The transnasal endoscopic approach for resection of clival tumors: a single-center experience.

Clival tumors present challenging entities regarding their treatment options. Due to their proximity to critical neurovascular structures, the operative goal of gross total tumor resection is rendered more difficult by a high risk of neurological deficits. Retrospective cohort study of patients treated for clival neoplasms through a transnasal endoscopic approach between 2009 and 2020. Assessment of preoperative clinical status, length of operation, number of approaches, pre- and postoperative radiotherapy, and the clinical outcome. Presentation and clinical correlation with our new classification. In total, 59 transnasal endoscopic operations were performed on 42 patients over 12 years. Most lesions were clival chordomas; 63% of the lesions did not reach the brainstem. Cranial nerve impairment was present in 67% of the patients, and 75% of the patients with cranial nerve palsy improved after surgical treatment. Interrater reliability for our proposed tumor extension classification showed a substantial agreement (Cohen's κ = 0.766). The transnasal approach was sufficient to achieve a complete tumor resection in 74% of the patients. Clival tumors exhibit heterogeneous characteristics. Depending on clival tumor extension, the transnasal endoscopic approach can present a safe surgical technique for upper and middle clival tumor resection, with a low risk of perioperative complications and a high rate of postoperative improvement.

Secondary Primary Cancer Risk After Radiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether radiation therapy (RT) has an impact on the development of secondary primary cancer (SC) in rectal cancer (RC) patients, especially within the true pelvis. AIM: To examine the incidence of SC in a population-based cohort of RC after surgical treatment with or without radiation therapy (RT, NRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The epidemiological cohort consisting of 13,919 RC patients with primary M0 stage diagnosed between 1998 and 2019 was collected from cancer registry data of Upper Bavaria. Competing risk analyses were conducted regarding the development of SC on 11 687 first malignancies, stratified by RT/NRT. A propensity score (PS) was generated by logistic regression modeling of RT to repeat competing risk analyses on a PS-matched cohort. RESULTS: The median age (interquartile range) of the epidemiological cohort was 68.9 years (60.4-76.7). About 60.8%, were men, 38.7% had UICC III, 35.8% of tumors were localized lower than 8 cm, 41.3% underwent RT. Only 17.1% of patients older than 80 years at diagnosis received RT. In general, RT patients were 5 years younger than NRT patients (65.9 years [58.0-73.0] vs. 71.3 years [62.4-79.2], P < .0001). The 20-year cumulative incidence of SC was 16.5% in RT and 17.4% in NRT patients (P = .2298). Men with RT had a lower risk of prostate cancer (HR = 0.55, 95%CI [0.34-0.91], P = .0168). In the PS-matched cohort, RT patients had a significantly higher risk of bladder cancer during follow-up (10-year cumulative incidence of 1.1% vs. 0.6% in NRT). The direction of the RT effects in men and women and different tumor sites may cancel each other. CONCLUSION: A protective effect of RT in rectal cancer patients on developing prostate SC by half is reproduced. Further analyses studying the long-term SC risks of RT should essentially focus on stratification by sex, and focus on more recent data.

PET-directed combined modality therapy for gastroesophageal junction cancer: Results of the multicentre prospective MEMORI trial of the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK).

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) may differentiate responding and non-responding tumours early in the treatment of locally advanced gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. Early PET non-responders (P-NR) after induction CTX might benefit from changing to chemoradiation (CRT). METHODS: Patients underwent baseline 18F-FDG PET followed by 1 cycle of CTX. PET was repeated at day 14-21 and responders (P-R), defined as ≥35% decrease in SUVmean from baseline, continued with CTX. P-NR switched to CRT (CROSS). Patients underwent surgery 4-6 weeks post-CTX/CRT. The primary objective was an improvement in R0 resection rates in P-NR above a proportion of 70%. RESULTS: In total, 160 patients with resectable gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas were prospectively investigated by PET scanning. Eighty-five patients (53%) were excluded. Seventy-five eligible patients were enrolled in the study. Based on PET criteria, 50 (67.6%)/24 (32.4%) were P-R and P-NR, respectively. Resection was performed on 46 responders, including one patient who withdrew the ICF, and 22 non-responders (per-protocol population). R0 resection rates were 95.6% (43/45) for P-R and 86.4% (19/22) for P-NR. No treatment related deaths occurred. With a median follow-up time of 24.5 months, estimated 18 months DFS was 75.4%/64.2% for P-R/P-NR, respectively. The estimated 18 months OS was 95.5% for P-R and 68.2% for P-NR. CONCLUSION: The primary endpoint of the study to increase the R0 resection rate in metabolic NR was not met. PET response after induction CTX is prognostic for outcome with a prolonged OS and DFS in PET responders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00002014-000860-16.