UK 2022 Consensus on Normal Tissue Dose-Volume Constraints for Oligometastatic, Primary Lung and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the UK has expanded over the past decade, in part as the result of several UK clinical trials and a recent NHS England Commissioning through Evaluation programme. A UK SABR Consortium consensus for normal tissue constraints for SABR was published in 2017, based on the existing literature at the time. The published literature regarding SABR has increased in volume over the past 5 years and multiple UK centres are currently working to develop new SABR services. A review and update of the previous consensus is therefore appropriate and timely. It is hoped that this document will provide a useful resource to facilitate safe and consistent SABR practice.

FISHing Tips: What Every Clinician Should Know About 1p19q Analysis in Gliomas Using Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation.

1p19q co-deletion is a chromosomal alteration associated with primary brain tumours of oligodendroglial histology. It is an established predictive and prognostic biomarker that informs whether patients are offered radiotherapy, chemotherapy or both. In the near future, 1p19q co-deletion status may also be incorporated into the reclassification of gliomas. Analysis is commonly carried out using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) because it is a reliable and validated laboratory technique. The result is generally considered to be dichotomous (1p19q co-deletion present or absent), but there are subtleties in interpretation that are of clinical relevance. Separate centres may interpret certain chromosome deletion patterns differently. Pivotal trials in mixed and pure anaplastic oligodendrogliomas have used slightly different FISH probe ratios as the cut-off for chromosome deletion. Here we review the clinical implications of this variability and review the process of 1p19q co-deletion assessment using FISH in gliomas from a clinician's perspective. We also consider common alternative methods of analysis.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective review of demographics, treatment and patient outcome in a single centre.

AIMS: Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is relatively uncommon, especially in the Western world. We report our single institution experience of 20 years of data in 128 patients with NPC, including responses to different treatment modalities and outcomes by histological subtype. MATERIALS AND METHODS: NPC patients presenting from 1992 to 2005 were located on the cancer registry database. Demographic data included age, gender, length of presenting symptoms and stage. World Health Organization classification (2005) was used for histological subtyping. The date of recurrence and survival outcomes were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Presentation data were analysed from 128 patients; the survival analysis included 123 patients. The median age at presentation was 57.7 years. Stage III and IV presentation rates were 34 and 38%, respectively. The most common presenting symptom was a palpable neck lump (55%) and the median duration of symptoms was 16 weeks. Forty-eight patients received radiotherapy alone and 75 received chemoradiotherapy. The median overall survival in chemoradiotherapy patients was 80.3 months versus 28.5 months with radiotherapy alone (P = 0.003). A significant difference was also seen with recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.017). Type 1 keratinising carcinoma had a significantly worse overall survival (P = 0.04) and a similar but non-statistically significant trend was seen for RFS (P = 0.051). The multivariate analysis for overall survival showed that histological subtype (hazard ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.3-5.5, P = 0.034), age (hazard ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1-4.9, P = 0.018) and N stage (hazard ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-9.4, P = 0.024) were prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first large-scale, single-centre retrospective review of NPC in a UK-based population. Demographic data were similar to that in other Western populations, with a significantly worse survival outcome in the keratinising group. Further prospective study of outcome in Western populations accounting for newer radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and dose escalation, particularly in the keratinising population who were more likely to present with an isolated local recurrence, is recommended.