Post unilateral lesion response biases modulate memory: crossed double dissociation of hemispheric specialisations.

We propose that what appears to be hemispheric specialisation in the memory domain, as indexed by effects of unilateral brain lesions, is to a great extent explainable as response bias: left hemisphere lesions result in an omissive response bias or error pattern whereas right hemisphere lesions result in a commissive response bias or error pattern. To test this prediction a group of 40 non-confabulatory cases with a verbal and non-verbal retention deficit (hypomnesia), subsequent to a unilateral lesion, was assembled from the literature. A group of non-amnesic cases with confabulation, paramnesia, false memories or memory-laden hallucination (dysfunctional hypermnesia), due to a unilateral lesion, was also assembled from the literature (N=72). Most of the hypomnesic patients had left hemisphere lesions (73%, p<.005, two tailed) while most of the hypermnesic patients had right hemisphere lesions (78%, p<.0005, two tailed). This crossed double dissociation held good despite statistical control of the lesion's locus within the hemisphere, its size or its aetiology, presence of aphasic symptoms, psychiatric comorbidity, the patient's age, gender, or hand preference, and several other potentially confounding variables.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition symptoms of mania: which one(s) result(s) more often from right than left hemisphere lesions?

Previously published single case reports of patients with a unilateral lesion were assembled. After the lesion, each of the 244 cases presented at least one of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) symptoms of a manic episode, namely, elated or irritable mood, grandiosity, talkativeness, flight of ideas, hyperhedonism, reduced need for sleep, agitation, or distractibility (all optional in DSM-IV). As expected, the subgroup of 59 manic patients had a right hemisphere lesion far more often than a left one. However, this was also true of various sets of the nonmanic cases. Furthermore, elation was not the symptom most strongly associated with lesion side. Elation without mania was not significantly predicted by lesion side. However, talkativeness was strongly predicted by right lesion side whether in manic or nonmanic patients or even when the symptom was the only symptom observed. Agitation was consistently and robustly associated with right lesion side, but not completely distinctly so (it fell short of significance when not accompanied by elation or other symptoms). It is proposed that prevalence of right hemisphere lesions causing mania is primarily related to mental and behavioral disinhibition rather than a shift of mood and that it consists of release of left hemisphere influence.

Ictal hallucination and hemispheric specialization: findings from 217 cases with a unilateral epileptic focus.

Epileptic populations are generally considered inappropriate to investigate hemispheric specialization. However, (1) because hallucination occurs in the early stage of the ictus during which activation is observed in and around the focus, the former could be a direct result of the latter (hypothesis 1), and (2) the type of psychological content of ictal hallucination could depend on which hemisphere is ictally activated (hypothesis 2). It was predicted that, on the basis of quantitative analysis of previously published singles case reports, unilateral ictal hallucinations should occur in the visual field, ear or hemibody contralateral to the side of the ictal focus (test of hypothesis 1). It was also predicted that verbal ictal auditory hallucinations should result more often from left hemisphere foci, and non-verbal auditory ictal hallucinations from right hemisphere foci (test of hypothesis 2). Previously published cases (N=217) of ictal hallucination from a unilateral epileptic focus were reviewed and analyzed with multivariate statistics. Both predictions were strongly supported.