Changes in cis-regulatory elements of a key floral regulator are associated with divergence of inflorescence architectures.

Higher plant species diverged extensively with regard to the moment (flowering time) and position (inflorescence architecture) at which flowers are formed. This seems largely caused by variation in the expression patterns of conserved genes that specify floral meristem identity (FMI), rather than changes in the encoded proteins. Here, we report a functional comparison of the promoters of homologous FMI genes from Arabidopsis, petunia, tomato and Antirrhinum. Analysis of promoter-reporter constructs in petunia and Arabidopsis, as well as complementation experiments, showed that the divergent expression of leafy (LFY) and the petunia homolog aberrant leaf and flower (ALF) results from alterations in the upstream regulatory network rather than cis-regulatory changes. The divergent expression of unusual floral organs (UFO) from Arabidopsis, and the petunia homolog double top (DOT), however, is caused by the loss or gain of cis-regulatory promoter elements, which respond to trans-acting factors that are expressed in similar patterns in both species. Introduction of pUFO:UFO causes no obvious defects in Arabidopsis, but in petunia it causes the precocious and ectopic formation of flowers. This provides an example of how a change in a cis-regulatory region can account for a change in the plant body plan.

Arguments in the evo-devo debate: say it with flowers!

A key question in evolutionary developmental biology is how DNA sequence changes have directed the evolution of morphological diversity. The widely accepted view was that morphological changes resulted from differences in number and/or type of transcription factors, or even from small changes in the amino acid sequence of similar proteins. Research over the last two decades indicated that most of the developmental and genetic mechanisms that produce new structures involve proteins that are deeply conserved. These proteins are encoded by a type of genes known as 'toolkit' genes that control a plethora of processes essential for the correct development of the organism. Mutations in these toolkit genes produce deleterious pleiotropic effects. In contrast, alterations in regulatory regions affect their expression only at specific sites in the organism, facilitating morphological change at the tissue and organ levels. However, some examples from the animal and plant fields indicate that coding mutations also contributed to phenotypic evolution. Therefore, the main question at this point is to what extent these mechanisms have contributed to the evolution of morphological diversity. Today, an increasing amount of data, especially from the plant field, implies that changes in cis-regulatory sequences in fact played a major role in evolution.