RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Premature graduation to an adult seatbelt is common and detrimental to optimal crash protection. While there is an existing tool (the 5-step test) to support a parent's decision to graduate their child, its effectiveness is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-step test. METHOD: A randomised controlled design was used. Participants were parents of children aged 7-12 years. After exposure to information about the 5-step test or control material, participants assessed belt fit in three seating conditions and 'thought aloud' while making their assessment. Seating conditions provided a good, poor and partially good seatbelt fit based on the child's anthropometry. Participants were also assessed on their knowledge of good seatbelt fit criteria. RESULTS: Participants exposed to the 5-step test (n=18) had significantly improved their knowledge of the criteria required to achieve good seatbelt with, on average, 1.0 higher score in the 6-point assessment (95% CI 0.23 to 1.7, p=0.012) than those in the control group. There was also a greater percentage of participants in this group (44.4% intervention vs 27.8% control) who made accurate decisions about seatbelt fit, but this difference did not reach significance (OR 2.08, 95% CI 0.52 to 8.34). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that the 5-step test is effective in improving knowledge but are inconclusive about its effectiveness in promoting accurate decision-making. However, the proportion of participants making accurate decisions in the intervention group remained low. This suggests that parents may require greater assistance than what is currently provided.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Crash injury risk is reduced when a child correctly uses an appropriate restraint; however, incorrect restraint use remains widespread. The aim of this study was to determine whether product information developed using a user-driven approach increases correct child restraint use. METHODS: We conducted a two-arm double-blinded parallel randomised controlled trial in New South Wales, Australia 2019-2021. Participants were current drivers who were either an expectant parent or a parent of at least one child residing in the greater Sydney metropolitan area who were interested in purchasing a new child restraint. The intervention was user-driven product information consisting of instructions printed on an A3 sheet of paper, swing tags with key reminders and a video accessed via Quick Response codes printed on the materials. The control group received a postcard summarising legal child restraint requirements. The primary outcome was the correctness of child restraint use observed during home visit approximately 6 months after restraint purchase. Correct use was defined as no serious error or <2 minor errors. The secondary outcome was a count of observed errors. RESULTS: 427 participants were recruited. Home visits were conducted for 372 (190 intervention and 182 control). Correct use was more common in the intervention group (37.4%) compared with the control group (24.2%, p=0.006). Participants receiving the intervention were 1.87 times more likely to correctly use their restraint than those in the control group (95% CI 1.19 to 2.93). CONCLUSIONS: The results provide evidence for the effectiveness of user-driven instructions as a countermeasure to restraint misuse. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617001252303.