Optimal combination therapy with tropisetron in 445 patients with incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated tropisetron (Navoban; Sandoz Pharma, Basle, Switzerland)-based combination therapy in patients who had incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting when using tropisetron as a single antiemetic agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand seventy-two patients, who were scheduled to receive at least two identical cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy, were treated with 5 mg tropisetron once daily in their first chemotherapy course. A 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was used to evaluate three additional treatments to the recommended 5 mg once daily (intravenously [i.v.] on day 1; orally on days 2 through 6) tropisetron regimen during course 2 in those patients who had shown incomplete control of nausea and/or vomiting on any day of course 1. Four hundred forty-five patients were centrally randomized to receive, in addition, open-label dexamethasone (day 1, 0.2 mg/kg i.v.; days 2 through 6, 8 mg orally) and/or open-label alizapride (day 1, 100 mg i.v. and 4 x 50 mg orally; days 2 through 6, 4 x 50 mg orally) and/or double-blind tropisetron (ie, doubling the dose to 10 mg once daily) or corresponding placebo. RESULTS: Complete response rates (no nausea and no vomiting) were 72% for day 1 and 48% for days 1 through 6 of course 1. During course 2, more complete responders were observed when dexamethasone was added, both for day 1 (76% v 66%, P = .020) and for days 1 through 6 (50% v 34%, P = .0004). A moderate increase in the complete response rate was seen with the addition of conventional-dose alizapride (day 1, 75% v 68%, P = .14; days 1 through 6: 47% v 37%, P = .041). Doubling the dose of tropisetron did not change the complete response rate. CONCLUSION: The addition of dexamethasone significantly increases the complete response rate of both acute and delayed emesis in patients who have incomplete disease control with tropisetron alone.

Isradipine in essential hypertension: the Belgian General Practitioners' Study.

Over 200 hypertensive patients were recruited by 37 general practitioners into a single-blind 12-week study to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of isradipine as an antihypertensive, alone and in combination with guanfacine. A total of 212 patients were given isradipine at doses of 1.25 and 2.5 mg twice daily. Twelve hours after the last dose, diastolic blood pressure was reduced to no more than 90 mm Hg in 52.6 percent of patients treated with isradipine alone. After eight weeks of treatment, 30 percent of patients were also given guanfacine 1 mg daily. By Week 12, 67.6 percent of the patients had attained normotension. Compared with placebo, side-effect frequency was higher for flushing and edema with isradipine, and dry mouth was more frequent with added guanfacine. Electrocardiographic examinations and routine laboratory determinations showed no clinically relevant changes. These data indicate that isradipine as monotherapy and in combination with guanfacine is an effective antihypertensive agent. Most patients will continue to participate in a two-year follow-up involving bimonthly clinical visits and half-yearly electrocardiographic examinations and laboratory determinations.

The use of Sandimmun (cyclosporin A) in severe refractory rheumatoid arthritis: the Belgian experience.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate practicability, efficacy and tolerability of low starting doses of Sandimmun (cyclosporin A) (2.5 mg/kg daily) in patients with severe refractory rheumatoid arthritis in the short (6 months) and middle (12 months) term. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients, presenting with active and severe rheumatoid arthritis unresponding to conventional DMRADs were allowed to start Sandimmun at the dose of 2.5 mg/kg daily. This dose was progressively increased by steps of 25 mg daily up to a maximum of 5 mg/kg daily according to the renal function and blood pressure. RESULTS: A mean maintenance dose of 3.9 mg/kg daily was reached after 5 months and maintained throughout the study. Twenty-one patients (36%) completed the one year study. The reasons for discontinuation were: inefficacy (13), adverse events (17), both inefficacy and adverse events (5) and non-compliance (3). For those patients who completed the trial, clinical relevant improvements were observed within 3 months of treatment and were maintained until the end of the study for the Lee functional and the Ritchie articular index, as well as for the number of tender and swollen joints. No changes for the grip strength, the biological and immunological parameters were observed. Mean serum creatinine values rose from 0.81 mg/dl at start to 1.1 mg/dl after 5 months of therapy and remained at that level throughout the study. In patients who discontinued, the serum creatinine level nearly normalized after one month of Sandimmun withdrawal. One hundred and sixty-two side effects were reported of which most were minor and known to occur with Sandimmun. Twenty-two cases (37% of patients) dropped out for adverse events before 1 year treatment. The criteria to withdraw the patients from the study differed greatly from centre to centre. CONCLUSIONS: Managing RA patients presenting with very long and severe disease remains difficult. Therefore low dose Sandimmun (2.5-5 mg/kg daily) appears to be a valuable therapeutic opportunity in RA patients refractory to various other conventional drugs, including methotrexate.

Tropisetron in the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting over six courses of emetogenic chemotherapy.

Tropisetron (Navoban") suppresses nausea and vomiting induced by cancer chemotherapy by antagonizing central and peripheral 5-HT3 receptors. In this open-label study, tropisetron was evaluated in 873 patients who were either refractory to antiemetic treatment during previous chemotherapy or at high risk of emesis as a result of current chemotherapy. The most commonly used agents alone or in combination were cyclophosphamide (35%), fluorouracil (30%), carboplatin (24%) and cisplatin (21%). The primary tumors were breast cancer (27%), lung cancer (16%), gynecological cancers (12%) and lymphoma (9%). Tropisetron was administered as a 15 min infusion prior to chemotherapy and an additional oral 5 mg dose was taken by 80% of the patients on subsequent days. During course 1, complete response to tropisetron was obtained in 64% of patients on day 1, 54% on day 2, 63% on day 3, 71% on day 4 and 77% on day 5. Very similar response rates were found for the six chemotherapy courses. There were few failures after complete and partial response, at maximum 3 and 15%, respectively. Moreover, 24-38% of those with partial response and 7-29% of those with failure could achieve a complete response during the following cycle. The treatment was well tolerated, the most frequently reported adverse events being constipation (3.7%) and headache (2.6%).

At equipotent doses, isradipine is better tolerated than amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.

1. The objective of this double-blind parallel-group study was to compare the tolerability of isradipine and amlodipine, specifically, the side-effects known to be related to the use of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists. 2. A total of 205 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension were randomized to receive either the sustained-release (SRO) formulation of isradipine (n = 103) or amlodipine (n = 102), both at dosages of 5 mg once daily. Blood pressure measurements were taken at the end of the dosing interval to assess the antihypertensive efficacy of the two drugs. 3. Adverse reactions were assessed in two ways: a) spontaneously reported adverse events were recorded and investigated in depth for severity, duration, relation to the study drug, and outcome; b) a questionnaire was used to elicit specific adverse reactions known to be related to the use of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists which were evaluated for severity, duration, relation to the study drug, and outcome. 4. After 6 weeks of active treatment, both isradipine and amlodipine reduced mean sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure: from 165.1/100.1 to 145.2/89.7 mm Hg with isradipine; and from 164.1/100.6 to 145.7/90.5 mm Hg with amlodipine. There was no difference in antihypertensive effect between isradipine and amlodipine (95% CI: -3.73 to 4.73 and -1.89 to 3.49 for differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively). 5. The number of patients spontaneously reporting adverse events was significantly higher (P = 0.02; 95% CI: 3.1 to 26.7%) with amlodipine (33.3%) than with isradipine (18.4%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Two-week oral treatment of tinea pedis, comparing terbinafine (250 mg/day) with itraconazole (100 mg/day): a double-blind, multicentre study.

In this randomized double-blind trial, two new antifungal compounds were compared in patients with interdigital or more extensive forms of tinea pedis. Two weeks of oral treatment with either terbinafine, an allylamine and new chemical entity, 250 mg daily, or itraconazole 100 mg daily, was given to 366 patients (184 terbinafine, 182 itraconazole). Of 13 patients who did not return after the first visit, 11 were lost to follow-up (five on terbinafine, six on itraconazole) and two reported adverse events. Another nine patients (three on terbinafine and six on itraconazole) were excluded because it was uncertain to which group they were randomized. A central laboratory performed both the mycology and safety tests. In 355 patients who received the study medications and were available for analysis of side-effects, 18 out of 179 (10.0%) in the terbinafine group and 10 out of 176 (5.7%) in the itraconazole group reported adverse events. No new clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were seen after treatment. At week 8 the efficacy analysis in 117 patients with mycologically confirmed dermatophyte infections (51 on terbinafine, 66 on itraconazole) showed that clinical symptoms were absent or minimal in 94.1% of the terbinafine and 72.7% of the itraconazole group (P = 0.0095); mycology was negative in 86.3% of the terbinafine and 54.5% of the itraconazole group (P = 0.0002). With terbinafine, negative mycology at week 8 was 81.3% in the interdigital and 88.6% in the more extensive forms of tinea pedis; with itraconazole mycology was negative in 65.0% and 50.0% of patients, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Twelve weeks of continuous oral therapy for toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes: a double-blind comparative trial of terbinafine 250 mg/day versus itraconazole 200 mg/day.

BACKGROUND: Dermatophyte infections of the toenail have been difficult to treat, requiring long courses of therapy and having high recurrence rates. New oral antifungal agents with better outcomes and minimal adverse events are needed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare two newer antifungal compounds, terbinafine and itraconazole, for efficacy and safety in toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes. METHODS: The study was randomized and double-blind. It compared 12 weeks of continuous oral treatment with terbinafine 250 mg/day or itraconazole 200 mg/day for confirmed toenail dermatophyte onychomycosis. Clinical symptoms and mycologic outcome were assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48. A total of 372 patients (186 in each group) with dermatophyte infection confirmed by microscopy and culture were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: At week 48, a statistically significantly greater percentage of the terbinafine group than itraconazole group showed negative mycology (73% [119 of 163] vs 45.8% [77 of 168]; p < 0.0001) (difference = 27.2%; 95% CI = [17.0%, 37.3%]). The difference was also confirmed clinically (p = 0.001) in the patients who were clinically cured or had only minimal symptoms at the end of the study (76.2% [125 of 164] vs 58.1% [100 of 172]) (difference = 18.1%; 95% CI = [8.24%, 27.9%]). The geometric mean length of healthy nail of the big toe was significantly greater in the terbinafine than itraconazole group (8.1 vs 6.4 mm; p = 0.026). Tolerability was good to very good in almost 90% of patients in both groups, and all reported adverse events were known for these compounds. CONCLUSION: Terbinafine produced higher rates of clinical and mycologic cure at follow-up than did itraconazole.

A 12-week treatment for dermatophyte toe onychomycosis: terbinafine 250 mg/day vs. itraconazole 200 mg/day--a double-blind comparative trial.

Lamisil (terbinafine) 250 mg daily and itraconazole 200 mg daily were compared in the treatment of dermatophyte toe onychomycosis over 12 weeks in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. At the end of follow-up (week 48) treatment with Lamisil led to negative mycology in 73% of patients compared with 45.8% in the itraconazole group (P < 0.0001). Globally the clinical symptoms of the target nail improved, a response which was in favour of Lamisil (P = 0.001). The percentages of patients who were clinically totally cured or who presented with only minimal symptoms were 76.3% for the Lamisil-treated group compared with 58.1% in the itraconazole group. The unaffected nail length for big toes was significantly higher in the Lamisil-treated group (9.1 mm vs. 7.7 mm; P = 0.0298). Onycholysis was also less in the Lamisil group (P = 0.001). We conclude that 12 weeks' continuous oral therapy leads to higher cure rates with Lamisil than with itraconazole and that both drugs are equally well tolerated.

Tolerability of isradipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in general practice: a large-scale surveillance study.

The tolerability of isradipine was evaluated in an open trial of patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension as treated in general practice. The primary objective was to identify all adverse reactions, especially those that were newly occurring (greater than or equal to 6 reports), with a frequency greater than 1/1,000. Over 1,100 general practitioners and 5,526 patients participated in this trial. After a 2-week washout period, and a 3-week placebo run-in, patients with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg were initially given isradipine at 1.25 mg twice daily. After 4 weeks, doses were doubled if DBP was greater than 90 mm Hg. If, after a further 4 weeks with doubled dosages, the DBP was still greater than 90 mm Hg, a second (nonspecified free-choice) antihypertensive agent was added to the treatment. Adverse events were recorded by open questioning. The incidence of adverse events was found to be similar to that with placebo; adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity and disappeared over time. No newly occurring adverse events were found. In conclusion, isradipine is safe and well tolerated at effective antihypertensive doses in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension as treated in general practice.

Long-term (2-year) isradipine data in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.

At the end of a short-term (3-month) study of antihypertensive treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension, 141 of the 200 study patients continued into a 2-year follow-up of isradipine as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. Although all 141 patients completed the first year, only 102 completed the study. Twenty-four patients dropped out: 2 with flushing; 1 each with arrhythmia, edema, angina, and headache; 12 who were noncompliant; 2 with disease unrelated to the study drug; and 4 for reasons unknown. Before the follow-up, 70% of the 141 patients were taking isradipine; after 2 years, 63% were still taking isradipine as monotherapy. During the follow-up study, the blood pressure remained stable (142.9/86.8 mm Hg after 3 months, and 142.9/86.2 mm Hg after 2 years), whereas the normalization rate was only slightly changed (73 vs. 75.2%). The incidence of reported adverse events decreased with time. At the end of the short-term study, 44.7% of patients had reported one or more adverse events; after 2 years of treatment, only 14.4% reported adverse events. Two patients had ECG signs of left ventricular hypertrophy: one showed no relevant changes while the other presented clear signs of regression. No clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities were noted during the study. In conclusion, isradipine is effective, well tolerated and safe in the long-term treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Optimal combination therapy with Navoban (tropisetron) in patients with incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The Belgian Navoban Group.

Even with the availability of potent and selective serotonin antagonists, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting remain a major problem for many patients. This study aims to evaluate the benefit of combination therapy based on Navoban (tropisetron) in patients who had incomplete control of nausea and/or vomiting induced by chemotherapy when using Navoban as a single antiemetic agent. In their first chemotherapy course, 1072 patients planned to receive at least two identical cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy were treated with 5 mg Navoban once daily. To evaluate three treatments additional to the recommended 5 mg once-daily Navoban regimen during Course 2 in those patients who had shown incomplete control of nausea and/or vomiting on any day of Course 1, a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was employed. Of these patients, 445 were centrally randomised to receive an additional dose of open-label dexamethasone (Day 1, 0.2 mg/kg i.v.; Days 2-6, 8 mg p.o.) and/or open-label alizapride (Day 1, 100 mg i.v. and 4 x 50 mg p.o.; Days 2-6, 4 x 5 mg p.o.) and/or double-blind Navoban--that is, doubling the dose to 10 mg once daily or placebo. Complete response rates during Course 1 (CRR, no nausea and no vomiting) were, for Day 1, 72% and for Days 1-6, 48%. More complete responders were observed when dexamethasone was added during Course 2, both on Day 1 (76% vs. 66%, p = 0.020) and on Days 1-6 (50% vs. 34%, p = 0.0004).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)