The Retrospective Stressor Analysis (RSA): a novel qualitative tool for identifying causes of burnout and mitigation strategies during residency.

BACKGROUND: Resident physicians are at an increased risk of burnout due to their high-pressure work environments and busy schedules which can lead to poor mental health outcomes and decreased performance quality. Given variability among training programs and institutions across the United States, stressors likely differ, and interventions must be tailored to the local context, but few tools exist to assist in this process. METHODS: A tool commonly used in adverse event analysis was adapted into a "retrospective stressor analysis" (RSA) for burnout prevention. The RSA was tested in a group of chief residents studying quality improvement and patient safety in veteran's hospitals across the United States. The RSA prompted them to identify stressors experienced during their residencies across four domains (clinical practice, career development, personal life, and personal health), perceived causes of the stressors, and potential mitigation strategies. RESULTS: Fifty-eight chief residents completed the RSA. Within the clinical domain, they describe the stress of striving for efficiency and clinical skills acquisition, all while struggling to provide quality care in high pressure environments. In the career domain, identifying mentors and opportunities for research engagement was stressful. Within their personal lives, a lack of time-constrained their ability to maintain hobbies, relationships, and attend meaningful social events while also reducing their engagement in healthy behaviors such as exercise, optimal nutrition, and attending medical appointments. Within each of these domains, they identified and described stress mitigation strategies at the individual, departmental, and national levels. CONCLUSION: The RSA is a novel tool that can identify national trends in burnout drivers while simultaneously providing tailored prevention strategies for residents and their training sites.

The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomised controlled trials in the urological literature.

OBJECTIVES: To use the Fragility Index to evaluate the robustness of statistically significant findings from urological randomised controlled trials (RCTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 'Fragility Index' is defined as the minimum number of patients in one arm of a trial whose status would have to change from 'event' to 'non-event', such that a statistically significant result becomes non-significant. We identified all RCTs published in four major urology journals between 2011 and 2015, and we determined the Fragility Index values for those trials reporting statistically significant results of dichotomous outcomes using the Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In all, 332 RCTs were identified, and 41 studies met the inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile range) Fragility Index was 3 (1, 4.5), indicating that an addition of only three alternate events to one arm of a typical trial would have eliminated its statistical significance. In 27/40 cases (67.5% of cases), the number of patients lost to follow-up was larger than its Fragility Index. CONCLUSIONS: The results of urology RCTs that study dichotomous outcomes and report statistically significant differences between groups are sometimes fragile and depend on few events. Urologists should interpret these RCTs cautiously, particularly when the number of participants lost to follow-up exceeds the Fragility Index. Routine reporting of Fragility Index values alongside P values may provide additional guidance about the robustness of statistically significant findings.

A cross-sectional study of the catheter management of neurogenic bladder after traumatic spinal cord injury.

AIMS: This cross-sectional study describes the catheter management of neurogenic bladder (NGB) in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) with emphasis on the motivations behind transitions between intermittent (IC) and indwelling catheters. METHODS: Patients at the Minneapolis VA with history of tSCI who utilized either intermittent catheterization (IC), urethral (UC) or suprapubic (SP) catheters, participated in a voluntary, anonymous survey regarding their bladder management strategies. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients participated, 94% were male and 90% Caucasian with median age of 61 years. Patients with current UC or SP were older than those utilizing IC (P = 0.002). The median age at injury and years since SCI were 32 years and 20.5 years, respectively. The median time with current modality was 11 years. A total of 27% of all patients reported at least one transition between catheter type. A total of 14 of 54 patients using IC had prior use of UC or SP, while 12/25 patients using SP and 10/21 patients using UC had prior use of IC. The most common reasons to stop IC included inconvenience, physician recommendation, and dislike of IC. A total of 53% of patients currently using UC or SP reported never using IC. Patients currently using SP were more content with their current catheterization method than those using UC or IC (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients using catheters for NGB, intermittent catheterization was the most common modality utilized and the transition between intermittent and indwelling catheter was most often influenced by patient preferences and clinician recommendations.

Similar perspectives on prostate cancer screening value and new guidelines across patient demographic and PSA level subgroups: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based prostate cancer screening for all men. OBJECTIVE: To inform educational materials addressing patient questions and concerns about the 2012 USPSTF guidelines, we sought to: (i) characterize patient perceptions about prostate cancer screening benefits, harms and recommendations against screening, and (ii) compare perceptions across race, age and PSA level subgroups. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with a sample of 26 men from the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, stratified by race (African American, other), age (50-69, 70-84) and PSA level (documented PSA level ≥4 in Veterans Health Administration electronic medical records vs no such documentation). We used an inductive approach informed by grounded theory to analyse transcribed interviews. RESULTS: Most men in all subgroups expressed misperceptions about the benefits of prostate cancer screening and had difficulty identifying harms associated with screening. In all subgroups, reactions to recommendations against screening ranged from unconditionally receptive to highly resistant. Some men in every subgroup initially resistant to the idea said they would accept a recommendation to discontinue screening from their provider. CONCLUSIONS: Given the similarity of perceptions and reactions across subgroups, materials targeted by race, age and PSA level may not be necessary. Efforts to inform decision making about prostate cancer screening should address misperceptions about benefits and lack of awareness of harms. Provider perspectives and recommendations may play a pivotal role in shaping patient reactions to new guidelines.

Defining the publication source of high-quality evidence in urology: an analysis of EvidenceUpdates.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the publication sources of urology articles within EvidenceUpdates, a second-order peer review system of the medical literature designed to identify high-quality articles to support up-to-date and evidence-based clinical decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using administrator-level access, all EvidenceUpdates citations from 2005 to 2014 were downloaded from the topics 'Surgery-Urology' and 'Oncology-Genitourinary'. Data fields accessed included PubMed unique reference identifier, study title, abstract, journal and date of publication, as well as clinical relevance and newsworthiness ratings as determined by discipline-specific physician raters. The citations were then coded by clinical topic (oncology, voiding dysfunction, erectile dysfunction/infertility, infection/inflammation, stones/endourology/laparoscopy, trauma/reconstruction, transplant, or other), journal category (general medical journal, oncology journal, urology journal, non-urology specialty journal, Cochrane review, or other), and study design (randomised controlled trial [RCT], systematic review, observational study, or other). Articles that were perceived to be misclassified and/or of no direct interest to urologists were excluded. Descriptive statistics using proportions and 95% confidence intervals, as well as means and standard deviations (SDs) were used to characterise the overall data cohort and to analyse trends over time. RESULTS: We identified 731 unique citations classified under either 'Surgery-Urology' or 'Oncology-Genitourinary' for analysis after exclusions. Between 2005 and 2014, the most common topics were oncology (48.6%, 355 articles) and voiding dysfunction (21.8%, 159). Within the topic of oncology, prostate cancer contributed over half the studies (54.6%, n = 194). The most common study types were RCTs (42.3%, 309 articles) and systematic reviews (39.6%, 290). Systematic reviews had a nearly fourfold relative increase within less than a decade. The largest proportion of studies relevant to urology were published in general oncology journals (20.0%, n = 146), followed by the Cochrane Library (19.3%, n = 141) and general medical journals (17.2%, n = 126). Urology-specific journals contributed to only approximately one-tenth of EvidenceUpdates alerts (9.4%, n = 69), with the highest contribution occurring during the 2013/2014 period. For clinical relevance and newsworthiness scores (each graded on scales of 1-7), urology journals scored the highest in clinical relevance with a mean (SD) of 5.9 (0.75) and general medical journals scored highest for newsworthiness at 5.3 (0.94). On average, RCTs scored highest both for clinical relevance and newsworthiness with mean (SD) scores of 5.71 (0.81) and 5.22 (0.91), respectively. CONCLUSION: A large number of high-quality, clinically relevant, and newsworthy peer-reviewed urology publications are published outside of traditional urology journals. This requires urologists to implement well-defined strategies to stay abreast of current best evidence.

Multi-Institutional Validation of an OSATS for the Assessment of Cystoscopic and Ureteroscopic Skills.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the internal and construct validity of an assessment tool for cystoscopic and ureteroscopic cognitive and psychomotor skills at a multi-institutional level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects included a total of 30 urology residents at Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. A single external blinded reviewer evaluated cognitive and psychomotor skills associated with cystoscopic and ureteroscopic surgery using high fidelity bench models. Exercises included navigation, basketing and relocation; holmium laser lithotripsy; and cystoscope assembly. Each resident received a total cognitive score, checklist score and global psychomotor skills score. Construct validity was assessed by calculating correlations between training year and performance scores (both cognitive and psychomotor). Internal validity was confirmed by calculating correlations between test components. RESULTS: The median total cognitive score was 91 (IQR 86.25, 97). For psychomotor performance residents had a median total checklist score of 7 (IQR 5, 8) and a median global psychomotor skills score of 21 (IQR 18, 24.5). Construct validity was supported by the positive and statistically significant correlations between training year and total cognitive score (r = 0.66, 95% CI 0.39-0.82, p = 0.01), checklist scores (r = 0.66, 95% CI 0.35-0.84, p = 0.32) and global psychomotor skills score (r = 0.76, 95% CI 0.55-0.88, p = 0.002). The internal validity of OSATS was supported since total cognitive and checklist scores correlated with the global psychomotor skills score. CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-institutional study we successfully demonstrated the construct and internal validity of an objective assessment of cystoscopic and ureteroscopic cognitive and technical skills, including laser lithotripsy.

Use of risk stratification indices to predict mortality in critically ill children.

UNLABELLED: The complexity and high cost of neonatal and pediatric intensive care has generated increasing interest in developing measures to quantify the severity of patient illness. While these indices may help improve health care quality and benchmark mortality across hospitals, comprehensive understanding of the purpose and the factors that influenced the performance of risk stratification indices is important so that they can be compared fairly and used most appropriately. In this review, we examined 19 indices of risk stratification used to predict mortality in critically ill children and critically analyzed their design, limitations, and purposes. Some pediatric and neonatal models appear well-suited for institutional benchmarking purposes, with relatively brief data acquisition times, limited potential for treatment-related bias, and reliance on diagnostic variables that permit adjustment for case mix. Other models are more suitable for use in clinical trials, as they rely on physiologic variables collected over an extended period, to better capture the interaction between organ systems function and specific therapeutic interventions in acutely ill patients. Irrespective of their clinical or research applications, risk stratification indices must be periodically recalibrated to adjust for changes in clinical practice in order to remain valid outcome predictors in pediatric intensive care units. Longitudinal auditing, education, training, and guidelines development are also critical to ensure fidelity and reproducibility in data reporting. CONCLUSION: Risk stratification indices are valid tools to describe intensive care unit population and explain differences in mortality.

Examining the surgical stress effects (SSE) framework in practice: A qualitative assessment of perceived sources and consequences of intraoperative stress in surgical teams.

BACKGROUND: Surgical adverse events persist despite extensive improvement efforts. Emotional and behavioral responses to stressors may influence intraoperative performance, as illustrated in the surgical stress effects (SSE) framework. However, the SSE has not been assessed using "real world" data. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with all surgical team roles at one midwestern VA hospital and elicited narratives involving intraoperative stress. Two coders inductively identified codes from transcripts. The team identified themes among codes and assessed concordance with the SSE framework. RESULTS: Throughout 28 interviews, we found surgical stress was ubiquitous, associated with a variety of factors, including adverse events. Stressors often elicited frustration, anger, fear, and anxiety; behavioral reactions to negative emotions frequently were perceived to degrade individual/team performance and compromise outcomes. Narratives were consistent with the SSE framework and support adding a process outcome (efficiency) and illustrating how adverse events can feedback and acutely increase job demands and stress. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study describes narratives of intraoperative stress, finding they are consistent with the SSE while also allowing minor improvements to the current framework.

The influence of hospital leadership support on burnout, psychological safety, and safety climate for US infection preventionists during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To explore infection preventionists' perceptions of hospital leadership support for infection prevention and control programs during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and relationships with individual perceptions of burnout, psychological safety, and safety climate. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey, administered April through December 2021. SETTING: Random sample of non-federal acute-care hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Lead infection preventionists. RESULTS: We received responses from 415 of 881 infection preventionists, representing a response rate of 47%. Among respondents, 64% reported very good to excellent hospital leadership support for their infection prevention and control program. However, 49% reported feeling burned out from their work. Also, ∼30% responded positively for all 7 psychological safety questions and were deemed to have "high psychological safety," and 76% responded positively to the 2 safety climate questions and were deemed to have a "high safety climate." Our results indicate an association between strong hospital leadership support and lower burnout (IRR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50-0.74), higher perceptions of psychological safety (IRR, 3.20; 95% CI, 2.00-5.10), and a corresponding 1.2 increase in safety climate on an ascending Likert scale from 1 to 10 (ß, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.93-1.49). CONCLUSIONS: Our national survey provides evidence that hospital leadership support may have helped infection preventionists avoid burnout and increase perceptions of psychological safety and safety climate during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings aid in identifying factors that promote the well-being of infection preventionists and enhance the quality and safety of patient care.

Penile measurements in Tanzanian males: guiding circumcision device design and supply forecasting.

PURPOSE: Voluntary medical male circumcision decreases the risk in males of HIV infection through heterosexual intercourse by about 60% in clinical trials and 73% at post-trial followup. In 2007 WHO and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) recommended that countries with a low circumcision rate and high HIV prevalence expand voluntary medical male circumcision programs as part of a national HIV prevention strategy. Devices for adult/adolescent male circumcision could accelerate the pace of scaling up voluntary medical male circumcision. Detailed penile measurements of African males are required for device development and supply size forecasting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consenting males undergoing voluntary medical male circumcision at 3 health facilities in the Iringa region, Tanzania, underwent measurement of the penile glans, shaft and foreskin. Age, Tanner stage, height and weight were recorded. Measurements were analyzed by age categories. Correlations of penile parameters with height, weight and body mass index were calculated. RESULTS: In 253 Tanzanian males 10 to 47 years old mean ± SD penile length in adults was 11.5 ± 1.6 cm, mean shaft circumference was 8.7 ± 0.9 cm and mean glans circumference was 8.8 ± 0.9 cm. As expected, given the variability of puberty, measurements in younger males varied significantly. Glans circumference highly correlated with height (r = 0.80) and weight (r = 0.81, each p <0.001). Stretched foreskin diameter moderately correlated with height (r = 0.68) and weight (r = 0.71, each p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our descriptive study provides penile measurements of males who sought voluntary medical male circumcision services in Iringa, Tanzania. To our knowledge this is the first study in a sub-Saharan African population that provides sufficiently detailed glans and foreskin dimensions to inform voluntary medical male circumcision device development and size forecasting.

Optimizing ergonomics during open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted surgery: A review of surgical ergonomics literature and development of educational illustrations.

BACKGROUND: The surgical profession is plagued with a high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. While numerous interventions have been tested over the years, surgical ergonomics education is still uncommon. METHODS: The available literature on surgical ergonomics was reviewed, and with input from surgeons, recommendations from the review were used to create pictorial reminders for open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted surgical modalities. These simple pictorial ergonomic recommendations were then assessed for practicality by residents and surgeons. RESULTS: A review of the current literature on surgical ergonomics covered evidence-based ergonomic recommendations on equipment during open and laparoscopic surgery, as well as proper adjustment of the surgical robot for robot-assisted surgeries. Ergonomic operative postures for the three modalities were examined, illustrated, and assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The resulting illustrations of ergonomic guidelines across surgical modalities may be employed in developing ergonomic education materials and improving the identification and mitigation of ergonomic risks in the operating room.

Voluntary medical male circumcision: logistics, commodities, and waste management requirements for scale-up of services.

BACKGROUND: The global HIV prevention community is implementing voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) programs across eastern and southern Africa, with a goal of reaching 80% coverage in adult males by 2015. Successful implementation will depend on the accessibility of commodities essential for VMMC programming and the appropriate allocation of resources to support the VMMC supply chain. For this, the United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, in collaboration with the World Health Organization and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, has developed a standard list of commodities for VMMC programs. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This list of commodities was used to inform program planning for a 1-y program to circumcise 152,000 adult men in Swaziland. During this process, additional key commodities were identified, expanding the standard list to include commodities for waste management, HIV counseling and testing, and the treatment of sexually transmitted infections. The approximate costs for the procurement of commodities, management of a supply chain, and waste disposal, were determined for the VMMC program in Swaziland using current market prices of goods and services. Previous costing studies of VMMC programs did not capture supply chain costs, nor the full range of commodities needed for VMMC program implementation or waste management. Our calculations indicate that depending upon the volume of services provided, supply chain and waste management, including commodities and associated labor, contribute between US$58.92 and US$73.57 to the cost of performing one adult male circumcision in Swaziland. CONCLUSIONS: Experience with the VMMC program in Swaziland indicates that supply chain and waste management add approximately US$60 per circumcision, nearly doubling the total per procedure cost estimated previously; these additional costs are used to inform the estimate of per procedure costs modeled by Njeuhmeli et al. in "Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision: Modeling the Impact and Cost of Expanding Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Eastern and Southern Africa." Program planners and policy makers should consider the significant contribution of supply chain and waste management to VMMC program costs as they determine future resource needs for VMMC programs.

Validation of the World Health Organization tool for situational analysis to assess emergency and essential surgical care at district hospitals in Ghana.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (hereafter called the WHO Tool) has been used in more than 25 countries and is the largest effort to assess surgical care in the world. However, it has not yet been independently validated. Test-retest reliability is one way to validate the degree to which tests instruments are free from random error. The aim of the present field study was to determine the test-retest reliability of the WHO Tool. METHODS: The WHO Tool was mailed to 10 district hospitals in Ghana. Written instructions were provided along with a letter from the Ghana Health Services requesting the hospital administrator to complete the survey tool. After ensuring delivery and completion of the forms, the study team readministered the WHO Tool at the time of an on-site visit less than 1 month later. The results of the two tests were compared to calculate kappa statistics for each of the 152 questions in the WHO Tool. The kappa statistic is a statistical measure of the degree of agreement above what would be expected based on chance alone. RESULTS: Ten hospitals were surveyed twice over a short interval (i.e., less than 1 month). Weighted and unweighted kappa statistics were calculated for 152 questions. The median unweighted kappa for the entire survey was 0.43 (interquartile range 0-0.84). The infrastructure section (24 questions) had a median kappa of 0.81; the human resources section (13 questions) had a median kappa of 0.77; the surgical procedures section (67 questions) had a median kappa of 0.00; and the emergency surgical equipment section (48 questions) had a median kappa of 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital capacity survey questions related to infrastructure characteristics had high reliability. However, questions related to process of care had poor reliability and may benefit from supplemental data gathered by direct observation. Limitations to the study include the small sample size: 10 district hospitals in a single country. Consistent and high correlations calculated from the field testing within the present analysis suggest that the WHO Tool for Situational Analysis is a reliable tool where it measures structure and setting, but it should be revised for measuring process of care.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) pediatric quality indicators (PDIs): accidental puncture or laceration during surgery in children.

CONTEXT: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) pediatric quality indicators (PDIs) are measures designed to evaluate the quality of pediatric healthcare. They specifically focus on adverse events that are potentially avoidable, including complications and iatrogenic events. PDI 1 refers to accidental puncture or laceration. OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors and outcomes associated with PDI 1 in a population of pediatric surgical patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Kids Inpatient Database were used to identify hospitalized pediatric surgical patients in the United States (age: 0-18) from 1988 to 2005. The data from these 1,939,540 patients was linked to the AHRQ PDIs using AHRQ WinQI software, and 7,033 pediatric patients with PDI 1 were identified. A 1:3 matched case control design was implemented with 6,459 cases (patients with PDI 1) and 19,377 controls (patients without PDI 1) matched on age, race, gender, and hospital ID. Cases and controls were stratified into procedure categories based on diagnosis related group procedure codes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To examine the relationship between PDI 1 and procedure category, as well as the outcomes of in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and total hospital charges for cases compared with controls. RESULTS: Of the 4,627 patients with PDI 1 stratified into procedure categories, the highest proportion of PDI 1 cases occurred in the gastrointestinal (30.19%), cardiothoracic (19.6%), and the orthopedic (11.13%) categories. Logistic regression analysis for PDI 1, controlling for admission type and insurance status, revealed a statistically significant higher odds of PDI 1 in the gynecology (OR: 1.69, P < 0.001) and transplant (OR: 1.45, P: 0.026) procedure categories. Multivariable regression analysis revealed patients with PDI 1 were more likely to die (OR: 1.91, P < 0.001), had a 4.81 day longer length of stay (95% CI: 4.26-5.36, P < 0.001) and had USD 36,291 higher total hospital charges (95% CI: USD 32,583-USD 40,000, P < 0.001) compared with patients without PDI 1. CONCLUSIONS: Cases of PDI 1 were most commonly associated with the gastrointestinal, cardiothoracic, and orthopedic procedure categories, and these were also 3 of the most common procedure categories overall. Controlling for type of procedure and other variables, the procedure categories having the highest likelihood of PDI 1 were gynecology and transplant. PDI 1 was found to be associated with greater mortality, longer length of stay, and greater total hospital charges.

Analysis of 23 million US hospitalizations: uninsured children have higher all-cause in-hospital mortality.

BACKGROUND: The number of uninsured children in the USA is increasing while the impact on children's health of being uninsured remains largely uncharacterized. We analyzed data from more than 23 million US children to evaluate the effect of insurance status on the outcome of US pediatric hospitalization. METHODS: In our analysis of two well-known large inpatient databases, we classified patients less than 18 years old as uninsured (self-pay) or insured (including Medicaid or private insurance). We adjusted for gender, race, age, geographic region, hospital type, admission source using regression models. In-hospital death was the primary outcome and secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay and total hospital charges adjusted to 2007 dollars. RESULTS: The crude in-hospital mortality was 0.75% for uninsured versus 0.47% for insured children, with adjusted mortality rates of 0.74 and 0.46%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, uninsured compared with insured patients had an increased mortality risk (odds ratio: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.45-1.76). The excess mortality in uninsured children in the US was 37.8%, or 16,787, of the 38,649 deaths over the 18 period of the study. CONCLUSION: Children who were hospitalized without insurance have significantly increased all-cause in-hospital mortality as compared with children who present with insurance.

Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data.

Importance: Diagnostic delay in the outpatient setting is an emerging safety priority that health information technology (HIT) should help address. However, diagnostic delays have persisted, and new safety concerns associated with the use of HIT have emerged. Objective: To analyze HIT-related outpatient diagnostic delays within a large, integrated health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study involved qualitative content analysis of safety concerns identified in aggregated root cause analysis (RCA) data related to HIT and outpatient diagnostic delays. The setting was the US Department of Veterans Affairs using all RCAs submitted to the Veterans Affairs (VA) National Center for Patient Safety from January 1, 2013, to July 31, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Common themes associated with the role of HIT-related safety concerns were identified and categorized according to the Health IT Safety framework for measuring, monitoring, and improving HIT safety. This framework includes 3 related domains (ie, safe HIT, safe use of HIT, and using HIT to improve safety) situated within an 8-dimensional sociotechnical model accounting for interacting technical and nontechnical variables associated with safety. Hence, themes identified enhanced understanding of the sociotechnical context and domain of HIT safety involved. Results: Of 214 RCAs categorized by the terms delay and outpatient submitted during the study period, 88 were identified as involving diagnostic delays and HIT, from which 172 unique HIT-related safety concerns were extracted (mean [SD], 1.97 [1.53] per RCA). Most safety concerns (82.6% [142 of 172]) involved problems with safe use of HIT, predominantly sociotechnical factors associated with people, workflow and communication, and a poorly designed human-computer interface. Fewer safety concerns involved problems with safe HIT (14.5% [25 of 172]) or using HIT to improve safety (0.3% [5 of 172]). The following 5 key high-risk areas for diagnostic delays emerged: managing electronic health record inbox notifications and communication, clinicians gathering key diagnostic information, technical problems, data entry problems, and failure of a system to track test results. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study of a national RCA data set suggests that interventions to reduce outpatient diagnostic delays could aim to improve test result management, interoperability, data visualization, and order entry, as well as to decrease information overload.

Optimizing Outcomes in Urologic Surgery: Intraoperative Environmental, Behavioral, and Performance Considerations.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative surgical outcomes are influenced by a wide variety of environmental, provider and institutional factors. There is little in the current literature that provides guidance for practitioners interested in adapting these factors to improve the quality of the urological care they provide. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of subject matter experts (urologists, nurses, anesthesiologists) was convened to evaluate the existing literature, create a white paper, and disseminate this to providers and institutions to fuel quality improvement efforts in urological surgery. Focusing on intraoperative environmental, behavioral and performance factors, a narrative review was performed, highlighting practical interventions when available. RESULTS: Intraoperative performance is optimized by encouraging a culture of safety, improving intraoperative teamwork, thoughtfully navigating conflict and disruptive behavior, improving surgeon ergonomics, minimizing noise/distractions and engaging in ongoing technical performance improvement. In addition, practical tools are provided to assist in the challenging task of quality improvement in the surgical context. CONCLUSIONS: We summarize the influence of organizational culture, environment and behavior on surgical performance and outcomes. This work is intended to support local quality improvement efforts by educating the urological community regarding less well-known environmental, behavioral and institutional factors that influence surgical performance and patient outcomes.

Optimizing Outcomes in Urological Surgery: Preoperative Care.

PURPOSE: Understanding best practices in preoperative care is critical for quality of care for our urology patients. We compiled a concise resource that provides recommendations for optimizing preoperative outcomes for patients undergoing urological surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urological preoperative care was defined as medical evaluation or treatment received in preparation for surgery or a procedure. The Preoperative White Paper Panel was comprised of practicing urologists and nurses. The topic was researched via literature published from 1980 through 2018 which focused on preoperative evaluation and safety. Best practice recommendations were also reviewed from specialty societies. Recommendations in this article reflect expert opinion from the Panel, and are based on review of available evidence and existing best practice statements. RESULTS: Preoperative optimization involves a good assessment and stratification of surgical risk for the patient about to undergo surgery or a procedure. This assessment starts with a timely history and physical evaluation, as well as review of underlying frailty and cognition. The assessment helps inform potential postoperative needs. Risk stratification calculators are available to determine potential cardiac and pulmonary morbidity as well as overall surgical risk. Optimization of endocrine and gastrointestinal comorbidities can also reduce complications for patients. Modifiable preoperative behaviors and needs such as malnutrition and smoking cessation should also be discussed before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We summarize the preoperative factors that may impact surgical outcomes in urology. By understanding and applying best practices for preoperative care, urologists can optimize the quality of care for their patients.

Optimizing Outcomes in Urological Surgery: Postoperative Care.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding best practices in perioperative care is critical for quality of care for our urology patients. We compiled a single, concise resource that provides recommendations for optimizing postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing urological surgery. METHODS: Optimal postoperative care includes minimizing complications, optimizing recovery and improving patient outcomes. The assembled White Paper multidisciplinary writing team included experts in a number of different areas (urologists, nurses, anesthesiologists) to address a comprehensive set of topics that urological providers face when caring for postoperative patients. This article provides a summary of key elements to optimize postoperative care in adult urological surgery, including in-hospital considerations, transition/discharge, and followup and surveillance. RESULTS: In-hospital postoperative considerations include checklists, handoffs for safe transitions from the anesthesia to surgical team, level of care planning and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®). Embedded in ERAS are postoperative nutrition, mobilization, wound care, judicious use of catheters and drains, and postoperative medications and transfusions. As the patient transitions to the outpatient setting, the urologist must provide clear and readable postoperative education, which includes medication management and coordinated followup with primary care providers and home health as needed. Finally, followup visits should be carefully considered using innovative methods such as telehealth and patient reported outcomes to elevate postoperative and long-term care. CONCLUSIONS: This article summarizes postoperative factors that may impact surgical outcomes in urology. By understanding and applying best practices for postoperative care, urologists can optimize the quality of care for their patients.