RESUMO
RATIONALE: Endothelial cells (ECs) are highly glycolytic and generate the majority of their energy via the breakdown of glucose to lactate. At the same time, a main role of ECs is to allow the transport of glucose to the surrounding tissues. GLUT1 (glucose transporter isoform 1/Slc2a1) is highly expressed in ECs of the central nervous system (CNS) and is often implicated in blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, but whether and how GLUT1 controls EC metabolism and function is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the role of GLUT1 in endothelial metabolism and function during postnatal CNS development as well as at the adult BBB. METHODS AND RESULTS: Inhibition of GLUT1 decreases EC glucose uptake and glycolysis, leading to energy depletion and the activation of the cellular energy sensor AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase), and decreases EC proliferation without affecting migration. Deletion of GLUT1 from the developing postnatal retinal endothelium reduces retinal EC proliferation and lowers vascular outgrowth, without affecting the number of tip cells. In contrast, in the brain, we observed a lower number of tip cells in addition to reduced brain EC proliferation, indicating that within the CNS, organotypic differences in EC metabolism exist. Interestingly, when ECs become quiescent, endothelial glycolysis is repressed, and GLUT1 expression increases in a Notch-dependent fashion. GLUT1 deletion from quiescent adult ECs leads to severe seizures, accompanied by neuronal loss and CNS inflammation. Strikingly, this does not coincide with BBB leakiness, altered expression of genes crucial for BBB barrier functioning nor reduced vascular function. Instead, we found a selective activation of inflammatory and extracellular matrix related gene sets. CONCLUSIONS: GLUT1 is the main glucose transporter in ECs and becomes uncoupled from glycolysis during quiescence in a Notch-dependent manner. It is crucial for developmental CNS angiogenesis and adult CNS homeostasis but does not affect BBB barrier function.
Assuntos
Barreira Hematoencefálica/fisiologia , Encéfalo/irrigação sanguínea , Células Endoteliais/metabolismo , Transportador de Glucose Tipo 1/fisiologia , Neovascularização Fisiológica , Vasos Retinianos , Proteínas Quinases Ativadas por AMP/metabolismo , Animais , Encéfalo/citologia , Movimento Celular , Proliferação de Células , Células Endoteliais/fisiologia , Endotélio , Endotélio Vascular/fisiologia , Metabolismo Energético , Glucose/metabolismo , Transportador de Glucose Tipo 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Glicólise , Humanos , Camundongos , Retina/citologiaRESUMO
Objectives: Epileptiform activity and seizures are present in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and genetic animal models of AD. Amyloid beta 1-42 (Aß1-42) oligomers are thought to be crucial in AD and can cause neuronal hyperexcitability in vitro. However, it is unclear whether these Aß1-42 oligomers cause the increased seizure susceptibility in vivo in people with AD and in AD animal models, nor via which mechanisms it would do so. We investigated this question by injecting Aß1-42 oligomers intracerebrally in mice and assessed its impact on seizure susceptibility. Materials and methods: We performed a single intracerebral injection of synthetic Aß1-42 oligomers or scrambled Aß1-42 in NMRI mice in three different cohorts and subjected them to an i.v. infusion of a chemoconvulsant. We evoked the seizures 1.5 h, 1 week, or 3 weeks after the intracerebral injection of Aß1-42 oligomers, covering also the timepoints and injection locations that were used by others in similar experimental set-ups. Results: With a thioflavine T assay and transmission electron microscopy we confirmed that Aß1-42 monomers spontaneously aggregated to oligomers. We did not find an effect of Aß1-42 oligomers on susceptibility to seizures - evoked 1.5 h, 1 week or 3 weeks - after their intracerebral injection. Significance: The lack of effect of Aß1-42 oligomers on seizure susceptibility in our experiments contrasts with recent findings in similar experimental set-ups. Contradicting conclusions are frequent in experiments with Aß1-42 and they are often attributed to subtle differences in the various aggregation forms of the Aß1-42 used in different experiments. We confirmed the presence of Aß1-42 oligomers with state-of-the-art methods but cannot ascertain that the protein aggregates we used are identical to those used by others. Whether our findings or those previously published best represent the role of Aß1-42 oligomers on seizures in AD remains unclear.