A survey of compliance with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy quality recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: Many publications have proposed quality standards for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR). However, data on the level of compliance with these guidelines is lacking in the literature. This study aimed to understand how these guidelines are applied in the clinic and to identify barriers to implementing such recommendations. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with multidisciplinary staff at radiation oncology centres across New South Wales formulated around the RANZCR Guidelines for Safe Practice of Stereotactic Body (Ablative) Radiation Therapy. The interview responses were grouped into 20 topics, assessed against the guidelines and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Good compliance with the guidelines was found, with more than 80% of centres achieving satisfactory results in more than half the topics. The areas with the lowest compliance were auditing, risk assessment and reporting recommendations. Barriers to the quality of SABR treatments included limited training opportunities, low patient numbers and a lack of clear requirements on comprehensive auditing and reporting. CONCLUSION: Overall, the centres surveyed reported good compliance with most of the RANZCR SABR guidelines. The tasks with the lowest compliance were those that monitor quality outcomes. Potential strategies for improvement include inclusion in clinical trials and the use of databases which link treatment parameters, dosimetry and outcomes. Further work will focus on the barriers identified in this survey and propose practical solutions to improve compliance in these areas.

In-vivo dosimetry comparison of supraclavicular junction dose for breast and chest-wall patients with and without deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH).

PURPOSE: The use of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) for patients with left-sided breast cancer reduces cardiac dose, with the aim of reducing the risk of major coronary events. However, this technique has not been universally adopted for patients requiring regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with one concern related to the junction dose. This study evaluates the dose received at the junction for both DIBH and free-breathing patients having tangential breast/chest wall radiation and regional nodal radiation treated with 3D-conformal or hybrid IMRT radiotherapy. METHODS: In-vivo dosimetry measurements utilizing EBT3 GafChromic™ film were performed for 19 patients during three fractions over their course of treatment. The mean junction dose and variability in junction dose were compared between the DIBH and free breathing patients. RESULTS: Our results show that for voluntary DIBH (v-DIBH) patients the junction dose is more variable between fractions. However, when comparing the average junction dose for DIBH and free breathing patients over the three measurements, the difference was small and not statistically significant. A larger difference was seen when patient measurements were analysed based on treatment linac. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the mean junction dose is not significantly compromised by the use of v-DIBH. The small possibility of a change in junction dose due to breathing technique should be weighed against the proven increased risks associated with excess cardiac dose received by free-breathing patients. If junction dose is of concern, an in-vivo study, such as this one, could allow cautious introduction of DIBH for patients requiring supraclavicular irradiation.