RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM) is a technique that is worthwhile for anesthesiologists because it allows spinal cord and plexus anatomy to be visualized three dimensionally and followed over time in the same animal. For example, the long-term effect of indwelling intrathecal or plexus catheters can be studied in situ, and convective and diffusive forces within intrathecal, epidural, or nerve sheath spaces can be investigated. Further, diffusion-weighted MRM, which measures an "apparent diffusion coefficient" (ADC), can be used to track the presence of ischemia, hypoperfusion, or cytotoxic edema. This study investigates problems associated with the use of in vivo MRM for spinal cord and peripheral nerve studies in the rat. METHODS: Twenty-one anesthetized female Fisher CDF rats were used. Group 1 (n=7) was used for anatomic three-dimensional studies. Groups 2 (n=4), 3 (n=4), and 4 (n=6) were used for measurements of the ADC. Group 2 served as controls, group 3 received lumbar intrathecal catheters, and group 4 received cervical intrathecal catheters. RESULTS: Cervical spine, lumbar spine, and spinal nerves and ganglia were accurately visualized with MRM. As a rule, spinal cord gray and white matter were better demonstrated using diffusion-weighted proton stains. By contrast, T2-weighted proton staining superiorly demonstrated structures surrounding the spinal cord. In groups 3 and 4, indwelling intrathecal catheters did not affect the spinal cord ADC, indicating normal blood flow and no cytotoxic edema. Contrast studies revealed nonhomogeneous distribution of contrast predominately in the lateral and ventral intrathecal space. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional diffusion-weighted MRM displays cervical and lumbar spine anatomy accurately in vivo. Apparent diffusion coefficients measurements are feasible in rat cervical spinal cord with intrathecal catheters. Spinal cord ADCs are unaffected by intrathecal catheters, indicating normal spinal cord perfusion.
Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Microscopia/métodos , Medula Espinal/anatomia & histologia , Animais , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Cateteres de Demora , Vértebras Cervicais , Corantes , Meios de Contraste , Difusão , Edema/diagnóstico , Edema/patologia , Espaço Epidural , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Injeções Espinhais/instrumentação , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/patologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Vértebras Lombares , Neurilema , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/diagnóstico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/patologia , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos F344 , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiologia , Medula Espinal/irrigação sanguínea , Doenças da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Doenças da Medula Espinal/patologia , Nervos Espinhais/anatomia & histologia , Nervos Espinhais/irrigação sanguíneaRESUMO
Colonic transit scintigraphy was developed to quantitatively evaluate colonic transit. Using this technique the progression of a radiolabeled marker from cecal instillation to defecation was studied in 7 normal male volunteers. An 8-ml bolus containing 50 mu Ci of indium 111-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid was instilled into the cecum via a 2-mm tube, which was passed orally, and serial scintigrams were obtained over 48 h. By 48 h, 70.7% +/- 9.1% (mean +/- SEM) of the instilled activity had been defecated. The cecum and ascending colon emptied rapidly, with a half-emptying time of 87.6 +/- 27.0 min. Geometric center analysis showed an initial logarithmic progression of activity in the proximal colon and a linear progression distally. This study suggests that the transverse colon, not the cecum and ascending colon, may be the primary site for fecal storage. Colonic transit scintigraphy is a safe, physiologic, and quantitative method for evaluating the colonic transit of fecal material and may provide a useful tool for evaluating normal and abnormal large intestinal physiology.
Assuntos
Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Motilidade Gastrointestinal , Adulto , Colo/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Métodos , CintilografiaRESUMO
Accurate identification of surface landmarks is essential for the successful performance of peripheral nerve blocks. The variability between experienced and inexperienced practitioners in identifying anatomical landmarks has not been studied previously. Anaesthetists were asked to identify the point of needle insertion for posterior lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blocks on a volunteer using a standard textbook description. The chosen point for needle insertion was described in terms of X and Y co-ordinates, measured in millimetres, from a zero reference point marked on a volunteer's back. Fifteen experienced and 22 inexperienced anaesthetists took part in the study. The lumbar plexus block mean [range] values for the X, Y co-ordinates were 80 [62-108], 66 [46-86] and 92 [49-150], 62 [0-131] in the experienced and inexperienced groups, respectively. The sciatic nerve block X, Y co-ordinates were 77 [62-99], 70 [49-89] and 68 [29-116], 62 [26-93] in the experienced and inexperienced groups, respectively. The variance for the point of needle insertion was significantly greater in the inexperienced group (p <0.01) for both the lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blocks. We conclude that with increasing experience, there is decreased variability in determining the point of needle insertion using anatomical landmarks.
Assuntos
Anestesiologia/normas , Competência Clínica , Bloqueio Nervoso/normas , Anestesiologia/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Humanos , Plexo Lombossacral , Masculino , Agulhas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Nervo IsquiáticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Major breast cancer surgery is associated with a high incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting and pain. Regional anaesthesia, with intraoperative sedation, would seem an ideal alternative to general anaesthesia for this type of surgery. We report our initial experience using paravertebral blocks (PVB) to provide anaesthesia for major breast surgery. METHODS: Twenty-five patients agreeing to have surgery performed under paravertebral blocks were studied. Procedures performed varied from simple lumpectomy with axillary dissection to modified radical mastectomy with axillary dissection. During monitored sedation, blocks opposite spinous processes of C7-T6 were performed using bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine, 3-4 ml per segment. Patients were evaluated for 72 hr and were requested to document: (i) when sensation returned (ii) incidence and frequency of nausea or vomiting (iii) degree of discomfort and medication taken. RESULTS: Twenty patients had blocks that required no supplementation. Five patients had blocks that were incomplete. No complications were attributed to the blocks. Post-operatively, patients with successful blocks had minimal nausea, vomiting and pain. No patients found the procedure unsatisfactory. Patients with successful blocks were all very satisfied. CONCLUSION: Our initial results show that PVB for breast cancer surgery can be successfully performed in a majority of patients with few side effects. All patients with successful blocks were returned to the ambulatory care unit, bypassing the recovery room. That breast cancer surgery under regional anaesthesia can be safely performed as an ambulatory procedure has the potential for accomplishing major cost-saving.
Assuntos
Anestesia por Condução/métodos , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Information about the onset time and duration of action of ropivacaine during a combined lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block is not available. This study compares bupivacaine and ropivacaine to determine the optimal long-acting local anaesthetic for lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Forty adult patients scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty, under lumbar plexus and sciatic block were entered into this double-blind randomized study. Patients were assigned (20 per group) to receive lumbar plexus block using 30 ml of local anaesthetic and a sciatic nerve block using 15 ml of local anaesthetic with either bupivacaine 0.5% or ropivacaine 0.5%. All solutions contained fresh epinephrine in a 1:400,000 concentration. Every one minute after local anaesthetic injection, patients were assessed to determine loss of motor function and loss of pinprick sensation in the L1-S1 dermatomes. The time to request first analgesic was documented from the PCA pump. This time was used as evidence of block regression. RESULTS: Blocks failed in four patients in each group. The mean onset time of both motor and sensory blockade was between 14 and 18 min in both groups. Duration of sensory blockade was longer in the bupivacaine group, 17 +/- 3 hr, than in the ropivacaine group, 13 +/- 2 hr (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.5% have a similar onset of motor and sensory blockade when used for lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block. Analgesic duration from bupivacaine 0.5% was prolonged by four hours compared with an equal volume of ropivacaine 0.5%.
Assuntos
Amidas/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Artroplastia , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Plexo Lombossacral , Bloqueio Nervoso , Nervo Isquiático , Adulto , Idoso , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neurônios Motores/efeitos dos fármacos , Neurônios Aferentes/efeitos dos fármacos , Limiar da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Ropivacaina , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
UNLABELLED: The onset time and duration of action of ropivacaine during an interscalene block are not known. The potentially improved safety profile of ropivacaine may allow the use of higher concentrations to try and speed onset time. We compared bupivacaine and ropivacaine to determine the optimal long-acting local anesthetic and concentration for interscalene brachial plexus block. Seventy-five adult patients scheduled for outpatient shoulder surgery under interscalene block were entered into this double-blind, randomized study. Patients were assigned (n = 25 per group) to receive an interscalene block using 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, or 0.75% ropivacaine. All solutions contained fresh epinephrine in a 1:400,000 concentration. At 1-min intervals after local anesthetic injection, patients were assessed to determine loss of shoulder abduction and loss of pinprick in the C5-6 dermatomes. Before discharge, patients were asked to document the time of first oral narcotic use, when incisional discomfort began, and when full sensation returned to the shoulder. The mean onset time of both motor and sensory blockade was <6 min in all groups. Duration of sensory blockade was similar in all groups as defined by the three recovery measures. We conclude that there is no clinically important difference in times to onset and recovery of interscalene block for bupivacaine 0.5%, ropivacaine 0.5%, and ropivacaine 0.75% when injected in equal volumes. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we demonstrated a similar efficacy between equal concentrations of ropivacaine and bupivacaine. In addition, increasing the concentration of ropivacaine from 0.5% to 0.75% fails to improve the onset or duration of interscalene brachial plexus block.
Assuntos
Amidas/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Plexo Braquial , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio Nervoso , Ombro/cirurgia , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ropivacaina , SensaçãoRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is commonly used to prevent postoperative thromboembolism. Currently, there is no convenient test to measure the degree of anticoagulation from LMWH. This prospective study examines the relationship of thromboelastography and serum anti-Xa concentration in patients treated with enoxaparin. Twenty-four adult patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery using epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Epidural catheters were removed the morning after surgery before the commencement of subcutaneous enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily. Venous blood samples were obtained at 1) the induction of anesthesia (baseline), 2) immediately before the third dose of enoxaparin postoperatively (Day 2-trough), 3) 4 h after the third dose postoperatively (Day 2-peak), and 4) immediately before the fifth dose postoperatively (Day 3-trough). Whole blood samples were obtained for thromboelastography, activated clotting time, and anti-Xa level analyses at each of the four time intervals. At the four sample intervals, the r time (mean +/- SEM). (20 +/- 1, 25 +/- 2, 51 +/- 6, 31 +/- 3 mm) and the k time (9 +/- 0. 7, 12 +/- 1, 27 +/- 5, 14 +/- 2 mm) of the thromboelastograph were significantly correlated with the expected peak and trough levels of LMWH and serum anti-Xa levels (P: < 0.05). At the Day 3-trough, thromboelastograph r times exceeded the normal range in 6 of 25 patients (25%). Prolongation of r time and k time on postoperative Day 3 may indicate an exaggerated response to LMWH. Thromboelastography is a test that could potentially correlate with the degree of anticoagulation produced by low molecular weight heparin. IMPLICATIONS: Thromboelastography is a test that could potentially correlate with the degree of anticoagulation produced by low molecular weight heparin. The r time from the thromboelastogram correlates with serum anti-Xa concentration.