Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Psychol Health Med ; 25(3): 331-343, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31630537

RESUMO

Research regarding cross-behavioral relationships between the cognitive mechanisms motivating health behavior change is lacking for cancer survivors. This study investigated these relationships to inform the development of multiple health behavior change (MHBC) interventions for this at-risk population. Eligible participants included cancer survivors attending an intake appointment for smoking cessation services. This cross-sectional survey study assessed participants' self-efficacy and motivation (stage of change) for smoking cessation and exercise, as well as self-reported health behaviors. Analyses evaluated cross-behavioral associations between cognitive mechanisms and their relationships with smoking and exercise behaviors. Seventy-six participants completed the survey questionnaire. The correlation between self-efficacy scores for smoking cessation and exercise was statistically significant (r = .45, 95% CI [.09, .67]), as were correlations between self-efficacy and reported levels of exercise ((r = .44, 95% CI [.20, .65]) strenuous); ((r = .36, 95% CI [.12, .59]) moderate), exercise self-efficacy and smoking behavior (r = -.27, 95% CI [-.46, -.05]), and smoking self-efficacy and smoking behavior (r = -0.41, 95% CI [-.61, -.18]). For cancer survivors, associations between exercise self-efficacy and smoking cessation self-efficacy may offer an opportunity to leverage MHBC; specifically, this positive association may facilitate exercise intervention in survivors seeking smoking cessation services..


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Exercício Físico/psicologia , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Autoeficácia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia , Fumar/psicologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 25(6): 1873-1879, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28124735

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and obesity are prevalent in cancer survivors and decrease quality of life; however, the impact of the co-occurrence of these conditions has garnered little attention. This study investigated differences between obese and non-obese cancer survivors with CIPN and predictors of symptom burden and pain. METHODS: Patients with CIPN were administered the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and a modified version of pain descriptors from the McGill Pain Inventory. Independent t tests assessed group differences between obese and non-obese survivors, and linear regression analyses explored predictors of patient outcomes. RESULTS: Results indicated a significant difference in symptom severity scores for obese (M = 32.89, SD = 25.53) versus non-obese (M = 19.35, SD = 16.08) patients (t(37.86) = -2.49, p = .02). Significant differences were also found for a total number of pain descriptors endorsed by obese (M = 4.21, SD = 3.45) versus non-obese (M = 2.42, SD = 2.69) participants (t(74) = -2.53, p = .01). Obesity was a significant predictor of symptom severity and total pain descriptors endorsed. Other significant predictors included age and months since treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors with CIPN and co-occurring obesity may be more at risk for decreased quality of life through increased symptom severity and pain compared to non-obese survivors. This paper identified risk factors, including obesity, age, and months since treatment, that can be clinically identified for monitoring distress in CIPN patients. Future research should focus on the longitudinal relationship between obesity and CIPN, and robust interventions to address the multifaceted issues faced by cancer survivors.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/complicações , Obesidade/complicações , Dor/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/induzido quimicamente , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Sobreviventes
3.
Psychooncology ; 24(11): 1377-83, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25601235

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Depression and reduced quality of life are often reported in patients with upper-extremity lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment. Little is known about how pain and body image influence depression in patients with lymphedema. The current study examined the association of pain intensity and body integrity beliefs with depressive symptoms and the extent to which body image dissatisfaction mediated these associations. METHODS: A cross-sectional sample of patients with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment completed self-report questionnaires of pain, body image, and depressive symptoms. Hierarchical regression analyses and tests of mediation were conducted to examine the associations among the variables of interest. RESULTS: Pain intensity and body integrity beliefs were positively associated with depressive symptoms. Further, body image dissatisfaction mediated the relationship between pain and depressive symptoms, indicating that higher levels of pain led to higher states of body image dissatisfaction, which, in turn, led to greater depressive symptoms. Body image dissatisfaction also mediated the relationship between body integrity beliefs and depressive symptoms, suggesting that greater body integrity beliefs led to higher dissatisfaction with one's body and subsequently to greater depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide preliminary evidence that pain intensity and body image are important factors in understanding depressive symptoms in patients with lymphedema. Clinical implications include screening for pain and body image concerns in this population to identify patients who are in distress. Counseling interventions targeting body image dissatisfaction can also be potentially helpful for patients with lymphedema.


Assuntos
Imagem Corporal/psicologia , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Depressão/epidemiologia , Linfedema/psicologia , Dor/psicologia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Linfedema/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/diagnóstico , Medição da Dor , Satisfação Pessoal , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Regressão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Appetite ; 81: 180-92, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24949566

RESUMO

Inhibitory control and sensitivity to reward are relevant to the food choices individuals make frequently. An imbalance of these systems can lead to deficits in decision-making that are relevant to food ingestion. This study evaluated the relationship between dietary behaviors - binge eating and consumption of sweetened beverages and snacks - and behavioral control processes among 198 adolescents, ages 14 to 17. Neurocognitive control processes were assessed with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a generic Go/No-Go task, and a food-specific Go/No-Go task. The food-specific version directly ties the task to food cues that trigger responses, addressing an integral link between cue-habit processes. Diet was assessed with self-administered food frequency and binge eating questionnaires. Latent variable models revealed marked gender differences. Inhibitory problems on the food-specific and generic Go/No-Go tasks were significantly correlated with binge eating only in females, whereas inhibitory problems measured with these tasks were the strongest correlates of sweet snack consumption in males. Higher BMI percentile and sedentary behavior also predicted binge eating in females and sweet snack consumption in males. Inhibitory problems on the generic Go/No-Go, poorer affective decision-making on the IGT, and sedentary behavior were associated with sweetened beverage consumption in males, but not females. The food-specific Go/No-Go was not predictive in models evaluating sweetened beverage consumption, providing some initial discriminant validity for the task, which consisted of sweet/fatty snacks as no-go signals and no sugar-sweetened beverage signals. This work extends research findings, revealing gender differences in inhibitory function relevant to behavioral control. Further, the findings contribute to research implicating the relevance of cues in habitual behaviors and their relationship to snack food consumption in an understudied population of diverse adolescents not receiving treatment for eating disorders.


Assuntos
Bulimia/psicologia , Comportamento Alimentar/psicologia , Inibição Psicológica , Edulcorantes/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Bebidas , Índice de Massa Corporal , Comportamento de Escolha , Estudos Transversais , Sinais (Psicologia) , Ingestão de Energia , Feminino , Preferências Alimentares , Humanos , Masculino , Atividade Motora , Lanches , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
J Safety Res ; 38(4): 407-11, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17884427

RESUMO

PROBLEM: Safety-belt use reduces motor vehicle crash-related morbidity and mortality, yet an estimated 18% of drivers do not consistently buckle up (NHTSA, 2005). In 1985, Geller and colleagues developed an interpersonal Flash-for-Life prompt that increased belt use among 22% of 1,087 unbuckled drivers (Geller, Bruff, & Nimmer, 1985). METHOD: The Flash-for-Life intervention was re-introduced at a large university with high safety-belt use (i.e., 80%). College students stood at parking-lot entrance/exits and "flashed" signs with the message, "Please Buckle Up, I Care" to unbuckled drivers. RESULTS: Of 427 unbuckled drivers observed, 30% of these complied with the prompt. Male drivers were significantly more likely to comply with prompts delivered by females. DISCUSSION: Compliance was higher than in the 1985 study, indicating a high baseline rate of safety-belt use does not negate potential beneficial influence of a prompting intervention. This intervention is particularly effective with college-aged males, a sub-group of the driving population least likely to buckle-up. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: A simple behavioral prompt could be used at most industrial complexes to increase safety-belt use among vehicle occupants who are not buckled-up.


Assuntos
Condução de Veículo/legislação & jurisprudência , Automóveis/legislação & jurisprudência , Promoção da Saúde , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Gestão da Segurança , Cintos de Segurança/legislação & jurisprudência , Marketing Social , Humanos , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Virginia
6.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 33(10): 758-765, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28820332

RESUMO

For cancer survivors, who also often present with co-existing health conditions, exercise testing is often performed using submaximal protocols incorporating linear heart rate response for estimating the cardiorespiratory capacity and assessing exercise tolerance. However, use of beta-blocker medications, during sub-maximal protocols based on linear HR response can be problematic. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE), which takes into account an individual's overall perception of effort, can be used as a complementary tool that does not rely solely on the heart rate response to increased workload. We compared heart rate response (VO2HR) and self-rating of perceived exertion (VO2RPE) in a graded submaximal exercise test (GXT) in 93 endometrial cancer survivors. The results of the GXT were stratified according to whether participants were taking beta-blocker (BB) medications or not (non-BB). Among non-BB participants, there was no difference between the mean VO2HR and the mean VO2RPE estimates of cardiorespiratory capacity (mlO2//kg/min) (20.4 and 19.3, respectively; p = 0.166). Among BB participants, the mean VO2HR approached significant difference than the mean VO2RPE (21.7 mlO2//kg/min and 17.6 mlO2//kg/min, respectively; p = 0.087). Bland-Altman plots for both methods showed a proportional bias for the non-BB group; but not the BB group. Our results suggest that sub-maximal protocols based on Borg's Rating of Perceived exertion (RPE) produce differing results from sub-maximal protocols based on HR response when applied to clinical population taking BB medications. Using RPE instead of HR for participants on BB medications may be a better method for assessing the exercise tolerance for estimating the cardiorespiratory capacity in sub-maximal exercise testing.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Aptidão Cardiorrespiratória , Neoplasias do Endométrio/terapia , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Nível de Saúde , Esforço Físico , Autoimagem , Autorrelato , Adulto , Idoso , Ciclismo , Neoplasias do Endométrio/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/fisiopatologia , Tolerância ao Exercício , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Análise dos Mínimos Quadrados , Modelos Lineares , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Consumo de Oxigênio , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
7.
JMIR Cancer ; 2(1): e1, 2016 Feb 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28410164

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Effective, broad-reaching channels are important for the delivery of health behavior interventions in order to meet the needs of the growing population of cancer survivors in the United States. New technology presents opportunities to increase the reach of health behavior change interventions and therefore their overall impact. However, evidence suggests that older adults may be slower in their adoption of these technologies than the general population. Survivors' interest for more traditional channels of delivery (eg, clinic) versus new technology-based channels (eg, smartphones) may depend on a variety of factors, including demographics, current health status, and the behavior requiring intervention. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the factors that predict cancer survivors' interest in new technology-based health behavior intervention modalities versus traditional modalities. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to 1871 survivors of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. Participants' demographics, diet and physical activity behaviors, interest in health behavior interventions, and interest in intervention delivery modalities were collected. Using path analysis, we explored the relationship between four intervention modality variables (ie, clinic, telephone, computer, and smartphone) and potential predictors of modality interest. RESULTS: In total, 1053 respondents to the survey (56.3% response rate); 847 provided complete data for this analysis. Delivery channel interest was highest for computer-based interventions (236/847, 27.9% very/extremely interested) and lowest for smartphone-based interventions (73/847, 8.6%), with interest in clinic-based (147/847, 17.3%) and telephone-delivered (143/847, 16.9%) falling in between. Use of other technology platforms, such as Web cameras and social networking sites, was positively predictive of interest in technology-based delivery channels. Older survivors were less likely to report interest in smartphone-based diet interventions. Physical activity, fruit and vegetable consumption, weight status, and age moderated relationships between interest in targeted intervention behavior and modality. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified several predictors of survivor interest in various health behavior intervention delivery modalities. Overall, computer-based interventions were found to be most acceptable, while smartphones were the least. Factors related to survivors' current technology use and health status play a role in their interest for technology-based intervention versus more traditional delivery channels. Future health behavior change research in this population should consider participants' demographic, clinical, and lifestyle characteristics when selecting a delivery channel. Furthermore, current health behavior interventions for older cancer survivors may be best delivered over the Internet. Smartphone interventions may be feasible in the future following further adoption and familiarization by this particular population.

8.
Eval Health Prof ; 38(3): 343-66, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24346658

RESUMO

Inadequate statistical power to detect treatment effects in health research is a problem that is compounded when testing for mediation. In general, the preferred strategy for increasing power is to increase the sample size, but there are many situations where additional participants cannot be recruited, necessitating the use of other methods to increase statistical power. Many of these other strategies, commonly applied to analysis of variance and multiple regression models, can be applied to mediation models with similar results. Additional predictors or blocking variables will increase or decrease statistical power, however, depending on whether these variables are related to the mediator, the outcome, or both. The effect of these two methods on the power for tests of mediation is illustrated through the use of simulations. Implications for health researchers using these methods are discussed.


Assuntos
Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Modelos Estatísticos , Humanos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Tamanho da Amostra
9.
Eval Rev ; 37(5): 405-31, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24681690

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Causal inference continues to be a critical aspect of evaluation research. Recent research in causal inference for statistical mediation has focused on addressing the sequential ignorability assumption; specifically, that there is no confounding between the mediator and the outcome variable. OBJECTIVES: This article compares and contrasts three different methods for assessing sensitivity to confounding and describes the graphical depiction of these methods. DESIGN: Two types of data were used to fully examine the plots for sensitivity analysis. The first type was generated data from a single mediator model with a confounder influencing both the mediator and the outcome variable. The second was data from an actual intervention study. With both types of data, situations are examined where confounding has a large effect and a small effect. SUBJECTS: The nonsimulated data were from a large intervention study to decrease intentions to use steroids among high school football players. We demonstrate one situation where confounding is likely and another situation where confounding is unlikely. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss how these methods could be implemented in future mediation studies as well as the limitations and future directions for these methods.


Assuntos
Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Viés , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Estatísticos
10.
J Appl Behav Anal ; 43(2): 321-5, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21119908

RESUMO

ResearcherS used two behavioral prompts to compare increases in safety belt use: a Click It or Ticket prompt or a Flash-for-Life prompt. Participants were 1,822 unbuckled drivers exiting two student parking lots of a large university. Research assistants identified unbuckled drivers, flashed one of the two prompts, and recorded whether drivers buckled after the prompt and the drivers' facial expressions and hand gestures. Findings and implications are discussed.


Assuntos
Cinésica , Cintos de Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Condução de Veículo/psicologia , Sinais (Psicologia) , Expressão Facial , Feminino , Gestos , Humanos , Masculino , Reforço Psicológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa