RESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at increased risk of infections and suffer from poor bone quality due to their disseminated malignant bone disease. Therefore, postoperative complications may occur following surgical treatment of MM lesions. PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence of postoperative complications and retreatments after spinal surgery in MM patients. Additionally, we sought to identify risk factors associated with complications and retreatments. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: In total, 270 patients with MM who received surgical treatment for spinal involvement between 2008 and 2021 were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of perioperative complications within 6 weeks and reoperations within 2.5 years and individual odds ratios for factors associated with these complications and reoperations. METHODS: Data were collected through manual chart review. Hosmer and Lemeshow's purposeful regression method was used to identify risk factors for complications and reoperations. RESULTS: The median age of our cohort was 65 years (SD = 10.8), and 58% were male (n = 57). Intraoperative complications were present in 24 patients (8.9%). The overall 6-week complication rate after surgery was 35% (n = 95). The following variables were independently associated with 6-week complications: higher Genant grading of a present vertebral fracture (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.04-1.95; p = .031), receiving intramuscular or intravenous steroids within a week prior to surgery (OR 3.97; 95% CI 1.79-9.06; p = .001), decompression surgery without fusion (OR 6.53; 95% CI 1.30-36.86; p = .026), higher creatinine levels (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.19-5.60; p = .014), and lower calcium levels (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.37-0.88; p = .013). A secondary surgery was indicated for 53 patients (20%), of which 13 (4.8%) took place within two weeks after the initial surgery. We additionally discovered factors associated with retreatments, which are elucidated within the manuscript. CONCLUSION: The goal of surgical treatment for MM bone disease is to enhance patient quality of life and reduce symptom burden. However, postoperative complication rates remain relatively high after spine surgery in patients with MM, likely attributable to both inherent characteristics of the disease and patient comorbidities. The risk for complications and secondary surgeries should be explored and a multidisciplinary approach is crucial.
Assuntos
Doenças Ósseas , Mieloma Múltiplo , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Doenças Ósseas/complicações , Fusão Vertebral/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Despite the rapid increase in instrumented spinal fusions for a variety of indications, most studies focus on short-term fusion rates. Long-term clinical outcomes are still scarce and inconclusive. This study investigated clinical outcomes > 10 years after single-level instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis with neurological symptoms. METHODS: Cross-sectional long-term follow-up among the Dutch participants of an international multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing osteogenic protein-1 with autograft. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D-3L and visual analogue scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, as well as questions on satisfaction with treatment and additional surgery. RESULTS: The follow-up rate was 73% (41 patients). At mean 11.8 (range 10.1-13.7) years after surgery, a non-significant deterioration of clinical outcomes compared to 1-year follow-up was observed. The mean ODI was 20 ± 19, mean EQ-5D-3L index score 0.784 ± 0.251 and mean VAS for leg and back pain, respectively, 34 ± 33 and 31 ± 28. Multiple regression showed that diagnosis (degenerative vs. isthmic spondylolisthesis), graft type (OP-1 vs. autograft) and 1-year fusion status (fusion vs. no fusion) were not predictive for the ODI at long-term follow-up (p = 0.389). Satisfaction with treatment was excellent and over 70% of the patients reported lasting improvement in back and/or leg pain. No revision surgeries for non-union were reported. CONCLUSION: This study showed favourable clinical outcomes > 10 years after instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion and supports spondylolisthesis with neurological symptoms as indication for fusion surgery.
Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral , Espondilolistese , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed at discussing the relevance of the type B3 fracture of the new AOSpine classification. METHODS: Hyperextension fractures of the spine are rare in the general population, but common in the ankylotic spine. We present a case of a severe spinal fracture with concomitant esophageal rupture, which was diagnosed early and could be treated during the initial trauma care. RESULTS: The spinal column was stabilized using a percutaneous technique after which the perforated esophagus was sutured through a thoracotomy. The spinal injury was classified a type B3 fracture using the new AOSpine classification. CONCLUSION: The B3 typification raised a lot of discussion during the development of the new classification system and may be controversial. This case, however, nicely illustrates the relevance of an intact posterior hinge as compared to C-type injuries where complete dissociation is present with inherent spinal cord damage.
Assuntos
Esôfago/lesões , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Espondilite Anquilosante/complicações , Vértebras Torácicas/lesões , Idoso , Esôfago/diagnóstico por imagem , Esôfago/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Ruptura Espontânea/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura Espontânea/etiologia , Ruptura Espontânea/cirurgia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bone destruction is the most frequent disease-defining clinical feature of multiple myeloma (MM), resulting in skeletal-related events such as back pain, pathological fractures, or neurologic compromise including epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC). Up to 24% of patients with MM will be affected by ESCC. Radiation therapy has been proven to be highly effective in pain relief in patients with MM. However, a critical knowledge gap remains with regard to neurologic outcomes in patients with high-grade ESCC treated with radiation. METHODS: We retrospectively included 162 patients with MM and high-grade ESCC (grade 2 or 3) who underwent radiation therapy of the spine between January 2010 and July 2021. The primary outcome was the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score after 12 to 24 months, or the last known ASIA score if the patient had had a repeat treatment or died. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with poor neurologic outcomes after radiation, defined as neurologic deterioration or lack of improvement. RESULTS: After radiation therapy, 34 patients (21%) had no improvement in their impaired neurologic function and 27 (17%) deteriorated neurologically. Thirty-six patients (22%) underwent either surgery or repeat irradiation after the initial radiation therapy. There were 100 patients who were neurologically intact at baseline (ASIA score of E), of whom 16 (16%) had neurologic deterioration. Four variables were independently associated with poor neurologic outcomes: baseline ASIA (odds ratio [OR] = 6.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.70 to 17.38; p < 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (OR = 6.19; 95% CI = 1.49 to 29.49; p = 0.015), number of levels affected by ESCC (OR = 4.02; 95% CI = 1.19 to 14.18; p = 0.026), and receiving steroids prior to radiation (OR = 4.42; 95% CI = 1.41 to 16.10; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that 38% of patients deteriorated or did not improve neurologically after radiation therapy for high-grade ESCC. The results highlight the need for multidisciplinary input and efforts in the treatment of high-grade ESCC in patients with MM. Future studies will help to improve patient selection for specific and standardized treatments and to clearly delineate which patients are likely to benefit from radiation therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Compressão da Medula Espinal , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral , Humanos , Compressão da Medula Espinal/etiologia , Compressão da Medula Espinal/radioterapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Mieloma Múltiplo/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases can lead to unremitting pain and neurological deficits, which substantially impair daily functioning and quality of life. Patients with unstable spinal metastases receive surgical stabilization followed by palliative radiotherapy as soon as wound healing allows. The time between surgery and radiotherapy delays improvement of mobility, radiotherapy-induced pain relief, local tumor control, and restart of systemic oncological therapy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) enables delivery of preoperative high-dose radiotherapy while dose-sparing the surgical field, allowing stabilizing surgery within only hours. Patients may experience earlier recovery of mobility, regression of pain, and return to systemic oncological therapy. The BLEND RCT evaluates the effectiveness of SBRT followed by surgery within 24 h for the treatment of symptomatic, unstable spinal metastases. METHODS: This phase III randomized controlled trial is embedded within the PRospective Evaluation of interventional StudiEs on boNe meTastases (PRESENT) cohort. Patients with symptomatic, unstable spinal metastases requiring stabilizing surgery and radiotherapy will be randomized (1:1). The intervention group (n = 50) will be offered same-day SBRT and surgery, which they can accept or refuse. According to the Trial within Cohorts (TwiCs) design, the control group (n = 50) will not be informed and receive standard treatment (surgery followed by conventional radiotherapy after 1-2 weeks when wound healing allows). Baseline characteristics and outcome measures will be captured within PRESENT. The primary outcome is physical functioning (EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL) 4 weeks after start of treatment. Secondary endpoints include pain response, time until return to systemic oncological therapy, quality of life, local tumor control, and adverse events up to 3 months post-treatment. DISCUSSION: The BLEND RCT evaluates the effect of same-day SBRT and stabilizing surgery for the treatment of symptomatic, unstable spinal metastases compared with standard of care. We expect better functional outcomes, faster pain relief, and continuation of systemic oncological therapy. The TwiCs design enables efficient recruitment within an ongoing cohort, as well as prevention of disappointment bias and drop-out as control patients will not be informed about the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05575323. Registered on October 11, 2022.
Assuntos
Parafusos Pediculares , Radiocirurgia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral , Humanos , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Dor/etiologia , HospitaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the neurological outcome after transverse sacral fractures in patients with neurological impairment. METHODS: A systematic review of the English, French, German, and Dutch literature was conducted. All study designs, including retrospective cohort studies and case reports, describing transverse sacral fractures were included. Two authors independently extracted the predefined data and scored the neurological impairment according to the Gibbons classification after the trauma and at the time of follow-up. The neurological outcomes were pooled according to the Gibbons classification. RESULTS: No randomized controlled trials or prospective case series were found. A total of 139 articles were included, consisting of 81 case reports and 58 retrospective case series involving 521 patients. Regardless of the type of management, neurological recovery of at least 1 Gibbons category was reported in 62% of these patients. A comparison of the neurological outcome of nonoperatively treated patients and surgically treated patients showed similar neurological recovery rates. For the surgically treated patients, fixation of the fracture resulted in a better neurological improvement compared with an isolated decompression. CONCLUSIONS: This review could not provide evidence of improved neurological recovery after surgical treatment compared with nonoperative treatment. When surgical treatment was considered, there was a low level of evidence that fixation of the fracture results in better neurological improvement compared with isolated decompression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador/estatística & dados numéricos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fixação de Fratura/estatística & dados numéricos , Sacro/lesões , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Feminino , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Sacro/inervação , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The intra-individual variability of plasma lipids and apolipoproteins has not been studied systematically in familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL). METHODS: Intra-individual changes in fasting plasma lipids and apolipoproteins B and AI were determined in 18 untreated FCHL subjects and 16 unrelated, normolipidemic subjects. Participants were matched for gender, age and body mass index. The mean follow-up period of fasting plasma lipids was 48.91 +/- 35.46 (mean +/- S.D.) days. Postprandial lipemia was determined on 3 different days in 1 week in 90 healthy controls and 17 untreated FCHL subjects by the area under the diurnal capillary triglyceride curve (TGc-AUC). RESULTS: The coefficients of variation (CVs) for fasting plasma TG were similar between FCHL (23.2 +/- 10.2%) and controls (20.4 +/- 8.2%). The CVs for HDL-C, apo B and apo AI were the lowest of all fasting plasma measurements in both groups and there was no significant difference between FCHL (12.8 +/- 8.2%, 13.2 +/- 15.8% and 6.4 +/- 5.2%, respectively) and controls (11.4 +/- 4.3%, 11.3 +/- 10.6% and 7.8 +/- 4.6%, respectively). The CVs for postprandial lipemia were not different between FCHL (15.9 +/- 11.3%) and controls (15.1 +/- 11.0%), and were significantly lower than the CV of fasting capillary TG (TGc) in the same period (36.3 +/- 24.7% and 24.9 +/- 17.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not provide evidence for short-term major changes in fasting or postprandial lipemia or apolipoproteins in FCHL when systematically compared to healthy controls.
Assuntos
Apolipoproteínas/sangue , Jejum/sangue , Hiperlipidemia Familiar Combinada/sangue , Lipídeos/sangue , Período Pós-Prandial , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of osteogenic protein (OP)-1 in 1-level lumbar spine instrumented posterolateral fusions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Instrumented posterolateral fusion with the use of autograft is a commonly performed procedure for a variety of spinal disorders. However, harvesting of bone from the iliac crest is associated with complications. A promising alternative for autograft are bone morphogenetic proteins. METHODS: As part of a larger prospective, randomized, multicenter study, 36 patients were included, who received a 1-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine. All patients had a degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis with symptoms of neurologic compression. There were 2 treatment arms: OP-1 combined with locally available bone from laminectomy (OP-1 group) or iliac crest autograft (autograft group). The primary outcome was the fusion rate based on a computed tomography scan after 1-year follow-up. The clinical outcome was measured using the Oswestry Disability Index. Additionally, the safety of OP-1 was evaluated by comparing the number and severity of adverse events that occurred between both groups. RESULTS: Using strict criteria, fusion rates of 63% were found in the OP-1 group and 67% in the control group (P = 0.95). There was a decrease in Oswestry scores at subsequent postoperative time points compared with preoperative values (P > 0.001). There were no significant differences in the mean Oswestry scores between the study group and control group at any time point (P = 0.56). No product-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that OP-1 combined with locally obtained autograft is a safe and effective alternative for iliac crest autograft in instrumented single-level posterolateral fusions of the lumbar spine. The main advantage of OP-1 is that it avoids morbidity associated with the harvesting of autogenous bone grafts from the iliac crest.