RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is recommended in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), but its efficacy may vary in different subtypes. We report the outcomes of patients with GBS following IVIg treatment compared to the natural course (NC). We also compare the effect of IVIg treatment in different subtypes of GBS. METHODS: From a cohort of 528 GBS subjects, we have extracted 189 patients who received IVIg and compared their outcomes with 199 age- and peak disability-matched patients who did not receive IVIg, plasmapheresis, or corticosteroid. Disability was assessed using the 0-6 Guillain-Barré Syndrome Disability Scale (GBSDS). Clinical and neurophysiological subtypes were recorded. The primary outcome was functional disability at 6 months, which was categorized as complete (GBSDS ≤ 1), partial (GBSDS 2-3), or poor (GBSDS > 3). The secondary outcomes were in-hospital death, duration of hospitalization, and mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: In-hospital death (2.6% vs. 2%, p = 0.74) and 3-month poor recovery (20.7% vs. 18%) were similar in the IVIg and NC groups. At 6 months, however, a lesser proportion of patients in the IVIg group had poor recovery (2.2% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.026). The outcomes of IVIg and NC were compared in 72 acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) and 256 acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP) patients. IVIg therapy did not alter the outcome in AMAN but resulted in a lesser proportion of poor recovery at 6 months in AIDP (0.8% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: IVIg is beneficial in AIDP variants of GBS but not in the AMAN subtype. A customized treatment may be cost-effective until a randomized controlled trial is conducted in AMAN.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Amantadina/uso terapêutico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/tratamento farmacológico , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Respiração ArtificialRESUMO
There is a paucity of large studies evaluating the subtypes of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and their outcome from Southeast Asia. We report cliniconeurophysiological subtypes of GBS and their correlation with triggering events and 3-month outcome from northern India. Three hundred and twenty eight consecutive patients with GBS were clinically evaluated, including their triggers, severity, autonomic involvement, cranial nerve palsy, and respiratory paralysis. Nerve conduction study (NCS) was repeated at 3 weeks if the initial study was normal. They were categorized into acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP), acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN), acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN), inexcitable motor nerve, and equivocal. Clinically, 204 (62.2%) patients had pure motor, 106 (32.3%) motor sensory, 16 (4.9%) Miller Fisher syndrome, and 2 (0.6%) pure sensory GBS. Based on NCS, 242 (73.8%) had AIDP, 44 (13.4%) AMAN, 15 (4.6%) AMSAN, 8 (2.4%) inexcitable motor nerves, and 27 (8.2%) equivocal GBS. AIDP patients were older, more common in summer, had lesser peak disability, and better outcome compared to those with AMAN. Eleven (3.4%) patients died and 48 (14.6%) had poor outcome at 3 months. The poor outcome was related to severity, dysautonomia, and inexcitable motor nerves. AIDP is the commonest variant of GBS in our study and has better outcome compared to AMAN.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Vias Autônomas/fisiopatologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/classificação , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiologia , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Condução Nervosa/fisiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
This study was undertaken to evaluate the role of ACE and αADDUCIN polymorphisms in patients with recurrent and nonrecurrent hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). A total of 101 nonrecurrent and 33 recurrent hypertensive ICH patients underwent an ACE (rs4646994) and αADDUCIN (rs4961) gene polymorphism study. The risk factors, clinical findings, CT scan abnormalities and functional outcome of recurrent and nonrecurrent ICH were compared. ACE (rs4646994) and αADDUCIN (rs4961) gene polymorphisms were also compared in the two groups and with 198 controls. The patients with recurrent ICH were older compared to those with nonrecurrent ICH and the other stroke risk factors were found in the two groups. Ganglionic-ganglionic pattern of recurrence was the commonest (75.6%) and all had at least one ICH in the location of hypertensive ICH. ACE DD genotype (OR6.18, 95%CI 2.93-13.02) and D allele (OR 2.43, 95%CI 1.70-3.47) were associated with nonrecurrent ICH compared to controls. In patients with recurrent ICH, DD genotype (OR 7.46, 95%CI 2.8-19.4) and D allele (OR 3.16, 95%CI 1.83-5.46) of ACE, and GW (OR 3.49, 95%CI 1.47-8.28), WW (OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.40-4.30) genotypes and W allele (OR 7.46, 95%CI 2.80-19.40) of αADDUCIN were more frequent compared to controls. Recurrent ICH also had higher frequency of WW genotype (OR 9.43, 95%CI 1.49-59.50) and W allele (OR 2.19, 95%CI 1.11-4.03) compared to nonrecurrent ICH. The frequency of DD + WW (P = 0.008) and DD/WW + ID/GW (P = 0.0001) genotypes in the recurrent ICH was higher than in the nonrecurrent ICH and the controls. Variant genotype combinations of ACE and αADDUCIN render the hypertensive patient more vulnerable to recurrent ICH.