RESUMO
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated patterns of utilization of the digital picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in radiologic publications in order to ascertain whether there may be a correlation between PACS use and demographic/cultural factors such as geographic location, radiologic specialization, and use of advanced radiologic technologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,037 articles in 22 randomly selected issues of AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology and of Radiology (1999-2001) were reviewed for the rate of PACS use and the type of PACS used. Articles for which PACS use or nonuse was established were further classified according to originating continent or region, imaging modality, study design (whether retrospective or prospective), and the use of advanced radiologic technology. The use of a PACS was then correlated with these factors. The data were recorded and statistics were prepared by means of statistical software. The nonparametric (chi2) test also was run by using this software. RESULTS: PACS had been used and reported in the preparation of 225 of the 1,037 articles. The type of PACS used was mini PACS (eg, systems using digital imaging and communications in medicine [DICOM] protocols or precursors) in 55 (24%) and department- or hospital-wide PACS in 161 (72%). Most of the articles for which use of a PACS was reported had originated in North America (60%), Europe (22%), or Asia (14%). PACS were used in almost half of retrospective studies and in one-fourth of prospective studies (P < .01). A low correlation was found between utilization of PACS and use of other advanced technologies. CONCLUSION: Although PACS were utilized in the preparation of a substantial proportion of articles published in the two major radiology journals, there was a great disparity in the rate of PACS use among world regions. The proportion of studies originating in North America for which a PACS was used was nearly three times the number of similar studies originating in Europe, and more than four times the number originating in Asia.
Assuntos
Editoração/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Informação em Radiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiologia , Pesquisa , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Humanos , Publicações Periódicas como AssuntoRESUMO
In the young population, spontaneous rupture of Achilles tendon is very rare. The big hematoma is also rare finding of the Achilles tendon partial rupture. It is usually seen with complete rupture. We presented imaging findings of 4 years follow up of the spontaneous partial rupture of Achilles tendon presenting with giant expanding hematoma and mimicking complete rupture radiologically. We discussed the alterations of tendon signal intensity and result of conservative therapy after partial rupture with big hematoma in the long term. A 29 year-old man, applied with pain and swelling in the retrocalcaneal region of left ankle. He did not have chronic metabolic disease. He was not active in physical activities. X-ray radiograms were normal. At magnetic resonance images (MRI), there was an intratendinous big hematoma, subcutanous fat planes were edematous around tendon. The diagnosis was partial rupture and giant hematoma. Hematoma was drained. The conservative treatment was applied and his complaints disappeared. After treatment, approximately 4 years later, control MRI showed thickened and hypointense tendon in all images.
Assuntos
Tendão do Calcâneo/lesões , Hematoma/etiologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Traumatismos dos Tendões/complicações , Tendão do Calcâneo/patologia , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Hematoma/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Ruptura , Traumatismos dos Tendões/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We compared the accuracy and tolerability of intravenous contrast enhanced spiral computed tomography colonography (CTC) and optical colonoscopy (OC) for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic patients for colorectal neoplasia. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in 48 patients with symptomatic patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer. Spiral CTC was performed in supine and prone positions after colonic cleansing. The axial, 2D MPR and virtual endoluminal views were analyzed. Results of spiral CTC were compared with OC which was done within 15 days. The psychometric tolerance test was asked to be performed for both CTC and colonoscopy after the procedure. RESULTS: Ten lesions in 9 of 48 patients were found in CTC and confirmed with OC. Two masses and eight polyps, consisted of 1 tubulovillous, 1 tubular, 2 villous adenoma, 4 adenomatous polyp, 4 adenocarcinoma, were identified. Lesion prevalence was 21%. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values were found 100%, 87%, 89%, 67% and 100%, respectively. Psychometric tolerance test showed that CTC significantly more comfortable comparing with OC (p=0.00). CTC was the preferred method in 37% while OC was preferred in 6% of patients. In both techniques, the most unpleasant part was bowel cleansing. CONCLUSION: Contrast enhanced CTC is a highly accurate method in detecting colorectal lesions. Since the technique was found to be more comfortable and less time consuming compare to OE, it may be preferable in management of symptomatic patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer.