Analyzing the effect of interview time and day on emergency medicine residency interview scores.

BACKGROUND: When it comes to scheduling interviews, medical students may wonder if they need a strategy to increase their likelihood of matching. Previous studies examined the temporal effects of the residency interview on overall match rate; however, there are additional factors that affect the match process, including board examination scores and letters of recommendation. Only few studies have examined the effect interview time of day has on match success. The current study examines the impact date and time of interview during the interview season have on candidates' respective interview scores. METHODS: Interview data over a three-year period (i.e., three interview cycles) was examined at a PGY-1-3, ACGME-accredited EM residency program in Philadelphia. Date of interview and time of day of interview (i.e., morning versus afternoon) was examined. A linear regression analysis was performed to determine if there is a statistically-significant difference in overall interview scores based on date during the interview season and time of day. RESULTS: There is no statistically-significant effect of time of day or date on residency interview scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are congruent with other studies on the temporal effects of residency interviews on overall match rate. Findings should provide reassurance to students scheduling interviews, as time slots have not been found to have a significant relationship with overall interview score. Future studies should more holistically analyze the residency application process.

Determining Goals of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Virtual Course for Emergency Medicine Residents.

Background Patients' goals of care (GOC), which direct end-of-life clinical decision-making, should be established in conjunction with their primary physician when they are well. However, these discussions are often left for when critical intervention is needed in the Emergency Department, and this has been exacerbated in the new context of the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Establishing effective, formal training for Emergency Medicine (EM) residents to successfully carry out these conversations and potentially improve patient care is needed. Methodology A physician dual-certified in Emergency Medicine and Palliative Care developed a virtual course on best practices in determining GOC for EM residents. It occurred for one hour during resident didactic conference and all residents who attended were included. A survey was sent to all participants to assess the success of the course's content and method of delivery. Results Of the 39 residents who participated, 18 (46%) completed the survey. The majority (94%) agreed the course helped close knowledge gaps and increased comfort in carrying out these discussions and 100% planned to incorporate these learning points into practice. A smaller majority (61%) thought the virtual platform was an effective method of delivery and 61% felt the breakout rooms helped with learning retention. Open-ended comments reflected learners' desire for more of this content, suggestions to augment with simulation, as well as technical difficulties experienced. Conclusions This course helped EM residents identify and close knowledge gaps in determining patients' GOC who plan to incorporate what they learned into their clinical practice. Next steps in validating the course include seeking more pointed feedback of the virtual format and assessing its effects over broader audiences after making feedback-focused adjustments to its content and delivery.

Making the Cut: Implementing a Low Cost, Low Fidelity Simulation Model for Teaching Emergency Thoracotomy Procedure.

Emergent thoracotomy is a rare but high-stakes procedure for trauma patients. Emergency medicine residents are expected to perform this procedure after graduation, but few get the opportunity to perform it, leading to suboptimal performance and patient morbidity and mortality. Previous low-cost thoracotomy trainers revolve around modifying an existing costly thoracotomy task trainer or bear limited resemblance to actual landmarks and anatomy. This study attempts to bridge this gap by creating a low-cost model with supplies found at most home improvement/craft stores that is more anatomically accurate. We constructed a low fidelity model, which residents ultimately found to be helpful in mastering this rare procedure, and after the training session, they reported a greater level of comfort and familiarization with the procedure.