Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va) ; 64(1): 24-9, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12570392

RESUMO

A problem may arise in ventilation design when the contaminant source is located in the worker's wake, where turbulence and vortex formation can carry the contaminant into the breathing zone even though the source is downwind. It was found previously that forced directional variations in the flow can reduce or eliminate the vortex formation that causes these local reversals. Reported here is a simple realization of this concept, in which an oscillating jet of air was directed at a mannequin in an otherwise steady flow of air. A 50th percentile male mannequin was placed in a nearly uniform flow of approximately 0.18 m/sec (36 ft/min). A low-velocity tracer gas source (isobutylene) was held in the standing mannequin's hands with the upper arms vertical and the elbows at 90 degrees. Four ventilation scenarios were compared by concentration measurements in the breathing zone, using photoionization detectors: (A) uniform flow; (B) addition of a steady jet with initial velocity 5.1 m/sec (1.0 x 10(3) ft/min) directed at the mannequin's back, parallel to the main flow; (C) making the jet oscillate to 45 degrees on either side of the centerline with a period of 13 sec; and (D) introducing a blockage at the centerline so the oscillating jet never blew directly at the worker. At the 97.5% confidence level the interrupted oscillating jet (case D) achieved at least 99% exposure reduction compared with the uniform flow by itself (case A), at least 93% compared with the steady jet (case B), and at least 45% exposure reduction compared with the unblocked oscillating jet (case C).


Assuntos
Movimentos do Ar , Exposição por Inalação , Modelos Teóricos , Exposição Ocupacional , Ventilação , Humanos , Movimento , Fenômenos Físicos , Física , Respiração , Local de Trabalho
2.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 1(7): 423-9, 2004 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15238311

RESUMO

Researchers from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) have conducted several evaluations of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) systems for the United States Postal Service (USPS) since autumn 2001 when (a) terrorist(s) employed the mail system for acts of bioterrorism. As a part of the USPS 2002 Emergency Preparedness Plan, the development and installation of LEV onto USPS mail-processing equipment can reduce future exposures to operators from potentially hazardous contaminants, such as anthrax, which might be emitted during the processing of mail. This article describes how NIOSH field testing led to the development of recommended testing procedures for evaluations of LEV capture efficiency for mail-processing equipment, including tracer gas measurements, smoke release observations, air velocity measurements, and decay-rate testing under access hoods.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Ventilação/instrumentação , Microbiologia do Ar , Antraz/microbiologia , Bioterrorismo , Monitoramento Ambiental/instrumentação , Filtração , Humanos , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Tamanho da Partícula , Serviços Postais , Fumaça/análise , Hexafluoreto de Enxofre , Estados Unidos , Ventilação/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa