Editorial Commentary: Subacromial Balloon Spacer for Management of Massive Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears Improves Shoulder Range of Motion and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Considerable controversy exists regarding the management of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. This conversation has been invigorated further by the emergence of the subacromial balloon spacer for management of patients with tear patterns deemed irreparable. Most data lend support to the balloon spacer improving shoulder range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures, with a simplified technique and accelerated patient recovery. Biomechanical data support both decreased contact pressure in the subacromial space and humeral re-centering. Patient indications are increasingly being defined and include lower-demand patients who prioritize pain relief over strength recovery and have maintained active elevation, absence of glenohumeral arthritis, and an intact subscapularis. The subacromial balloon spacer has shown largely positive results at mid-term follow-up. Further data are still needed to determine long-term outcomes and the impact on future revision surgery or conversion to reverse arthroplasty, as well as expanded indications such as large tears that are mechanically repairable but carry a substantial risk of failure of healing. For now, so far, so good.

Autologous Minced Repair of Knee Cartilage Is Safely and Effectively Performed Using Arthroscopic Techniques.

Articular cartilage defects in the knee are common and possess limited ability to inherently heal. Many of the surgical management options for cartilage repair that result in a hyaline or hyaline-like chondral surface have donor site morbidity, are resource intensive, are costly, and may require multiple surgeries. Autologous minced cartilage implantation is an encouraging, single-stage technique that can be safely and efficiently performed arthroscopically to address focal chondral defects in the knee. The limited morbidity and cost-effective nature of using autograft tissue has clear advantages, including an ability to treat patients at the time a clinically relevant defect is identified, increased availability of tissue, reduced patient morbidity with the use of an arthroscopic harvest technique, and the production of a hyaline cartilage repair product with active chondrocytes. Clinically, it has been demonstrated to be superior to microfracture. However, mincing technique may compromise cell viability. A recent porcine model investigation demonstrated that arthroscopic cartilage harvest using a shaver, contains a significantly lower median number of viable chondrocytes compared to open scalpel harvest, resulting in reduced proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans, aggrecan, and COL2A1 expression, a result of fewer viable chondrocytes. The authors suggest that traditional open scalpel harvest results in a superior single-stage autologous minced cartilage transplantation product with more hyaline-like tissue compared to arthroscopic mincing techniques. However, the findings of the study regarding cell viability after arthroscopic harvest are in stark contrast to previous findings, including our prior work. Pending future research, it is our view that an arthroscopic single-stage autologous cartilage transplant is more reproducible, efficient, and of lower morbidity than open harvest, and we and others have shown the arthroscopic technique to be both safe and effective.

Arthroscopic Debridement of Mild and Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis Results in Clinical Improvement at Short-Term Follow-Up: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic debridement for the treatment of Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade I and II (mild) and III (moderate) knee osteoarthritis (OA) at a minimum 1-year follow-up. METHODS: A systematic review of primary literature was performed in concordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies regarding arthroscopic debridement/chondroplasty for management of knee OA at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Studies were included if they included KL grades I to III or dichotomized clinical outcomes by KL grade. The primary outcome was patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the final follow-up. Bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score. RESULTS: Eight studies including a total of 773 patients met inclusion criteria (range of patients in each study, 31-214). Mean age of patients ranged from 35.5 to 64 years, with most studies having a mean patient age of 55 to 65 years. Mean follow-up ranged from 1.5 to 10 years. Seven of the 8 (87.5%) studies reported good to excellent PROMs at a minimum 1- to 4-year follow-up after arthroscopic debridement. Improvements in PROMs were superior in patients with less severe knee OA (KL I-II) in comparison to KL III in most studies. Conversion to arthroplasty ranged from 7.6% to 50% in KL III patients compared with 0% to 4.5% in KL I-II patients after arthroscopic debridement. Two of the 3 studies with at least a 4-year clinical follow-up reported that clinical improvements diminished with time (improvements no longer significant in total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score). The lone randomized controlled trial was the only investigation that did not find a benefit of arthroscopic debridement over quality nonoperative care. MINORS scores ranged from 6 to 10 (mean, 8.0) for the 5 nonrandomized studies without controls. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic debridement for the management of mild to moderate knee OA is effective at short-term follow-up in patients who have exhausted conservative care. There is limited evidence demonstrating the durability of improvement following arthroscopic debridement after 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

All-Inside and Inside-Out Repair Techniques for Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears Both Result in Improved Patient Outcomes and a Broad Range of Failure Rates: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported outcomes, failure rates, risk factors for failure, and complications in patients with bucket-handle meniscus tears (BHMTs) undergoing repair with inside-out (IO) versus all-inside (AI) techniques. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception to August 2023 according to the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The inclusion criteria consisted of Level I to IV clinical studies published in the past 10 years with greater than 2 years of follow-up that evaluated patient-reported outcome scores and/or the incidence of failure after IO or AI repairs for BHMTs. Clinical studies not reporting outcomes or failure rates, older studies using outdated implants, animal studies, reviews, letters to the editor, case reports, cadaveric studies, and articles not written in the English language or with English-language translation were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Outcomes were reported as ranges and qualitatively compared. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies published from 2013 to 2023, consisting of 1,062 patients with BHMTs, were identified. Thirteen studies (14 cohorts, 649 patients) reported on AI repair (mean age range, 23.7-32 years) and 7 studies (7 cohorts, 413 patients) reported on IO repair (mean age range, 16.7-34.6 years). Both groups had improved postoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores. Decreased range of motion was the most commonly reported complication in the AI group (range, 2.6%-4%), whereas adhesions for arthrofibrosis were the most commonly reported complication in the IO group (n = 12; range, 6%-7.9%). The overall reported failure rate ranged from 6.9% to 20.5% within the AI group and from 0% to 20% within the IO group. CONCLUSIONS: AI and IO repair techniques for BHMTs both result in improved Lysholm and Tegner scores. However, broad ranges of failure are reported in the literature, with overall failure rates ranging from 6.9% to 20.5% after AI repair and from 0% to 20% after IO repair. Younger age and isolated medial BHMT repair are the most frequently reported risk factors for the AI technique, whereas postoperative stiffness is the most frequently reported complication after both repair techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Revision and Conversion to Arthroplasty Are Low Among Adolescents Undergoing Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Using the Bridge-In-Slot Technique at Midterm Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To report midterm outcomes after primary medial and lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) with fresh-frozen allografts implanted with the bridge-in-slot technique in the adolescent patient population. METHODS: Adolescent patients less than 18 years old at the time of primary MAT from 1999 to 2016 were retrospectively identified. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form, Lysholm, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales scores were collected before surgery and at 1-year, 2-year, and a minimum 5-year follow-up. Thresholds for achieving clinically significant outcomes were calculated, and the proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) was determined. Meniscus reoperation (partial, subtotal, or total meniscectomy, repair, or failure) and failure (revision MAT or conversion to arthroplasty) rates were determined. RESULTS: Forty-four (female n = 33; male n = 11) of 62 identified patients met inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 9.5 ± 3.8 years (range, 5.0-17.7). Lateral MAT was performed in most patients (n = 35/44 [80%]). Isolated MAT was performed in 27 (61%) patients. Common concomitant procedures included osteochondral allograft transplantation (32%), autologous chondrocyte implantation (18%), and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (14%). MCID, PASS, and SCB were achieved by patients at a minimum 5-year follow-up for IKDC (62%; 76%; 31%), Lysholm (62%; 79%; 23%), and KOOS questionnaires (Pain [65%; 81%; 41%], Symptoms [58%; 81%; 47%], Activities of Daily Living [53%; 77%; 35%], Sport [86%; 75%; 50%], and Quality of Life [59%; 81%; 59%]), respectively. Fourteen patients (32%) underwent reoperation at an average of 5.0 ± 4.3 years (range, 0.8-14.0) after MAT. Three (7%) patients met criteria for failure, requiring revision MAT an average of 3.8 ± 1.1 years (range, 2.8-4.9) after transplantation. No patients underwent arthroplasty. Overall survival free from failure at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years was 100%, 100%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. At the time of final follow-up, 80% of patients reported satisfaction with their current physical status. CONCLUSIONS: Primary MAT in adolescent patients resulted in significant and durable functional improvements at mid- to long-term follow-up. At an average of 9.5 years after surgery, meniscal reoperation rate was 32% whereas graft survival free of revision MAT was 93%. Adolescents undergoing MAT demonstrated similar functional outcomes and graft survivability when compared to available adult MAT literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Lower Range of Recurrent Instability Rates Following Bankart Repair and Remplissage Compared to Isolated Bankart Repair in Patients With "Nonengaging/On-Track" Hill-Sachs Lesions and <20% Glenoid Bone Loss.

PURPOSE: To compare recurrent instability and return-to-sport rates along with external rotation differences between on-track (nonengaging) Hill-Sachs lesion patients undergoing either an isolated Bankart repair (IBR) or a Bankart repair augmented with a remplissage procedure (B+R). METHODS: A search was conducted using 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL) in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Only clinical comparative (level of evidence I-III) studies were considered for inclusion. Quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. RESULTS: Six level of evidence III studies, totaling 537 patients (202 B+R and 335 IBR) were included for analysis. All patients had <20% glenoid bone loss and a nonengaging, on-track Hill-Sachs lesion. At a median final follow-up of 34.7 months, recurrent dislocation rates ranged from 0% to 7.7% and 3.5% to 30% in the B+R and IBR groups, respectively. Moreover, subjective instability and revision surgery rates presented lower ranges in the B+R upon comparison with the IBR cohort (0%-32% vs 5%-71.4% and 0%-5% vs 0%-35%, respectively). Furthermore, return to preinjury level of sports ranged from 64% to 100% in the remplissage-augmented group and 50% to 90% in the IBR cohort. Postoperative external rotation at side varied from 50° to 63° in the B+R and 55° to 63° in the IBR arm. Additional subgroup analysis revealed recurrent dislocation rates in athletes and patients with near-track Hill-Sachs lesions undergoing remplissage augmentation to be 0% to 5% and 2% to 47% while ranging from 8.8% to 30% and 9% to 66% for IBR patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Upon qualitative analysis, ranges of recurrent instability measures, including recurrent dislocation rates, are higher in patients undergoing IBR in comparison to B+R. Activity level influences outcomes as athletes were found to have a higher range of recurrent dislocation rates in the IBR group. The addition of remplissage showed a higher range of return-to-sport rates with comparable postoperative external rotation between groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of Level III studies.

Revision and Primary Meniscal Allograft Transplantations Provide Clinical Benefit at Mid-Term Follow-Up: A Matched-Cohort Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Reoperations, and Failures.

PURPOSE: To report the mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent revision meniscal allograft transplantation (RMAT) and compare survivorship free from reoperation and failure with a matched cohort of patients who underwent primary meniscal allograft transplantation (PMAT). METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified patients who underwent RMAT and PMAT between 1999 and 2017. A cohort of PMAT patients matched at a ratio of 2:1 with respect to age, body mass index, sex, and concomitant procedures served as the control group. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at baseline and at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively were collected. PROMs and the achievement of clinically significant outcomes were analyzed within groups. Graft survivorship free from meniscal reoperation and failure (arthroplasty or subsequent RMAT) was compared between cohorts using log-rank testing. RESULTS: During the study period, 22 RMATs were performed in 22 patients. Of these RMAT patients, 16 met the inclusion criteria (73% follow-up rate). The mean age of RMAT patients was 29.7 ± 9.3 years, and the mean follow-up period was 9.9 ± 4.2 years (range, 5.4-16.8 years). There were no differences between the RMAT cohort and the 32 matched PMAT patients with respect to age (P = .292), body mass index (P = .623), sex (P = .537), concomitant procedures (P ≥ .286), or baseline PROMs (P ≥ .066). The patient acceptable symptomatic state was achieved by the RMAT cohort for the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score (70%), Lysholm score (38%), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (Pain [73%], Symptoms [64%], Sport [45%], Activities of Daily Living [55%], and Quality of Life [36%]). In the RMAT cohort, 5 patients (31%) underwent subsequent reoperation at a mean of 4.7 ± 2.1 years (range, 1.7-6.7 years) and 5 patients met the criteria for failure at a mean of 4.9 ± 2.9 years (range, 1.2-8.4 years). There were no significant differences in survivorship free from reoperation (P = .735) or failure (P = .170) between the RMAT and PMAT cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: At mid-term follow-up, most patients who underwent RMAT achieved the patient acceptable symptomatic state for the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales of Pain, Symptoms, and Activities of Daily Living. Additionally, there were no differences in survival free from meniscal reoperation or failure between the PMAT and RMAT cohorts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative cohort.

Role of pre-revision tissue biopsy in evaluation of painful shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pre-revision tissue biopsy (PTB) for culture has been used as a diagnostic tool in the evaluation for periprosthetic joint infection among patients with a painful shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of PTB culture results compared with results of "gold-standard" tissue biopsy for culture taken at the time of subsequent revision surgery (TBR), and (2) report the current indications and protocols described for use of PTB. The hypothesis was that PTB culture results would correlate highly with results of TBR and that protocols for PTB would vary by institution. METHODS: By use of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis of English-language literature were performed using the Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane databases from inception through March 2020. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) validated grading criteria were used to summarize the quality and bias of included studies. Studies were included if an arthroscopic or open tissue biopsy was performed in patients who had previously undergone anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, shoulder hemiarthroplasty, or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as a separate procedure prior to revision of components, if applicable. Meta-analysis to identify the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of PTB was performed. Analysis was performed by first defining 1 positive PTB culture result as infection and then defining 2 positive culture results as infection. RESULTS: A total of 1751 titles were screened, and 66 full-text articles were reviewed for inclusion. Four total studies encompassing 72 cases met the inclusion criteria. All studies were small (N = 13 to N = 23), retrospective series, with all but 12 biopsies performed arthroscopically. Sixty-five patients (90.2%) underwent subsequent revision surgery and TBR. Of these patients, 23 (35.4%) had ≥1 positive culture result with PTB and TBR. By this definition, the sensitivity of PTB was 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.5%-98.6%); specificity, 70.0% (95% CI, 53.3%-82.9%); PPV, 65.7% (95% CI, 47.7%-80.3%); and NPV, 93.3% (95% CI, 76.5%-98.8%). For 2 positive PTB results, the sensitivity of PTB was 100% (95% CI, 51.7%-100%); specificity, 50.0% (95% CI, 31.4%-68.6%); PPV, 33.3% (95% CI, 14.4%-58.8%); and NPV, 100% (95% CI, 69.9%-100%). No complications of PTB were reported. The mean Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) grade was 11.4 (range, 8.5-14). CONCLUSION: PTB is a sensitive diagnostic modality with a high NPV that may aid in the diagnosis of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection in patients with a painful shoulder arthroplasty. Given the disparate biopsy protocols, greater standardization of clinical best practices and broader prospective studies are necessary to define the future role of PTB in dictating treatment.

Efficacy of combinational therapy using blue light and benzoyl peroxide in reducing Cutibacterium acnes bioburden at the deltopectoral interval: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of blue light therapy (BLT) and 5% topical benzoyl peroxide (BPO) gel in combination with standard chlorhexidine (CHX) preparation in eradicating Cutibacterium acnes at the deltopectoral interval measured by positive, quantitative culture findings. METHODS: Adult male volunteers were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups: BPO, BLT, and BPO followed by BLT. Contralateral shoulders served as matched controls. Volunteers randomized to BPO applied the gel for a total of 5 treatments. In the BLT group, a single 23-minute treatment was administered at an estimated irradiance of 40 mW/cm2 (radiant exposure, 55.2 J/cm2). In the BPO-BLT group, volunteers received both treatments as described earlier. After treatment with either BPO, BLT, or both, a single swab culture was taken from the treatment shoulder. Next, control and treatment shoulders were prepared with CHX, and cultures were taken from each shoulder. Cultures were sent for anaerobic quantitative growth analysis with both polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing confirmation of presumptive C acnes colonies. RESULTS: This study enrolled 60 male volunteers, 20 per group, with no loss to follow-up. After treatment but prior to CHX administration, all culture samples in the BPO group and BLT group grew C acnes. Prior to CHX, 16 samples (80%) in the BPO-BLT group grew C acnes. On quantitative analysis, the BPO group and BPO-BLT group had significantly less growth of C acnes compared with the BLT group after treatment but prior to CHX (P < .05 for each). Following CHX administration, the BPO and BPO-BLT groups had significantly fewer positive culture findings (odds ratios of 0.03 and 0.29, respectively) and less quantity of growth compared with their control arms (P < .05). This was not seen in the BLT group. For quantitative between-group analysis, no significant synergistic effects were seen with BPO-BLT compared with BPO alone (P = .688). There was no difference in side effects between groups. CONCLUSION: The combination of topical BPO and CHX was effective at eliminating C acnes in most cases. BLT alone did not demonstrate effective antimicrobial properties against C acnes at the radiant exposure administered in this study. Combining BPO and BLT did not lead to significant synergistic antimicrobial effects. Both BPO and BLT are safe with few, transient side effects reported. More work is needed to determine whether BLT at higher radiant exposures or serial treatment results in bactericidal effects against C acnes in vivo.

The Influence of Physeal Status on Rate of Reoperation After Arthroscopic Screw Fixation for Symptomatic Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee.

PURPOSE: To determine if physeal status or other preoperative or intraoperative variables influence the failure rate after arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions in the knee. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing screw fixation of osteochondral fragments from OCD by a single surgeon from 2005 to 2015 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Demographic, preoperative imaging, and intraoperative data were analyzed to determine risk factors associated with failure, which was defined as the need for a revision reoperation or arthroplasty after initial OCD fixation. RESULTS: A total of 45 knees met the inclusion criteria, including 26 skeletally mature patients and 19 patients with incompletely closed physes on preoperative imaging. The mean ages of the skeletally mature and immature groups were 18.3 ± 2.5 years and 14.9 ± 2.2 years, respectively (P < .001), and the mean body mass index values were 24.3 ± 3.6 and 23.2 ± 4.0, respectively (P = .432). We excluded 10 patients from the survivorship analysis because they had less than 2 years' follow-up. No statistically significant difference in failure rates was found between skeletally mature and immature individuals (30% and 40%, respectively; P = .721). The only factor significantly associated with fixation failure was undergoing a prior surgical procedure to address the OCD lesion (P = .038). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed rates of overall survivorship from revision reoperations of 88.6% at 1 year and 68.8% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes after internal fixation of OCD fragments are guarded, with a fragment survival rate of 65.7% at a mean of 4.1 years' follow-up. No difference in fragment survival was noted in skeletally mature versus immature patients. The only independent risk factor identified for fixation failure was the number of previous operations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series with subgroup analysis.

Adverse Local Tissue Reaction due to Mechanically Assisted Crevice Corrosion Presenting as Late Instability Following Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC) at modular junctions can cause a spectrum of adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) in patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to describe the presentation, treatments, and related complications of a cohort of patients presenting with late instability following metal-on-polyethylene THA due to underlying MACC and ALTR. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective case series presents 17 patients (12 women, mean age 62.6, range 42-73) presenting with late instability secondary to ALTR and MACC. All patients had a metal (Cobalt Chrome)-on-polyethylene bearing surface. Patients experienced a mean 2.7 dislocations (range 1-6) at mean 4.3 years (range 0.4-17.0) following their index surgery. Serum metal levels (n = 12) demonstrated a greater elevation of cobalt (mean 6.9, range 0.13-20.88 ng/mL) than chromium (mean 1.9, range 0.13-3.23 ng/mL). RESULTS: Patients were revised for instability at a mean of 6.8 years (range 2.1-19.4) following their index surgery. ALTR was encountered in every case and the modular head-neck junction demonstrated visible corrosion. An exchange of the CoCr head to a ceramic head with a titanium sleeve and placement of a constrained liner was performed for a majority of patients (n = 15, 88.2%). Five patients (29.4%) had complications postoperatively including peroneal palsy (n = 2), periprosthetic joint infection (n = 2), and ALTR recurrence (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Recurrent instability in the setting of otherwise well-positioned THA components and without another obvious cause should raise concern for ALTR as a potential underlying etiology.

Cartilage Restoration Surgery: Incidence Rates, Complications, and Trends as Reported by the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Candidates.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the current status of advanced cartilage restoration procedures among newly trained orthopaedic surgeons in the United States. METHODS: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database was queried to identify all advanced cartilage restoration procedure cases submitted by American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery part II board certification examination candidates from 2003 to 2015. All documented autologous chondrocyte implantation, autologous osteochondral transfer, osteochondral allograft transplantation, and marrow stimulation techniques (MSTs) procedures were analyzed. Analysis was performed to describe trends in annual incidence, types of complications, concomitant procedures, and geographical differences in incidence of advanced cartilage procedures. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2015, a total of 2,827 surgeons submitted 7,522 cartilage restoration procedures, with 7,060 cases documented as MST (80.01%). The number of cartilage cases decreased significantly from 2003 to in 2015 (P <.001), with MST having the largest decline (P < .001). The incidence of open osteochondral allograft transplantation (odds ratio = 1.35; P = .023) and open autologous osteochondral transfer (odds ratio = 0.84; P = .004) increased over the study period. Overall, the majority of patients (57.0%) were male; however, female patients were on average significantly older than male patients (P < .001). Cartilage procedures were performed concomitantly with a realignment osteotomy procedure in 1.7% of cases. The incidence of surgical complications increased throughout the study period from 2.9% in 2003 to 9.5% in 2015 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage restoration procedures, specifically MSTs, are being decreasingly performed among recently trained orthopaedic surgeons. In contrast, complication rates have been increasing since 2003, demonstrating a possible paradigm shift toward more complex cartilage procedures, specifically osteochondral grafting procedures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates a significant decline in the use of MSTs by recently trained orthopaedic surgeons. In addition, an increase in several more complex cartilage restoration procedures was found. Taken in sum, these changes may reflect a shift in residency and fellowship training away from marrow stimulation procedures that elicit a fibrocartilage reparative tissue and toward more complex procedures that provide a more hyaline-like articular cartilage surface.

Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Secondary Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee in Skeletally Mature Patients.

PURPOSE: To report clinical outcomes of osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) for skeletally mature patients with osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the knee in whom prior surgical intervention has failed, and to describe return-to-sport (RTS) rates and any predictive demographic or preoperative variables associated with a higher likelihood to RTS. METHODS: Patients who underwent OCA by a single surgeon (B.J.C.) between October 1, 2002, and November 30, 2014, for a diagnosis of OCD with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were included. Demographic, surgical history, operative, and postoperative data points including RTS were analyzed for all patients collectively, with subanalysis to identify any demographic and operative variables associated with the ability to RTS. Failure was defined as revision OCA, gross appearance of graft failure on second-look arthroscopy, or conversion to arthroplasty. RESULTS: We identified 41 consecutive patients (43 knees), with 37 patients (39 knees, comprising 26 male and 13 female knees) available for clinical follow-up at an average of 7.29 ± 3.30 years. There was significant improvement (P < .05) in all patient-reported outcome scores, with the exception of the Short Form 12 mental subscale (P = .910). Most patients (81.6%) reported being either mostly satisfied or completely satisfied at final follow-up. Of patients self-identifying as athletes preoperatively (n = 22), 18 (81.8%) achieved RTS at an average of 14.0 ± 8.7 months. Athletes with failure to RTS had a significantly greater body mass index (RTS, 24.68 ± 3.67; no RTS, 27.82 ± 0.69; P = .005). Subsequent surgery was performed in 14 patients (35.9%), and primary OCA failed in 2 patients at an average of 6.2 ± 3.8 years. CONCLUSIONS: OCA is a successful secondary surgical treatment for OCD of the knee in skeletally mature patients and leads to clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcome scores and high patient satisfaction and RTS rates in low-level athletes at an average of 7.29 years' follow-up. Athletes with failure to RTS were found to have a significantly higher body mass index. Although reoperation may be common after OCA (35.9%), the failure rate is low (5.1%) in this series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Utility of Modern Arthroscopic Simulator Training Models: A Meta-analysis and Updated Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To determine the utility of modern arthroscopic simulators in transferring skills learned on the model to the operating room. METHODS: A meta-analysis and systematic review of all English-language studies relevant to validated arthroscopic simulation models using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines from 1999 to 2016 was performed. Data collected included the specific simulator model, the joint used, participant demographic characteristics, participant level of training, training session information, type and number of tasks, pre- and post-training assessments, and overall outcomes of simulator performance. Three independent reviewers analyzed all studies. RESULTS: Fifty-seven studies with 1,698 participants met the study criteria and were included. Of the studies, 25 (44%) incorporated an arthroscopic training program into the study methods whereas 32 (56%) did not. In 46 studies (81%), the studies' respective simulator models were used to assess arthroscopic performance, whereas 9 studies (16%) used Sawbones models, 8 (14%) used cadaveric models, and 4 (7%) evaluated subject performance on a live patient in the operating room. In 21 studies (37%), simulator performance was compared with experience level, with 20 of these (95%) showing that clinical experience correlated with simulator performance. In 25 studies (44%), task performance was evaluated before and after simulator training, with 24 of these (96%) showing improvement after training. All 4 studies that included live-patient arthroscopy reported improved operating room performance after simulator training compared with the performance of subjects not participating in a training program. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that (1) training on arthroscopic simulators improves performance on arthroscopic simulators and (2) performance on simulators for basic diagnostic arthroscopy correlates with experience level. Limited data suggest that simulator training can improve basic diagnostic arthroscopy skills in vivo. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.

Management of Biceps Tendon Pathology: From the Glenoid to the Radial Tuberosity.

Management of proximal and distal biceps tendon pathology is evolving. The long head of the biceps tendon, if inflamed, may be a pain-producing structure. In appropriately indicated patients, a symptomatic long head of the biceps tendon can be surgically managed via tenotomy, tenodesis, and/or superior labrum anterior to posterior repair. In some patients, primary superior labrum anterior to posterior pathology can be managed via biceps tenodesis. Determining which procedure is most appropriate for and which technique and implant are preferred in a given patient with biceps tendon pathology is controversial. Less debate exists with regard to the timing of distal biceps tendon repair; however, considerable controversy exists with regard to selection of an appropriate surgical technique and implant. In addition, the treatment of patients with a chronic and/or retracted distal biceps tendon tear and patients in whom distal biceps tendon repair fails is extremely challenging. Orthopaedic surgeons should understand the anatomy of, nonsurgical and surgical treatment options for, and outcomes of patients with proximal or distal biceps tendon pathology.

The Utility of Biologics, Osteotomy, and Cartilage Restoration in the Knee.

The management of complex cartilage and meniscal pathology in young, athletic patients is extremely challenging. Patients with concomitant knee pathologies, including cartilage defects, meniscal deficiency, malalignment, and/or ligamentous insufficiency, are the patients in whom joint preservation surgery is most difficult. Clinical decision making for these patients is further complicated by articular cartilage lesions, which often are incidental findings; therefore, treatment decisions must be based on the confirmed contribution of articular cartilage lesions to symptomatology. Surgical management of any of the aforementioned knee pathologies that is performed in isolation typically results in acceptable patient outcomes; however, concomitant procedures for the management of concomitant knee pathologies often are essential to the success of any single procedure. The use of biologic therapy as an alternative to or to augment more conventional surgical management has increased in popularity in the past decade, and indications for biologic therapy continue to evolve. Orthopaedic surgeons should understand knee joint preservation techniques, including biologic and reconstructive approaches in young, high-demand patients.

Patient Understanding, Expectations, and Satisfaction Regarding Rotator Cuff Injuries and Surgical Management.

Rotator cuff injuries are among the most common in orthopaedics, with rotator cuff repair surgery consistently reported as one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. Patient satisfaction is becoming an increasingly important outcome metric as health care continues to evolve with regard to quality measures affecting physician reimbursement. Evidence supports that postoperative patient satisfaction, an important quality outcome metric, is highly influenced by preoperative patient expectations, which are in turn governed by patient knowledge and understanding. Many authors have delineated patient-, injury-, and surgery-specific variables associated with high preoperative expectations and satisfaction after rotator cuff surgery. Specifically, large rotator cuff tears, subscapularis tears, persistence of postoperative pain and dysfunction, worker's compensation cases, lower education level, and preoperative disability have been seen more frequently in patients reporting poor satisfaction. Others have reported variables associated with higher patient satisfaction such as being married, employed, and of older age at the time of surgery (>55 years old) predictive of higher satisfaction. Patient education preoperatively regarding details about the surgery and the postoperative plan both immediately after the procedure and for rehabilitation are critical in helping set patients' preoperative expectations that have a known effect on patients' subjective clinical outcomes.

Patient Understanding, Expectations, Outcomes, and Satisfaction Regarding Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Surgical Management.

Patient satisfaction has become an increasingly important outcome metric in orthopaedics and medicine in general as many initiatives at both the state and national levels aim to improve the efficiency and quality of health care. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are among the most common injuries in orthopaedics, with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery consistently reported as one of the most frequently performed procedures by orthopaedic surgeons. Patient-reported outcomes are frequently used to evaluate outcomes from the patient's perspective, and many physicians also ask patients about their satisfaction with treatment. A growing volume of literature has investigated the relation between preoperative patient expectations and postoperative patient satisfaction. The quality of online resources, patient expectations for ACLR, and factors associated with and/or predictive of either poor or good to excellent outcomes after surgery are described. This article critically reviews the orthopaedic literature on this important topic and identifies variables that influence patient expectations and satisfaction to help treating physicians better counsel and evaluate patients and ultimately improve outcomes of and satisfaction with ACLR surgery.

Increased Posterior Tibial Slope Is Associated With Increased Risk of Meniscal Root Tears: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: While increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) is an established risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament tears, the association between tibial slope and meniscal posterior root tears is not well-defined. PURPOSE: To summarize the available literature evaluating the association between PTS and meniscus root injuries compared with patients without root tears. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the Scopus, PubMed, and Embase databases. Human clinical studies evaluating the associations between the medial tibial slope (MTS), lateral tibial slope (LTS), lateral-to-medial (L-to-M) slope asymmetry, and the risk of meniscus root tears were included. Patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) and lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) were compared with a control group without root injury. Study quality was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies criteria. RESULTS: Ten studies with 1313 patients were included (884 patients with root tears; 429 controls). The LMPRT subgroup (n = 284) had a significantly greater LTS (mean ± SD, 7.3°± 1.5° vs 5.7°± 3.91°; P < .001), MTS (5.26°± 1.2° vs 4.8°± 1.25°; P < .001), and increased L-to-M asymmetry (2.3°± 1.3° vs 0.65°± 0.5°; P < .001) compared with controls. The MMPRT group (n = 600) had significantly increased MTS relative to controls (8.1°± 2.5° vs 4.3°± 0.7°; P < .001). Furthermore, there was a higher incidence of noncontact injuries (79.3%) and concomitant ramp lesions (56%) reported in patients with LMPRT. CONCLUSION: Increased MTS, LTS, and L-to-M slope asymmetry are associated with an increased risk of LMPRTs, while increased MTS is associated with MMPRTs. Surgeons should consider how proximal tibial anatomy increases the risk of meniscus root injury.

Antimicrobial effects of blue light therapy against cutibacterium acnes: optimal dosing and impact of serial treatments.

Background: Blue light therapy (BLT) is a Food and Drug Administration cleared modality used in dermatology as an effective treatment of acne. The primary purpose of this study is to determine if there are dose-dependent antimicrobial effects of BLT against Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes). Methods: A known strain of C. acnes was grown on chocolate agar in a controlled laboratory environment under anaerobic conditions for 1 week. After 1 week, 2-3 colonies of C. acnes were isolated and transferred to broth medium to incubate for 2 or 7 days. Broth vials (treatment arm) then underwent 1 of 6 different blue light dosing treatment regimens and a duplicate broth vial served as a control left open to the same environment. The BLT regimens were a single treatment of 25 J/cm2, 50 J/cm2, 75 J/cm2, 100 J/cm2, 2 serial treatments of 50 J/cm2 separated by 24 hours, or 2 serial treatments of 75 J/cm2 separated by 24 hours. The Omnilux Blue device (415 nm wavelength) was used for all BLT treatments and delivered, on average, 1.68 ± 0.004 J/min. Following treatment, the control and treatment broth samples were plated on chocolate agar and allowed to grow for 7 days. After 7 days, plates were counted and colony forming units (CFUs) were calculated. Six trials were completed for each BLT dosing regimen based on an a priori power analysis of 6 individual 2-sided t-tests. Comparisons in the primary outcome were made via mixed-effects analysis of variance with replicate as a random effect. Results: All BLT treatment regimens resulted in significantly fewer CFUs than their aggregate control plate CFUs (P < .05 for all). Furthermore, in 2-way comparison of CFUs between BLT treatment groups, a single treatment of 75 J/cm2 did lead to significantly less growth than 25 J/cm2 (P = .017) and 50 J/cm2 (P = .017). There were no improved antimicrobial effects with serial treatments when comparing 2 doses of 50 J/cm2 with a single dose of 100J/cm2, nor were 2 doses of 75 J/cm2 more efficacious than 100 J/cm2. Using the Omnilux Blue device, it took 44.8 minutes to deliver a 75 J/cm2 dose. Conclusion: BLT is an effective antimicrobial agent against this single virulent strain of C. acnes. Treatment dosing of 75 J/cm2 was identified to be the most effective dose per unit time. Serial treatments did not lead to superior antimicrobial effects over a single, high-dose treatment.