Hemodiafiltration with online regeneration of ultrafiltrate: effect on heme-oxygenase-1 and inducible subunit of nitric oxide synthase and implication for oxidative stress and inflammation.

Hemodiafiltration with regeneration of ultrafiltrate (HFR) has a positive impact on inflammation and oxidative stress (OxSt), risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), the most common cause of excess morbidity and mortality for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. However, studies have been of limited duration. This study extends our previous study of HFR effects by evaluating the effect on mononuclear cell protein expression of heme-oxygenase-1 (HO-1), induced by OxSt, and inducible subunit of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and plasma level of interleukin-1ß (Il-1ß) and oxidized low-density lipoproteins (OxLDL), marker of OxSt, for a 12-month period. Fourteen ESRD patients stable on hemodialysis over a period of at least 2 years and on conventional bicarbonate dialysis were switched to be treated with HFR. Blood samples were collected at baseline, after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. HO-1 and iNOS protein expression were evaluated by Western blot, OxLDL by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and Il-1ß by enzyme amplified sensitivity immumoassay assay. HFR significantly increased HO-1 at the 9 and 12 months (ANOVA = P < 0.00001): 0.17 ± 0.11 (baseline) versus 0.48 ± 0.20, P < 0.043 and 0.59 ± 0.32, P < 0.004, respectively. Il-1ß declined (ANOVA = P < 0.0001) since the 3 months from 169.92 ± 92.39 pg/mL (baseline) to 39.03 ± 10.01 (12 months), P < 0.0001. HFR also reduced plasma OxLDL: 475.4 ± 110.8 ng/mL (baseline) versus 393.1 ± 101.9 ng/mL (12 months), P < 0.04. iNOS showed no changes upon HFR treatment. These results together with our previous results indicate that HFR improves OxSt and inflammation. Given the strong relationships between OxSt and inflammation with CVD, their reduction might provide a beneficial impact by reducing the risk of atherosclerotic CVD in dialysis patients.

Carnitine-mediated improved response to erythropoietin involves induction of haem oxygenase-1: studies in humans and in an animal model.

BACKGROUND: Carnitine improves erythropoetin (EPO) response and anaemia in haemodialysis patients (HD); however, the mechanism(s) responsible remain unidentified. We have reported that carnitine induces haem oxygenase (HO)-1, which is an antioxidant and antiapoptotic that acts via pathways shared with EPO. Therefore carnitine's effect on these pathways may account for the improved EPO response. This study evaluates carnitine's effect on protein expression of HO-1 in unexplained EPO resistant HD. Carnitine's effect was assessed by HO-1 expression in patients and compared to its antiapoptotic effect via HO-1 induction in a rat model of carnitine-treated heart failure. METHODS: Unexplained EPO resistant HD mononuclear cell HO-1 and rat gastrocnemious muscle HO-1 and Bcl-2 protein expression were evaluated by western blot. RESULTS: HD's haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (Ht) were not different before carnitine treatment: 8.8 +/- 0.4 mg/dl versus 8.98 +/- 0.13 and 30.20% +/- 0.84 versus 30.72 +/- 1.14, respectively. Carnitine increased HO-1, Hb and Ht compared with patients not treated with carnitine: 2.40 +/- 0.58 versus 1.49 +/- 0.41, P = 0.02; 11.22 +/- 0.54 versus 8.90 +/- 0.15, P < 0.0001; 32.72 +/- 1.77 versus 30.66 +/- 0.43, P = 0.035, respectively. Carnitine-treated HD's HO-1 significantly correlated with haemoglobin. HO-1 and Bcl-2 protein levels in untreated heart failure rat's gastrocnemious muscle were reduced when compared with controls: 3.41 +/- 0.49 versus 5.32 +/- 0.38 and 0.69 +/- 0.11 versus 1.65 +/- 0.37, respectively, but were higher in carnitine-treated heart failure rats: 4.8 +/- 0.32 versus 3.41 +/- 0.49, P < 0.0002 and 1.09 +/- 0.08 versus 0.69 +/- 0.11, P = 0.0007, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with an involvement of HO-1 in carnitine's effect on erythropoiesis. The initial signals or effectors responsible for carnitine's effect remain to be identified.

Adult patients with sporadic polycystic kidney disease: the importance of screening for mutations in the PKD1 and PKD2 genes.

BACKGROUND: ADPKD is one of the most common inherited disorders, with high risk for end-stage renal disease. Numerous patients, however, have no relatives in whom this disorder is known and are unsure whether they may transmit the disease to their offsprings. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether germline mutation analysis adds substantial information to clinical symptoms for diagnosis of ADPKD in these patients. METHODS: Clinical data included renal function and presence of liver or pancreas cysts, heart valve insufficiency, intracranial aneurysms, colonic diverticles, and abdominal hernias. Family history was evaluated regarding ADPKD. Germline mutation screening of the PKD1 and PKD2 genes was performed for intragenic mutations and for large deletions. RESULTS: A total of 324 adult patients with ADPKD including 30 patients without a family history of ADPKD (sporadic cases) were included. PKD1 mutations were found in 24/30 and PKD2 mutations in 6 patients. Liver cysts were present in 14 patients and intracranial aneurysms in 2 patients. Fourteen patients (45%) had no extrarenal involvement. Compared to the 294 patients with familial ADPKD, the clinical characteristics and the age at the start of dialysis were similar in those with sporadic ADPKD. CONCLUSION: The clinical characteristics of patients with sporadic and familial ADPKD are similar, but sporadic ADPKD is often overlooked because of the absence of a family history. Molecular genetic screening for germline mutations in both PKD1 and PKD2 genes is essential for the definitive diagnosis of ADPKD.