RESUMO
Essentials Platelet phenotypes can be modified by lentiviral transduction of hematopoietic stem cells. Megakaryocyte-specific lentiviral vectors were tested in vitro and in vivo for restricted expression. The glycoprotein 6 vector expressed almost exclusively in megakaryocytes. The platelet factor 4 vector was the strongest but with activity in hematopoietic stem cells. SUMMARY: Background Lentiviral transduction and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) can be utilized to modify the phenotype of megakaryocytes and platelets. As the genetic modification in HSCs is transmitted onto all hematopoietic progenies, transgene expression from the vector should be restricted to megakaryocytes to avoid un-physiologic effects by ectopic transgene expression. This can be achieved by lentiviral vectors that control expression by lineage-specific promoters. Methods In this study, we introduced promoters of megakaryocyte/platelet-specific genes, namely human glycoprotein 6 (hGP6) and hGP9, into third generation lentiviral vectors and analyzed their functionality in vitro and in vivo in bone marrow transplantation assays. Their specificity and efficiency of expression was compared with lentiviral vectors utilizing the promoters of murine platelet factor 4 (mPf4) and hGP1BA, both with strong activity in megakaryocytes (MKs) used in earlier studies, and the ubiquitously expressing phosphoglycerate kinase (hPGK) and spleen focus forming virus (SFFV) enhancer/promoters. Results Expression from the mPf4 vector in MKs and platelets was the strongest similar to expression from the viral SFFV promoter, however, the mPf4 vector, also exhibited considerable off-target expression in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. In contrast, the newly generated hGP6 vector was highly specific to megakaryocytes and platelets. The specificity was also retained when reducing the promoter size to 350 bp, making it a valuable new tool for lentiviral expression in MKs/platelets. Conclusion MK-specific vectors express preferentially in the megakaryocyte lineage. These vectors can be applied to develop murine models to study megakaryocyte and platelet function, or for gene therapy targeting proteins to platelets.
Assuntos
Plaquetas/metabolismo , Vetores Genéticos , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/citologia , Lentivirus/genética , Megacariócitos/metabolismo , Animais , Transplante de Medula Óssea , Diferenciação Celular , Linhagem da Célula , Glicoproteínas/genética , Proteínas de Fluorescência Verde/metabolismo , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Microscopia de Fluorescência , Fator Plaquetário 4/genética , Regiões Promotoras GenéticasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Platelet aggregation at sites of vascular injury is essential for normal hemostasis, but may also cause pathologic vessel occlusion. Rho GTPases are molecular switches that regulate essential cellular processes, and they have pivotal functions in the cardiovascular system. Rac1 is an important regulator of platelet cytoskeletal reorganization, and contributes to platelet activation. Rac1 inhibitors are thought to be beneficial in a wide range of therapeutic settings, and have therefore been tested in vivo for a variety of disorders. Two small-molecule inhibitors, NSC23766 and EHT1864, have been characterized in different cell types, demonstrating high specificity for Rac1 and Rac, respectively. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the specificity of NSC23766 and EHT1864. METHODS: Platelet function was assessed in mouse wild-type and Rac1-deficient platelets by the use of flow cytometric analysis of cellular activation and aggregometry. Platelet spreading was analyzed with differential interference contrast microscopy, and activation of effector molecules was analyzed with biochemical approaches. RESULTS: NSC23766 and EHT1864 showed strong and distinct Rac1-independent effects at 100 µm in platelet function tests. Both inhibitors induced Rac1-specific inhibition of platelet spreading, but also markedly impaired agonist-induced activation of Rac1(-/-) platelets. Furthermore, glycoprotein Ib-mediated signaling was dramatically inhibited by NSC23766 in both wild-type and Rac1-deficient platelets. Importantly, these inhibitors directly affected the activation of the Rac1 effectors p21-activated kinase (PAK)1 and PAK2. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal critical off-target effects of NSC23766 and EHT1864 at 100 µm in mammalian cells, raising questions about their utility as specific Rac1/Rac inhibitors in biochemical studies at these concentrations and possibly as therapeutic agents.
Assuntos
Aminoquinolinas/farmacologia , Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Neuropeptídeos/antagonistas & inibidores , Pirimidinas/farmacologia , Pironas/farmacologia , Quinolinas/farmacologia , Proteínas rac1 de Ligação ao GTP/antagonistas & inibidores , Animais , Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Camundongos , Camundongos Knockout , Neuropeptídeos/genética , Fosforilação , Transdução de Sinais , Proteínas rac1 de Ligação ao GTP/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Blood platelets are small anucleated cell fragments generated from bone marrow megakaryocytes (MKs) by a cytoskeleton-driven process. Thereby, mature MKs form long cytoplasmic protrusions (pro-platelets), which extend into the sinusoids within the bone marrow and finally release platelets. Podosomes are F-actin rich matrix contacts that have been suggested to play an important role in cell migration, but also in pro-platelet formation by MKs. Phospholipase D (PLD) has been proposed to contribute to the regulation of actin dynamics through the local generation of phosphatidic acid but its role in platelet formation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the significance of PLD in MK podosome formation and thrombocytopoiesis. METHODS: Podosome formation, spreading and ultra-structure of PLD single- and double-deficient MKs were analyzed using confocal and transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: Phospholipase D-deficient MKs displayed a highly altered ultra-structure in vivo and abnormal actin rearrangement, with almost abolished formation of podosomes upon spreading on collagen I in vitro. However, MK endomitosis and platelet production were not altered by PLD deficiency. CONCLUSION: Together, our findings point to a specific function of PLD in actin dynamics as well as podosome formation and size determination in MKs on a collagen I matrix. The normal platelet number in PLD-deficient mice, however, suggests the existence of compensatory mechanisms in vivo that overcome the defective podosome formation observed in vitro.