Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Pharm Pharm Sci ; 18(1): 61-7, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25877442

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The therapeutic equivalence of multiple registered fenofibrate formulations, several of which are suprabioavailable and therefore marketed at lower dosage strengths than their reference products, is based on the results of bioequivalence studies. Most of these formulations show a higher bioavailability when taken with a high-fat meal. The relative bioavailability of two of these formulations, the 200 mg Lidose hard capsules and the 145 mg nanoparticle tablets, was assessed when taken with a high-fat meal. METHODS: In this single dose, 2-way, randomized, crossover study, 24 healthy subjects received a 200 mg fenofibrate Lidose hard capsule (Test) and a 145 mg nanoparticle tablet (Reference) under high-fat fed conditions. Plasma concentrations of fenofibric acid were measured up to 72 hours by using a validated LC-MS/MS method. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (Test/Reference) and the 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-t and Cmax were 1.37 (131.58 - 142.88) and 1.38 (124.60 - 152.93), respectively. The median (range) Tmax- values of fenofibric acid were 4.5 h (3.0 - 8.0 h) and 3.25 h (1.0 - 6.5 h) after administration of the Lidose hard capsule and the nanoparticle tablet, respectively. CONCLUSION: Under high-fat fed conditions the extent of fenofibrate absorption was 37% higher for the 200 mg Lidose hard capsule compared to the 145 mg nanoparticle tablet, which is exactly as expected based on a mg-to-mg weight basis. The results of the present study underline the importance of assessing bioequivalence of fenofibrate formulations under identical fed conditions, and preferentially after a high-fat meal as this condition represents the worst-case scenario. Furthermore, the results of this study demonstrate that the 145 mg nanoparticle tablet is not bioequivalent to the 200 mg Lidose hard capsule when administered under high-fat meal conditions.


Assuntos
Gorduras na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Fenofibrato/análogos & derivados , Hipolipemiantes/farmacocinética , Nanopartículas , Adolescente , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Disponibilidade Biológica , Cápsulas , Cromatografia Líquida/métodos , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Fenofibrato/administração & dosagem , Fenofibrato/farmacocinética , Humanos , Hipolipemiantes/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Comprimidos , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos , Equivalência Terapêutica , Adulto Jovem
2.
Nutrients ; 14(15)2022 Jul 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35893907

RESUMO

Retrospective studies showed a relationship between vitamin D status and COVID-19 severity and mortality, with an inverse relation between SARS-CoV-2 positivity and circulating calcifediol levels. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the length of hospital stay and clinical improvement in patients with vitamin D deficiency hospitalized with COVID-19. The study was randomized, double blind and placebo controlled. A total of 50 subjects were enrolled and received, in addition to the best available COVID therapy, either vitamin D (25,000 IU per day over 4 consecutive days, followed by 25,000 IU per week up to 6 weeks) or placebo. The length of hospital stay decreased significantly in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (4 days vs. 8 days; p = 0.003). At Day 7, a significantly lower percentage of patients were still hospitalized in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (19% vs. 54%; p = 0.0161), and none of the patients treated with vitamin D were hospitalized after 21 days compared to 14% of the patients treated with placebo. Vitamin D significantly reduced the duration of supplemental oxygen among the patients who needed it (4 days vs. 7 days in the placebo group; p = 0.012) and significantly improved the clinical recovery of the patients, as assessed by the WHO scale (p = 0.0048). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the clinical outcome of COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization was improved by administration of vitamin D.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Colecalciferol/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Método Duplo-Cego , Hospitalização , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vitamina D , Vitaminas/uso terapêutico
3.
Nutrients ; 10(6)2018 May 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29882841

RESUMO

We aimed to determine whether a cumulative dose of vitamin D3 produces the same effects on the serum concentration of 25(OH)D3 if it is given daily or monthly. This is a monocentric, two-armed, randomized, interventional, open, and parallel study conducted from November 2016 to March 2017 in Belgium. We randomized 60 subjects with vitamin D deficiency to receive 2000 IU vitamin D3 daily or 50,000 IU monthly. The same cumulative dose of vitamin D3 was given to each treatment group (150,000 IU). The 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations from baseline to day 75 were 14.3 ± 3.7 to 27.8 ± 3.9 ng/mL in the monthly group and 14.1 ± 3.4 to 28.8 ± 5.4 ng/mL in the daily group. The mean change versus the baseline level was significantly different between the groups at day 2, 4, 7, and 14 and no longer different from day 25. One day after the intake of vitamin D3, as expected, serum 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 increased significantly in the monthly group, whereas they did not change significantly in the daily group. The median time to reach the 20 ng/mL target concentration was significantly different in the two groups, in favor of the monthly regimen (1 day versus 14 days; p = 0.02). In conclusion, a monthly administration of 50,000 IU vitamin D3 provides an effective tool for a rapid normalization of 25(OH)D3 in deficient subjects. A daily administration of the same cumulative dose is similarly effective but takes two weeks longer to reach the desirable level of 20 ng/mL.


Assuntos
Colecalciferol/administração & dosagem , Suplementos Nutricionais , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Bélgica , Biomarcadores/sangue , Calcifediol/sangue , Colecalciferol/sangue , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fator de Crescimento de Fibroblastos 23 , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Regulação para Cima , Deficiência de Vitamina D/sangue , Deficiência de Vitamina D/diagnóstico , Adulto Jovem
4.
Nutrients ; 8(5)2016 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27213447

RESUMO

Vitamin D3 is known to be liposoluble and its release could be a factor limiting the rate of absorption. It was presumed that the presence of fat could favor absorption of vitamin D3. However, as bioavailability is related not only to the active molecules but also to the formulations and excipients used, the optimization of the pharmaceutical form of vitamin D3 is also important. The objective of this study was to evaluate if there is a food effect on absorption when a high dose of vitamin D3 is completely solubilized in an oily solution. In the present cross-over study, 88 subjects were randomized and received a single dose of 50,000 IU of vitamin D3 in fasting state or with a standardized high-fat breakfast. Assessment of serum concentrations of 25 hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) was performed three, five, seven, 14, 30 and 60 days after supplementation. In fed and fast conditions, the 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations were significantly higher than the baseline value three days after administration and remained significantly higher during the first month. No significant difference between fasting vs. fed conditions was observed. It is therefore concluded that the vitamin D3 absorption from an oily solution was not influenced by the presence or absence of a meal.


Assuntos
Calcifediol/sangue , Colecalciferol/administração & dosagem , Gorduras na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Suplementos Nutricionais , Interações Alimento-Droga , Adulto , Bélgica , Disponibilidade Biológica , Biomarcadores/sangue , Desjejum , Colecalciferol/sangue , Colecalciferol/farmacocinética , Estudos Cross-Over , Gorduras na Dieta/metabolismo , Feminino , Absorção Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Prandial , Adulto Jovem
5.
Clin Ther ; 26(11): 1774-82, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15639689

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Opioid analgesics may be a useful alternative in patients with osteoarthritis who have not responded to first-line treatment with acetaminophen and in whom nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are contraindicated, ineffective, or poorly tolerated. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of tramadol LP 200 mg, a new once-daily,sustained-release formulation, with those of placebo in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee (European League Against Rheumatism criteria) were randomized to receive either tramadol LP 200 mg once daily or placebo for 14 days. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to the end of the study in scores on the Huskisson visual analog scale for pain. Secondary end points were change in the Lequesne functional discomfort index, global efficacy assessed by the patient and the investigator, time to improvement, and use of acetaminophen as rescue analgesic medication. Global tolerability was assessed by both patients and investigators at the end of the study The number and severity of adverse events occurring during the study and for 2 weeks thereafter were also recorded. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty patients (167 women, 63 men) were evaluable for efficacy and safety Demographic data for the tramadol and placebo groups were as follows: mean (SD) age, 67.1 (7.1) and 66.4 (92) years, respectively; female sex, 72.1% and 73.1%; and mean body weight, 74.7 (13.6) and 74.6 (14.8) kg. All patients were white. The completer analysis included 197 patients (85 tramadol, 112 placebo). Pain was significantly reduced in the tramadol LP group compared with the placebo group on day 7 (P = 0.002) and day 14 (P = 0.010). In the patient's assessment of global efficacy, 77.6% (66) of the tramadol LP group reported improvement by day 14, compared with 59.8% (67) of the placebo group; in the investigator's assessment, the efficacy of tramadol LP was rated very good or good for 612% (52) of patients, compared with 30.4% (34) for placebo. Improvement was reported before day 7 in 882% (75) of patients in the tramadol LP group, compared with 65.2% (73) in the placebo group (P = 0.021); the mean time from the initiation of treatment to reported improvement was 3 days for tramadol LP and 6 days for placebo (P < 0.001). Rates of response (defined as > or =30% pain reduction between days 0 and 14) were 64.7% (55) for tramadol LP and 50.0% (56) for placebo (P = 0.039); no rescue medication was used by 60.0% (51) of the tramadol LP group and 36.6% (41) of the placebo group (P - 0.001). One or more adverse event was reported by 45.0% (50) of the tramadol LP group, compared with 193% (23) of the placebo group (P < 0.001). As would be expected with an opiate agonist such as tramadol, the most common adverse events with this agent involved the gastrointestinal system (nausea, 22.5% [25] of patients; vomiting, 17.1% [19]) and the central nervous system (somnolence, 11.7% [13]). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, tramadol LP 200 mg was significantly more effective than placebo in alleviating pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. It appeared to be relatively well tolerated for an opioid compound.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Osteoartrite do Quadril/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoartrite do Joelho/tratamento farmacológico , Tramadol/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tramadol/administração & dosagem , Tramadol/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa