RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Our recent studies have shown headache disorders to be very common in the central and western sub-Saharan countries of Benin and Cameroon. Here we report headache in nearby Mali, a strife-torn country that differs topographically, culturally, politically and economically. The purposes were to estimate headache-attributed burden and need for headache care. METHODS: We used cluster-random sampling in seven of Mali's eleven regions to obtain a nationally representative sample. During unannounced household visits by trained interviewers, one randomly selected adult member (18-65 years) from each household was interviewed using the structured HARDSHIP questionnaire, with enquiries into headache in the last year and, additionally, headache yesterday (HY). Headache on ≥ 15 days/month (H15+) was diagnosed as probable medication-overuse headache (pMOH) when associated with acute medication use on ≥ 15 days/month, and as "other H15+" when not. Episodic headache (on < 15 days/month) was recorded as such and not further diagnosed. Burden was assessed as impaired participation (days lost from paid and household work, and from leisure activity). Need for headache care was defined by criteria for expectation of benefit. RESULTS: Data collection coincided with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The participating proportion was nonetheless extremely high (99.4%). The observed 1-year prevalence of any headache was 90.9%. Age- and gender-adjusted estimates were 86.3% for episodic headache, 1.4% for pMOH and 3.1% for other H15+. HY was reported by 16.8% with a mean duration of 8.7 h. Overall mean headache frequency was 3.5 days/month. Participants with pMOH lost more days from paid (8.8 days/3 months) and household work (10.3 days/3 months) than those with other H15+ (3.1 and 2.8 days/3 months) or episodic headache (1.2 and 0.9 days/3 months). At population level, 3.6-5.8% of all time was spent with headache, which led to a 3.6% decrease in all activity (impaired participation). Almost a quarter (23.4%) of Mali's adult population need headache care. CONCLUSION: Headache is very common in Mali, as in its near neighbours, Benin and Cameroon, and associated with substantial losses of health and productivity. Need for headache care is high - a challenge for a low-income country - but lost productivity probably translates into lost gross domestic product.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Cefaleia , Avaliação das Necessidades , Humanos , Adulto , Mali/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Transversais , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Idoso , PrevalênciaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In resource-limited countries, epilepsy prevalence is underestimated and little is known about its risk factors. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors for epilepsy in six health districts (HDs) in Mali. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional and nested case-control study was conducted in 180 villages with the highest number of suspicious epilepsy cases (SECs) in the six study HDs. The SECs were observed as part of a Phase 1 screening conducted by community health workers. For the nested case-control study, one case was matched with at least one control based on residence and age. A case of epilepsy was a person diagnosed with convulsive epilepsy after clinical assessment by a neurologist. A control was a person diagnosed as normal after neurological assessment by a neurologist. Data were collected on sociodemographic characteristics, familial and medical history of epilepsy, consanguinity, place of delivery, preterm birth, length/type of delivery, and history of meningitis and cerebral malaria. A univariate and multivariate binomial logistic regression model was used to analyse factors associated with epilepsy. RESULTS: A total of 1,506 cases of epilepsy and 2,199 controls were enrolled in six HDs. The mean prevalence of epilepsy was 2, with the highest in Kenieba (3), a previously meso-endemic-onchocerciasis HD, and the lowest in Kadiolo (1.5), a hypo-endemic-onchocerciasis HD. Age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.02 [95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.02-1.03]), history of cerebral malaria (aOR = 11.41 [95% CI 8.86-14.85]), history of meningitis (aOR = 1.95 [95% CI 1.16-3.29]), living in the HD of Tominian (aOR = 1.69 [95% CI 1.29-2.22]), delayed delivery (aOR = 3.21 [95% CI 2.07-5.07]), and dystocia (aOR = 3.37 [95% CI 2.03-5.73]) were all significantly associated with epilepsy. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of epilepsy (3) in a previously meso-endemic-onchocerciasis HD was much lower than the prevalence (13.35) documented in onchocerciasis endemic areas in 2,000. This decrease epilepsy prevalence in the previously meso-endemic region was induced by onchocerciasis, and the reduction was due to an effective community direct treatment with ivermectin programme. Cerebral malaria and obstetrical complications were the main risk factors for epilepsy and interventions improving malaria prevention/treatment and optimizing prenatal and obstetrical care need to be implemented to reduce incidence.
Assuntos
Epilepsia , Malária Cerebral , Oncocercose , Nascimento Prematuro , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Malária Cerebral/complicações , Mali/epidemiologia , Oncocercose/complicações , Oncocercose/tratamento farmacológico , Oncocercose/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Prevalência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In Mali, the burden of epilepsy is underestimated due to socio-cultural barriers that keep most people with epilepsy out of the local health facilities. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of trained community health workers (CHWs) in identifying epilepsy cases (active case detection) as compared to the passive cases detection (PCD) during outpatient visits at the community health centers in the health districts (HDs) of Kolokani, Kayes, Kéniéba, Sikasso, Kadiolo, and Tominian. METHODS: A two-phase cross-sectional study was conducted from February to December 2019. In phase 1, trained CHWs conducted a census in 1017 villages organized into 174 community health centers which are part of the six study HDs to identify suspected epilepsy cases (SEC). Investigators used a modified epilepsy screening questionnaire from a validated standard questionnaire with the following three (3) questions: (i) Does or did the subject have a loss of consciousness and/or a loss of urine and/or drooling? (ii) Does or did the subject have an uncontrollable shake or abnormal movements of limb(s) (convulsions), with sudden onset and duration of a few minutes? (iii) Has or had the subject ever been told that he or she has epilepsy? During phase 2, neurologists confirmed the supposedly SEC (censed by the CHWs) in the first 30 villages with the highest number of SEC in each HD that were reported during phase 1. RESULTS: Of a total of 4830 SEC, 422 (10%) were identified by PCD during routine outpatient visits and 4408 (90%) through the active case detection (ACD) using the trained CHWs. The majority of SEC reported by the CHWs (PCD) were confirmed by neurologists, i.e. 82.9% (1645/1985). Phenobarbital was available in only 26 (14.9%) of the 174 surveyed health centers. Confirmed cases of epilepsy were reported in all the 174 health centers with prevalence varying from 91/100,00 to 285/100,000. CONCLUSION: Active case detection of epilepsy using trained CHWs is an effective approach for epidemiological studies of epilepsy in the community settings as compared to the passive approach.
Assuntos
Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Epilepsia , Estudos Transversais , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mali/epidemiologia , FenobarbitalRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: According to the taxonomy of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP 2011), neuropathic pain (NeuP) is defined as "pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system". NeuP is currently well-defined clinically, despite a high degree of etiological variation, and it has become a significant public health problem. This work aimed to study the situation regarding NeuP in current practice in Mali, as well as to analyze the therapeutic environment of the patients. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective and cross-sectional study, carried out in two phases: (1) compilation of the files of patients according to the ICD-11, over a period of 24 months (2) a second prospective phase regarding the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) of general practitioners and neurologists in regard to NeuP. The focus of the first phase of the study was the files of the patients who had undergone a consultation at the Gabriel Touré UHC. The second phase of the study focused on the general practitioners (Community Health Centers (comHC) of Bamako) and neurologists (Malian or not). RESULTS: Over the period of the study, 7840 patients were seen in consultation in the Department of Neurology, of whom 903 for NeuP, thus amounting to a NeuP frequency of 11.5%. Women accounted for 58.9% (532/903), with a sex ratio of 1.4. Using a comparative normal law, the difference in frequency was statistically significant between males and females (p < 10-7) and between two age groups (p ã10-3). The 49-58 years of age group was represented the most. Diabetic NeuP (21%), lumbar radiculopathies (14%), HIV/AIDS NeuP (13%), and post-stroke NeuP (11%) were the most represented. The survey among the carers revealed: a need for training, a low level of compliance with the therapeutic guidelines, and the use of traditional medicine by the patients. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This work confirms that NeuP is encountered frequently in current practice, and its optimal management will involve specific training of carers and improvement of access to the medications recommended in this indication. In light of this issue, we revisit the debate regarding the concept of essential medications and the relevance of taking into account effective medications for the treatment of NeuP.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) with or without neuropathic pain is a frequent complication of diabetes. This work aimed to determine the prevalence of diabetic polyneuropathy, to describe its epidemiological aspects, and to analyze the therapeutic itinerary of patients with DPN. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study performed synchronously over six months at two major follow-up sites for patients with diabetes in Mali. DPN was diagnosed based on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI). The neuropathic nature of the pain and the quality of life of patients were evaluated by the DN4 and the ED-5D scale, respectively. We used three (3) different questionnaires to collect data from patients (one at inclusion and another during the follow-up consultation) and from the caregivers of patients with DPN. RESULTS: We included 252 patients with diabetes, and DPN was found to have a healthcare facility-based prevalence of 69.8% (176/252). The sex ratio was approximately three females for every male patient. The patients were mostly 31 to 60 years of age, 83% had type 2 diabetes, and 86.9% had neuropathic pain Approximately half of the patients (48.3%) had autonomic neuropathy and they reported moderate to intense pain, which was mainly described as a burning sensation. The patients exhibited impaired exteroceptive and proprioceptive sensations in 51.7% of cases. The patients smoked tobacco in 3.4% of cases, while 36.6% of the patients were obese and had dyslipidemia. The caregivers clearly indicated that appropriate medications were not readily accessible or available for their patients with DPN. CONCLUSION: The healthcare facility-based prevalence of DPN with or without neuropathic pain was high in our cohort. These inexpensive and easy-to-use tools (MNSI, DN4) can be used to adequately diagnose DPN in the African context. In Mali, screening and early treatment of patients at risk of DPN should allow for a reduction of the burden of the disease, while caregivers need to be adequately trained to manage DPN.