Assessing the feasibility of yttria-stabilized zirconia in novel designs as mandibular anterior fixed lingual retention after orthodontic treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of yttria-stabilized zirconia (Y-TZP) in fixed lingual retention as an alternative to stainless steel. METHODS: Exploratory Y-TZP specimens were milled to establish design parameters. Next, the specimens were milled according to ASTM standard C1161-13 and subjected to 4-point flexural tests to determine material properties. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate 9 novel cross-sectional designs, which were compared with stainless steel wire. Each design was analyzed under loading conditions to determine von Mises and bond stresses. The most promising design was fabricated to assess the accuracy and precision of current CAD/CAM milling technology. RESULTS: The superior design had a 1.0 × 0.5 mm semielliptical cross-section and was shown to be fabricated reliably. Overall, the milling indicated a maximum percent standard deviation of 9.3 and maximum percent error of 13.5 with a cost of $30 per specimen. CONCLUSIONS: Y-TZP can be reliably milled to dimensions comparable with currently available metallic retainer wires. Further research is necessary to determine the success of the bonding protocol and the clinical longevity of Y-TZP fixed retainers. Advanced technology is necessary to connect the intraoral scan to an esthetic and patient-specific Y-TZP fixed retainer.

Normal and malaligned talonavicular fusion alters cadaveric foot pressure and kinematics.

Talonavicular (TN) fusion is a common treatment for TN arthritis or deformity correction. There is incongruous evidence regarding remaining motion at the talocalcaneal and calcaneocuboid joints after TN fusion. Additionally, the effects of a malaligned TN fusion are not well understood and alignment of the fusion may be important for overall foot integrity. This project assessed the kinematic and kinetic effects of neutral and malaligned TN fusions. Ten cadaveric feet were tested on a gait simulator in four conditions: unfused, fused in neutral, fused in varus, and fused in valgus. The fusions were simulated with external fixation hardware. An eight-camera motion analysis system and a 10-segment foot model generated kinematic data, and a pressure mat captured pressure data. Simulated TN fusion was achieved in eight feet. From unfused to fused-neutral, range of motion (ROM) was not eliminated in the adjacent joints, but the positions of the joints changed significantly throughout stance phase. Furthermore, the ROM increased at the tibiotalar joint. Plantar pressure and center of pressure shifted laterally with neutral fusion. The malalignments marginally affected the ROM but changed joint positions throughout stance phase. Pressure patterns were shifted laterally in varus malalignment and medially in valgus malalignment. The residual motion and the altered kinematics at the joints in the triple joint complex after TN fusion may subsequently increase the incidence of arthritis. Clinical significance: This study quantifies the effects of talonavicular fusion and malalignment on the other joints of the triple joint complex.

Anteroposterior Translational Malalignment of Ankle Arthrodesis Alters Foot Biomechanics in Cadaveric Gait Simulation.

Tibiotalar arthrodesis is a common surgical treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis. Proper ankle alignment is important as malalignment can lead to complications that may require revision surgery. This study aimed to determine how anteroposterior (AP) translational malalignment of ankle arthrodesis affects distal foot joint kinematics and plantar pressure. Ankle arthrodesis was performed on 10 cadaveric foot specimens using a custom fixture that could fuse the ankle neutrally and induce discrete malalignments (3, 6, and 9 mm) anteriorly and posteriorly. Gait was simulated under each alignment with a robotic gait simulator, and foot bone motion and plantar pressure were quantified. AP translational malalignment did not substantially affect plantar pressure or joint range of motion, but there were several significant differences in joint position throughout stance phase. Differences were seen in five joints (talocalcaneal, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid, fifth tarsometatarsal, and first metatarsophalangeal) and in the position of the first metatarsal relative to the talus. The most extreme effects occurred when the talus was displaced 6 mm or more posteriorly. In vivo, this may lead to aberrant joint loading, which could negatively impact patient outcomes. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:450-458, 2020.

Altered Range of Motion and Plantar Pressure in Anterior and Posterior Malaligned Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Gait Study.

BACKGROUND: Malaligned ankle arthroplasty components have been associated with increased postoperative pain and reduced ankle range of motion. With this study, we aimed to quantify how anterior and posterior malalignment of the talar component affects foot bone kinematics and plantar pressures in a dynamic, cadaveric gait simulation. METHODS: Ten cadaveric foot specimens received a modified ankle prosthesis. Proper alignment was defined as the prosthesis being neutral to a plantigrade foot, where varus/valgus and internal/external rotation were determined using the tibial alignment guide from the prosthesis manufacturer. Axially loaded lateral radiographs were made to measure the tibiotalar ratio (TTR) preoperatively and postoperatively. Specimens were prepared for gait simulation and mounted into the robotic gait simulator. Foot bone kinematics and plantar pressures were measured for each alignment condition. RESULTS: Posterior malalignment of the talar component decreased mean sagittal-plane range of motion (p ≤ 0.0005) in the tibiotalar joint (by up to 3.9°) and in the first metatarsophalangeal joint (by up to 7.7°) and increased sagittal-plane range of motion (p ≤ 0.0005) in the calcaneocuboid joint (by up to 2.0°). Posterior malalignment increased mean transverse-plane range of motion (p ≤ 0.0005 and p = 0.012) in the tibiotalar joint (by up to 2.3°) and in the calcaneocuboid joint (by 2.3°). Posterior malalignment decreased mean peak plantar pressures (p = 0.001 and p = 0.013) under the hallux and the first metatarsal (by up to 82.1 and 110.1 kPa, respectively) and increased (p = 0.012 and p = 0.0006) peak plantar pressures under the third metatarsal and the hindfoot (by 23.0 and 47.8 kPa, respectively). Anterior malalignment decreased (p = 0.0006) mean hindfoot peak plantar pressure (by 127.7 kPa). Anterior and posterior malalignments shifted center of pressure laterally during early and late stance. The TTR weakly to moderately correlated with range-of-motion changes in the tibiotalar, calcaneocuboid, and first metatarsophalangeal joints (r ≤ 0.39) and weakly correlated with plantar pressure changes under the hindfoot, the first metatarsal, and the hallux (r ≤ 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior and posterior malalignments of the talar component altered foot bone kinematics and plantar pressures. Mild malalignments produced fewer significant differences than moderate and extreme malalignments. A greater number of significant differences were found for posterior malalignments than for anterior. The TTR weakly to moderately correlated with changes in range of motion and plantar pressures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The observed changes in range of motion and plantar pressures may explain why malaligned ankle arthroplasties are associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes and poor prosthesis longevity. Posterior malalignments may produce worse clinical outcomes than anterior malalignments.