Parental socioeconomic position and midlife allostatic load: a study of potential mediators.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying the association of parental socioeconomic position with later life allostatic load remain unclear. The present study aims to examine potential pathways underlying this association: personality, social relations, intelligence and education. METHODS: The study comprised 361 members of the Copenhagen Perinatal Cohort who participated in two subsequent follow-ups: the Prenatal Development Project (mean age 27 years) and the Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank study (mean age 50 years). Allostatic load was based on 14 biomarkers representing the inflammatory, metabolic and cardiovascular system measured at midlife. Information on potential mediators was collected in young adulthood, and their role in the association of parental socioeconomic position with midlife allostatic load were examined in linear regression path analyses. RESULTS: Parental socioeconomic position at one year was inversely associated with midlife allostatic load (ß = - 0.238, p < .001). No mediation effects were found for personality or social relations. In a model including intelligence and education, a significant indirect effect was found for education (ß = - 0.151, p < .001). A significant direct effect remained (ß = - 0.111, p = .040). CONCLUSIONS: Parental socioeconomic position was inversely associated with allostatic load in midlife. Results suggest that part of this association was mediated by education. A better understanding of the non-cognitive pathways related to education is an important prerequisite for the development of effective intervention strategies.

Sleep and allostatic load: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The detrimental effects of sleep disturbances on health and wellbeing are well-established but not fully understood. The allostatic load model has been suggested as a framework for understanding the adverse effects of sleep disturbances. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the associations of sleep disturbance and sleep duration with allostatic load. PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for records relating to sleep and allostatic load published from 1993 to January 14th, 2022. Two independent raters screened 395 titles and abstracts and 51 full texts. Data were extracted from 18 studies that were assessed for methodological quality. Of these, 17 studies of 26,924 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Sleep disturbance was significantly associated with higher allostatic load (effect size correlation [ESr] = 0.09, p < 0.001), and the association was weaker in samples with a larger proportion of women. When compared to normal sleep, long sleep was significantly associated with higher allostatic load (ESr = 0.12, p = 0.003). Results indicated heterogeneity. No association was found for short sleep (ESr = 0.05, p = 0.069) or sleep duration (ESr = -0.06, p = 0.36). Future research should identify mechanisms and directionality in longitudinal studies.

Objective and subjective stress, personality, and allostatic load.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the understanding of allostatic load (AL) as a consequence of ongoing adaptation to stress, studies of the stress-AL association generally focus on a narrow conceptualization of stress and have thus far overlooked potential confounding by personality. The present study examined the cross-sectional association of objective and subjective stress with AL, controlling for Big Five personality traits. METHODS: Participants comprised 5,512 members of the Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank aged 49-63 years (69% men). AL was measured as a summary index of 14 biomarkers of the inflammatory, cardiovascular, and metabolic system. Objective stress was assessed as self-reported major life events in adult life. Subjective stress was assessed as perceived stress within the past four weeks. RESULTS: Both stress measures were positively associated with AL, with a slightly stronger association for objective stress. Adjusting for personality traits did not significantly change these associations. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest measures of objective and subjective stress to have independent predictive validity in the context of personality. Further, it is discussed how different operationalizations of stress and AL may account for some of the differences in observed stress-AL associations.