Celecoxib and exemestane versus placebo and exemestane in postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer patients: a double-blind phase III GINECO study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate antitumor effects of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in breast carcinoma and their ability to act synergistically with aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer patients without previous adjuvant AI treatment received exemestane 25 mg/days plus either celecoxib 400 mg twice daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). This trial was prematurely terminated (N = 157 of 342 planned) after cardiovascular toxicity was reported in other celecoxib trials. Although no PFS difference was observed between the two arms (9.8 months for both, P = 0.72), a trend favoring celecoxib was observed in 60 tamoxifen-resistant patients (9.6 vs. 5.1 months; P = 0.14) and in 126 patients treated >or=3 months before study termination (12.2 vs. 9.8 months; P = 0.09). No severe adverse events were reported. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors seemingly contribute to reverse endocrine resistance in breast cancer patients, although further study is necessary to allow development of a new therapeutic strategy.

Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2-3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Early improvements in disease-free survival have been noted when an aromatase inhibitor is given either instead of or sequentially after tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with oestrogen-receptor-positive early breast cancer. However, little information exists on the long-term effects of aromatase inhibitors after treatment, and whether these early improvements lead to real gains in survival. METHODS: 4724 postmenopausal patients with unilateral invasive, oestrogen-receptor-positive or oestrogen-receptor-unknown breast cancer who were disease-free on 2-3 years of tamoxifen, were randomly assigned to switch to exemestane (n=2352) or to continue tamoxifen (n=2372) for the remainder of a 5-year endocrine treatment period. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival; overall survival was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were intention-to-treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN11883920. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 55.7 months (range 0-89.7), 809 events contributing to the analysis of disease-free survival had been reported (354 exemestane, 455 tamoxifen); unadjusted hazard ratio 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.88, p=0.0001) in favour of exemestane, absolute benefit 3.3% (95% CI 1.6-4.9) by end of treatment (ie, 2.5 years after randomisation). 222 deaths occurred in the exemestane group compared with 261 deaths in the tamoxifen group; unadjusted hazard ratio 0.85 (95% CI 0.71-1.02, p=0.08), 0.83 (0.69-1.00, p=0.05) when 122 patients with oestrogen-receptor-negative disease were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that early improvements in disease-free survival noted in patients who switch to exemestane after 2-3 years on tamoxifen persist after treatment, and translate into a modest improvement in overall survival.

Pegase 03: a prospective randomized phase III trial of FEC with or without high-dose thiotepa, cyclophosphamide and autologous stem cell transplantation in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Pegase 03 is a multicenter prospective randomized phase III trial evaluating the impact of first-line high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with stem cell support on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and response rate in 308 patients with histologically proven metastatic breast cancer responding to induction therapy. Eligible patients received four induction cycles with FEC 100 (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2)). Patients with objective response (N=179) were randomized to one cycle of HDC (cyclophosphamide 6000 mg/m(2) and thiotepa 800 mg/m(2) (CHUT)) and stem cell support (N=88), or no further treatment (N=91). All patients were observed until disease progression or death. One toxic death occurred after CHUT. Other toxicities were manageable. The response rate at 3 months was higher in the intensification arm: 82.7% (25.3% complete response (CR)) versus 59.2% (14.1% CR) (P=0.0002). Median follow-up was 48 months. Median DFS was 11 and 6.6 months in the intensification and the observation arms, respectively (P=0.0001). There was no survival difference: 33.6 versus 27.3% OS at 3 years (P=0.8) and 22.9 versus 22.3 months median time to relapse in the intensification and observation arms, respectively. In this randomized trial, HDC with CHUT improved DFS but not OS, corroborating findings from earlier trials.

Phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide combination as first-line chemotherapy in older metastatic breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD; Caelyx)-cyclophosphamide combination in older metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: A multicenter phase II trial was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age 65-75 years, ECOG 0-1 and left ventricular ejection fraction > or =50%. First-line chemotherapy was given to metastatic breast cancer patients resistant to hormonal therapy. The treatment schedule was PLD 40 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks. Efficacy was the primary endpoint, while response duration and tolerance were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (median age 71.3 years) were enrolled. No treatment-related death, no congestive heart failure or decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction and no febrile neutropenia were reported. TOXICITY: grade 3 dyspnea was found in 1 patient, neutropenia in 11 patients (7 grade 3, 4 grade 4), grade 3 mucositis in 4 patients, grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 1 patient and a generalized rash in 1 patient. An objective response (complete and partial response) was achieved in 10 (28.6%) patients and disease control in 24 (69%) with a progression-free survival of 8.8 months and a median overall survival of 20.3 months. CONCLUSION: The PLD-cyclophosphamide combination is moderately active and safe in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients, but cannot be recommended routinely due to myelotoxicity and mucositis hazards.

Prospective evaluation of serum anti-Müllerian hormone dynamics in 250 women of reproductive age treated with chemotherapy for breast cancer.

AIM: Women of reproductive age with breast cancer generally receive gonadotoxic chemotherapy. Fertility issues are of great concern for them. However, little is known on ovarian damage during chemotherapy and its evolution during long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to provide a detailed description of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) evolution during chemotherapy and 24-month follow-up. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted in 250 patients, aged 18-39 years, diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Each patient underwent blood AMH measurement at each chemotherapy cycle, and at 6, 12 and 24 months after chemotherapy. Menses occurrence was also recorded. RESULTS: Mean basal AMH level was 4.19 ± 4.84 ng/mL, and was negatively correlated with age. Serum AMH level rapidly decreased in all patients after each chemotherapy cycle to undetectable levels in most of them, and slowly increased in 45% of the patients during the 24-month follow-up. AMH decrease was significantly associated with age and basal AMH level, but not with cyclophosphamide dose and tamoxifen use. The prevalence of chemotherapy-related amenorrhoea was 92.4% at the end of chemotherapy; women with amenorrhoea being significantly older and having lower basal AMH than women who resumed menses. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms rapid and deep ovarian reserve alteration in young women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer, and shows moderate AMH recovery in some patients. Although AMH cannot alone predict fertility potential, these new data emphasise the need for post-treatment ovarian insufficiency follow-up, strongly support the use of fertility preservation strategies and may provide new tools for improved counselling.

Phase II study of oral vinorelbine in first-line advanced breast cancer chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy, tolerance, and pharmacokinetic profiles of oral vinorelbine (Navelbine). Oral Navelbine (NVB; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Boulogne, France) was given as first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic breast carcinoma (ABC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients were entered to receive oral NVB on a weekly basis for a total of 8 weeks unless progression or toxicity occurred. Oral NVB was given at 60 mg/m(2) weekly for the first three administrations and was increased to 80 mg/m(2) for the subsequent administrations if there was no grade 4 neutropenia or no more than one episode of grade 3 neutropenia. Patients with objective response or stable disease continued treatment up to a total of 12 weeks or more. RESULTS: Fifty-eight evaluable patients were included in our study. Four patients (6.9%) had complete responses, and 14 (24.1%) had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 31% (95% CI, 19% to 43%). Median progression-free survival was 17.4 weeks. Median overall survival is not yet reached. There were no treatment-related deaths. The main toxicity was neutropenia: grade 4 in 17.2% of the patients, and 1.8% of administrations and associated clinical serious events in 4 patients (6.2%). Grade 3 and 4 nausea and/or vomiting were noted in 3.1% and 4.6% of the patients, respectively. Only one patient developed grade 3 neuroconstipation. An analysis of Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 forms revealed no significant alteration between baseline and weeks 8 and 16 in global quality of life. CONCLUSION: Oral NVB at this schedule is an effective and well-tolerated agent in the treatment of ABC and offers a promising alternative to the intravenous route. Combination studies are ongoing.

Intensification of adjuvant chemotherapy: 5-year results of a randomized trial comparing conventional doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with high-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim in operable breast cancer with 10 or more involved axillary nodes.

PURPOSE: To determine whether intensifying the dose of adjuvant chemotherapy improves the outcome of women with primary breast cancer and 10 or more involved axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 150) were randomized to receive either four cycles of standard doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (arm A) or four courses of intensified mitoxantrone 23 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), with filgrastim 5 g/kg/d from days 2 to 15, every 3 weeks (arm B). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined using life-table estimates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in DFS (P =.44), DDFS (P =.67), or OS (P =.99) between the two groups at 5 years; DDFS was 45% (arm A) versus 50% (arm B), and DFS was 41% versus 49%, respectively. Five-year survival was similar in both arms (61% v 60%, respectively). Failure to note an intergroup difference in outcome was unrelated to relative dose-intensity. Analysis of patients with 15 or more positive nodes revealed a significant difference in 5-year DDFS (19% v 49% in arm B; P =.01). Toxicity was generally mild in both groups, with no toxic death. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (0.3% v 3%). Alopecia was less frequent in arm B (P <.001). CONCLUSION: This randomized trial confirms the feasibility of administering mitoxantrone 23 mg/m(2) with cyclophosphamide and filgrastim. Although there was no significant difference between conventional and intensified arms at 5 years, according to subgroup analysis, intensified treatment may decrease the risk of relapse in patients with 15 or more positive nodes compared with doxorubicin an cyclophosphamide.

Improved local control and disease-free survival after perioperative chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a short intensive course of perioperative polychemotherapy can change the course of early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2,795 women with early breast cancer, stage I to IIIA, were randomized onto a trial (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] 10854) to compare surgery followed by one course of perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone. Patients assigned to the chemotherapy arm received one course of fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (FAC) intravenously, within 24 hours after surgery. In both randomized treatment arms, a recommendation was made for premenopausal women with positive axillary nodes to receive prolonged courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF), according to the standard treatment for this subgroup. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 41 months, local control was significantly better in the perioperative treatment arm as compared with the observation arm (hazards ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 0.83; P < .01). Disease-free survival was significantly prolonged in the chemotherapy arm (hazards ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.99; P = .04). Premenopausal node-negative patients especially showed an advantage for the perioperative chemotherapy arm. No advantage for perioperative chemotherapy was observed in premenopausal node-positive women who also had received prolonged chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that one course of perioperative FAC is able to improve local control and can prolong disease-free survival in women with early breast cancer. However, our results also suggest that a perioperative timing cannot improve the results of standard prolonged chemotherapy in premenopausal women with positive axillary nodes.

Phase II trial of weekly intravenous vinorelbine in first-line advanced breast cancer chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the therapeutic effects of single-agent intravenous (IV) weekly Navelbine (vinorelbine or 5'-nor-anhydro-vinblastine; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Boulogne, France), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, in women who had received no prior chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven patients with assessable advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy were entered onto the study. They were stratified into five groups according to the main assessable tumor target: lung, liver, lymph nodes, skin, and others. One hundred forty-five patients were assessable for toxicity and response using World Health Organization (WHO) criteria; the 12 patients who were not evaluated were excluded because they were found not to meet the eligibility criteria. Navelbine was administered as a weekly 30-mg/m2 short IV infusion, and treatment was continued until disease progression. RESULTS: The overall response rate (WHO criteria) was 41% (complete response [CR], 7%; partial response [PR], 34%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 33% to 49%). In addition, 30% of the patients had stable disease. The response rate according to target was lymph nodes (28 of 42), 67%; liver (nine of 39), 23%; lung (10 of 30), 33%; skin (21 of 30), 70%; primary tumor (10 of 16), 56%; and bone (three of 10), 30%. The median time to treatment failure was 6 months and the median survival was 18 months. A total of 1,673 cycles were given to 145 eligible patients. At least one episode of WHO grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was seen in 72% of the patients. Nausea and/or vomiting, anemia, and/or thrombocytopenia were seen in less than 1% of cycles. Other side effects were rare, and additional toxicities were documented in the following proportions of patients: grade 2 to 3 alopecia, 8%; infectious episodes, 6%; and peripheral neuropathy, 3%. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that Navelbine has major single-agent antitumor activity as front-line therapy in advanced breast cancer. Given its excellent tolerance profile and low toxicity, it should be considered for inclusion in first-line combination chemotherapy regimens.

High-dose sequential chemotherapy with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and repeated stem-cell support for inflammatory breast cancer patients: does impact on quality of life jeopardize feasibility and acceptability of treatment?

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the quality of life (QOL) of patients enrolled onto the High-Dose Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Study Group trial (PEGASE 02), a French pilot multicenter trial of the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) aimed at evaluating (1) toxicity and feasibility of sequential high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) and stem-cell support and (2) response to HDC in terms of pathologic response and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: QOL measures were performed at inclusion and four times subsequently up to 1 year using an ad hoc side-effect questionnaire (19 physical symptoms) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). RESULTS: Of the 95 patients entered, the overall QOL questionnaire completion compliance was 75.6%. During cycle 3 of HDC, the number of symptoms was high (mean +/- SD QOL score, 10 +/- 3), with fatigue, hair loss, appetite loss, nausea, change in taste, vomiting, fever, and weight loss reported by more than 60% of patients. Toxicity and distress associated with HDC were reflected in the decline of four EORTC QLQ-C30 scores: global QOL (P =.001), and physical, role, and social functioning (P <.001 for all statistics). However, QOL deterioration disappeared after treatment completion, except for physical functioning (P =.025). One year after inclusion, most QOL scores returned to baseline, and both emotional functioning and global QOL scores were even higher than baseline (P =.030 and P =.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: If it is confirmed that improvements in pathologic response rates with HDC effectively translate into increased probabilities of survival for IBC patients, adoption of such treatment as PEGASE 02 will not involve crucial choices between length of life and QOL and should not be delayed for QOL arguments.

Tamoxifen adjuvant treatment duration in early breast cancer: initial results of a randomized study comparing short-term treatment with long-term treatment. Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer Breast Group.

PURPOSE: In 1986, The Fédération Nationale desCentres de Lutte Contre le Cancer Breast Group initiated a multicenter randomized trial to assess the usefulness of long-term adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. Short-term adjuvant tamoxifen treatment was to be compared with life long adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were disease-free after 2 to 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment were eligible for the trial. From September 1986 to May 1995, 3,793 patients were randomized from France, Belgium, and Argentina. A total of 1,882 patients stopped tamoxifen (short-term group), and 1,911 patients were to continue tamoxifen for life (long-term group) at the same dose as previously prescribed. The protocol was modified in February 1997, limiting tamoxifen treatment to 10 years after randomization, thus giving a comparison between a 2- to 3-year treatment and a 12- to 13-year treatment. To date, the median duration of tamoxifen treatment is 30 months in the short-term group, and 70 months in the long-term group. RESULTS: Overall, longer tamoxifen treatment induced a 23% reduction in relapse rates, leading to a 7-year disease-free survival rate of 78%, compared with 72% in the shorter-treatment group. In contrast, overall survival did not differ between the two groups, with a 79% overall survival rate in both groups. This improvement in disease-free survival could be observed in node-positive patients (P: =.001); however, it was not found in node-negative patients. Prolonged tamoxifen treatment corresponded to a significant increase in disease-free survival in estrogen receptor-positive patients (P: =.03) as well as in estrogen receptor-negative patients (P: =.05). Furthermore, longer treatment reduced contralateral breast cancers and did not increase the number of endometrial cancers. CONCLUSION: Although no survival advantage was noted, patients did benefit from longer tamoxifen treatment over 3 years and had significantly better disease-free survival compared with patients who stopped hormonal treatment. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess these results. Most patients in the long-term group are still receiving treatment. Comparison of results as time passes will enable conclusions to be made on the value of long-term treatment over 5 years compared with 2 to 3 years.

Immunohistochemical study of cell cycle regulatory proteins in intraductal breast carcinomas--a preliminary study.

The aim of this study was to assess the levels of cell cycle regulatory proteins p21waf1 (p21), p53, Cyclin A, Cyclin D1 and Ki-67 to see whether they correlated with recurrence-free survival (RFS). From 1982 to 1996, 50 patients aged less than 51 years underwent lumpectomy followed by radiotherapy for a pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). For each case, the following immunohistochemical stains were carried out: Ki-67, Cyclin A, Cyclin D1, p53 and p21waf1 (p21). The percentage of positive nuclei was assessed. Multiple combinations of these factors were performed; in particular, we called the sum of Ki-67 and Cyclin A a global proliferation factor (GPF). Correlations with classical clinicopathological data were assessed. After a multivariate analysis, only GPF, Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI) grade and mitotic index were independent predictive factors of recurrence in the whole population. In the population with close surgical margins, when the GPF level was less than the 25th percentile or more than the 75th percentile recurrence was low. In this preliminary study, GPF seems to be of interest to help in the decision process in the post-surgical management of the patient.

Improved survival after one course of perioperative chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients. long-term results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Trial 10854.

The aim of this study was to examine whether one course of perioperative polychemotherapy yields better results in terms of survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control than surgery alone in early stage breast cancer. From 1986 to 1991, 2795 patients with stage I/II breast cancer were randomised to receive either one perioperative course of an anthracycline-containing chemotherapeutic regimen within 36 h after surgery or surgery alone. Patients were followed-up for overall survival, PFS and locoregional recurrence. The median follow-up period at time of the analysis was 11 years. PFS and locoregional control were significantly better (P=0.025 and P=0.004, respectively) in the perioperative chemotherapy arm. Node-negative patients seemed to benefit most from the perioperative FAC. Patients who received perioperative chemotherapy and locoregional therapy alone had significantly better overall survival rates than patients who received locoregional therapy alone (P=0.004). Patients who received additional systemic therapy did not seem to benefit from one course of perioperative chemotherapy (P=0.65). One course of perioperative polychemotherapy does improve PFS and locoregional control in early stage breast cancers. This effect is still present after 11 years of follow-up.

Pirarubicin in advanced breast cancer: a French cooperative phase II study.

79 patients with advanced breast cancer were given Pirarubicin 20-25 mg/m2 during 3 consecutive days every 3 or 4 weeks. 78 were evaluable for response (41 without previous chemotherapy and 37 with only one previous regimen). The overall response rate was 35% (95% CI 24-45) and the complete response rate was 8%. In previously untreated patients, the response rate reached 41.5%. The limiting toxicity was a non-cumulative granulocystopenia, sometimes severe at these high doses, with a prompt recovery. The non-haematological toxicities were mild, and included 13% with grade 3 alopecia.

Results of a phase III prospective, randomised trial, comparing mitoxantrone and vinorelbine (MV) in combination with standard FAC/FEC in front-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer.

This comparative phase III trial of mitoxantrone+vinorelbine (MV) versus 5-fluorouracil+cyclophosphamide+either doxorubicin or epirubicin (FAC/FEC) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer was conducted to determine whether MV would produce equivalent efficacy, while resulting in an improved tolerance in relation to alopecia and nausea/vomiting. This multicentre study recruited and randomised 281 patients with metastatic breast cancer; 280 were evaluable for response survival and toxicity (138 received FAC/FEC, 142 received MV). Patient characteristics were matched in each arm and stratification for prior exposure to adjuvant therapy was made prospectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was equivalent in the two arms (33.3% for FAC/FEC versus 34.5% for MV), but MV was more effective in patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (13% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3-23) for FAC/FEC versus 33% (95% CI 20-47) for MV P=0.025) with a better progression-free survival (PFS) (5 months (range 1-18 months) versus 8 months (range 1-27 months); P=0.0007 for FAC/FEC versus MV, respectively) while FAC/FEC was more effective in previously untreated patients (ORR 43% (95% CI 33-53) versus 35% (95% CI 25-45), P=0.26; PFS 9 months (range 0-29 months) versus 6 months (range 0-26 months) P=0.014). Toxicity was monitored through the initial six cycles of therapy; febrile neutropenia and delayed haematological recovery was more frequent for MV (P=0.001), while nausea/vomiting of grades 3-4 was greater for FAC/FEC (P=0.031), as was alopecia (P=0.0001), cardiotoxicity was the same for the two regimens. MV represents a chemotherapy combination with equivalent efficacy to standard FAC/FEC and improved results for patients who have previously received adjuvant chemotherapy. Toxicity must be balanced to allow for increased haematological suppression and risk of febrile neutropenia with MV compared with a higher risk of subjectively unpleasant side-effects such as nausea/vomiting and alopecia with FAC/FEC.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine) in the treatment of breast cancer: the European experience.

Phase II studies of vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France) have been conducted mainly at a dose of 30 mg/m2/wk, and this schedule has been used extensively in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Vinorelbine used in a first-line setting as a single agent in 25 patients with previously untreated advanced metastatic breast cancer produced objective responses in 15 patients (60%) and complete responses (CR) in five (20%). A large multicenter study to assess the response rate by the main site of disease involvement included 145 assessable patients. The overall response rate was 41% (10 CRs and 50 partial responses: skin, 70%; lymph nodes, 67%; primary tumor, 56%; lungs, 33%; measurable bone, 27%; and liver, 23%). The median time to disease progression was 25 weeks and the median overall survival duration was 18 months. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity with grade 3/4 suppression noted; however, this was not accompanied by serious infection (incidence of grade 3/4 infection < 1%). Other grade 3/4 toxicity also was uncommon. Another phase II study included 50 patients assessable for toxicity and response. The overall response rate was 50% (2% CRs). In a salvage setting (second- and third-line treatment), 33 patients were treated with an overall response rate of 30% (two CRs). Rates of toxicity were no greater than in first-line patients. The most notable results for combination vinorelbine therapy were with a schedule of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, with cycles repeated every 21 days. The overall response rate for the 89 evaluable patients was 74% (19 [21%] CRs; 47 [53%] partial responses). These data indicate that vinorelbine is a highly active agent with a favorable toxicity profile in the treatment of breast cancer.

Phase II study of tetrahydropyranyl adriamycin (pirarubicin) in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer.

Thirty elderly (over 70 years) women with measurable advanced breast cancer entered into this Phase II study. An initial dose of 30 mg/m2 of pirarubicin (THP) every 3 weeks was given intravenously. THP was escalated by levels of 10 mg/m2 according to the blood cell count done at day 14 and day 21 until a maximum dose per cycle of 70 mg/m2 was reached. The mean total cumulative dose of THP received was 204 mg/m2 (range 30-710 mg/m2). The mean number of cycles given was 5.5 (range 1-24). Of 28 evaluable patients, 1 achieved a complete response (CR), 6 had a partial response (PR) (CR + PR = 25%; 95% confidence interval 9-41%), 13 showed no change, and 5 had a progressive disease. The median time to progression was 3 months (range 0.5-18+ months). Of 28 patients evaluable for toxicity, the hematologic toxicity at day 15 was neutropenia grade 3 and 4 in 61% of the patients and thrombopenia grade 3 and 4, 0% of cycles. No cumulative hematologic toxicity was detected. Nonhematologic toxicities consisted of nausea and vomiting in 50% of patients (WHO grade 3 = 5%) and alopecia in 64% (WHO grade 2-3 = 36%). No stomatitis occurred. No cardiac toxicity was observed. The results of this study show that THP is an active drug in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer. Because of its safety, THP deserves further investigation in this application.

Epirubicin--docetaxel combination in first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer: final results of a dose-finding and efficacy study.

The aim of the study was to define a regular and tolerable dose of the epirubicin-docetaxel combination in first-line chemotherapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Sixty-five women with measurable and/or evaluable disease were treated with epirubicin escalated from 60 to 110 mg/m(2) according to 5 dose levels, in combination with a fixed dose of 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel, every 21 days for 6 cycles, without preventive use of hematopoietic growth factors or antibiotics. Forty-three women received adjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of anthracyline- or anthracenedione-based regimens in 39 cases (60%). Twenty-seven women were treated in the phase I study (3 at epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), and 6 at each subsequent dose level). Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of grade III asthenia and febrile neutropenia (epirubicin 75 mg/m(2)), grade IV thrombopenia and grade III asthenia (epirubicin 90 mg/m(2)), grade IV stomatitis and grade III diarrhea (epirubicin 100 mg/m(2)), and grade III diarrhea (epirubicin 110 mg/m(2)). In the phase II study, an additional 38 women were treated at epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 100 mg/m(2). During the 349 cycles delivered, grade IV neutropenia occurred in 90%; febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization occurred in 62 (17.8%) and lasted more than 3 days in 12 (3.4%). Nonhematologic toxicity was acceptable. Three left ventricular ejection fraction depressions occurred and normalized during follow-up. The overall response rate in the 62 evaluable women was 69.4% (range: 58--81%), with a median duration of 7.8 months. After 26 months of follow-up, the median time to progression was 9.1 months and median overall survival was 22.7 months. On the basis of efficacy and toxicity, the recommended dose of the combination is epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2).

[Comparative study of adriamycin, epirubicin and mitoxantrone in cancer of the breast. Review of the literature]. / Etude comparative de l'adriamycine, l'épirubicine et la mitoxantrone dans le cancer du sein. Revue de la littérature.

An overview of all published randomized trials which compared mitoxantrone or epirubicine to adriamycin was performed to analyse tolerance, toxicity and efficacy of these drugs, related to adriamycin. Mitoxantrone confirms its better tolerance: nausea and vomiting are less frequent (P < 10(-9)) and alopecia less intensive (P < 10(-9)). There is a significant decrease in cardiotoxicity occurrence with mitoxantrone (P < 0.01) but a significantly higher degree of leucopenia (P < 10(-4)). As far a response rate is concerned, mitoxantrone is somewhat less effective than adriamycin (P < 0.001). As compared to adriamycin, epirubicine does not reduce side effects incidence, nevertheless, their intensity is less important: nausea and vomiting (P < 0.04) and alopecia (P < 0.01). Leucopenia is less frequent following epirubicine administration as compared to adriamycin, documented course by course (P < 0.01) or on the overall treatment (P < 0.01). Epirubicine is noted to be less cardiotoxic than adriamycin (P = 0.001) with a decreased incidence of heart failures (P < 0.05). No difference can be observed in response rate between these two treatments, for objective as well as for complete responses.

[Hydroxy-9-methyl-2-ellipticinium (NSC 264-137) for osseous metastases from breast cancer. A 4 year experience (author's transl)]. / L'hydroxy-9-methyl-2-ellipticinium (NSC 264-137) dans le traitement des métastases osseuses du cancer du sein. Bilan d'une expérimentation de 4 années.

In 96 patients (95 women--1 man) with osseous metastases from breast cancer suitable for analysis an objective remission was obtained with hydroxy-9-methyl-2-ellipticinium (100 mg/m2 weekly) in 31 cases. These responses lasted from 3 to 17 months. The main characteristic of this compound is its lack of marrow toxicity, a property of value in osseous lesions where marrow is so frequently involved, making difficult the use of conventional chemical drugs. The principal unpleasant drawback is an inhibition of the salivary secretion which causes other side effects such as tongue mycosis, anorexia, and asthenia. Less frequently immunologic disorders and a few cases of renal insufficiency were observed.