Pharmacotherapy for Sexual Dysfunction in Women.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review article discusses the controversy in the DSM-5 conceptualization and diagnostic criteria for female sexual dysfunction (FSD). An overview of recent studies on available treatments for hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), and genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPD) is provided. RECENT FINDINGS: Include delineation of the process of care for pre- and postmenopausal women with HSDD; release of global position statement on testosterone therapy in women; updates on efficacy and safety of vaginal estrogen for genitourinary syndrome of menopause and bremelanotide for HSDD; removal of flibanserin alcohol REMS; and development of new technology to enhance bioavailability and brain delivery of treatments. The DSM-5 revision combining HSDD and FSAD into one diagnostic category is a less accurate characterization of these separate disorders and may hinder access to demonstrated effective treatments for the women with these conditions. There are a wide range of pharmacological, other physiological, and psychological treatment options available for women with FSD, which can be offered based on their specific symptoms, potential benefits/risks, and preferences.

The neurobiology of bremelanotide for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women.

Hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) is a common female sexual dysfunction and is estimated to affect approximately 10% of women in the United States. It has been suggested that HSDD is associated with an imbalance of hormone and neurotransmitter levels in the brain, resulting in decreased excitation, increased inhibition, or a combination of both. Evidence suggests neurotransmitters, including dopamine (DA), norepinephrine, and serotonin, as well as hormones such as estradiol and testosterone, contribute to female sexual desire and response. Current treatments for HSDD include psychotherapy, and two US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for premenopausal women: flibanserin, a serotonin mixed agonist and antagonist, and bremelanotide, a melanocortin receptor (MCR) agonist. Melanocortins are endogenous neuropeptides associated with the excitatory pathway of the female sexual response system. MCRs are found throughout the body, including the brain. Bremelanotide is an MCR agonist that nonselectively activates several of the receptor subtypes, of which subtype 4 (MC4R) is the most relevant at therapeutic doses. MC4R is predominantly expressed in the medial preoptic area (mPOA) of the hypothalamus in the brain, and is important for female sexual function. Animal studies suggest that bremelanotide may affect female sexual desire by activating presynaptic MC4Rs on neurons in the mPOA of the hypothalamus, leading to increased release of DA, an excitatory neurotransmitter that increases sexual desire. This review presents what is known about the mechanism of action of bremelanotide in the context of treating HSDD.

Including partners in discussions of sexual side effects from breast cancer: a qualitative study of survivors, partners, and providers.

PURPOSE: Ensuring there are clear standards for addressing cancer-related sexual side effects is important. Currently, there are differences in two leading sets of clinical guidelines regarding the inclusion of survivors' romantic partners into clinical discussions between survivors and their providers about this issue. To help refine guidelines, we examine breast cancer survivor, partner, and oncology provider perspectives about including partners in discussions about cancer-related sexual side effects in a secondary analysis of a broader qualitative study. METHODS: Partnered female breast cancer survivors (N = 29) completed online surveys, and intimate partners of breast cancer survivors (N = 12) and breast oncology providers (N = 8) completed semi-structured interviews. Themes were derived from thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Among survivors who reported a discussion with their provider, fewer than half indicated their partner had been present, despite most survivors expressing it was - or would have been - helpful to include their partner. Partners also largely indicated being included was or would have been helpful, when welcomed by the survivor. Providers similarly emphasized the importance of survivors' autonomy in deciding whether to discuss sexual concerns in the presence of a partner. CONCLUSIONS: Partners were infrequently included in conversations about cancer-related sexual side effects, even though survivors, partners, and providers alike expressed value in these discussions occurring with the couple together - when that is the survivor's preference. Findings suggest future clinical guidelines should emphasize that incorporating partners into clinical discussions about sexual concerns is important for many breast cancer patients. Soliciting and enacting patients' preferences is essential for truly patient-centered care.

An Innovative Model of Behavior Management to Address Behavioral Emergencies in the Acute Medical Inpatient Setting: Pilot Data.

Workplace violence in healthcare is a significant and costly problem. The majority of violent events that occur in the medical inpatient setting are perpetrated by patients against staff and occur during a behavioral emergency. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of an innovative model of behavior management on occurrence of behavioral emergencies and staff comfort and competence in managing difficult patient behaviors. This model consists of primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions provided by a clinical psychologist which include proactive training for hospital staff and consultation-liaison services for behavior management. Forty-six staff at the University of Virginia Medical Center completed a 1-h training on preventing and managing difficult patient behavior. Self-report data on comfort and competence in managing challenging patient behaviors was collected at baseline, immediately following the intervention, and one and three months post-intervention. Behavioral emergencies were tracked for the intervention unit and a comparison unit. The occurrence of behavioral emergencies decreased by 50% in the three months following the intervention compared to a 142% increase on the comparison unit. Staff reported the greatest increase in confidence from baseline to three months post-intervention on caring for patients with psychiatric illnesses, managing verbal abuse, being supported by medical center leadership, having clear roles and responsibilities, and effectiveness of the skills and strategies used to manage difficult patient behavior. The results of this study provide preliminary support for the use of a comprehensive model for managing the behavioral needs of medical inpatients.

Addressing sexual concerns of female breast cancer survivors and partners: a qualitative study of survivors, partners, and oncology providers about Internet intervention preferences.

PURPOSE: Sexual side effects after breast cancer treatment are common and distressing to both survivors and their intimate partners, yet few receive interventions to address cancer-related sexual concerns. To direct intervention development, this qualitative study assessed the perceptions of female breast cancer survivors, intimate partners of breast cancer survivors, and breast cancer oncology providers about how an Internet intervention for couples may address breast cancer-related sexual concerns. METHODS: Survivors (N = 20) responded to online open-ended surveys. Partners (N = 12) and providers (N = 8) completed individual semi-structured interviews. Data were inductively coded using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Three primary intervention content areas were identified by the key stakeholder groups: (1) information about and strategies to manage physical and psychological effects of cancer treatment on sexual health, (2) relationship and communication support, and (3) addressing bodily changes and self-image after treatment. Survivors and partners tended to express interest in some individualized intervention private from their partner, although they also emphasized the importance of opening communication about sexual concerns within the couple. Survivors and partners expressed interest in an intervention that addresses changing needs across the cancer trajectory, available from the time of diagnosis and through survivorship. CONCLUSION: Internet intervention for couples to address cancer-related sexual concerns, particularly one that provides basic education about treatment side effects and that evolves with couples' changing needs across the cancer trajectory, was perceived as a valuable addition to breast cancer care by survivors, partners, and providers.

Effect of Brexpiprazole on Prolactin and Sexual Functioning: An Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Study Data in Major Depressive Disorder.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Evidence supports use of adjunctive atypical antipsychotics in major depressive disorder (MDD). Impaired sexual functioning is common in MDD and may be worsened by antipsychotic adverse effects. We evaluated the effect of brexpiprazole on prolactin and sexual functioning in patients with MDD. METHODS/PROCEDURES: In short-term studies, patients received adjunctive brexpiprazole 1, 2, or 3 mg or placebo. The long-term study was a flexible-dose (0.5-3 mg/d) open-label extension (OLE). Change from baseline and shifts in prolactin status and prolactin-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. Sexual functioning was assessed by the Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Functioning Questionnaire. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Median changes in prolactin levels from baseline to week 6 in short-term studies were as follows: brexpiprazole, 5.99 ng/mL (females) and 1.61 ng/mL (males); placebo, -0.15 ng/mL (females) and -0.08 ng/mL (males).Median changes from baseline to week 52 in the OLE were as follows: 0.27 ng/mL (females) and 0.27 ng/mL (males). Prolactin levels in patients with baseline prolactin greater than 1× upper limit of normal values tended to decrease over time.The proportion of brexpiprazole-treated patients with greater than 3× upper limit of normal postbaseline prolactin values in short-term studies for both sexes was low (0%-0.3%) and did not differ from placebo: OLE, 0.5% (females) and 0.8% (males).In short-term studies, the incidence of prolactin-related TEAEs was 3.1% for brexpiprazole and 0.7% for placebo (OLE, 3.1%). There were overall numerical improvements from baseline in sexual functioning for females and males after short- and long-term brexpiprazole treatment, with statistically significant improvements for brexpiprazole versus placebo in females on the items 'interest in sex' (-0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.33 to -0.05; P = 0.0074), 'sexually aroused' (-0.17; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.03; P = 0.0154), and 'overall sexual satisfaction' (-0.16; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.03; P = 0.0184). IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: There were small changes in prolactin levels, low proportions of patients with postbaseline elevated prolactin values, low incidences of prolactin-related TEAEs, and modest improvements in sexual functioning with adjunctive brexpiprazole in MDD.

Effects of Alcohol Administered With Flibanserin in Healthy Premenopausal Women: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Dose Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: Flibanserin is approved in the United States and Canada for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women. AIM: The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the safety of concomitant administration of flibanserin with alcohol. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, crossover study, participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 12 sequences to receive each of 7 treatments: flibanserin 100 mg or placebo with ethanol 0.2 g/kg, 0.4 g/kg, or 0.6 g/kg, or flibanserin 100 mg only. Treatments were administered using a worst-case approach that included morning dosing and consumption of alcohol within 10 minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary end point was the proportion of participants who experienced dizziness, syncope, or hypotension. Safety end points included orthostatic vital signs. RESULTS: The study included 96 premenopausal women (mean age 31 ± 8 years). The incidence of dizziness for ethanol + flibanserin was 39.8% for ethanol 0.6 g/kg, 34.1% for 0.4 g/kg, and 27.4% for 0.2 g/kg compared with 31.1% for flibanserin without ethanol. Based on the available vital signs data, there was no effect of ethanol concentration on orthostatic blood pressure, vertigo, or hypotension; no instances of syncope were observed. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar when flibanserin was administered alone (96.7%) or with ethanol (90.5-97.6%). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Consumption of the tested amounts of alcohol (0.2-0.6 g/kg) does not have an additive effect on the AE profile of flibanserin 100 mg in healthy premenopausal women. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths include the study population (premenopausal women, as indicated for flibanserin) and range of ethanol doses. Limitations include the morning dosing of study medication, which is inconsistent with the bedtime dosing recommended for flibanserin, and the method of handling missing vital sign measurements. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of flibanserin 100 mg with varying doses of ethanol resulted in few AEs of special interest, with no notable alcohol dose response. However, a significantly greater percentage of participants administered flibanserin with 0.6 g/kg and 0.4 g/kg of alcohol were characterized as "Participants in Whom Standing Blood Pressure Was Not Obtained" compared with participants administered flibanserin alone. Simon JA, Clayton AH, Parish SJ, et al. Effects of Alcohol Administered With Flibanserin in Healthy Premenopausal Women: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Dose Crossover Study. J Sex Med 2020;17:83-93.

Dose-Finding Study of Lorexys for Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in Premenopausal Women.

INTRODUCTION: Prior medication treatment for hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in women has left about half the subjects without benefit. Lorexys (LOR), a proprietary combination of the stimulating/excitatory dopamine-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor bupropion (BUP) and the sedating/inhibitory serotonergic agonist-antagonist trazodone (TRZ), was developed as a multifunctional solution for this problem. AIM: Test efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LOR in a range of doses in a combined phase IB/IIA study in premenopausal outpatients with HSDD. METHODS: Otherwise healthy premenopausal women from 25-50 years of age with HSDD were tested in an open-label, active-control, one-way crossover study, with three 4-week treatments of extended-release TRZ and/or sustained-release BUP. Evaluations were made before and after each treatment. A washout of at least a week followed each treatment. The order of treatments was a standard dose of BUP; a subtherapeutic dose of BUP and TRZ (LOR-low); and a threshold-therapeutic dose of BUP and TRZ (LOR-mod). A midpoint interim analysis was planned to consider adapting doses for efficacy or safety. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary efficacy measure was the Female Sexual Function Index, Desire domain; the main secondary efficacy measures included the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised 13th item, on bother about low desire, and a Patient's Global Impression of Change. The main outcome comparison was the proportions of responders. Safety measures were elicited adverse events, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale 6-item SCREEN version, vital signs, electrocardiograms, and standard laboratory tests. RESULTS: Interim analysis did not require altering doses. Most evaluable subjects responded to LOR-mod (at the standard thresholds for response based on minimum clinically relevant difference from baseline, 79% on Female Sexual Function Index, Desire domain, 87% on Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised Item 13, and 79% on Patient's Global Impression of Change; each P < .05 vs BUP). As expected, close to half responded to BUP (38%, 45%, and 52%, respectively). Response to LOR-low was intermediate (not significant vs BUP). Sensitivity analyses to compensate for carryover effects supported the efficacy of LOR-mod. Elicited adverse events showed the expected profile of TRZ, but led to no sedative-type dropouts or worsening on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The open-label 1-way crossover design of this phase IB/IIA study limits conclusions, but the consistency of responder analyses showing superiority of LOR-mod dose over control, and the lack of central depressant dropouts, favor further development in double-blind placebo-control trials. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: Strengths include large margins of efficacy over control agent, rapid onset of action, and rigorous safety assessment. Limitations are open-label, cross-over design/lack of placebo control and 1-month duration of exposure. CONCLUSION: Moderate-dose LOR was generally well-tolerated and was significantly more effective than BUP (active control). The results seem highly favorable compared to previously tested agents. Pyke RE, Clayton AH. Dose-Finding Study of Lorexys for Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in Premenopausal Women. J Sex Med 2019;16:1885-1894.

Responder Analyses from a Phase 2b Dose-Ranging Study of Bremelanotide.

BACKGROUND: Responder analyses are used to determine whether changes that occur during a clinical trial are clinically meaningful; for subjective endpoints such as those based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), responder analyses are particularly useful. AIM: To identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for selected scores on questionnaires assessing female sexual functioning and to use these differences to analyze the response in a large, controlled, phase 2b, dose-finding study of bremelanotide in premenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) and mixed HSDD/female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD). METHODS: The responder analyses were performed for the change from baseline to end of study for a total of 7 endpoints. Each PRO endpoint was assessed using at least 1 of 4 types of responder analyses: a planned analysis anchored to MCIDs based on expert estimates (historical anchors); post hoc analyses based on self-reported global benefit; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves; and cumulative distribution function. The prespecified analysis groups were all female sexual dysfunction (FSD)-based diagnoses (all study participants), those with HSDD alone, and a combined group of those with FSAD alone plus those with mixed HSDD/FSAD. Post hoc analyses were also performed for subjects with mixed HSDD/FSAD with a primary diagnosis of HSDD. OUTCOMES: MCIDs based on the ROC curves for changes in Female Sexual Function Index-desire domain, Female Sexual Distress Scale-Desire/Arousal/Orgasm (FSDS-DAO) total score, FSDS-DAO item 13 and 14 scores, and number of satisfying sexual events. RESULTS: Outcomes matched those based on input from clinical experts. For all 7 endpoints, responder rates at the 1.75 mg dose in the overall modified intention-to-treat population achieved statistical significance compared with placebo (P ≤ .03). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These responder definitions were subsequently used in the bremelanotide phase 3 registration studies (RECONNECT) that evaluated the safety and efficacy of the bremelanotide 1.75 mg subcutaneous dose in premenopausal women with HSDD. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: MCIDs for this study were based on changes from a single-blind phase to account for changes due to the placebo effect. These analyses were restricted to a study population composed only of premenopausal women with a clinical diagnosis of HSDD and/or FSAD and were based on data from the same clinical trial. CONCLUSION: Bremelanotide was safe and well tolerated and demonstrated significant improvement in efficacy vs placebo in the phase 2b trial. The multiple responder analyses offer a valuable approach for determining clinically important effects of bremelanotide for HSDD and FSAD. Althof S, Derogatis LR, Greenberg S, et al. Responder Analyses from a Phase 2b Dose-Ranging Study of Bremelanotide. J Sex Med 2019;16:1226-1235.

Effects of Timing of Flibanserin Administration Relative to Alcohol Intake in Healthy Premenopausal Women: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: Flibanserin is approved in the United States and Canada for the treatment of acquired, generalized, hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women. Sedation-related side effects are among the most prevalent adverse events. Although infrequent, hypotension and syncope remain safety concerns because of possible interaction of flibanserin with alcohol. AIM: To evaluate the impact of the timing of alcohol consumption on flibanserin safety and tolerability. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-treatment crossover study, 64 healthy premenopausal women (mean age 32.5 ± 8.7 years; range 20‒52 years) received once-daily flibanserin 100 mg or placebo during each of two 10-day treatment periods. Study medication was administered on days 1-3 to achieve steady state. On days 4, 6, 8, and 10, after a standard breakfast, participants consumed 0.4 g/kg ethanol (approximately equivalent to two 5-oz glasses of wine) administered with orange juice 2, 4, or 6 hours before taking study medication or orange juice alone (no ethanol) 2 hours before taking study medication. OUTCOMES: The primary endpoint was percentage of participants experiencing syncope or orthostatic hypotension-associated adverse events requiring medical intervention. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of hypotension, the incidence of orthostatic hypotension, and rates of adverse events of special interest (syncope, orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, and somnolence). RESULTS: 1 participant experienced a primary endpoint event (syncope) during treatment with placebo taken 4 hours after ethanol consumption. Within each ethanol dose-timing treatment, there were no statistically significant differences for flibanserin compared with placebo. Rates of hypotension were 53.3-66.7% after flibanserin dosing and 57.4-63.3% after placebo dosing. Rates for orthostatic hypotension were 0.0-5.0% after flibanserin dosing and 1.7-6.6% after placebo dosing. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Ethanol interaction with flibanserin was not observed in this study. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study provides information regarding the use of flibanserin after the consumption of moderate amounts of ethanol (0.4 g/kg). However, daytime administration of flibanserin is not consistent with the drug's indicated bedtime dosing. CONCLUSION: Flibanserin, at steady state taken 2, 4, or 6 hours after 0.4 g/kg of ethanol intake did not increase the incidence of hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, or syncope compared with either flibanserin alone or ethanol alone. Simon JA, Clayton AH, Kingsberg SA, et al. Effects of Timing of Flibanserin Administration Relative to Alcohol Intake in Healthy Premenopausal Women: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study. J Sex Med 2019;16:1779-1786.