RESUMO
Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome remains an enigmatic medical condition. Creation of the National Institutes of Health-funded Chronic Prostatitis Collaborative Research Network (CPCRN) has stimulated a renewed interest in research on and clinical aspects of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Landmark publications of the CPCRN document a decade of progress. Insights from these CPCRN studies have improved our management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and offer hope for continued progress.
Assuntos
Prostatite , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatite/diagnóstico , Prostatite/epidemiologia , Prostatite/terapia , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) in men is principally defined by pain in the pelvic region lasting more than 3 months. No cause of the disease has been established, and therapies are empirical and mostly untested. Antimicrobial agents and alpha-adrenergic receptor blockers are frequently used. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 6-week therapy with ciprofloxacin or tamsulosin is more effective than placebo at improving symptoms in men with refractory, long-standing CP/CPPS. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design comparing 6 weeks of therapy with ciprofloxacin, tamsulosin, both drugs, or placebo. SETTING: Urology outpatient clinics at 10 tertiary care medical centers in North America. PATIENTS: Patients were identified from referral-based practices of urologists. One hundred ninety-six men with a National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) score of at least 15 and a mean of 6.2 years of symptoms were enrolled. Patients had received substantial previous treatment. MEASUREMENTS: The authors evaluated NIH-CPSI total score and subscores, patient-reported global response assessment, a generic measure of quality of life, and adverse events. INTERVENTIONS: Ciprofloxacin, 500 mg twice daily; tamsulosin, 0.4 mg once daily; a combination of the 2 drugs; or placebo. RESULTS: The NIH-CPSI total score decreased modestly in all treatment groups. No statistically significant difference in the primary outcome was seen for ciprofloxacin versus no ciprofloxacin (P = 0.15) or tamsulosin versus no tamsulosin (P > 0.2). Treatments also did not differ significantly for any of the secondary outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Treatment lasting longer than 6 weeks was not tested. Patients who had received less pretreatment may have responded differently. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin and tamsulosin did not substantially reduce symptoms in men with long-standing CP/CPPS who had at least moderate symptoms.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Dor Pélvica/tratamento farmacológico , Prostatite/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos , Síndrome , Tansulosina , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
Treatment of nonbacterial chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome continues to be a challenge for the treating physician. However, results from studies on the use of alpha-blockers seem to show some promise. Further studies on this class of drugs in the treatment of this condition are recommended.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Prostatite/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Crônica , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
Members of the Chronic Prostatitis Collaborative Research Network (CPCRN) met in a 1-day symposium to review recent findings and to debate unanswered issues in the diagnosis and management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). The meeting was focused on producing an overview summary statement that would, as nearly as possible, represent the consensus views of the attendees. As discussed below, the participants agreed that a history, physical examination, and urinalysis/urine culture are mandatory for the evaluation of all patients presenting with CP/CPPS, with other assessments categorized as recommended or optional, depending on the history and physical findings. Observations and suggestions regarding first- and second-line therapies are also offered, with the recognition that randomized, placebo-controlled trials to guide selection of therapies for chronic nonbacterial prostatitis are currently lacking.