Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 18(1): 390, 2017 Sep 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28893220

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal ultrasound improves the accuracy of detecting the level of disease activity (DA) in RA patients, although its impact on the final treatment decision in a real clinical setting is uncertain. The objectives were to define the percentage of clinical scenarios from an ongoing cohort of RA outpatients in which the German Ultrasound Score on 7 joints (GUS-7) impacted the treatment and to explore if the impact differed between a senior rheumatologist (SR) vs. a trainee (TR). METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive and randomly selected RA outpatients underwent 170 assessments, 85 each by the SR and the TR. Initially, both physicians (blinded to each other) performed a rheumatic assessment and recommended a preliminary treatment. Then, the patients underwent the GUS-7 evaluation by an experienced rheumatologist blinded to clinical evaluations; selected joints of the clinically dominant hand were assessed by gray-scale and power Doppler (PD). In the final step, the TR and the SR integrated the GUS-7 findings with their previous evaluation and reviewed their recommendations. The patients received the final recommendation from the SR to avoid patient confusion. The study was approved by the Internal Review Board and all the patients signed informed consent. GUS-7 usefulness was separately evaluated by the SR and the TR according to a visual analogue scale (0 = not useful at all, 10 = very useful). Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: The patients were primarily middle-aged females (91.4%) with (mean ± SD) disease duration of 7.5 ± 3.9 years. The majority of them (69.2% according to TR and 71.8% to SR) were in DAS28-ESR-remission. In 34 of 170 clinical scenarios (20%), the GUS-7 findings modified the final treatment proposal; 24 of these scenarios were determined by the TR vs. 10 by the SR: 70.5% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.01. Treatment changes (increase, decrease and joint injection) were similar between both specialists. As expected, the TR rated the GUS-7 usefulness higher than the SR, particularly in the clinical scenarios where the GUS-7 findings impacted treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal ultrasound added to standard rheumatic assessments impacted the treatment proposal in a limited number of patients; the impact was greater in the TR.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite Reumatoide/terapia , Competência Clínica/normas , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Médicos/normas , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 30(3): 402-8, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22510514

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Sustained remission (SR) is the target of treatment offered to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of the present paper is to describe predictors of favourable outcomes in a cohort of early RA patients. METHODS: Data from 89 patients with 3 years of consecutive assessments and traditional treatment were analysed. SR was defined as ≥ 6 consecutive months with 2011 ACR/EULAR remission criteria. Excellent outcome (EO) was defined according to patient's perception. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression models and Cox regression were used. RESULTS: At baseline, patients were predominantly females (n=78), had rheumatoid factor (n=70) and (mean ± SD) age of 38.8 ± 13.6 years. After (mean ± SD) 37.1 ± 2.5 months, 75 patients achieved ≥ 1 SR state and 35 an EO. The former had lower disease activity, disability and comorbidity and better functional status at baseline than their counterparts (p ≤ 0.05); they also accumulated lesser disability (p ≤ 0.03). Lower C-reactive protein and disease activity and lesser comorbidity predict SR (p ≤ 0.04). Patients with EO were younger, better educated, had lower disease activity, better functional status and lesser comorbidity at baseline than their counterparts (p ≤ 0.05). They achieved a first sustained remission state (p ≤ 0.001) sooner and accumulated lesser disability and incident erosive disease (p ≤ 0.002). Younger age and lower disease activity were prognosticators of EO (p ≤ 0.02). When age, baseline disease activity and time to first SR were investigated as predictors of EO, younger age (HR:0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.98, p=0.003) and earlier SR (HR:0.49, 95% CI: 0.39-0.61, p ≤ 0.001) were relevant. CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients with lower disease activity achieved earlier SR which, in addition to age, was predictor of EO.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idade de Início , Comorbidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 28(5): 748-51, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20863447

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate impact of persistence on therapy on sustained major patient-, physician- and laboratory-reported outcomes (PROs, PHYROs and LAROs, respectively) in 112 recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: At each visit a rheumatologist interviewed patients regarding therapy, morning stiffness and fatigue, scored the 28-joint disease activity score and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and determined acute-phase-reactants. The patients completed the Hispanic version of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index, the Medical Outcome Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), a pain-VAS and an overall-disease activity-VAS. Persistence was defined by self-report through directed interview. Sustained major PROs, PHYROs and LAROs were defined according to cut-offs, when maintained for ≥6 months and until last follow-up. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models were used. RESULTS: Total person-time of receiving therapy was of 375.5 patient-years. From February 2004 to June 2009, 36 (32.1%) patients were persistent. Baseline PROs/PHYROs/LAROs showed active disease and poor health status in both groups, but persistent patients (PP) had significantly lower HAQ (p=0.03) and overall-disease activity-VAS (p=0.01). More PP reached a sustained major SF-36-physical function-score (p=0.02). Persistence was the greatest independent risk factor for sustained major PROs (but absence of fatigue) and PHYROs, (p≤0.04). Time from baseline to major and sustained PROs (excluded absence of fatigue), PHYROs and C-reactive protein were shorter in PP (p≤0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Persistence was a strong predictor for major and sustained outcomes in early RA. Favourable outcomes appear earlier in persistent than in non-persistent patients.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Satisfação do Paciente , Adulto , Artrite Reumatoide/sangue , Artrite Reumatoide/fisiopatologia , Sedimentação Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Articulações/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa