Use of tamoxifen in pT1a-pT1b, pN0 breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if in low-risk breast cancer patients (pT1a-pT1b, pN0) tamoxifen can reduce local recurrence and improve survival. METHODS: Retrospectively 700 patients were analyzed. All patients were treated from 1980 to 2003 with conservative surgery plus radiotherapy at the University of Florence. No patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Tamoxifen was prescribed in 359 patients (51.3%). The crude probability of survival (or local recurrence) was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier method, and survival (or local recurrence) comparisons were carried out using Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: The univariate analysis for specific survival showed that only histological type and local recurrence were significant prognostic factors (log rank test: p=0.02 and p<0.0001, respectively). The Cox regression model by stepwise selection confirmed lobular histological type (p=0.008; HR: 3.83, 95% CI: 1.31-11.21) and local recurrence (p<0.001; HR: 9.05, 95% CI: 3.05-26.82) as independent prognostic factors for disease specific survival. For local disease free survival, multivariate analysis did not show any significant parameters. CONCLUSION: In our series tamoxifen did not seem to improve disease specific survival and local disease specific survival. The number of events in terms of death for cancer or in terms of local recurrence is too small in this group of patients. However, according to our results we suggest not to prescribe tamoxifen in patients affected by pT1a-pT1b, pN0 breast cancer.

Early detection of local recurrences in the follow-up of primary breast cancer.

The results of physical examination (PE) in the detection of local recurrences (LR) from breast cancer are reviewed in the follow-up experience of 1139 breast cancer patients. A minimum follow-up time of 5 years was considered. LR accounted for 40% of total first relapses and isolated (without distant metastases) LR represented about 1/3 of total relapses. The chest wall was the most frequent site of LR. The extent of LR was correlated with the probability of associated distant metastases detectable at the time of LR diagnosis, whereas no correlations were found with the presence or absence of subjective symptoms at diagnosis. The mean free interval from primary surgery was 3 months shorter for LR detected in asymptomatic phase than in the symptomatic phase. This difference increased to 5 months for recurrences detected in the first 2 years, when PE controls were repeated every 6 months whereas a smaller difference of 2 months was observed over 2 years with yearly controls. The mean and 5-year actuarial survival was better (75.5 vs. 64.9 months and 54% vs. 40%) for cases detected in the asymptomatic phase than in the symptomatic phase; however, the difference was not statistically significant for the small sample considered and could be even partially due to length biased sampling. On the basis of the reported results, PE should still be recommended as a follow-up test, although further studies are needed to assess its real impact on prognosis.

Role of radiotherapy boost in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: a single-center experience in a series of 389 patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of adjuvant radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ is accepted by most radiation oncologists worldwide; the role of a boost on the tumor bed is however more controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our Institute experience in DCIS treatment, focusing on main prognostic factors and impact of radiation boost on local relapse. A total of 389 patients treated between 1990 and 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for a median dose of 50 Gy; 190 patients (48.8%) received and additional radiation boost on the tumor bed. RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 7.7 years, we recorded 26 local recurrence (6.7%). Concerning local relapse-free survival, at Cox regression univariate analyses <1 mm surgical margins (p < 0.0001) and young age (p = 0.01) emerged as significant unfavorable prognostic factors. At multivariate analysis Cox regression model, surgical margins (p < 0.001) and radiation boost (p = 0.014) resulted as the significant independent predictors of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed the negative prognostic impact of surgical margins <1 mm and the protective role of radiation boost on LR rate. Anyway, results from ongoing prospective Phase III studies are strongly necessary to better identify high-risk DCIS patients.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx®) and oral vinorelbine in first-line metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines.

Doxorubicin is highly effective and widely used in breast cancer; however, its use is limited by cardiotoxicity related to its cumulative dose. In previous studies, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has shown an acceptable toxicity profile with minimal cardiotoxicity. Between June 2006 and October 2009, 27 metastatic breast cancer patients were treated with first-line PLD and vinorelbine at the University of Florence, Radiotherapy Unit. PLD (30 mg/m²) was administered on day 1, and oral vinorelbine (60 mg/m²) was administered on days 1 and 8 of a 4-week cycle. All patients were previously treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Median age was 52 years (range 38-69) and median time to metastasis was 78.5 months. There were no treatment interruptions or discontinuation for cardiac toxicity and no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3 hematological toxicity was observed in 18.6% of patients, and 3.7% had grade 3 non-hematological adverse events. With a median follow-up of 13.2 months (range 3-33), median response duration was 6.1 months, and median PFS was 5.3 months. The overall clinical benefit rate was 55.5%. Our experience adds to evidence supporting the activity and cardiac safety of PLD and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Use of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

We evaluated the feasibility and incidence of hematological toxicity in a series of 39 breast cancer patients treated at our institute with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by docetaxel, using prophylactic G-CSF (pegfilgrastim). We prescribed G-CSF as secondary prophylaxis during the AC regimen and as primary prophylaxis during treatment with docetaxel. For the AC treatment, we recorded 6 cases of grade III (15.3%) and one case of grade IV (2.5%) neutropenia; we found one case of Grade IV anemia. For the docetaxel regimen, we registered one case of Grade IV (2.5%) neutropenia and three cases of Grade III leukopoenia without neutropenia. No patients experienced cardiac symptoms or baseline LVEF rate decrease. All patients concluded the programmed chemotherapy. Our experience shows the safety of docetaxel in combination with anthracyclines and the efficacy of prophylaxis with G-CSF in breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy.

Oral ibandronate in metastatic bone breast cancer: the Florence University experience and a review of the literature.

Ibandronate is an amino-bisphosphonate approved in metastatic breast cancer to reduce skeletal complications and to alleviate bone pain. we report our experience about the safety of oral ibandronate and review the literature.We treated 44 patients and administered 524 cycles of oral ibandronate (a single cycle was defined as a 50 mg capsule once daily for 28 days) with a median of 12 cycles (range 6-24). At a median follow-up of 18.5 months (range 6-28) the mean pain score decreased from 1.59 (SD+/-0.97) at baseline to 0.41 (SD+/-0.72) after 48 weeks of treatment. The mean analgesic score was 1.89 (SD+/-1.37) at baseline and 1.46 (SD+/-1.62) after 48 weeks of treatment. Ibandronate was generally well-tolerated; we had no Grade 3-4 adverse events. No patients had deterioration of renal function. No patients developed bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw. Our experience confirmed that ibandronate may be a useful and safe co-analgesic to conventional treatments for bone pain in selected metastatic breast cancer patients.

Adjuvant trastuzumab in breast cancer: experience from the University of Florence.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability profile of sequential trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer. We analyzed 94 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer who underwent postoperative treatment between November 2003 and December 2008 at the University of florence. All patients received one year of sequential trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy. Cardiac monitoring in our study consisted of assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (lVef) by echocardiography at baseline, after the completion of chemotherapy, then every 3 months during trastuzumab treatment and every 6 months thereafter. 91.6% of patients were alive without evidence of distant or local relapse, while 8.4% developed disease recurrence. The cumulative incidence of cardiotoxicity was 14.5%. In our experience trastuzumab given postoperatively with adjuvant chemotherapy was well tolerated and produced optimal clinical results in terms of disease-free survival.

Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

This study evaluated whether doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide are superior to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Between July 1976 and December 2004, 1045 breast cancer patients received adjuvant chemotherapy at the Radiotherapy Unit of the University of florence. 927 were administered i.v. CMF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days for a total of six cycles) and 118 i.v. DC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) on day 1 repeated every 21 days for a total of four cycles). All patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy as well. The survival analysis, stratified according to treatment, did not show any significant difference in metastasis occurrence between the two groups (log rank test p=0.42). According to multivariate analysis four parameters emerged as independent prognostic factors for distant metastases in patients treated with the Cmf regimen: pt (p=0.0005), number of positive axillary lymph nodes (p=<0.0001), tamoxifen use (p=0.0109) and local relapses (p=<0.0001). Only number of positive axillary lymph nodes and local relapses were significant predictors of metastases occurrence according to multivariate analysis in the DC group, 17 and p=0.028, respectively. No significant difference between the two regimens was observed with regards to number of involved nodes. DC and CMF produced similar outcome in breast cancer patients.

Respiratory function tests after mantle irradiation in patients with Hodgkin's disease.

Pulmonary function tests were performed in 43 patients with Hodgkin's disease before mantle irradiation and at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 or more months thereafter. Treatment was given with a telecobalt unit to a total dose of 36 to 42 Gy, the higher dose being reserved for cases with considerable mediastinal involvement. The functional parameters explored included static and dynamic lung volumes, gas exchanges, ventilatory efficiency, and airway resistance. Measured parameters were expressed as a percentage of the pre-treatment value (PTV) in the individual patient. In the whole group, only small variations in the functional indices were observed at 3 to 6 months after mantle irradiation. In patients with normal PTVs a greater variation in static and dynamic volumes was observed at 3 to 6 months after mantle irradiation, with complete recovery thereafter. The gas exchange parameters also showed a similar variation at 3 to 6 months but no recovery was demonstrated in the subsequent examinations. No changes in ventilatory efficiency and airway resistance were observed. In patients with abnormal PTVs, usually presenting large mediastinal adenopathy, all parameters improved after mantle irradiation, and the favourable effect of tumour regression was probably more important than the radiation damage on the pulmonary parenchyma.

Weekly gemcitabine plus Epirubicin as effective chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

The current role of chemotherapy in pancreatic carcinoma is limited, and progress in the treatment of this disease represents a significant challenge to medical oncology. The most promising drug under study is gemcitabine, a relatively new antimetabolite that represents an attractive candidate for combination chemotherapy because of its excellent side-effect profile and the absence of overlapping toxicities with other chemotherapeutic agents. Combined administration of gemcitabine and anthracyclines could result in the induction of DNA breaks that are not easily repaired by the cell's machinery, thus enhancing the apoptotic signals triggered by these lesions. Forty-four patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this multicenter study. Patients received Epirubicin 20 mg m(-2) for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest (1 cycle) and gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) after Epirubicin on the same day. All were assessable for toxicity and response, 11 patients responded to treatment with one complete response and 10 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 25%. Median survival was 10.9 months (range, 2-26 months). Therapy was well tolerated, with a low incidence of haematologic grade >2 toxicity. A total of 12 of 27 (44.4%) eligible patients attained a clinical benefit response. Our findings suggest that the gemcitabine-epirubicin schedule is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.