:PP1 complex is ∼10-fold lower than PP1 alone. We show that this change in binding affinity is solely due to the interaction of I3 with the PP1 active site, specifically PP1's M2 metal, demonstrating that SDS22 likely allows for PP1 M2 metal exchange and thus PP1 biogenesis.

Conformational Rigidity and Protein Dynamics at Distinct Timescales Regulate PTP1B Activity and Allostery.

Protein function originates from a cooperation of structural rigidity, dynamics at different timescales, and allostery. However, how these three pillars of protein function are integrated is still only poorly understood. Here we show how these pillars are connected in Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), a drug target for diabetes and cancer that catalyzes the dephosphorylation of numerous substrates in essential signaling pathways. By combining new experimental and computational data on WT-PTP1B and ≥10 PTP1B variants in multiple states, we discovered a fundamental and evolutionarily conserved CH/π switch that is critical for positioning the catalytically important WPD loop. Furthermore, our data show that PTP1B uses conformational and dynamic allostery to regulate its activity. This shows that both conformational rigidity and dynamics are essential for controlling protein activity. This connection between rigidity and dynamics at different timescales is likely a hallmark of all enzyme function.

SDS22 selectively recognizes and traps metal-deficient inactive PP1.

The metalloenzyme protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), which is responsible for ≥50% of all dephosphorylation reactions, is regulated by scores of regulatory proteins, including the highly conserved SDS22 protein. SDS22 has numerous diverse functions, surprisingly acting as both a PP1 inhibitor and as an activator. Here, we integrate cellular, biophysical, and crystallographic studies to address this conundrum. We discovered that SDS22 selectively binds a unique conformation of PP1 that contains a single metal (M2) at its active site, i.e., SDS22 traps metal-deficient inactive PP1. Furthermore, we showed that SDS22 dissociation is accompanied by a second metal (M1) being loaded into PP1, as free metal cannot dissociate the complex and M1-deficient mutants remain constitutively trapped by SDS22. Together, our findings reveal that M1 metal loading and loss are essential for PP1 regulation in cells, which has broad implications for PP1 maturation, activity, and holoenzyme subunit exchange.

A Quantitative Chemical Proteomic Strategy for Profiling Phosphoprotein Phosphatases from Yeast to Humans.

A "tug-of-war" between kinases and phosphatases establishes the phosphorylation states of proteins. While serine and threonine phosphorylation can be catalyzed by more than 400 protein kinases, the majority of serine and threonine dephosphorylation is carried out by seven phosphoprotein phosphatases (PPPs). The PPP family consists of protein phosphatases 1 (PP1), 2A (PP2A), 2B (PP2B), 4 (PP4), 5 (PP5), 6 (PP6), and 7 (PP7). The imbalance in numbers between serine- and threonine-directed kinases and phosphatases led to the early belief that PPPs are unspecific and that kinases are the primary determinants of protein phosphorylation. However, it is now clear that PPPs achieve specificity through association with noncatalytic subunits to form multimeric holoenzymes, which expands the number of functionally distinct signaling entities to several hundred. Although there has been great progress in deciphering signaling by kinases, much less is known about phosphatases.We have developed a chemical proteomic strategy for the systematic interrogation of endogenous PPP catalytic subunits and their interacting proteins, including regulatory and scaffolding subunits (the "PPPome"). PP1, PP2A, PP4, PP5, and PP6 were captured using an immobilized, specific but nonselective PPP inhibitor microcystin-LR (MCLR), followed by protein identification by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in a single analysis. Here, we combine this approach of phosphatase inhibitor bead profiling and mass spectrometry (PIB-MS) with label-free and tandem mass tag (TMT) quantification to map the PPPome in human cancer cell lines, mouse tissues, and yeast species, through which we identify cell- and tissue-type-specific PPP expression patterns and discover new PPP interacting proteins.

A Sephin1-insensitive tripartite holophosphatase dephosphorylates translation initiation factor 2α.

The integrated stress response (ISR) is regulated by kinases that phosphorylate the α subunit of translation initiation factor 2 and phosphatases that dephosphorylate it. Genetic and biochemical observations indicate that the eIF2αP-directed holophosphatase, a therapeutic target in diseases of protein misfolding, is comprised of a regulatory subunit, PPP1R15, and a catalytic subunit, protein phosphatase 1 (PP1). In mammals, there are two isoforms of the regulatory subunit, PPP1R15A and PPP1R15B, with overlapping roles in the essential function of eIF2αP dephosphorylation. However, conflicting reports have appeared regarding the requirement for an additional co-factor, G-actin, in enabling substrate-specific dephosphorylation by PPP1R15-containing PP1 holoenzymes. An additional concern relates to the sensitivity of the holoenzyme to the [(o-chlorobenzylidene)amino]guanidines Sephin1 or guanabenz, putative small-molecule proteostasis modulators. It has been suggested that the source and method of purification of the PP1 catalytic subunit and the presence or absence of an N-terminal repeat-containing region in the PPP1R15A regulatory subunit might influence the requirement for G-actin and sensitivity of the holoenzyme to inhibitors. We found that eIF2αP dephosphorylation by PP1 was moderately stimulated by repeat-containing PPP1R15A in an unphysiological low ionic strength buffer, whereas stimulation imparted by the co-presence of PPP1R15A and G-actin was observed under a broad range of conditions, low and physiological ionic strength, regardless of whether the PPP1R15A regulatory subunit had or lacked the N-terminal repeat-containing region and whether it was paired with native PP1 purified from rabbit muscle or recombinant PP1 purified from bacteria. Furthermore, none of the PPP1R15A-containing holophosphatases tested were inhibited by Sephin1 or guanabenz.

PP1:Tautomycetin Complex Reveals a Path toward the Development of PP1-Specific Inhibitors.

Selective inhibitors for each serine/threonine phosphatase (PPP) are essential to investigate the biological actions of PPPs and to guide drug development. Biologically diverse organisms (e.g., cyanobacteria, dinoflagellates, beetles) produce structurally distinct toxins that are catalytic inhibitors of PPPs. However, most toxins exhibit little selectivity, typically inhibiting multiple family members with similar potencies. Thus, the use of these toxins as chemical tools to study the relationship between individual PPPs and their biological substrates, and how disruptions in these relationships contributes to human disease, is severely limited. Here, we show that tautomycetin (TTN) is highly selective for a single PPP, protein phosphatase 1 (PP1/PPP1C). Our structure of the PP1:TTN complex reveals that PP1 selectivity is defined by a covalent bond between TTN and a PP1-specific cysteine residue, Cys127. Together, these data provide key molecular insights needed for the development of novel probes targeting single PPPs, especially PP1.

Understanding the antagonism of retinoblastoma protein dephosphorylation by PNUTS provides insights into the PP1 regulatory code.

The serine/threonine protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) dephosphorylates hundreds of key biological targets by associating with nearly 200 regulatory proteins to form highly specific holoenzymes. However, how these proteins direct PP1 specificity and the ability to predict how these PP1 interacting proteins bind PP1 from sequence alone is still missing. PP1 nuclear targeting subunit (PNUTS) is a PP1 targeting protein that, with PP1, plays a central role in the nucleus, where it regulates chromatin decondensation, RNA processing, and the phosphorylation state of fundamental cell cycle proteins, including the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), p53, and MDM2. The molecular function of PNUTS in these processes is completely unknown. Here, we show that PNUTS, which is intrinsically disordered in its free form, interacts strongly with PP1 in a highly extended manner. Unexpectedly, PNUTS blocks one of PP1's substrate binding grooves while leaving the active site accessible. This interaction site, which we have named the arginine site, allowed us to define unique PP1 binding motifs, which advances our ability to predict how more than a quarter of the known PP1 regulators bind PP1. Additionally, the structure shows how PNUTS inhibits the PP1-mediated dephosphorylation of critical substrates, especially Rb, by blocking their binding sites on PP1, insights that are providing strategies for selectively enhancing Rb activity.

Inhibitor-3 inhibits Protein Phosphatase 1 via a metal binding dynamic protein-protein interaction.

To achieve substrate specificity, protein phosphate 1 (PP1) forms holoenzymes with hundreds of regulatory and inhibitory proteins. Inhibitor-3 (I3) is an ancient inhibitor of PP1 with putative roles in PP1 maturation and the regulation of PP1 activity. Here, we show that I3 residues 27-68 are necessary and sufficient for PP1 binding and inhibition. In addition to a canonical RVxF motif, which is shared by nearly all PP1 regulators and inhibitors, and a non-canonical SILK motif, I3 also binds PP1 via multiple basic residues that bind directly in the PP1 acidic substrate binding groove, an interaction that provides a blueprint for how substrates bind this groove for dephosphorylation. Unexpectedly, this interaction positions a CCC (cys-cys-cys) motif to bind directly across the PP1 active site. Using biophysical and inhibition assays, we show that the I3 CCC motif binds and inhibits PP1 in an unexpected dynamic, fuzzy manner, via transient engagement of the PP1 active site metals. Together, these data not only provide fundamental insights into the mechanisms by which IDP protein regulators of PP1 achieve inhibition, but also shows that fuzzy interactions between IDPs and their folded binding partners, in addition to enhancing binding affinity, can also directly regulate enzyme activity.

Molecular basis of ß-lactam antibiotic resistance of ESKAPE bacterium E. faecium Penicillin Binding Protein PBP5.

Penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) are essential for the formation of the bacterial cell wall. They are also the targets of ß-lactam antibiotics. In Enterococcus faecium, high levels of resistance to ß-lactams are associated with the expression of PBP5, with higher levels of resistance associated with distinct PBP5 variants. To define the molecular mechanism of PBP5-mediated resistance we leveraged biomolecular NMR spectroscopy of PBP5 - due to its size (>70 kDa) a challenging NMR target. Our data show that resistant PBP5 variants show significantly increased dynamics either alone or upon formation of the acyl-enzyme inhibitor complex. Furthermore, these variants also exhibit increased acyl-enzyme hydrolysis. Thus, reducing sidechain bulkiness and expanding surface loops results in increased dynamics that facilitates acyl-enzyme hydrolysis and, via increased ß-lactam antibiotic turnover, facilitates ß-lactam resistance. Together, these data provide the molecular basis of resistance of clinical E. faecium PBP5 variants, results that are likely applicable to the PBP family.

Association with endoplasmic reticulum promotes proteasomal degradation of GADD34 protein.

Stress-induced endogenous and ectopically expressed GADD34 proteins were present both in the cytoplasm and in membranes, with their membrane association showing similar biochemical properties. Deletion of N-terminal sequences in GADD34-GFP proteins highlighted an amphipathic helix, whose hydrophobic surface, specifically valine 25 and leucine 29, mediated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) localization. Substitution of leucines for three arginines on the polar surface indicated that the same helix also mediated the association of GADD34 with mitochondria. Fluorescence protease protection and chemical modification of cysteines substituted in the membrane-binding domain pointed to a monotopic insertion of GADD34 into the outer layer of the ER membrane. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching showed that ER association retards the mobility of GADD34 in living cells. Both WT GADD34 and the mutant, V25R, effectively scaffolded the α-isoform of protein phosphatase-1 (PP1α) and enabled eIF2α dephosphorylation. However, the largely cytosolic V25R protein displayed a reduced rate of proteasomal degradation, and unlike WT GADD34, whose ectopic expression resulted in a dilated or distended ER, V25R did not modify ER morphology. These studies suggested that the association of with ER modulates intracellular trafficking and proteasomal degradation of GADD34, and in turn, its ability to modify ER morphology.