Variation in Carotid Artery Stenosis Measurements Among Facilities Seeking Carotid Stenting Facility Accreditation.

BACKGROUND: Based on the inclusion criteria of clinical trials, the degree of cervical carotid artery stenosis is often used as an indication for stent placement in the setting of extracranial carotid atherosclerotic disease. However, the rigor and consistency with which stenosis is measured outside of clinical trials are unclear. In an agreement study using a cross-sectional sample, we compared the percent stenosis as measured by real-world physician operators to that measured by independent expert reviewers. METHODS: As part of the carotid stenting facility accreditation review, images were obtained from 68 cases of patients who underwent carotid stent placement. Data collected included demographics, stroke severity measures, and the documented degree of stenosis, termed operator-reported stenosis (ORS), by 34 operators from 14 clinical sites. The ORS was compared with reviewer-measured stenosis (RMS) as assessed by 5 clinicians experienced in treating carotid artery disease. RESULTS: The median ORS was 90.0% (interquartile range, 80.0%-90.0%) versus a median RMS of 61.1% (interquartile range, 49.8%-73.6%), with a median difference of 21.8% (interquartile range, 13.7%-34.4%), P<0.001. The median difference in ORS and RMS for asymptomatic versus symptomatic patients was not statistically different (24.6% versus 19.6%; P=0.406). The median difference between ORS and RMS for facilities granted initial accreditation was smaller compared with facilities whose accreditation was delayed (17.9% versus 25.5%, P=0.035). The intraclass correlation between ORS and RMS was 0.16, indicating poor agreement. If RMS measurements were used, 72% of symptomatic patients and 10% of asymptomatic patients in the population examined would meet the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services criteria for stent placement. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world operators tend to overestimate carotid artery stenosis compared with external expert reviewers. Measurements from facilities granted initial accreditation were closer to expert measurements than those from facilities whose accreditation was delayed. Since decisions regarding carotid revascularization are often based on percent stenosis, such measuring discrepancies likely lead to increased procedural utilization.

Outcome Evaluation of Repeat Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations.

BACKGROUND: Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for persistent cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) has generally favorable patient outcomes. However, reporting studies are limited by small patient numbers and single-institution biases. The purpose of this study was to provide the combined experience of multiple centers, in an effort to fully define the role of repeat SRS for patients with arteriovenous malformation. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients treated with repeat, single-fraction SRS between 1987 and 2022. Follow-up began at repeat SRS. The primary outcome was a favorable patient outcome, defined as a composite of nidus obliteration in the absence of hemorrhage or radiation-induced neurological deterioration. Secondary outcomes were obliteration, hemorrhage risk, and symptomatic radiation-induced changes. Competing risk analysis was performed to compute yearly rates and identify predictors for each outcome. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 505 patients (254 [50.3%] males; median [interquartile range] age, 34 [15] years) from 14 centers. The median clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up was 52 (interquartile range, 61) and 47 (interquartile range, 52) months, respectively. At last follow-up, favorable outcome was achieved by 268 (53.1%) patients (5-year probability, 50% [95% CI, 45%-55%]) and obliteration by 300 (59.4%) patients (5-year probability, 56% [95% CI, 51%-61%]). Twenty-eight patients (5.6%) experienced post-SRS hemorrhage with an annual incidence rate of 1.38 per 100 patient-years. Symptomatic radiation-induced changes were evident in 28 (5.6%) patients, with most occurring in the first 3 years. Larger nidus volumes (between 2 and 4 cm3, subdistribution hazard, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.44-0.86]; P=0.005; >4 cm3, subdistribution hazard, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.32-0.7]; P<0.001) and brainstem/basal ganglia involvement (subdistribution hazard, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.45-0.81]; P<0.001) were associated with reduced probability of favorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat SRS confers reasonable obliteration rates with a low complication risk. With most complications occurring in the first 3 years, extending the latency period to 5 years generally increases the rate of favorable patient outcomes and reduces the necessity of a third intervention.

Hemorrhage and Recurrence of Obliterated Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Although complete nidal obliteration of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM) is generally presumed to represent durable cure, postobliteration hemorrhage, and AVM recurrence have become increasingly recognized phenomena. The goal of the study was to define hemorrhage and nidal recurrence risks of obliterated AVMs treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study from the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation comprising AVM patients treated between 1987 and 2020. Patients with AVM obliteration on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were included. Outcomes were (1) hemorrhage and (2) AVM recurrence. Follow-up duration began at the time of AVM obliteration and was censored at subsequent hemorrhage, AVM recurrence, additional AVM treatment, or loss to follow-up. Annualized risk and survival analyses were performed. A sensitivity analysis comprising patients with AVM obliteration on magnetic resonance imaging or DSA was also performed for postobliteration hemorrhage. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 1632 SRS-treated patients with AVM obliteration on DSA. Pediatric patients comprised 15% of the cohort, and 42% of AVMs were previously ruptured. The mean imaging follow-up after AVM obliteration was 22 months. Among 1607 patients with DSA-confirmed AVM obliteration, 16 hemorrhages (1.0%) occurred over 2223 patient-years of follow-up (0.72%/y). Of the 1543 patients with DSA-confirmed AVM obliteration, 5 AVM recurrences (0.32%) occurred over 2071 patient-years of follow-up (0.24%/y). Of the 16 patients with postobliteration hemorrhage, AVM recurrence was identified in 2 (12.5%). In the sensitivity analysis comprising 1939 patients with post-SRS AVM obliteration on magnetic resonance imaging or DSA, 16 hemorrhages (0.83%) occurred over 2560 patient-years of follow-up (0.63%/y). CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial hemorrhage and recurrent arteriovenous shunting after complete nidal obliteration are rare in AVM patients treated with SRS, and each phenomenon harbors an annual risk of <1%. Although routine postobliteration DSA cannot be recommended to SRS-treated AVM patients, long-term neuroimaging may be advisable in these patients.

Patterns of prophylactic anticonvulsant use in spontaneous intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a practitioner survey.

BACKGROUND: The use of prophylactic anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this survey was to better characterize the current state of prophylactic ASM use in sICH and aSAH in North America. METHODS: US and Canadian neurosurgeons, neurologists, and interventional neuroradiologists with an interest in or expertise in the management of neurovascular disease were surveyed using an electronic survey tool. RESULTS: Seven hundred ninety-four survey requests were sent; responses were received from 103 (13%). The majority of respondents were neurosurgeons (84%). Thirty-eight percent of respondents self-identified as vascular neurosurgeons and 10% self-identified as neurocritical care specialists. Seventy-two percent were in academic practice. When asked their preference for ASM prophylaxis (aSAH, sICH, or both), the most common response was to use prophylaxis in both aSAH and sICH (43, 45%). Twenty-one (22%) did not use routine prophylaxis, while 22 (23%) used prophylaxis only in aSAH and 9 (9%) only in sICH. The majority of practitioners (35, 67%) who answered that they used ASM prophylaxis in sICH, used ASMs selectively. For aSAH, the vast majority (53, 82%) used prophylaxis for all patients. Respondents felt that they were more likely to use ASMs for sICH patients if the sICH was in a cortical location, supratentorial location, or was related to a structural abnormality (e.g., tumor, arteriovenous malformation) Levetiracetam (Keppra) was the most commonly used ASM (73, 99%). When asked whether the statement "Current AHA/ASA Guidelines recommend against the use of prophylactic anticonvulsants in spontaneous ICH" was true or false, 78 (83%) responded correctly that the recommendation is true. Only 24 respondents answered the question as to whether they would be willing to randomize sICH and/or aSAH patients to management with or without ASM prophylaxis. Of these, 13 (54%) said they would be willing to randomize sICH patients, while only 6 (25%) were willing to randomize aSAH patients. There were no statistically significant differences in responses to survey questions when analyzed by practice type (academic versus non-academic) or physician specialty (critical care versus non-critical care, or vascular neurology/neurosurgery versus other). CONCLUSION: The use of ASMs for seizure prophylaxis after sICH and aSAH remains widespread despite the lack of any specific evidence-based guideline to support the practice. A large-scale randomized controlled trial is needed to add clarity to the practice of prophylactic ASM use in patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage.

Risk Factors Associated with ICU-Specific Care in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies suggest routine postoperative intensive care unit (ICUs) stays in presumed high-risk neurosurgical procedures may be unnecessary. Our objective was to evaluate the risk factors associated with ICU-specific needs in patients undergoing elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing elective endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms was performed between January 2010 and January 2020 in a single academic medical center. Patient demographic information, aneurysm and treatment characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative complications, as well as ICU-specific needs, were abstracted. The primary outcome was ICU-specific needs. RESULTS: A total of 382 patient encounters in 344 unique patients were abstracted. 13.6% (52 of 382) of patient encounters had an ICU-specific need. Multivariate analysis revealed that age [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.07, p = 0.03], procedure duration greater 200 min (adjusted OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.34-5.88, p = 0.007), and any intraoperative complication (adjusted OR 20.41, CI 7.97-56.57, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of postoperative ICU-specific needs. The majority of ICU-specific needs (94%, 49 of 52) occurred within 6 h of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that age, procedure duration greater than or equal to 200 min, and intraoperative complication were independent predictors of postoperative ICU-specific needs in patients presenting for elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The majority of ICU-specific needs and associated complications occurred in the immediate postoperative period. This data can be used to help decide the appropriate postoperative level of care in this patient population.

Balloon-Assisted Roadmap Technique to Enable Flow Diversion of a High-Flow Direct Carotid-Cavernous Fistula.

BACKGROUND: The use of flow diverters as a first-line treatment for direct carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) is a relatively new approach in the neurointerventional field which allows obliteration of the fistula with less mass effect from coils in the cavernous sinus. Safe and successful deployment of a flow diverter requires adequate imaging of the parent vessel, which may be challenging in the setting of high-flow CCF without antegrade flow. OBJECTIVE: To facilitate adequate parent vessel imaging in the setting of high-flow CCF to enable the safe development of a flow diverter device. METHODS: Here we present the case of a patient with delayed presentation of post-traumatic direct CCF after a motor vehicle accident, with no antegrade flow past the fistulous connection. We used temporary balloon occlusion of the fistulous connection to enable road-map imaging of the parent vessel and flow-diverter placement. "Drag and drop" device opening in the middle cerebral artery facilitated better deployment of the flow-diverter against retrograde cavernous flow through the fistula. RESULTS: Temporary balloon occlusion of the fistulous connection was used to acquire a roadmap to facilitate safe deployment of a flow diverter and subsequent treatment of the CCF with transvenous coil embolization, with complete resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSION: Balloon-assisted roadmap use is a novel means of visualizing the parent vessel in direct CCF to facilitate safe flow diverter deployment.

Impact of General Anesthesia on Safety and Outcomes in the Endovascular Arm of Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: General anesthesia (GA) for endovascular therapy (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke may be associated with worse outcomes. METHODS: The Interventional Management of Stroke III trial randomized patients within 3 hours of acute ischemic stroke onset to intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator±EVT. GA use within 7 hours of stroke onset was recorded per protocol. Good outcome was defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale ≤2. A multivariable analysis adjusting for dichotomized National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS; 8-19 versus ≥20), age, and time from onset to groin puncture was performed. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-four patients were randomized to EVT, 269 (62%) were treated under local anesthesia and 147 (33.9%) under GA; 18 (4%) were undetermined. The 2 groups were comparable except for median baseline NIHSS (16 local anesthesia versus 18 GA; P<0.0001). The GA group was less likely to achieve a good outcome (adjusted relative risk, 0.68; confidence interval, 0.52-0.90; P=0.0056) and had increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted relative risk, 2.84; confidence interval, 1.65-4.91; P=0.0002). Those with medically indicated GA had worse outcomes (adjusted relative risk, 0.49; confidence interval, 0.30-0.81; P=0.005) and increased mortality (relative risk, 3.93; confidence interval, 2.18-7.10; P<0.0001) with a trend for higher mortality with routine GA. There was no significant difference in the adjusted risks of subarachnoid hemorrhage (P=0.32) or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (P=0.37). CONCLUSIONS: GA was associated with worse neurological outcomes and increased mortality in the EVT arm; this was primarily true among patients with medical indications for GA. Relative risk estimates, though not statistically significant, suggest reduced risk for subarachnoid hemorrhage and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage under local anesthesia. Although the reasons for these associations are not clear, these data support the use of local anesthesia when possible during EVT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00359424.

Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

PURPOSE: The aim of this updated statement is to provide comprehensive and evidence-based recommendations for management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: Writing group members used systematic literature reviews from January 1977 up to June 2014. They also reviewed contemporary published evidence-based guidelines, personal files, and published expert opinion to summarize existing evidence, indicate gaps in current knowledge, and when appropriate, formulated recommendations using standard American Heart Association criteria. The guideline underwent extensive peer review, including review by the Stroke Council Leadership and Stroke Scientific Statement Oversight Committees, before consideration and approval by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. RESULTS: Evidence-based guidelines are presented for the care of patients presenting with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The guidelines address presentation, natural history, epidemiology, risk factors, screening, diagnosis, imaging and outcomes from surgical and endovascular treatment.

Facility perception of nuclear cardiology accreditation: Results of an Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) survey.

BACKGROUND: The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act requires accreditation for all non-hospital suppliers of nuclear cardiology, nuclear medicine, and positron emission tomography (PET) studies as a condition of reimbursement. The perceptions of these facilities regarding the value and impact of the accreditation process are unknown. We conducted an electronic survey to assess the value of nuclear cardiology accreditation. METHODS: A request to participate in an electronic survey was sent to the medical and technical directors (n = 5,721) of all facilities who had received Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Nuclear/PET accreditation. Demographic information, as well as, opinions on the value of accreditation as it relates to 16 quality metrics was obtained. RESULTS: There were 664 (11.6%) respondents familiar with the accreditation process of which 26% were hospital-based and 74% were nonhospital-based. Of the quality metrics examined, the process was perceived as leading to improvements by a majority of all respondents for 10 (59%) metrics including report standardization, report completeness, guideline adherence, deficiency identification, report timeliness, staff knowledge, facility distinction, deficiency correction, acquisition standardization, and image quality. Overall, the global perceived improvement was greater for hospital-based facilities (63% vs 57%; P < .001). Ninety-five percent of respondents felt that accreditation was important. Hospital-based facilities were more likely to feel that accreditation demonstrates a commitment to quality (43% vs 33%, P = .029), while nonhospital-based facilities were more likely to feel accreditation is important for reimbursement (50% vs 29%, P≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Although the accreditation process is demanding, the results of the IAC survey indicate that the accreditation process has a positive perceived impact for the majority of examined quality metrics, suggesting the facilities find the process to be valuable.

Recanalization and clinical outcome of occlusion sites at baseline CT angiography in the Interventional Management of Stroke III trial.

PURPOSE: To use baseline computed tomographic (CT) angiography to analyze imaging and clinical end points in an Interventional Management of Stroke III cohort to identify patients who would benefit from endovascular stroke therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary clinical end point was 90-day dichotomized modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary end points were 90-day mRS score distribution and 24-hour recanalization. Prespecified subgroup was baseline proximal occlusions (internal carotid, M1, or basilar arteries). Exploratory analyses were subsets with any occlusion and specific sites of occlusion (two-sided α = .01). RESULTS: Of 656 subjects, 306 (47%) underwent baseline CT angiography or magnetic resonance angiography. Of 306, 282 (92%) had arterial occlusions. At baseline CT angiography, proximal occlusions (n = 220) demonstrated no difference in primary outcome (41.3% [62 of 150] endovascular vs 38% [27 of 70] intravenous [IV] tissue-plasminogen activator [tPA]; relative risk, 1.07 [99% confidence interval: 0.67, 1.70]; P = .70); however, 24-hour recanalization rate was higher for endovascular treatment (n = 167; 84.3% [97 of 115] endovascular vs 56% [29 of 52] IV tPA; P < .001). Exploratory subgroup analysis for any occlusion at baseline CT angiography did not demonstrate significant differences between endovascular and IV tPA arms for primary outcome (44.7% [85 of 190] vs 38% [35 of 92], P = .29), although ordinal shift analysis of full mRS distribution demonstrated a trend toward more favorable outcome (P = .011). Carotid T- or L-type occlusion (terminal internal carotid artery [ICA] with M1 middle cerebral artery and/or A1 anterior cerebral artery involvement) or tandem (extracranial or intracranial) ICA and M1 occlusion subgroup also showed a trend favoring endovascular treatment over IV tPA alone for primary outcome (26% [12 of 46] vs 4% [one of 23], P = .047). CONCLUSION: Significant differences were identified between treatment arms for 24-hour recanalization in proximal occlusions; carotid T- or L-type and tandem ICA and M1 occlusions showed greater recanalization and a trend toward better outcome with endovascular treatment. Vascular imaging should be mandated in future endovascular trials to identify such occlusions. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Venous thromboembolism in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke acute ischemic stroke population: incidence and patterns of prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE), represents a serious complication in hospitalized ischemic stroke patients. This study examines the incidence of VTE and the patterns of VTE prophylaxis in acute ischemic stroke patients deemed appropriate for VTE prophylaxis (nonambulatory) in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-S) study. METHODS: We analyzed data from 149,916 patients who were admitted with acute ischemic stroke and enrolled in GWTG-S from 1259 U.S. hospitals. Patient variables and site characteristics were analyzed in relation to reported administration of VTE prophylaxis. RESULTS: The overall rate of VTE prophylaxis in the analysis cohort was 93% (139,476/149,916). The median site prophylaxis rate was 95%, and prophylaxis rates ranged from 17% (1 site) to 100% (101 sites). Factors associated with increased likelihood of VTE prophylaxis in the multivariable model included history of atrial fibrillation/flutter, receipt of intravenous or intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator, and admission to an academic hospital. Increasing age, black race, and a history of peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, or stroke were associated with lower likelihood of prophylaxis. Patients receiving care in the Midwest were less likely to receive prophylaxis compared to other regions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high overall rate of VTE prophylaxis, VTE was found to occur in approximately 3% of GWTG-S patients. Reported rates of VTE prophylaxis differed among hospitals by region and hospital type, and among patients by age, race, and medical comorbidities.

Efficacy of NeuroFlo device in treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a well-established independent risk factor for stroke. We examined cerebral blood flow augmentation in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients with AF by performing secondary analysis of data from the Safety and Efficacy of NeuroFlo Technology in Ischemic Stroke (SENTIS) trial, a randomized controlled trial evaluating NeuroFlo treatment in stroke patients within 14 hours of symptom onset. We report subgroup analyses of outcomes in SENTIS patients with a history or new diagnosis of AF. Among patients with AF, those treated with NeuroFlo demonstrated significant improvement over those not treated for multiple end points: global efficacy end point (P=.030), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 versus 3-6 (P=.029), and stroke-related mortality (P=.015). There was a significant improvement in global end point for those aged 60 years or older (P=.042) and 80 years or older (P=.017), with a trend toward improvement for age 70 years or older (P=.055), and significant improvement in those who achieved good outcomes (mRS score 0-2 versus 3-6) at age 60 years or older (P=.038), 70 years or older (P=.022), and 80 years or older (P=.008). NeuroFlo treatment in stroke patients with AF resulted in significantly better outcomes compared with nontreated patients with AF. Collateral flow recruitment, maintenance of cerebral blood flow around stroke core, and improvement of penumbral blood flow are potential mechanisms for these improved outcomes. NeuroFlo may represent a valid therapeutic option for patients with AF and AIS, and therefore, future trials of the device are warranted.

Localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas from the spatial relationships of perimedullary vessels on standard MRI.

OBJECTIVE: The goal in this study was to explore the spatial relationship of perimedullary vessels visualized on MRI to localize the side and the site of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 30 consecutive patients diagnosed with SDAVF on MRI was undertaken. Two experienced reviewers blinded to all reports and angiographic images analyzed T2-weighted as well as postcontrast T1-weighted sequences. A focal prominent zone of perimedullary vessels with lateralization to one side in the thecal space was evaluated to locate the side and the site of the fistula. Spinal digital subtraction angiography served as the gold standard technique. RESULTS: Good interrater agreement (κ = 0.77) was shown for the diagnosis of SDAVF with perimedullary vessels on T2-weighted MRI. Flow voids on T2-weighted MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% CI 1.0-1.0) and an accuracy of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.95) to identify the presence of fistula. The flow voids on T2-weighted MRI also demonstrated 0.88 (95% CI 0.71-1.03) sensitivity and 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.92) accuracy to identify the side of SDAVF. Furthermore, flow voids on T2-weighted MRI showed 0.87 (95% CI 0.71-1.03) sensitivity and 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.95) accuracy to identify the site of SDAVF within 3 vertebral levels above or below the actual site. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated significant results (0.87 [95% CI 0.73-1.0]; p < 0.001) for flow voids on T2-weighted MRI to identify the site of shunts within 3 vertebral levels in the cranial or caudal direction. CONCLUSIONS: Spatial distribution of perimedullary vessels observed on standard MRI show promise to locate the side and the site of fistula in patients with SDAVF.

Nationwide trends in intensive care unit utilization in the elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple studies suggest routine post-operative intensive care unit (ICU) stays after endovascular treatment (EVT) of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is unnecessary, though rates of ICU utilization nationwide are unknown. We aim to evaluate rates and characteristics of ICU utilization in patients undergoing elective endovascular repair of UIAs. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing a nationwide private-payer database in the United States to evaluate the ICU utilization in patients undergoing elective endovascular repair of UIAs between 2005 and 2019. Demographics and pre-operative comorbidities as well as post-procedural complications and discharge status were compared. An analysis of charges and costs was also performed. RESULTS: Among 6218 patients who underwent elective EVT of a UIA, 4890 (78.6%) were admitted to the ICU post-operatively. There were no differences in age, sex, or Charlson comorbidity scores in patients admitted to the ICU post-operatively compared to those admitted elsewhere. ICU utilization was more common in urban locations compared to rural. 12.7% of patients had ICU-specific needs sufficient to be billed by a critical care provider. Total provider costs were significantly higher in patients utilizing the ICU post-operatively, even among uncomplicated patients with routine discharges. CONCLUSION: Most patients undergoing elective endovascular UIA repair in the United States are admitted to the ICU postoperatively. Only 12.7% have ICU needs, and these patients are predictable from pre-operative characteristics or peri-operative complications. Reducing ICU use in this subgroup of patients may be an important target to improve healthcare value in this patient population.

Safety and efficacy of endovascular versus microsurgical treatment of unruptured wide-necked middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a propensity score-matched analysis of the NeuroVascular Quality Initiative Quality Outcomes Database Cerebral Aneurysm Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Unruptured, wide-necked middle cerebral artery (WN-MCA) aneurysms have traditionally been considered ideal candidates for microsurgery (MS), although endovascular treatment (EVT) has dramatically increased in popularity with the advent of novel devices such as intrasaccular flow disruptors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MS versus EVT for unruptured WN-MCA aneurysms. METHODS: The NeuroVascular Quality Initiative Quality Outcomes Database (NVQI-QOD) Cerebral Aneurysm Registry, a multiinstitutional, prospectively collected procedural database, was queried for cases of unruptured WN-MCA aneurysms treated with MS or EVT between 2015 and 2022. A wide neck was defined as an aneurysm neck ≥ 4 mm or a dome/neck ratio ≤ 2. Demographics and aneurysm characteristics were queried. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to match aneurysm size, number of aneurysms treated, patient age, and aneurysm status. Safety outcomes were evaluated including intraoperative and postoperative complication rates. Aneurysm occlusion status and clinical outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge and the last follow-up were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 671 unruptured MCA aneurysms, 319 were wide necked. Thirty cases were excluded, as the aneurysm had been previously treated. Two hundred eighty-nine operations (203 EVT, 86 MS) in 282 patients satisfied inclusion criteria. After PSM, there were 86 operations in each group for analysis. The mean aneurysm width was 5.0 (EVT) versus 4.9 mm (MS; p = 0.285). Safety data showed similar intraoperative (7.0% EVT vs 3.5% MS, p = 0.496) and postoperative (4.7% vs 7%, p = 0.746) complication rates. The MS patients were more likely to have complete aneurysm occlusion at discharge (90.4% vs 58.8%, p < 0.001). In a limited subset of patients (52.9%) for whom outcome data were available, the EVT patients were more likely to have an mRS score 0 at discharge (50/59 [84.7%] vs 29/54 [53.7%], p < 0.0003] and at the last follow-up (36/55 [65.5%] vs 13/36 [36.1%], p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes a large, modern cohort of propensity score-matched patients who underwent treatment of unruptured WN-MCA aneurysms. Safety data on intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were similar in both treatment groups. MS was more likely to result in complete aneurysm occlusion at discharge. In a subset of patients with available outcome data, EVT was associated with better functional outcomes at discharge and the last follow-up. Given the lack of complete follow-up data and rates of retreatment, these results should be interpreted cautiously.

Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for persistent cerebral arteriovenous malformations in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the long-term outcomes and associated risks related to repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for persistent arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in pediatric patients. METHODS: Under the auspices of the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, this retrospective multicenter study analyzed pediatric patients who underwent repeat, single-session SRS between 1987 and 2022. The primary outcome variable was a favorable outcome, defined as nidus obliteration without hemorrhage or neurological deterioration. Secondary outcomes included rates and probabilities of hemorrhage, radiation-induced changes (RICs), and cyst or tumor formation. RESULTS: The cohort included 83 pediatric patients. The median patient age was 11 years at initial SRS and 15 years at repeat SRS. Fifty-seven children (68.7%) were managed exclusively using SRS, and 42 (50.6%) experienced hemorrhage prior to SRS. Median AVM diameter and volume were substantially different between the first (25 mm and 4.5 cm3, respectively) and second (16.5 mm and 1.6 cm3, respectively) SRS, while prescription dose and isodose line remained similar. At the 5-year follow-up evaluation from the second SRS, nidus obliteration was achieved in 42 patients (50.6%), with favorable outcome in 37 (44.6%). The median time to nidus obliteration and hemorrhage was 35.5 and 38.5 months, respectively. The yearly cumulative probability of favorable outcome increased from 2.5% (95% CI 0.5%-7.8%) at 1 year to 44% (95% CI 32%-55%) at 5 years. The probability of achieving obliteration followed a similar pattern and reached 51% (95% CI 38%-62%) at 5 years. The 5-year risk of hemorrhage during the latency period after the second SRS reached 8% (95% CI 3.2%-16%). Radiographically, 25 children (30.1%) had RICs, but only 5 (6%) were symptomatic. Delayed cyst formation occurred in 7.2% of patients, with a median onset of 47 months. No radiation-induced neoplasia was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study results showed nidus obliteration in most pediatric patients who underwent repeat SRS for persistent AVMs. The risks of symptomatic RICs and latency period hemorrhage were quite low. These findings suggest that repeat radiosurgery should be considered when treating pediatric patients with residual AVM after prior SRS. Further study is needed to define the role of repeat SRS more fully in this population.

Effect of cerebral arteriovenous malformation location on outcomes of repeat, single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery: a matched-cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with deep-seated arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) have a higher rate of unfavorable outcome and lower rate of nidus obliteration after primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The aim of this study was to evaluate and quantify the effect of AVM location on repeat SRS outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study involved 505 AVM patients managed with repeat, single-session SRS. The endpoints were nidus obliteration, hemorrhage in the latency period, radiation-induced changes (RICs), and favorable outcome. Patients were split on the basis of AVM location into the deep (brainstem, basal ganglia, thalamus, deep cerebellum, and corpus callosum) and superficial cohorts. The cohorts were matched 1:1 on the basis of the covariate balancing score for volume, eloquence of location, and prescription dose. RESULTS: After matching, 149 patients remained in each cohort. The 5-year cumulative probability rates for favorable outcome (probability difference -18%, 95% CI -30.9 to -5.8%, p = 0.004) and AVM obliteration (probability difference -18%, 95% CI -30.1% to -6.4%, p = 0.007) were significantly lower in the deep AVM cohort. No significant differences were observed in the 5-year cumulative probability rates for hemorrhage (probability difference 3%, 95% CI -2.4% to 8.5%, p = 0.28) or RICs (probability difference 1%, 95% CI -10.6% to 11.7%, p = 0.92). The median time to delayed cyst formation was longer with deep-seated AVMs (deep 62 months vs superficial 12 months, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: AVMs located in deep regions had significantly lower favorable outcomes and obliteration rates compared with superficial lesions after repeat SRS. Although the rates of hemorrhage in the latency period and RICs in the two cohorts were comparable, delayed cyst formation occurred later in patients with deep-seated AVMs.

Conscious sedation by sedation-trained interventionalists versus anesthesia providers in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate choice of perioperative sedation during endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke is unknown. Few studies have evaluated the role of nursing-administered conscious sedation supervised by a trained interventionalist. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke performed with nursing-administered conscious sedation supervised by a trained interventionalist with monitored anesthesia care supervised by an anesthesiologist. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected stroke registry was performed. The primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin score of 0-2. Propensity score matching was performed to control for known confounders including patient comorbidities, access type, and direct-to-suite transfers. RESULTS: A total of 355 patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion between 2018 and 2022. Thirty five patients were excluded as they arrived at the endovascular suite intubated. Three hundred and twenty patients were included in our study, 155 who underwent endovascular thrombectomy with nursing-administered conscious sedation and 165 who underwent endovascular thrombectomy with monitored anesthesia care. After propensity score matching, there were 111 patients in each group. There was no difference in modified Rankin score 0-2 at 90 days (26.1% vs 35.1%, p = 0.190). Patients undergoing monitored anesthesia care received significantly more vasoactive medications (23.4% vs 49.5%, p < 0.001) and had a lower intraoperative minimum systolic blood pressure (134 vs 123 mmHg, p < 0.046). There was no difference in procedural efficacy, safety, intubation rates, and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Perioperative sedation with nursing-administered conscious sedation may be safe and effective in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke.