Prognostic value of the combination of volume, massiveness and fragmentation parameters measured on baseline FDG pet in high-burden follicular lymphoma.

The prognostic value of radiomic quantitative features measured on pre-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT was investigated in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). We conducted a retrospective study of 126 FL patients (grade 1-3a) diagnosed between 2006 and 2020. A dozen of PET/CT-derived features were extracted via a software (Oncometer3D) from baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT images. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis were used to assess the prognostic factors for progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) and progression-free survival at 24 months. Four different clusters were identified among the twelve PET parameters analyzed: activity, tumor burden, fragmentation-massiveness and dispersion. On ROC analyses, TMTV, the total metabolic tumor volume, had the highest AUC (0.734) followed by medPCD, the median distance between the centroid of the tumors and their periphery (AUC: 0.733). Patients with high TMTV (HR = 4.341; p < 0.001), high Tumor Volume Surface Ratio (TVSR) (HR = 3.204; p < 0.003) and high medPCD (HR = 4.507; p < 0.001) had significantly worse prognosis in both Kaplan-Meier and Cox univariate analyses. Furthermore, a synergistic effect was observed in Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses combining these three PET/CT-derived parameters (HR = 12.562; p < 0.001). Having two or three high parameters among TMTV, TVSR and medPCD was able to predict POD24 status with a specificity of 68% and a sensitivity of 75%. TMTV, TVSR and baseline medPCD are strong prognostic factors in FL and their combination better predicts disease prognosis.

Prognostic value of low skeletal muscle mass in patient treated by exclusive curative radiochemotherapy for a NSCLC.

Low skeletal muscle mass is a well-known prognostic factor for patients treated for a non-small-cell lung cancer by surgery or chemotherapy. However, its impact in patients treated by exclusive radiochemotherapy has never been explored. Our study tries to evaluate the prognostic value of low skeletal muscle mass and other antropometric parameters on this population. Clinical, nutritional and anthropometric date were collected for 93 patients treated by radiochemotherapy for a NSCLC. Anthropometric parameters were measured on the PET/CT by two methods. The first method was a manual segmentation at level L3, used to define Muscle Body Area (MBAL3), Visceral Fat Area (VFAL3) and Subcutaneous Fat Area (SCFAL3). The second method was an software (Anthropometer3D), allowing an automatic multislice measurement of Lean Body Mass (LBMAnthro3D), Fat Body Mass (FBMAnthro3D), Muscle Body Mass (MBMAnthro3D), Visceral Fat Mass (VFMAnthro3D), and Sub-Cutaneous Fat Mass (SCFMAnthro3D) on the PET/CT. All anthropometrics parameters were normalised by the patient's height. The primary end point was overall survival time. Univariate and then stepwise multivariate cox analysis were performed for significant parameters. Finally, Spearman's correlation between MBAL3 and MBMAnthro3D was assessed. Forty-one (44%) patients had low skeletal muscle mass. The median overall survival was 18 months for low skeletal muscle mass patients versus 36 months for non-low skeletal muscle mass patients (p = 0.019). Low skeletal muscle mass (HR = 1.806, IC95% [1.09-2.98]), serums albumin level < 35 g/l (HR = 2.203 [1.19-4.09]), Buzby Index < 97.5 (HR = 2.31 [1.23-4.33]), WHO score = 0 (HR = 0.59 [0.31-0.86] and MBMAnthro3D < 8.56 kg/m2 (HR = 2.36 [1.41-3.90]) were the only significant features in univariates analysis. In the stepwise multivariate Cox analysis, only MBMAnthro3D < 8.56 kg/m2 (HR = 2.16, p = 0.003) and WHO score = 0 (HR = 0.59, p = 0.04) were significant. Finally, muscle quantified by MBAL3 and MBMAnthro3D were found to be highly correlated (Spearman = 0.9). Low skeletal muscle mass, assessed on the pre-treatment PET/CT is a powerful prognostic factor in patient treated by radiochemotherapy for a NSCLC. The automatic software Anthropometer3D can easily identify patients a risk that could benefit an adapted therapy.

[PET technology: Latest advances and potential impact on radiotherapy]. / Tomographie par émission de positons (TEP) pour la radiothérapie : technique et innovations.

Multimodal imaging has become a standard for planning radiation therapy via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) in many cancers. However, its use is now old, and its impact has not been much discussed in light of technological improvements in imaging and advances in radiotherapy. However, in 20 years, the exclusive functional imaging has been replaced by hybrid imaging (functional and anatomical) with successive improvements (flight time, detector modifications, digitisation, etc.) have enabled us to go from centimetric resolution to the current 3 to 4mm resolution. This article will specifically review PET technology, its latest advances and the potential impact on radiotherapy, particularly head and neck cancers.

Interest of positron-emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning and control.

Computed tomography (CT) in the treatment position is currently indispensable for planning radiation therapy. Other imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission-tomography (PET), can be used to improve the definition of the tumour and/or healthy tissue but also to provide functional data of the target volume. Accurate image registration is essential for treatment planning, so MRI and PET scans should be registered at the planning CT scan. Hybrid PET/MRI scans with a hard plane can be used but pose the problem of the absence of CT scans. Finally, techniques for moving the patient on a rigid air-cushioned table allow PET/CT/MRI scans to be performed in the treatment position while limiting the patient's movements exist. At the same time, the advent of MRI-linear accelerator systems allows to redefine image-guided radiotherapy and to propose treatments with daily recalculation of the dose. The place of PET during treatment remains more confidential and currently only in research and prototype status. The same development of imaging during radiotherapy is underway in proton therapy.

Benefits of positron emission tomography scans for the evaluation of radiotherapy.

The assessment of tumour response during and after radiotherapy determines the subsequent management of patients (adaptation of treatment plan, monitoring, adjuvant treatment, rescue treatment or palliative care). In addition to its role in extension assessment and therapeutic planning, positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography provides useful functional information for the evaluation of tumour response. The objective of this article is to review published data on positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography as a tool for evaluating external radiotherapy for cancers. Data on positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography scans acquired at different times (during, after initial and after definitive [chemo-]radiotherapy, during post-treatment follow-up) in solid tumours (lung, head and neck, cervix, oesophagus, prostate and rectum) were collected and analysed. Recent recommendations of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network are also reported. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography with (18F)-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose has a well-established role in clinical routine after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancers, particularly to limit the number of neck lymph node dissection. This imaging modality also has a place for the evaluation of initial chemoradiotherapy of oesophageal cancer, including the detection of distant metastases, and for the post-therapeutic evaluation of cervical cancer. Several radiotracers for positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography, such as choline, are also recommended for patients with prostate cancer with biochemical failure. (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography is optional in many other circumstances and its clinical benefits, possibly in combination with MRI, to assess response to radiotherapy remain a very active area of research.

Radiomics: A primer for the radiation oncologist.

PURPOSE: Radiomics are a set of methods used to leverage medical imaging and extract quantitative features that can characterize a patient's phenotype. All modalities can be used with several different software packages. Specific informatics methods can then be used to create meaningful predictive models. In this review, we will explain the major steps of a radiomics analysis pipeline and then present the studies published in the context of radiation therapy. METHODS: A literature review was performed on Medline using the search engine PubMed. The search strategy included the search terms "radiotherapy", "radiation oncology" and "radiomics". The search was conducted in July 2019 and reference lists of selected articles were hand searched for relevance to this review. RESULTS: A typical radiomics workflow always includes five steps: imaging and segmenting, data curation and preparation, feature extraction, exploration and selection and finally modeling. In radiation oncology, radiomics studies have been published to explore different clinical outcome in lung (n=5), head and neck (n=5), esophageal (n=3), rectal (n=3), pancreatic (n=2) cancer and brain metastases (n=2). The quality of these retrospective studies is heterogeneous and their results have not been translated to the clinic. CONCLUSION: Radiomics has a great potential to predict clinical outcome and better personalize treatment. But the field is still young and constantly evolving. Improvement in bias reduction techniques and multicenter studies will hopefully allow more robust and generalizable models.

PET and MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy: Rational, feasibility and benefit.

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) corresponds to various replanning strategies aiming to correct for anatomical variations occurring during the course of radiotherapy. The goal of the article was to report the rational, feasibility and benefit of using PET and/or MRI to guide this ART strategy in various tumor localizations. The anatomical modifications defined by scanner taking into account tumour mobility and volume variation are not always sufficient to optimise treatment. The contribution of functional imaging by PET or the precision of soft tissue by MRI makes it possible to consider optimized ART. Today, the most important data for both PET and MRI are for lung, head and neck, cervical and prostate cancers. PET and MRI guided ART appears feasible and safe, however in a very limited clinical experience. Phase I/II studies should be therefore performed, before proposing cost-effectiveness comparisons in randomized trials and before using the approach in routine practice.

["Definition of target volume: When et how can the radiation oncologist use PET?"] / « Définition des volumes cibles : quand et comment l'oncologue radiothérapeute peut-il utiliser la TEP ? ¼.

PET/CT has become a standard examination in oncology but is probably still underused for radiotherapy planning. However, except for the clinical research data that shows the interest of this examination in considering personalized and adaptive radiotherapy, it is also important in defining target volumes. However, before using it in clinical practice, a few prerequisites are required to know the acquisition and segmentation methods. Ideally, PET/CT should become a standard examination for radiotherapy departments in the same way as planning CT and tomorrow as MRI.