Long-term results of kidney transplantation with cyclosporine- and everolimus-based immunosuppression.

The aim of the study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of everolimus with cyclosporine (CsA) in de novo renal transplant recipients. The immunosuppressive regimen, including basiliximab, everolimus (3 mg), and low-dose CsA, was administered to 17 patients, of whom 15 were part of a multicenter randomized study that stipulated cessation of steroids at 7 days posttransplantation in 5 recipients. Five patients underwent dialysis after transplantation for delayed graft function (DGF; 29%), all of whom showed a good recovery within 3 weeks. The mean follow-up was 45.7 months (SD +/- 13). The 1-year graft survival was 100%. We observed one acute rejection episode. No patient experienced a cytomegalovirus infection. Increased cholesterol and triglyceride levels were reported in almost all patients. Severe arthralgia (n = 3) was treated by everolimus dose reduction to maintain trough levels at 3 ng/mL. We noted a high rate of switch to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) throughout follow-up (n = 7), due to everolimus-induced side effects. However, we did not observe normalization of lipids after the switch: patients always required stain treatment, resulting in slightly lower serum cholesterol and triglycerides. Everolimus plus CsA was effective to prevent acute rejection after kidney transplantation. To manage the induced side effects of the drugs C(2) monitoring is mandatory, targeting 350 ng/mL during 1 year and 200 to 250 ng/mL thereafter. Careful reduction of everolimus trough levels to 3 ng/mL is recommended for patients with arthralgia.

Graft failure due to hemolytic uremic syndrome recurrence.

The hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a severe disease characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal failure. We herein report our experience with a 43-year-old female patient who underwent a second cadaveric kidney transplantation in February 2005, for adult-onset HUS. The first renal transplantation, which was performed in 1996, required removal after 3 weeks for probable recurrence of HUS. The immunosuppressive regimen for the second transplant included basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. On postoperative day (POD) 7, she received steroid treatment for an acute rejection episode with improved renal function. On POD 19 due to worsening renal function, a graft biopsy showed HUS recurrence, thus we instituted hemodialysis and then plasmapheresis treatments. At two months after transplantation, the patient continued under plasmapheresis treatment due to clinical evidence of HUS. On POD 80, cytomegalovirus infection was diagnosed and intravenous gancyclovir treatment started for 3 weeks. After 110 days from transplant, a deterioration in renal function was evident: the graft was swollen and painful with Doppler ultrasound showing patency of both the renal artery and vein but, low blood flow. After 2 weeks of hemodialysis, the patient underwent transplantectomy. In adult-onset HUS the recurrence rate reduces graft survival, particularly among patients undergoing second transplantation.

Use of mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplantation: a literature review.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug, exhibiting its effect through inhibition of proliferation of T and B lymphocytes. Standard primary immunosuppressive therapy after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is based on a calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI): cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Renal failure with arterial hypertension, due to CNI side-effects, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after OLT. Several studies have shown the efficacy of MMF to improve CNI-induced nephrotoxicity, blood pressure, and uric acid concentration in liver transplant patients with concomitant reduction or withdrawal of CNI. Predose plasma mycophenolic acid concentrations (MPA) are related to adverse events, drug dose, and clinical status. Blood level values outside the suggested MPA therapeutic range are associated with acute rejection episodes and side effects, which have been described in about half of the patients treated with MMF. Most authors have described gastrointestinal and hematological side-effects, whereas these appear usually dose related, responding quickly to reduction. MMF is potent and safe immunosuppressive agent, and replacement of CNI by MMF in liver transplant patients with renal dysfunction may improve not only kidney function but also other CNI-associated side-effects, such as hypertension and hyperuricemia, with a low risk of rejection.

Amantadine monotherapy is ineffective in the treatment of hepatitis C virus recurrence in the post-liver transplantation setting.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is universal after liver transplantation (LT), yet no effective therapy is available. Amantadine (Am) is currently under evaluation. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and the effectiveness of Am monotherapy in LT patients with HCV recurrence. METHODS: Twelve patients who underwent transplantation 1-4 years earlier were included when there was detectable serum HCV-RNA and histological signs of liver damage with evidence of progressive hepatic fibrosis. Basal Ishak's scores were 2.1 +/- 1.3 and 5.1 +/- 2.7, respectively. Exclusion criteria were histological cirrhosis and comorbidities. All patients were receiving cyclosporine, with or without azathioprine. Amantadine was given orally (200 mg/d) for 3 months. RESULTS: Eight (67%) patients completed a 3-month treatment course without dose adjustments. Am was reduced to 100 mg/d in 3 cases and withdrawn in 1 due to side effects, namely, insomnia (n = 7; 58%), tremor (n = 4; 33%), headache (n = 2; 17%), asthenia (n = 2; 17%), and dermatitis, diarrhea, and increased creatinine (each n = 1; 8%). Serum HCV-RNA levels decreased in 3 patients, increased in 3, and remained unchanged in the others. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) remained abnormal in all cases. Liver function test results did not improve. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term Am monotherapy was ineffective to treat post-LT HCV relapse and was associated with significant side effects.