Fewer Worsening Heart Failure Events With HeartLogic on top of Standard Care: a Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The implantable cardiac defibrillator-based HeartLogic algorithm aims to detect impending fluid retention in patients with heart failure (HF). Studies show that HeartLogic is safe to integrate into clinical practice. The current study investigates whether HeartLogic provides clinical benefit on top of standard care and device telemonitoring in patients with HF. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, propensity-matched cohort analysis was performed in patients with HF and implantable cardiac defibrillators, and it compared HeartLogic to conventional telemonitoring. The primary endpoint was the number of worsening HF events. Hospitalizations and ambulatory visits due to HF were also evaluated. RESULTS: Propensity score matching yielded 127 pairs (median age 68 years, 80% male). Worsening HF events occurred more frequently in the control group (2; IQR 0-4) compared to the HeartLogic group (1; IQR 0-3; P = 0.004). The number of HF hospitalization days was higher in controls than in the HeartLogic group (8; IQR 5-12 vs 5; IQR 2-7; P = 0.023), and ambulatory visits for diuretic escalation were more frequent in the control group than in the HeartLogic group (2; IQR 0-3 vs 1; IQR 0-2; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Integrating the HeartLogic algorithm in a well-equipped HF care path on top of standard care is associated with fewer worsening HF events and shorter duration of fluid retention-related hospitalizations.

Economic evaluation of an ultra-high density mapping system compared to non-ultra-high density mapping systems for radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation.

PURPOSE: Advanced non-fluoroscopic mapping systems for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have shown to be an effective treatment of atrial fibrillation. This study analyzes the resource usage and subsequent costs associated with the implementation of an ultra-high density mapping system (UHDMS) compared to non-ultra-high density mapping systems (NUHDMS). METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 120 patients (18 years or older) with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent RFA for de novo pulmonary vein isolation guided either by an UHDMS (n=63) or NUHDMS (n=57) for their index procedure. We compared patient characteristics, short- and long-term procedural outcomes, resource usage, and clinical outcomes followed up to 16 months between the two treatment groups. The cost analysis was conducted from the perspective of a single center in Spain (Clinica Universidad de Navarra). RESULTS: Neither baseline patient characteristics nor complication rate differed between groups. Repeat RFAs following recurrent arrhythmia at 16 months was lower in the UHDMS patient group than in the NUHDMS group (6 vs. 14, respectively; P=0.027). The average total cost per patient was €1,600 lower in the UHDMS group, compared to the NUHDMS group (€11,061 and €12,661, respectively; P=0.03). CONCLUSION: In patients treated with an NUHDMS, 25% had a repeat ablation for recurrent arrhythmia, whereas only 9% of patients treated with a UHDMS had one (61% relative risk reduction), resulting in an average cost saving per patient of €1,600.

Clinical and economic impact of HeartLogic™ compared with standard care in heart failure patients.

AIMS: The implantable cardiac defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator-based HeartLogic™ algorithm has recently been developed for early detection of impending decompensation in heart failure (HF) patients; but whether this novel algorithm can reduce HF hospitalizations has not been evaluated. We investigated if activation of the HeartLogic algorithm reduces the number of hospital admissions for decompensated HF in a 1 year post-activation period as compared with a 1 year pre-activation period. METHODS AND RESULTS: Heart failure patients with an implantable cardiac defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator with the ability to activate HeartLogic and willingness to have remote device monitoring were included in this multicentre non-blinded single-arm trial with historical comparison. After a HeartLogic alert, the presence of HF symptoms and signs was evaluated. If there were two or more symptoms and signs apart from the HeartLogic alert, lifestyle advices were given and/or medication was adjusted. After activation of the algorithm, patients were followed for 1 year. HF events occurring in the 1 year prior to activation and in the 1 year after activation were compared. Of the 74 eligible patients (67.2 ± 10.3 years, 84% male), 68 patients completed the 1 year follow-up period. The total number of HF hospitalizations reduced from 27 in the pre-activation period to 7 in the post-activation period (P = 0.003). The number of patients hospitalized for HF declined from 21 to 7 (P = 0.005), and the hospitalization length of stay diminished from average 16 to 7 days (P = 0.079). Subgroup analysis showed similar results (P = 0.888) for patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy during the pre-activation period or not receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy, meaning that the effect of hospitalizations cannot solely be attributed to reverse remodelling. Subanalysis of a single-centre Belgian subpopulation showed important reductions in overall health economic costs (P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Activation of the HeartLogic algorithm enables remote monitoring of HF patients, coincides with a significant reduction in hospitalizations for decompensated HF, and results in health economic benefits.

Evaluating the need to reform the organisation of care for major trauma patients in Belgium: an analysis of administrative databases.

PURPOSE: In light of the international evolutions to establish inclusive trauma systems and to concentrate the care for the most severely injured in major trauma centres, we evaluated the degree of dispersion of trauma care in Belgium. METHODS: We used descriptive statistics to illustrate the dispersion of major trauma care in Belgium based on two independent administrative databases: the registry of Mobile Intensive Care Units (2009-2015) and the Belgian Hospital Discharge Dataset (2009-2014). RESULTS: Patients with a severe trauma (n = 3856 in 2015) were transported towards 145 different hospital sites (on a total of 198 hospital sites) resulting in a median of 17 cases per hospital site (min = 1; P25 = 4; P75 = 30; max = 165). A minority of major trauma patients is after admission transferred to another hospital (8%) with a median of 10 days after admission to the hospital (IQR 3.5-24). CONCLUSIONS: The dispersion of care for major trauma patients in Belgium is so high that a reorganisation of care for severe injured patients in major trauma centres concentrating professional expertise and specialised equipment is recommended to guarantee a high quality of care in a qualitative and sustainable way.