RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is common after kidney transplantation and is classically associated with a significant decrease in graft survival. A major risk factor is a prior history of FSGS recurrence on a previous graft. This analysis reports the impact of a prophylactic treatment of FSGS recurrence in very high-risk patients who experienced a recurrence on a previous graft. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentre observational study in 25 French transplantation centres. The inclusion criteria were patients aged more than 18 years who had undergone kidney transplant between December 31, 2004, and December 31, 2020, and who had a history of FSGS recurrence on a previous graft. RESULTS: We identified 66 patients: 40 received prophylactic treatment (PT+), including intravenous cyclosporine and/or rituximab and/or plasmapheresis, and 26 did not receive any prophylactic treatment (PT-). The time to progression to end-stage kidney disease was similar between groups. The PT + group was younger at FSGS diagnosis and at the time of kidney retransplantation and lost their previous graft faster. The overall recurrence rate was 72.7% (76.9% in the PT- group and 70.0% in the PT + group, P = 0.54). At least partial remission was achieved in 87.5% of patients. The 5-year graft survival was 67.7% (95% CI: 53.4 to 78.4%): 65.1% (95%CI: 48.7 to 77.4%) in patients with FSGS recurrence vs. 77.3% (95% CI: 43.8 to 92.3%) in patients without recurrence (P = 0.48). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that prophylactic treatment should not be used routinely in patients receiving a second transplantation after recurrence of FSGS on a previous graft. The recurrence rate is high regardless of the use of prophylactic treatment. However, the 5-year graft survival remains satisfactory.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Acute graft pyelonephritis (AGPN) is the most frequent infectious complication in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). The treatment of acute community-acquired (CA) pyelonephritis is based on third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) and fluoroquinolones. Cefepime or a piperacillin-tazobactam combination are more often used in healthcare-associated (HCA) infections. However, these recommendations do not consider the resistance observed in KTRs. The objective of our study was to define the most appropriate empirical antibiotherapy for AGPN in KTRs according to the CA and HCA settings. To answer this question, we assessed the prevalence of resistance to different antibiotics usually recommended for urinary tract infections (UTIs) in the general population. METHODS: Observational, retrospective, multicenter study covering all episodes of AGPN occurring in hospitalized KTRs in 2019. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients were included in 7 centers and 244 episodes of AGPN were analyzed (158 CA-AGPN and 86 HCA-AGPN). The prevalence of 3GC and fluoroquinolone resistance was 23 % (n = 36) and 30 % (n = 50) in CA infections (n = 158), and 47 % (n = 40) and 31 % (n = 27) in HCA infections (n = 86), respectively. Cefepime resistance rate was 19 % (n = 30) in CA-AGPN and 29 % (n = 25) in HCA-AGPN. Piperacillin-tazobactam combination had resistance rates > 15 % in both CA and HCA infections. The only antimicrobials with resistance rates < 10 % were aminoglycosides and carbapenems. CONCLUSION: None of the antibiotics recommended in empirical treatment in UTIs has shown a resistance rate of less than 10% with regard to AGPN. Therefore, none of them should be used as monotherapy. A combination therapy including amikacin could be an appropriate strategy in this setting.