Corticotropin releasing factor in the nucleus basalis of Meynert impairs attentional performance and reduces levels of glutamate and taurine in male and female rats.

Psychiatric disorders that are characterized by impairments in sustained attention, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and major depression are also sensitive to exacerbation by stress. Sustained attention relies on cholinergic and non-cholinergic projections from the nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) in the basal forebrain to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). We have previously shown that central administration of the stress neuropeptide corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) impairs performance on the sustained attention task (SAT) in adult male and female rats. The present study investigated whether this effect was mediated by CRF's action in the NBM. Rats were administered CRF in the NBM and subsequent SAT performance was measured. A high dose of CRF (100 ng) significantly impaired performance on non-signaled events across sex. Because performance on non-signaled events is believed to depend on non-cholinergic (i.e., GABA and glutamate) signaling, high performance liquid chromatography was used to quantify amino acid levels in the NBM and mPFC. We found females have higher levels of glutamate, glutamine, GABA glycine, and alanine in the NBM than males. Importantly, CRF in the NBM led to a local decrease of taurine and several amino acids involved in glutamate synthesis in males and females, changes which may mediate the CRF-induced SAT performance deficit. Together these studies suggest that CRF regulation of amino acids in the NMB contributes to stress-induced attention deficits.

Sex differences in corticotropin releasing factor-evoked behavior and activated networks.

Hypersecretion of corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) is linked to the pathophysiology of major depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, disorders that are more common in women than men. Notably, preclinical studies have identified sex differences in CRF receptors that can increase neuronal sensitivity to CRF in female compared to male rodents. These cellular sex differences suggest that CRF may regulate brain circuits and behavior differently in males and females. To test this idea, we first evaluated whether there were sex differences in anxiety-related behaviors induced by the central infusion of CRF. High doses of CRF increased self-grooming more in female than in male rats, and the magnitude of this effect in females was greater when they were in the proestrous phase of their estrous cycle (higher ovarian hormones) compared to the diestrous phase (lower ovarian hormones), which suggests that ovarian hormones potentiate this anxiogenic effect of CRF. Brain regions associated with CRF-evoked self-grooming were identified by correlating a marker of neuronal activation, cFOS, with time spent grooming. In the infralimbic region, which is implicated in regulating anxiety, the correlation for CRF-induced neuronal activation and grooming was positive in proestrous females, but negative for males and diestrous females, indicating that ovarian hormones altered this relationship between neuronal activation and behavior. Because CRF regulates a number of regions that work together to coordinate different aspects of responding to stress, we then examined more broadly whether CRF-activated functional connectivity networks differed between males and cycling females. Interestingly, hormonal status altered correlations for CRF-induced neuronal activation between a variety of brain regions, but the most striking differences were found when comparing proestrous females to males, particularly when comparing neuronal activation between prefrontal cortical and other forebrain regions. These results suggest that ovarian hormones alter the way brain regions work together in response to CRF, which could drive different strategies for coping with stress in males versus females. These sex differences in stress responses could also help explain female vulnerability to psychiatric disorders characterized by CRF hypersecretion.

Searching the animal psyche with Charles Le Brun.

Around 1670 the French court painter and Academician Charles Le Brun produced a series of drawings featuring naturalistic animal heads, as well as imaginary heads in which he refashioned various nonhuman animal species to make humanoid physiognomies. What were the purpose and significance of these unusual works? I argue that they show Le Brun's interest in what we today would call animal psychology: focusing upon the sensory organs and their connections with the animal's brain, Le Brun studied his animals as conscious protagonists of the natural realm. One source that may have served him in this project was Marin Cureau de La Chambre's De la Connoissance des bestes of 1645, in which the physician argued that animals possess a conscious soul grounded in the senses. However, Le Brun's animal-humans have no clear place in the artist's taxonomy--nor, indeed, in any seventeenth-century understandings of species. It is rather John Locke, at his most skeptical, who offers the best parallel in the realm of natural philosophy to Le Brun's unsettling animal-humans. Probably without meaning to, Le Brun demonstrated through his eerie, boundary-crossing creatures the limits of visual classification.