Frequency and determinants of disagreement and error in gleason scores: a population-based study of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: To examine factors that affect accuracy and reliability of prostate cancer grade we compared Gleason scores documented in pathology reports and those assigned by urologic pathologists in a population-based study. METHODS: A stratified random sample of 318 prostate cancer cases was selected to ensure representation of whites and African-Americans and to include facilities of various types. The slides borrowed from reporting facilities were scanned and the resulting digital images were re-reviewed by two urologic pathologists. If the two urologic pathologists disagreed, a third urologic pathologist was asked to help arrive at a final "gold standard" result. The agreements between reviewers and between the pathology reports and the "gold standard" were examined by calculating kappa statistics. The determinants of discordance in Gleason scores were evaluated using multivariate models with results expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The kappa values (95% CI) reflecting agreement between the pathology reports and the "gold standard," were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.68) for biopsies, and 0.37 (0.23, 0.51) for prostatectomies. Sixty three percent of discordant biopsies and 72% of discordant prostatectomies showed only minimal differences. Using freestanding laboratories as reference, the likelihood of discordance between pathology reports and expert-assigned biopsy Gleason scores was particularly elevated for small community hospitals (OR = 2.98; 95% CI: 1.73, 5.14). CONCLUSIONS: The level of agreement between pathology reports and expert review depends on the type of diagnosing facility, but may also depend on the level of expertise and specialization of individual pathologists.

MutL-homolog 1 expression and risk of incident, sporadic colorectal adenoma: search for prospective biomarkers of risk for colorectal cancer.

To characterize the expression of the mismatch repair gene MutL-homolog 1 (MLH1) in normal colorectal crypts in humans, and assess parameters of its expression as a potential biomarker of risk for colorectal neoplasms, we conducted a pilot, colonoscopy-based case-control study (51 cases, 154 controls) of incident, sporadic colorectal adenoma. Biopsies of normal-appearing rectal, sigmoid, and ascending colon mucosa were procured, immunohistochemically processed for MLH1 protein, and analyzed using custom quantitative image analysis procedures. MLH1 expression in the ascending colon was, on average, 49% proportionally lower in cases than controls (P = 0.03), but there was little evidence for case-control differences in the rectum and sigmoid colon. In cases and controls, average MLH1 expression in the ascending colon tended to be lower with increased age [by 56% (P = 0.02) and 25% (P = 0.16), respectively, for those > or =55 years], and with a history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative (by 22% [P = 0.56] and 34% [P = 0.16], respectively). Among cases, but not controls, average MLH1 expression tended to be higher with current alcohol consumption, regular aspirin use, and higher total intakes of calcium, vitamin D, and folate. There was little indication of similar differences in the rectum. These preliminary data suggest that lower MLH1 expression in the normal colonic mucosa, at least in the ascending colon, may be associated with increased risk of incident, sporadic colorectal adenoma, as well as with modifiable risk factors for colorectal neoplasms, thus supporting further investigation of MLH1 expression as a potential "treatable" biomarker of risk for colorectal neoplasms.

Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on markers of apoptosis in normal colon mucosa: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

To further clarify and/or develop calcium and vitamin D as chemopreventive agents against colorectal cancer in humans, understand the mechanisms by which these agents reduce risk for the disease, and develop "treatable" biomarkers of risk for colorectal cancer, we conducted a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 x 2 factorial clinical trial to test the effects of calcium and vitamin D3, alone and in combination on markers of apoptosis, in the normal colorectal mucosa. Ninety-two men and women with at least one pathology-confirmed colorectal adenoma were treated with 2.0 g/d calcium or 800 IU/d vitamin D3, alone or in combination, versus placebo over 6 months. Overall expression and colorectal crypt distributions of Bcl-2 (an apoptosis inhibitor) and Bax (an apoptosis promoter) in biopsies of normal-appearing rectal mucosa were detected by automated immunohistochemistry and quantified by image analysis. After 6 months of treatment, Bax expression along the full lengths of crypts increased 56% (P = 0.02) in the vitamin D group and 33% in both the calcium (P = 0.31) and calcium plus vitamin D (P = 0.36) groups relative to the placebo group. The vitamin D treatment effect was more pronounced in the upper 40%, or differentiation zone, of crypts (80%; P = 0.01). There were no statistically significant treatment effects on Bcl-2 expression. Overall, these preliminary results suggest that calcium and vitamin D, individually or together, may enhance apoptosis in the normal human colorectal epithelium, and the strongest treatment effects may be vitamin D related and in the upper sections of the colorectal crypts.

Detecting and quantifying biomarkers of risk for colorectal cancer using quantum dots and novel image analysis algorithms.

Colorectal cancer, the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, is a molecular disease that is largely lifestyle determined and preventable. While heart disease has been sharply declining, in large part from widespread use of biological measurements that indicate risk ("biomarkers of risk"), such as blood cholesterol, to motivate and guide preventive treatment, colorectal cancer is a disease for which mortality rates have changed little and for which there have been no biomarkers of risk. Based on new knowledge about the molecular basis of colorectal cancer we developed and validated a panel of treatable biomarkers of risk that can be measured in rectal biopsies using automated immunohistochemistry and semi-automated image analysis. The methodology is now being made practical for clinical application through the use of 1) quantum dots, so that all of the biomarkers can be detected simultaneously on the same histologic sections (i.e., multiplexed), and 2) novel, automated image analysis algorithms to measure the quantities and tissue distributions of the biomarkers. Herein we summarize our methods, results, current directions, and progress.