Knowledge of the health impacts of smoking and public attitudes towards tobacco control in the former Soviet Union.

AIMS: To describe levels of knowledge on the harmful effects of tobacco and public support for tobacco control measures in nine countries of the former Soviet Union and to examine the characteristics associated with this knowledge and support. METHODS: Standardised, cross-sectional nationally representative surveys conducted in 2010/2011 with 18 000 men and women aged 18 years and older in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine. Respondents were asked a range of questions on their knowledge of the health effects of tobacco and their support for a variety of tobacco control measures. Descriptive analysis was conducted on levels of knowledge and support, along with multivariate logistic regression analysis of characteristics associated with overall knowledge and support scores. RESULTS: Large gaps exist in public understanding of the negative health effects of tobacco use, particularly in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Moldova. There are also extremely high levels of misunderstanding about the potential effects of 'light' cigarettes. However, there is popular support for tobacco control measures. Over three quarters of the respondents felt that their governments could be more effective in pursuing tobacco control. Higher levels of education, social capital (membership of an organisation) and being a former or never-smoker were associated with higher knowledge on the health effects of tobacco and/or being more supportive of tobacco control measures. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing public awareness of tobacco's health effects is essential for informed decision-making by individuals and for further increasing public support for tobacco control measures.

Prison health in Russia: the larger picture.

Russia, despite recent legal reforms, still has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world. There are many reports of the adverse conditions in Russian prisons, often highlighting the consequences for health, in particular, risks of HIV, tuberculosis, and other infectious diseases. However, there are no reviews of the broader health issues in the Russian penal system. This paper reviews the available information on the health of the imprisoned population in Russia and the factors underlying it. It was undertaken by means of a search of Russian and international literature, including unpublished sources, supplemented by in-depth interviews with 27 key informants from the Ministry of Justice, prison administration, and non-governmental organizations. Published and unpublished data from the ministries of health and justice were used to describe the demographic characteristics of the imprisoned population and compare it with the general population. Although convicts are drawn disproportionately from disadvantaged groups in society and are detained in adverse physical conditions, the standardized mortality ratio from all causes is slightly over one-third of that in the overall Russian male population. This is mainly explained by an eight-fold lower mortality from external causes and a more than two-fold lower mortality from cardiovascular disease. These far outweigh the increased mortality from infectious diseases. The chances of survival of young men in Russia may actually be improved by being in prison, highlighting the need for policies that reduce the overall level of violence and other external risks, such as dangerous driving habits, in Russian society. Yet while conditions are improving in Russian prisons, with death rates falling, there are still many avoidable deaths and high levels of mental illness and infectious disease. There is also much that is not known about the health of Russian convicts, with what is available reflecting what is measured rather than what is important.

Health systems factors influencing maternal health services: a four-country comparison.

It is widely understood that maternal health care relies on the entire health system. However, little empirical, country-specific, research has been done to trace out the ways in which health system elements can shape maternal health outcomes. This study seeks to redress this situation, by providing an example of how a health systems approach can benefit the understanding of maternal health services. A comparative analysis was conducted based on extensive case studies of maternal health and health systems in Bangladesh, Russia, South Africa, and Uganda. A number of cross-cutting health system characteristics affecting maternal health were identified by comparing these diverse settings. The most important common systems issues underlying maternal health care were found to be the human resource structures, the public-private mix of service provision, and the changes involved with health sector reforms. Specific country contexts can further determine many factors influencing maternal health outcomes and service performance. Systems issues were found to influence the access to and utilization of services, quality of care provided, and ultimately maternal health outcomes. This paper provides a first step in tracing out how such broad systems issues actually work to influence maternal health.

Variations in obstetric practice in Russia: a story of professional autonomy, isolation and limited evidence.

The Russian health system seeks to ensure consistent models of care through a series of nationwide decrees. Yet patterns of care vary widely, often unrelated to evidence of effectiveness. This study examines care provided by obstetricians in all 19 facilities in a typical Russian region. A first set of structured interviews was conducted with 52 obstetricians, with emerging themes explored in a second set of interviews with 36 of the original interviewees. Accounts were compared with quantitative data on patterns of practice.Obstetricians had little access to information, with only limited use of Russian journals and textbooks and minimal access to international evidence.The decisions made by obstetricians largely determined the overall pattern of care, with midwives, nurses and anaesthetists clearly subordinate. Care was highly medicalized, with many interventions long discarded in the west. There was no obvious reason for widespread variations.Obstetric care in Russia is characterized by widespread use of many harmful or ineffective practices, while many effective ones are not used. Effective policies to tackle these problems will require wide-ranging policies addressing factors ranging from educational policies to the status of professionals but, above all, will have to confront the legacy of Soviet science that prioritized ideology over evidence.

The decision to perform Caesarean section in Russia.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice in Russia is set out in a series of centralized guidelines. However, many of these guidelines are not supported by evidence and, despite their existence, there is considerable unexplained variation in practice. This study examines the decision to recommend a Caesarean section, an intervention for which there is a solid evidence base, but whose use varies considerably among facilities in Russia. AIM: To identify the factors that Russian obstetricians take into account when recommending a Caesarean section. METHODS: Conjoint analysis. Ninety-two obstetricians from three regions were asked to state whether they would recommend a Caesarean section in each of 30 vignettes (including three for validation) combining 10 medical, social and organizational factors previously identified as contributing to the decision to intervene, including some absolute indications to intervene or not to, on the basis of international evidence. RESULTS: Checks for consistency within ratings by individuals gave no cause for concern. However, there was a wide variation in the probability of intervening among obstetricians, with six recommending intervention in only one scenario and one in 27 scenarios. Some factors were consistent with evidence but others were not, such as myopia or previous abortions. INTERVENTION: was more likely at 11 p.m. than at noon. Male obstetricians were more likely to intervene than females. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of understanding clinical decision-making in Russia as a prelude to changing it.

Delivering babies in a time of transition in Tula, Russia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the provision of maternal services in the Tula region of Russia, with an emphasis on variations in practice. METHOD: The study was set in Tula Oblast. Data sources included an obstetric information database detailing all Tula deliveries in 2000 (n = 11,123) and structured interviews with the heads of maternity facilities and hospital maternity departments. RESULTS: Caesarean-section rates varied from 3.3-37%; episiotomy from 9-80%; and amniocentesis from 0-51%. As fertility rates fell since the 1980s, increasing numbers of women were hospitalized for 'pathological pregnancy' in an attempt to preserve infrastructure. CONCLUSION: Over-medicalization arises in a system typified by excess capacity and large numbers of specialists. Some practice variations were correlated with characteristics of mothers, but others derive from systems structures such as equipment availability. Improvements in practice will require addressing these structural elements and steering the clinical culture towards evidence-based medicine, rather than simply writing new decrees.

The fragmentary federation: experiences with the decentralized health system in Russia.

The Russian Federation has undergone a process of major constitutional change in the post-communist period, as a strong central government has ceded extensive powers to the regions. This has important implications for the organization of the health care system which, as with other elements of the Soviet system, had previously been highly centralized. Although it is now well-recognized that the powers of the Federal Health Ministry have weakened considerably, the precise scale and nature of the process of decentralization remain imperfectly understood. This paper provides new evidence on the nature of decentralization in the Russian Federation since the breakdown of the USSR, reporting the results of case studies undertaken in six regions of Russia (Samara, Tver, Tula, Chelyabinsk, Sverdlovsk and Moscow oblasts) to describe the organization of health care financing, regulation and delivery. It shows that while there is a common model of health system (with the exception of Samara, where an innovative model was implemented), there are many minor variations. The study confirms the limited scope for action by Federal authorities, but also shows that the power vested in the regional governments is more limited than was previously thought. Instead, the municipalities (rayons) emerge as important bodies, as they own the facilities in which much of the routine health care is delivered and, both directly and indirectly, by virtue of their contributions of insurance premiums for the non-working, provide a substantial amount of health care financing. The study demonstrates the complexity of the Russian health care system and identifies the widespread absence of mechanisms that might be used to bring about much needed change.

Inequalities in birth outcomes in Russia: evidence from Tula oblast.

This paper describes pregnancy outcomes and identifies their determinants in a Russian region, in the year 2000. It includes all births and perinatal deaths recorded as occurring in Tula oblast. The socio-economic correlates of adverse outcomes are explored using logistic regression; outcomes and their determinants are compared with other countries. Perinatal mortality in Tula in 2000 was 16.8/1000 births. The frequencies of low birthweight, low ponderal index and preterm birth were higher in Tula than in other industrialised countries. Mean birthweight increased with increasing education and was higher in married than in single mothers, and higher in ethnic Russians than in others. Survival in the perinatal period was substantially lower at all birthweights than in Sweden, which has the lowest neonatal mortality rate in Europe. There are wide inequalities in fetal development in Russia, especially in relation to maternal education, and the adverse outcomes appear to reflect a combination of adverse fetal development (implying the need for policies that improve the health of prospective mothers) and poor survival (implying the need for more effective care for newborn infants).

Environmental and social factors as determinants of respiratory dysfunction in junior schoolchildren in Moscow.

BACKGROUND: The process of industrialization of the USSR has left a legacy of widespread and often poorly controlled pollution which is widely believed to have adverse implications for health, in particular for respiratory disease among children. OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between area of residence and respiratory function in junior schoolchildren in different districts of Moscow. METHODS: A survey was conducted of 539 children aged 6-12 years who attend school and live in one of three districts of Moscow with varying ambient pollution levels. Spirometry [forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)] was assessed at school by trained school health staff. Parents of the children completed a questionnaire asking about respiratory function and factors potentially associated with it, as well as about social and other factors that could influence respiratory development and the health status of their children. RESULTS: There was appreciable difference in the characteristics of the children from the three districts. Children from the lower pollutant districts were generally younger, had higher parental income, and were less frequently exposed to cigarette smoke at home. They were also less likely to report heavy lorry traffic in the streets outside their homes. After adjustment for age, gender and height the FVC was 7.6 per cent (3.6-11.5 per cent) lower in children from the medium pollution district and 9.9 per cent [95 per cent confidence interval (CI) 5.6-14.0 per cent] lower in children from the high pollution district compared with those in the least polluted district (p < 0.001 for trend). These differences were little affected by further adjustment for household income or exposure to household smoking. In contrast, FEV1 showed comparatively little variation across districts. The odds of a forced expiratory ratio (FER) <75 per cent were substantially lower in the high pollution compared with the low pollution district (odds ratio 0.10, 95per cent CI 0.03-0.32 after adjustment for age, gender and height), and there was clear evidence of a trend across pollution categories (p < 0.001). The frequency of reported allergy was also lower in the high pollution district. FVC increased, and the probability of a low FER decreased, with household income. CONCLUSION: Children from areas of high environmental pollution had lower lung capacity but also smaller risk of a low FER compared with those from cleaner areas. The extent to which these differences can be attributed to environmental pollution is unclear without more detailed study. However, socio-economic deprivation, which was associated with pollution, appears to be an important determinant of respiratory function although it was associated with a lower risk of an obstructive pattern of lung function tests.