Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cell Host Microbe ; 29(12): 1738-1743.e4, 2021 12 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34861167

RESUMO

Different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are approved in various countries, but few direct comparisons of the antibody responses they stimulate have been reported. We collected plasma specimens in July 2021 from 196 Mongolian participants fully vaccinated with one of four COVID-19 vaccines: Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, and Sinopharm. Functional antibody testing with a panel of nine SARS-CoV-2 viral variant receptor binding domain (RBD) proteins revealed marked differences in vaccine responses, with low antibody levels and RBD-ACE2 blocking activity stimulated by the Sinopharm and Sputnik V vaccines in comparison to the AstraZeneca or Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines. The Alpha variant caused 97% of infections in Mongolia in June and early July 2021. Individuals who recover from SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination achieve high antibody titers in most cases. These data suggest that public health interventions such as vaccine boosting, potentially with more potent vaccine types, may be needed to control COVID-19 in Mongolia and worldwide.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vacina BNT162/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinação em Massa , SARS-CoV-2/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Idoso , Enzima de Conversão de Angiotensina 2/antagonistas & inibidores , Enzima de Conversão de Angiotensina 2/genética , Enzima de Conversão de Angiotensina 2/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/biossíntese , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/virologia , Feminino , Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Soros Imunes/química , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mongólia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade
2.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 12(3): 183-8, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22022819

RESUMO

Although Mongolia is regarded as one of the possible places of plague radiation, only few data are available from Mongolian Yersinia pestis strains. In this study a total of 100 Mongolian Y. pestis strains isolated from wild mammals and their parasites between the years 1960 and 2007 were analyzed for their phenotype. All strains grew well on selective Cefsulodin-Irgasan-Novobiocin agar and were positive for the F1-antigen, the F1-gene (caf1), and the plasminogen activator gene (pla). Biochemical analyses using the API20E® system identified 93% of the strains correctly as Y. pestis. The BWY in-house system consisting of 38 biochemical reactions was used to differentiate among Y. pestis subspecies pestis biovars Antiqua and Medievalis and also between the subspecies microtus biovars Ulegeica and Caucasica. Antibiotic susceptibility testing according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-guidelines identified one strain as being multiresistant. This strain was isolated from a wildlife rodent with no anthropogenic influence and thus suggests naturally acquired resistance.


Assuntos
Peste/veterinária , Doenças dos Roedores/microbiologia , Yersinia pestis/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana/métodos , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Humanos , Marmota , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Mongólia/epidemiologia , Fenótipo , Ftirápteros/microbiologia , Peste/epidemiologia , Peste/microbiologia , Ratos , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Doenças dos Roedores/epidemiologia , Roedores , Sifonápteros/microbiologia , Especificidade da Espécie , Carrapatos/microbiologia , Yersinia pestis/classificação , Yersinia pestis/efeitos dos fármacos , Yersinia pestis/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa