Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy: The Timeline of Progress.

AIM: To investigate the learning curve and perioperative outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy during the first 102 cases by a single surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed on the first 102 cases of single-site robotic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into five chronological groups based on the date of surgery, with 20 patients in each group except the 5th group which had 22 patients. The groups were compared by docking time, robotic dissection time, and overall surgery time. A P value of 0.05 was used as statistically significant. RESULTS: The female to male ratio was 2:1. The mean age was 51 years (18-87) and the mean BMI was 28.26 (18-41). Overall, 69 % of the patients underwent elective cholecystectomy and 31 % required urgent surgery. In all, 17 % of patients had previous abdominal surgeries. In total, 45 % of procedures were regarded as same day surgery. The total mean length of stay was 1.97 days (0-8). The mean operative time was 110 min (36-265), mean robotic console time 70 min (26-179), and mean docking time 9 min (1-26). The overall conversion rate was 3.9 % and the complication rate was 4 %. The docking time, robotic time, and average operative time were significantly different in the first group as compared to the remaining the five groups (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Single-site robotic cholecystectomy is safe in both elective and urgent conditions, and in patients with previous abdominal surgeries. It has a short learning curve.

Complications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery are rare and minor: a single institution's analysis and comparison to existing data.

BACKGROUND: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery, a minimally invasive procedure for treatment of early-stage rectal cancer, carcinoid tumors, and adenomas, is shown to be a safe procedure with very low perioperative morbidity. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery at a large volume tertiary care center with the existing literature. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of 325 transanal endoscopic microsurgery procedures and looked for risk factors associated with complications. Indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery included rectal adenocarcinomas, adenomas, and carcinoids. SETTING: Procedures were performed by a single surgeon at a large-volume tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients were enrolled over a 20-year period, and data were collected on demographics, perioperative details, tumor characteristics, and complications. INTERVENTIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was performed on all 325 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were urinary retention, late bleeding requiring intervention, dehiscence, peritoneal cavity entry, conversion to abdominal approach, fecal soiling, and rectovaginal fistula. RESULTS: Intraoperative bleeding was associated with larger tumor size, whereas postoperative bleeding requiring intervention was not associated with any factors studied. Peritoneal cavity entry and urinary retention were more likely if the tumor was in either the anterior or lateral position in the rectum. The peritoneal cavity was entered in 9 patients, and conversion to abdominal approach occurred in 1 patient. Intraoperative bleeding, by surgeon's choice, and urinary retention, by patient's choice, were associated with a greater likelihood of admission to the inpatient ward. Fecal soiling was not reported by patients and not recorded. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited because it was a retrospective analysis CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is an extremely safe procedure, offering very low perioperative morbidity. The overall morbidity found in our study was 10.5%, on par with published data for large series of 21%, 7.7%, and 14.9%. In contrast, complications from radical resection are reported at 18% to 55%.

Magnetic resonance enterography: the test of choice in diagnosing intestinal "zebras".

Small bowel tumors and other rare intestinal disorders are often exceedingly difficult to identify. Even cutting-edge technologies, such as push enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy, can fail to determine the cause of a patient's symptoms. At our institution magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) has become an increasingly reliable tool in the difficult-to-diagnose or difficult-to-monitor patient. In this retrospective case series, we discuss four patients with four rare intestinal disorders that were successfully diagnosed using MRE after failing to be diagnosed using more routine technologies, such as CT scans and flexible sigmoidoscopies. With the discussion of these four cases we demonstrate that MRE is a useful diagnostic modality in patients whose surveillance is difficult or to diagnose rare colorectal disease phenomena, colloquially referred to as "zebras."

A prospective study of in vivo and ex vivo sealing of the human inferior mesenteric artery using an electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing device.

BACKGROUND: Mesenteric vascular ligation is a critical step in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. This study assessed the quality of in vivo and ex vivo sealing of the human inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), as well as the relation of IMA stump and bursting pressure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective experimental study in a tertiary-care teaching hospital. In total, 25 patients were included in the study. For the main outcome measures, bursting pressures were measured for each specimen. Ten freshly sealed specimens were histologically assessed for seal quality and lateral thermal damage. RESULTS: We evaluated 54 specimens from 25 patients for bursting pressure, of which 25 were primary sealed vessels (sealed in vivo at surgery) and 29 were secondary sealed vessels (sealed in the laboratory). The mean bursting pressure was 862 mm Hg. The mean diameter was 4 mm (range, 3-5 mm) with a standard deviation of 1 mm. Pearson correlation showed no correlation between diameter and bursting pressure (P=.187) or the length and bursting pressure (P=.247). There was no statistically significant difference in bursting pressures in the four groups of vessels based on length. One calcified vessel had a significantly lower bursting pressure of 89 mm Hg. There was no intraoperative or postoperative bleeding. Ten sealed specimens were sent for histological evaluation, which showed mean lateral thermal damage of 0.57 mm (range, 0-1.75 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The bursting pressure in IMAs sealed with a bipolar device is significantly higher than physiological pressures; thus, the device can be safely used in sealing the vessel during colorectal surgery. Additionally, the length of the vessel stump does not correlate with the bursting pressures. Care needs to be taken when the vessel is calcified, which can be a potential cause of a weak seal.

Sealing of vessels larger than 7 millimeters using Enseal in porcine aorta.

BACKGROUND: The Enseal (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Blue Ash, Ohio) tissue-sealing device has proven efficacy for ligation of vessels<7 mm in diameter, even with significant supraphysiologic bursting pressures. We aimed to evaluate the safety of Enseal in porcine vessels>7 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The lumbar aortas of pigs that were euthanized for unrelated procedures were harvested. A 5- to 6-cm segment of aorta was sealed using the Enseal device. The opposite end was attached to a pressure-testing device to measure pressures at leak or bursting. The bivariate Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between diameter and bursting pressure. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine differences between the groups of vessels on the basis of their diameter. RESULTS: Ninety samples of 5-cm aorta segments were used to assess bursting pressure. The median diameter was 14 mm (range, 7-18) and bursting pressure was 85 mm Hg (range, 24-650). The Pearson test showed a negative correlation between vessel diameter and bursting pressure (P=.25). One-way analysis of variance did not show any significant difference between vessel diameters grouped by size (P=.517), and neither did the Scheffe post hoc test when comparing diameter with bursting pressure; 31% of specimens failed to seal. CONCLUSIONS: Bursting pressures are low and inconsistent after tissue sealing with the Enseal device in porcine vessels>7 mm. These vessels also demonstrated a higher rate of failure to seal. The histologic results of the aorta segments (ie, a low collagen-elastin ratio) may be the cause of the low bursting pressures.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: safe for midrectal lesions in morbidly obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a safe option for proximal rectal tumors in morbidly obese patients for whom transabdominal pelvic dissection often is fraught with morbidity. METHODS: From a database of 318 patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery, we report a retrospective case-control study of 9 patients with a body mass index range of 35 to 66 with sessile rectal lesions 6 to 15 cm from the anal verge who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Case subjects were compared with 15 controls and matched for age, tumor type, and level of tumor. The average body mass index of controls was 30 (P < .001). By using t test analysis, perioperative outcomes (surgical time, blood loss, and hospital length of stay) and postoperative complications were compared. RESULTS: Sessile tumors were located 7 to 11 cm from the anal verge with a diameter of 1 to 4 cm. Patient and tumor factors such as age, distal tumor margin from anal verge, and tumor diameter were not significantly different between case subjects and controls. Surgical blood loss, surgical time, and hospital length of stay were not significantly different between the 2 groups. One complication occurred among the cases. No complications occurred in the control group. All patients had complete surgical resections with negative margins. CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in morbidly obese patients is a safe, feasible, and a viable alternative to low anterior resection.